<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Maryhill &#8211; GoBike</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.gobike.org/tag/maryhill/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.gobike.org</link>
	<description>Strathclyde Cycle Campaign</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2022 17:15:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">67217435</site>	<item>
		<title>Consultation Digest (Local) Issue 109, 31 March 2022</title>
		<link>https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-109-31-march-2022-17074</link>
					<comments>https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-109-31-march-2022-17074#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Y]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2022 17:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Consultation digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoBike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ardrossan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecting Woodside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glasgow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inverclyde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liveable Neighbourhoods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryhill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Ayrshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Lanarkshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tro]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gobike.org/?p=17074</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Is the coast clear? A handful of Traffic Regulation Orders in Glasgow plus campus routes and a Liveable Neighbourhood up for consultation. Also, an update on bike lights bagged by the Barclays site. North Lanarkshire&#8217;s plan goes to government. Consultations on the coasts of North Ayrshire and Inverclyde. Contents(new/updated items in&#160;bold&#160;– link jumps to article) &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-109-31-march-2022-17074" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Consultation Digest (Local) Issue 109, 31 March 2022"</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Is the coast clear?</h2>



<p>A handful of Traffic Regulation Orders in Glasgow plus campus routes and a Liveable Neighbourhood up for consultation. Also, an update on bike lights bagged by the Barclays site. North Lanarkshire&#8217;s plan goes to government. Consultations on the coasts of North Ayrshire and Inverclyde.</p>



<span id="more-17074"></span>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Contents</strong><br>(new/updated items in&nbsp;<strong>bold</strong>&nbsp;– link jumps to article)</h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 1: Current Consultations</h4>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li><a href="#one-one">School Streets, Glasgow TRO (Merrylee/OLA)</a></li><li><a href="#one-two">Kelvin Way TRO</a></li><li><a href="#one-three">City Centre Campus/‘Learning Quarter’ (People-First infrastructure)</a></li><li><a href="#one-four">Yorkhill to Anderston Liveable Neighbourhoods</a></li><li><strong><a href="#one-five">Ardrossan Harbour Consultation</a></strong></li><li><a href="#one-six">Drumchapel Local Development Framework</a></li><li><a href="#one-seven">Greenock to Battery Park SfP lane</a></li></ol>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 2: Consultation Feedback</h4>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li><a href="#two-one">Barclays, West St works – further update</a></li><li><strong><a href="#two-two">Maryhill Road/North Woodside Road/Hopehill Road TRO</a></strong></li><li><strong><a href="#two-three"><span style="font-size: 1rem;">Nitshill Road, 40mph Speed limit (Amendment No.1) Order</span></a></strong></li><li><strong><a href="#two-four">Auldhouse Area (Traffic Management) Order 2022</a></strong></li><li><strong><span style="font-size: 1rem;"><a href="#two-five">North Lanarkshire Local Development Plan – Intention to Adopt</a></span></strong></li></ol>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 1: Current Consultations</strong><br>(in date order for responses)</h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-one">1.1: School Streets, Glasgow TRO (Merrylee/OLA)</h4>



<p><strong>Council:</strong>&nbsp;Glasgow City.<br><strong>Subject:</strong>&nbsp;‘Take 2’ of this School Streets Traffic Order. This one only covers two schools – the neighbouring&nbsp;Merrylee Primary School and Our Lady of the Annunciation Primary School near Langside Drive/Merrylee Rd.&nbsp;The boundary has been extended since the previous version of the TRO went out. It now includes parts of Cherrybank Rd and Glasserton Rd.<br><strong>First featured:</strong>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-105-3-february-2022-16627#one-two" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 105,&nbsp;Item 1.2</a>.<br><strong>Website links:</strong>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/GCC_School-Streets-Mar-2022_combined.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">School Streets TRO –&nbsp;revised (combined PDF)</a>.<br><strong>Deadline: 31 March 2022.</strong></p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-two">1.2: Kelvin Way TRO</h4>



<p><strong>Council:</strong>&nbsp;Glasgow City.<br><strong>Subject:</strong>&nbsp;Traffic Regulation Order to help make the temporary Spaces for People measures on Kelvin Way permanent. The street is filtered at either end. The southern end has a short 2-way protected bike lane next to 1-way access to Kelvingrove Museum. GoBike helped organise&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/world-car-free-day-glasgow-september-22nd-september-6304" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Car Free Day 2018 on Kelvin Way</a>, which showed the potential now being realised with the current signs, paint and planters. It’s become a well-used street by people walking, cycling, running, scooting and skating. Also, it’s due to link to a wider network in the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/article/24174/Yorkhill-and-Kelvingrove-Cycling-Village" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Yorkhill and Kelvingrove Cycling Village</a>&nbsp;(see Yorkhill–Anderston LN post, below).<br><strong>First featured:</strong>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/glasgow-spaces-for-people-more-space-to-walk-more-space-to-cycle-11391" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Glasgow Spaces for People blog post</a>.<br><strong>Website links:</strong>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Kelvin-Way-TRO-combined.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Kelvin Way TRO (combined PDF)</a>.<br><strong>Deadline: 7 April.</strong></p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-three">1.3: City Centre Campus/‘Learning Quarter’ (People-First infrastructure)</h4>



<p><strong>Organisation:</strong> Stantec on behalf of a partnership between University of Strathclyde, City of Glasgow College and Glasgow City Council.<br><strong>Area:</strong> Townhead/Cathedral St area of city centre.<br><strong>Subject:</strong> Consultation on infrastructure around the universities and college north-east of the city centre (‘Learning Quarter’). Many streets nearby are already due to be part of the city’s <a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/avenues" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Avenues Project</a>, including Cathedral St and North Hanover St. This project would link between those to the uni/college campuses. Firstly, the Western Route includes steep Montrose St, as it goes past Strathclyde Uni’s <a href="https://www.strath.ac.uk/whystrathclyde/campusupdate/heartofthecampus/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">‘Heart of the Campus’</a> (Rottenrow Gardens). There’s another hill past City of Glasgow College towards Buchanan Bus Station. Secondly, the Eastern Route would connect to Rottenrow East and link to Avenues Plus routes on George St and John Knox St. Thirdly, the Northern Route goes from a lane east of CoGC up towards the new Sighthill Bridge. The survey asks about different options for streets on the routes. Also, the ‘web hub’ includes context and evidence about the benefits of active travel.<br><strong>First featured:</strong> <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-74-24-november-2020-12604#two-one" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 74, Item 2.1</a>.<br><strong>Website links:</strong> <a href="https://people-first-infrastructure-in-a-city-centre-campus-1-stantec.hub.arcgis.com/pages/home" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Public Engagement Web Hub</a>.<br><strong>Deadline: 8 May 2022.</strong></p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-four">1.4: Yorkhill to Anderston Liveable Neighbourhoods</h4>



<p><strong>Council: </strong>Glasgow City.<br><strong>Area:</strong> From Yorkhill, Kelvinhaugh, Stobcross, Sandyford, Finnieston to Anderston.<br><strong>Subject:</strong> The latest Liveable Neighbourhoods consultation covers the area between the River Clyde, River Kelvin, Kelvingrove Park and M8. Popular active travel infrastructure in the area includes NCN7/75 and the West City Way. Also, the (almost finished?) lanes funded by City Deal on Bunhouse Rd and Old Dumbarton Rd. Further segregated cyclepaths are due for <a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/article/24174/Yorkhill-and-Kelvingrove-Cycling-Village" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Yorkhill and Kelvingrove Cycling Village</a>. These include Minerva St and Haugh Rd (where <a href="https://www.bikeforgood.org.uk/locations/glasgow-west-community-hub/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bike for Good</a> have their West hub). However, there are still plenty of gaps, as shown when the riverbank was shut during COP26. A new bridge across the Clyde at the Riverside Museum is due to start construction. Meanwhile, the <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-100-25-november-2021-16004#one-one" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">SEC’s redevelopment may close off the red ‘smartie tube’ bridge</a> at Exhibition Centre station. The M8 motorway remains a barrier to destinations like the Mitchell Library and Anderston station.<br><strong>First featured:</strong> <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-107-3-march-2022-16845#one-eleven" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 107, Item 1.11</a>.<br><strong>Website links: </strong><a href="https://yorkhilltoanderstonln.commonplace.is/proposals" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Yorkhill to Anderston LN (Commonplace)</a>.<br><strong>Deadline: June 2022.</strong></p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-five">1.5: Ardrossan Harbour Consultation</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><a href="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/ardrossan-harbour-consultation-boards_p19-plans-stitched_1200px.jpg?ssl=1"><img data-recalc-dims="1" fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="525" height="177" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/ardrossan-harbour-consultation-boards_p19-plans-stitched_1200px.jpg?resize=525%2C177&#038;ssl=1" alt="Plan of proposed cycling and walking lanes on Harbour Rd, Ardrossan" class="wp-image-17095" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/ardrossan-harbour-consultation-boards_p19-plans-stitched_1200px.jpg?resize=600%2C202&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/ardrossan-harbour-consultation-boards_p19-plans-stitched_1200px.jpg?resize=300%2C101&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/ardrossan-harbour-consultation-boards_p19-plans-stitched_1200px.jpg?w=1200&amp;ssl=1 1200w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/ardrossan-harbour-consultation-boards_p19-plans-stitched_1200px.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="(max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /></a><figcaption>Proposed walking/cycling paths on Harbour Rd (on a grass verge past Jewson&#8217;s – click to enlarge)</figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>Council: </strong>North Ayrshire.<br><strong>Subject:</strong> Ardrossan Harbour and ferry terminal redevelopment <em>“…will improve the facilities and operations at Ardrossan to meet the additional capacity provided by the MV Glen Sannox.<em>”</em></em> The <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-57595581" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">much-delayed ferry is due to enter service later in 2022</a>. Part of the proposals are about active travel routes into the site. The consultation interface is 3D but the plans are squashed into slides from a presentation. There seem to be walking and cycling lanes into both the west side (Harbour Rd – see image, above) and east side (behind the Housing Association building). The presentation also mentions cycle parking, which may be at the south-west corner of the terminal. However, the plans are very hard to read. The cycle lanes should link into the <a href="https://ardrossanconnectionsproposals.commonplace.is/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ardrossan Connections project</a> in the town. Despite some <a href="https://www.change.org/p/north-ayrshire-council-help-save-local-businesses-change-cycle-lane-plans" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">reaction against the project in the local paper</a> and a petition, its <a href="https://ardrossanconnectionsproposals.commonplace.is/en-GB/news/upcoming-events-and-virtual-walk-and-wheel-update" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">events continue into April</a>. <br><strong>Website links:</strong> <a href="http://northayrshire.community/ardrossan-harbour-consultation/46954/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ardrossan Harbour Consultation page</a> and <a href="http://www.ironsidefarrar.com/ardrossan/event.html#intro1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ardrossan Harbour survey</a>.<br><strong>Deadline:</strong> No obvious deadline.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-six">1.6: Drumchapel Local Development Framework</h4>



<p><strong>Council:&nbsp;</strong>Glasgow City.<br><strong>Subject:</strong>&nbsp;The latest framework consultation, following previous strategic ones for Glasgow North, ‘Inner East’, etc. Drumchapel is known as one of the&nbsp;‘big four’ post-war council housing estates (along with Castlemilk, Easterhouse and Pollok). The&nbsp;<a href="https://www.drumchapelcyclehub.org.uk/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Drumchapel Cycle Hub</a>&nbsp;is based near the sports centre but there’s very little cycling infrastructure around the area. The map has made it past 25 comments.<br><strong>First featured:</strong>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-102-23-december-2021-16327#one-twelve" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 102, Item 1.12</a>.<br><strong>Website links:&nbsp;</strong><a href="https://drumchapelldf.commonplace.is/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Drumchapel Commonplace map</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://survey123.arcgis.com/share/d7a453bccecf41eca2c1c0c83338ca33" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Drumchapel survey link</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/drumchapelldf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">background</a>.<br><strong>Deadline:</strong>&nbsp;No obvious deadline.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-seven">1.7: Greenock to Battery Park SfP lane</h4>



<p><strong>Council:&nbsp;</strong>Inverclyde.<br><strong>Subject:</strong>&nbsp;A Spaces for People temporary route between Greenock town centre and a coastal park. A recent council vote was 9:2 in favour of keeping the lanes for another six months, with a further review in September. Photos in the consultation survey show a mixture of on-road ‘soft’ segregation and painted lanes on footways and across side roads. While some of the junction and bus stop treatments may not be ideal, there seem to be decent protected sections too.<br><strong>Website links:&nbsp;</strong><a href="https://survey123.arcgis.com/share/d3949238143a4308b9bed86b67560c2e" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Greenock Town Centre to Battery Park – Community Engagement</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.inverclydenow.com/greenock-bike-lane-to-stay-for-at-least-another-six-months/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Inverclyde Now article on council vote</a>.<br><strong>Deadline:</strong>&nbsp;No obvious deadline.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 2:&nbsp;Consultation Feedback</strong></h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="two-one">2.1: Barclays, West St works – further update</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" decoding="async" width="525" height="296" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/SWCW-Barclays-junction-wide_1200px.jpg?resize=525%2C296&#038;ssl=1" alt="West St looking north on South West City Way towards Barclays buildings and Squinty Bridge" class="wp-image-17092" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/SWCW-Barclays-junction-wide_1200px.jpg?resize=600%2C338&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/SWCW-Barclays-junction-wide_1200px.jpg?resize=300%2C169&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/SWCW-Barclays-junction-wide_1200px.jpg?w=1200&amp;ssl=1 1200w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/SWCW-Barclays-junction-wide_1200px.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="(max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>South West City Way on West St to junction at Barclays (near Squinty Bridge)</figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>Organisation:</strong> Barclays.<br><strong>Area: </strong>South West City Way at Barclays site.<br><strong>Subject:</strong> GoBike convenor Thomas has followed up on <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-108-17-march-2022-16958#two-four" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Tor&#8217;s efforts in the last Digest</a>. The barriers around the cycleway next to Barclays buildings on West St have been removed. However, the bike traffic lights remain covered up so there is no phase for bikes at the Kingston St junction. Apparently, it&#8217;s not scheduled to be fully open until May, despite many people already using it. Thomas asked about opening the junction or at least getting signs to warn it wasn&#8217;t yet operational. Barclays responded: <em>“…this area is due to complete roughly in May </em><img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f91e.png" alt="🤞" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> <em>We&#8217;re hoping this might be all sorted a little sooner, but they did mention this all depends on the weather.</em> <em>In terms of the signs, I have asked to see if this is something we can look into for you<em>.”</em></em><br><strong>First featured:</strong> <a href="https://www.gobike.org/south-west-city-way-glasgow-ongoing-works-at-the-barclays-bank-site-west-street-8892" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">SWCW/Barclays works blog post</a>.<br><strong>Website links:</strong> <a href="https://twitter.com/urbanisttoc/status/1509133208708947969?s=21&amp;t=FzcN5azvR2av4mS0Ogb9Yg" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Twitter thread about West St SWCW junction</a>.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="two-two">2.2: Maryhill Road/North Woodside Road/Hopehill Road TRO</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" decoding="async" width="525" height="350" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Maryhill-Rd-TRO-plan-2022-03-30_1500px.png?resize=525%2C350&#038;ssl=1" alt="Plan of diagonal cycle crossing at Maryhill Rd/North Woodside Rd/Hopehill Rd" class="wp-image-17098" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Maryhill-Rd-TRO-plan-2022-03-30_1500px.png?resize=600%2C400&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Maryhill-Rd-TRO-plan-2022-03-30_1500px.png?resize=300%2C200&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Maryhill-Rd-TRO-plan-2022-03-30_1500px.png?w=1500&amp;ssl=1 1500w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Maryhill-Rd-TRO-plan-2022-03-30_1500px.png?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="(max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Another new drawing of the junction on Maryhill Rd, now with added &#8216;give ways&#8217;</figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>Council: </strong>Glasgow City.<br><strong>Subject:</strong> Prohibiting turns onto Maryhill Rd from North Woodside Rd cycle crossing. An attempt to deal with the potential problem of turning across pedestrian crossings when bike lights are at green and pedestrian green man is on at same time. The council have added a few cycle-only &#8216;Give ways&#8217; since their previous plan. It&#8217;s hard to see how they&#8217;ll help if folk turn right from N Woodside Rd onto Maryhill Rd. Also, would they complicate access for people with a visual impairment? A protected junction, like the ones on Victoria Rd, may have been a better alternative. However, at least the diagonal crossing is direct for the most popular crossing. N Woodside Rd is currently under construction – an earlier <a href="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/WMH-North-Woodside-Rd-e1511961390853-1024x572.jpg" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">visual of how the lanes might look</a> appeared in Digest 28, Item 1.1 in 2018. The Order was made on 11 March 2022.<br><strong>First featured:</strong> <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-88-8-june-2021-14260#one-two" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 88, Item 1.2</a>.<br><strong>Website links:</strong> <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/North-Woodside-Road-GA.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Maryhill Rd/N Woodside Rd TRO plan (PDF)</a>.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="two-three">2.3: Nitshill Road, 40mph Speed limit (Amendment No.1) Order 2022</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="328" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Nitshill-Rd-nr-J3-M77_1440px.jpg?resize=525%2C328&#038;ssl=1" alt="Nitshill Rd (A727) looking west towards development site and M77" class="wp-image-17100" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Nitshill-Rd-nr-J3-M77_1440px.jpg?resize=600%2C375&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Nitshill-Rd-nr-J3-M77_1440px.jpg?resize=300%2C188&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Nitshill-Rd-nr-J3-M77_1440px.jpg?w=1440&amp;ssl=1 1440w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Nitshill-Rd-nr-J3-M77_1440px.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Nitshill Rd – 40mph signs will be repositioned here, east of development site (gates on left). </figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>Council: </strong>Glasgow City.<br><strong>Subject:</strong> Traffic Order made on 18 March 2022 (amending a previous order from 2014 for Barrhead Road, Hurlet Road and Nitshill Road). This means moving 40mph signs slightly further down Nitshill Rd, past the entrance to a new development on a former church site. Apparently, a petrol station with shop, drive-thru and takeaway were approved for the site in 2018 (which is close to junction 3 of the M77). Also, it will include 52 car parking spaces, with a few disabled bays and electric vehicle charging points. The only active travel features seem to be a few mini-zebra crossings and 12 cycle parking spaces (perhaps for takeaway couriers?). If locals want to use the petrol station shop later at night, they&#8217;d have to cross five lanes of 40mph traffic. Recently, the Greens&#8217; Cllr Christy Mearns has <a href="https://twitter.com/LocalHilley/status/1501211341209677841" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">challenged the process of approving drive-thrus at a GCC Committee</a>.<br><strong>First featured:</strong> <br><strong>Website links:</strong> <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Nitshill-Road-Proposed-40mph-Speed-Limit-amendment.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Nitshill TRO 40mph amendment plan (PDF)</a> (related <a href="https://www.reglasgow.com/petrol-station-and-drive-thru-restaurant-approved/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">ReGlasgow article</a>, <a href="https://publicaccess.glasgow.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?keyVal=OT8PZ7EXN4W00&amp;activeTab=summary" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">planning application</a> and <a href="https://publicaccess.glasgow.gov.uk/online-applications/files/85E07DECDD6BAC0D7428DD297DEE3D72/pdf/17_01770_DC-PROPOSED_SITE_PLAN-3748204.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">proposed site plan</a>).</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="two-four">2.4: Auldhouse Area (Traffic Management) Order 2022</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><a href="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/GCC-Auldhouse-Area-Traffic-Management-Order-2022_2000px.png?ssl=1"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="360" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/GCC-Auldhouse-Area-Traffic-Management-Order-2022_2000px.png?resize=525%2C360&#038;ssl=1" alt="Plan of Auldhouse area one-way streets and other restrictions" class="wp-image-17103" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/GCC-Auldhouse-Area-Traffic-Management-Order-2022_2000px.png?resize=600%2C411&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/GCC-Auldhouse-Area-Traffic-Management-Order-2022_2000px.png?resize=300%2C205&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/GCC-Auldhouse-Area-Traffic-Management-Order-2022_2000px.png?resize=1536%2C1051&amp;ssl=1 1536w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/GCC-Auldhouse-Area-Traffic-Management-Order-2022_2000px.png?w=1897&amp;ssl=1 1897w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/GCC-Auldhouse-Area-Traffic-Management-Order-2022_2000px.png?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /></a><figcaption>Auldhouse area one-way streets, &#8216;no entry&#8217; and access restrictions (click to enlarge)</figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>Council: </strong>Glasgow City.<br><strong>Subject:</strong> Traffic restrictions in the triangle between Kilmarnock Rd, Auldhouse Rd and Nether Auldhouse Rd. The order was made on 18 March 2022 with one change from the consultation draft (July 2021). That is Mossgiel Road, from Kirkoswald Road to Alloway Road, is to remain two-way. While there are some back lanes to use for cycling there are no <a href="https://www.gobike.org/contraflow-cycling-open-letter-to-glasgow-city-council-and-police-scotland-17057" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">cycle contraflows, as discussed in Brenda&#8217;s recent blog</a>. Other developments nearby include the <a href="https://coltartearley.wixsite.com/shawbridge-arcade" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">redevelopment of Shawbridge Arcade</a> on Ashtree Rd into affordable housing by Wheatley Group (perhaps in partnership with <a href="https://connectingpollokshaws.co.uk/site/homePage#" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Connecting Pollokshaws</a> and their <a href="https://www.facebook.com/cpollokshaws/photos/a.124963649367264/472775364586089/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sustrans funding</a>).<br><strong>First featured:</strong> <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-92-3-august-2021-14734#one-eight" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 92, Item 1.8</a>.<br><strong>Website links: </strong><a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/GCC-Auldhouse-Area-Traffic-Management-Order-2022.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Auldhouse Area TRO 2022 (PDF)</a>.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="two-five">2.5: North Lanarkshire Local Development Plan – Intention to Adopt</h4>



<p><strong>Council: </strong>North Lanarkshire.<br><strong>Subject:</strong> NLC notified GoBike their Local Development Plan (LDP) is being submitted to the Scottish Government. The consultation for this document was three years ago. <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-30-19-march-2019-get-your-views-in-now-to-the-spt-regional-survey-and-the-get-glasgow-moving-petition-and-is-transformation-possible-8038" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 30, Item 1.5</a> details what little there was about active travel in the document at the time. Ministers have 28 days to ask NLC for any amendments. If they have no objections to the plan it will go on to be adopted by the council. <br><strong>First featured:</strong> <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-28-19-february-2019-north-lanarkshire-news-upset-on-university-avenue-spt-survey-and-parking-changes-in-glasgow-city-centre-7782" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 28, Item 1.7</a>.<br><strong>Website links: </strong><a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/NL-LDP-Adoption-Participants-Letter_22-03-28.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">NLC LDP letter</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-109-31-march-2022-17074/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">17074</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consultation Digest (Local) Issue 93, 17 August 2021</title>
		<link>https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-93-17-august-2021-14883</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Y]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2021 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Consultation digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoBike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[active travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auldhouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ayr Road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bellshill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Dunbartonshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Renfrewshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garnethill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glasgow city council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glasgow University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inner East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LEZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malls Mire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryhill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCN75]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Lanarkshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renfrewshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royston Rd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TRNSMT]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gobike.org/?p=14883</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Consultations from around Glasgow. This Digest covers most points of the compass in Glasgow and neighbouring areas to the west, south and east. Quite a few local and national petitions have been launched recently so this Digest has an update on those (instead of infrastructure). Petitions Update GoBike –&#160;Keep our paths open for COP26 (Glasgow &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-93-17-august-2021-14883" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Consultation Digest (Local) Issue 93, 17 August 2021"</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Consultations from around Glasgow.</h2>



<p>This Digest covers most points of the compass in Glasgow and neighbouring areas to the west, south and east. </p>



<p>Quite a few local and national petitions have been launched recently so this Digest has an update on those (instead of infrastructure). </p>



<span id="more-14883"></span>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Petitions Update</h3>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>GoBike –&nbsp;<a href="https://www.glasgowconsult.co.uk/KMS/dmart.aspx?strTab=PublicPetitions&amp;noip=1&amp;PageType=item&amp;DMartId=72" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Keep our paths open for COP26</a> (Glasgow residents only)</li><li>Cycling UK – <a href="https://action.cyclinguk.org/page/85451/act/1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Help fix our failing road traffic laws</a></li><li>Living Streets – <a href="https://e-activist.com/page/87240/action/1?utm_medium=email&amp;utm_source=engagingnetworks&amp;utm_campaign=pp&amp;utm_content=Pavement+Parking+Scotland+ban+MSP+prev+PP+actn&amp;ea.url.id=5427510&amp;forwarded=true" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">petition to bring forward the ban on pavement parking</a> (and there&#8217;s a <a href="https://twitter.com/Glasgow_LS/status/1426184522643673088?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">launch event for a new Glasgow branch of Living Streets</a>)</li><li>Progress for <a href="https://www.glasgowtimes.co.uk/news/19511145.review-public-toilets-glasgow-held-petition-gets-backing/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GoBike member Patricia&#8217;s petition on public toilets</a></li><li>A potential future <a href="https://twitter.com/nedboulting/status/1425733758808952837?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">petition about making cycling infrastructure fit for purpose</a> by the broadcaster/author Ned Boulting</li></ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="block-2e87f9c2-a8af-4262-bff7-8842c5412bae"><strong>Contents</strong><br>(new consultations in&nbsp;<strong>bold</strong>&nbsp;– link jumps to article)</h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 1: Current Consultations</h4>



<ol class="wp-block-list" id="block-94ad3f9e-5c10-4412-bc03-d3df722422ba"><li><a href="#one-one">Glasgow City Council – Auldhouse Area Traffic Management Order</a>&nbsp;(ends 20 Aug)</li><li><a href="#one-two">North Lanarkshire Council –&nbsp;Bellshill Entrance/Velo Park Project</a> (until end of Aug)</li><li><a href="#one-three">East Renfrewshire Council –&nbsp;Ayr Road (A77): Spaces for People, Phase 2</a></li><li><a href="#one-four">Glasgow City Council – Low Emission Zone consultation</a> (ends 2 Sep)</li><li><strong><a href="#one-five">Rosemount Development Trust – Royston Road Masterplan</a> (ends 3 Sep)</strong></li><li><a href="#one-six">Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;Inner East Strategic Development Framework</a> (ends 3 Sep)</li><li><strong><a href="#one-seven">Renfrewshire Council –&nbsp;Improving Barshaw Park Junction, Paisley</a> (ends 5 Sep)</strong></li><li><a href="#one-eight">East Dunbartonshire Council – Active Travel Discussion</a>&nbsp;(ends 28 Sep)</li></ol>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations</h4>



<p>None this time.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 3: Consultation Feedback</h4>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li><strong><span style="font-size: 1rem;"><a href="#three-one">Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;Active Travel Forum Network map</a></span></strong></li><li><a href="#three-two">Urban Roots – Malls Mire partial opening (and newsletter July 2021)</a> </li><li><span style="font-size: 1rem;"><a href="#three-three">Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;Maryhill Road/North Woodside Road/Hopehill Road</a></span></li><li><a href="#three-four">Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;TRNSMT Festival and Access to NCN75</a></li><li><a href="#three-five">Multiplex – Glasgow Uni campus contact changes (and newsletter August 2021)</a></li><li><a href="#three-six">Glasgow City Council – Garnethill Traffic Management and Parking Controls Order</a></li></ol>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="block-cc85ef75-cc87-4a82-a726-8f744aa66a48"><strong>Section 1: Current Consultations<br></strong>(in date order for responses)</h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-one">1.1: Glasgow City Council – Auldhouse Area Traffic Management Order</h4>



<p>The Auldhouse area order appeared in the last <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-92-3-august-2021-14734#one-eight" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 92, Item 1.8</a>. It applies to a triangle of land in the Southside, just off Kilmarnock Rd and Nether Auldhouse Rd. The TRO deals with parking restrictions and making some lanes access only for motor vehicles. See our <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/GoBike-Auldhouse-Area-traffic-mgt-response-040821-1.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GoBike response to the Auldhouse Area order</a>. See the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Auldhouse-Area-Traffic-Management-Order-plan.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Auldhouse plan</a> PDF or the above link for the rest of the documents (ends <strong>20 Aug</strong>). </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-two">1.2: North Lanarkshire Council – Bellshill Entrance/Velo Park Project</h4>



<p>As seen in the last <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-92-3-august-2021-14734#one-nine" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 92, Item 1.9</a>, the new velo park would be at the edge of Bellshill (next to Motherwell Rd/A721) with mountain bike trails down into Strathclyde Country Park. The project lead is due to meet local community groups in the next week or so. A GoBike member should be at one of the meetings so we&#8217;ll hopefully have feedback next time.</p>



<p>If you cycle in the park or the wider area, see the&nbsp;<a href="https://sway.office.com/RsgVUssczf0waxaJ?ref=Link" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bellshill Entrance &amp; Velo Park info page</a>. The page says the process should lead to a Sport Scotland application this month so email the council&nbsp;<strong>before the end of August</strong>. </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-three">1.3: East Renfrewshire Council – Ayr Road (A77): Spaces for People, Phase 2</h4>



<p>As covered in&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-91-20-july-2021-14629#one-five" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 91, Item 1.5</a>, Ayr Rd through Newton Mearns has a phase 2 consultation. It&#8217;s about replacing the&nbsp;<a href="https://erspacesforpeople.commonplace.is/proposals/a-77-ayr-road-pop-up-bike-roll-corridor" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">phase 1 cones</a>&nbsp;with light segregation, removing some segregation and adding parking bays. For examples of the segregation, maps and more details, see the&nbsp;<a href="https://erspacesforpeople.commonplace.is/proposals/a-77-ayr-road-phase-2" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ayr Road Phase 2 Commonplace page</a>. No obvious deadline on this one.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-four">1.4: Glasgow City Council – Low Emission Zone consultation</h4>



<p>As in&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-90-6-july-2021-14538#one-three" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 90, Item 1.3</a>&nbsp;this consultation is about phase 2 of the Low Emission Zone in Glasgow city centre (between the M8, river and High St). Phase 1 applied to local buses but phase 2&nbsp;will include all vehicles entering the zone area (unless exempt). However, enforcement is only due to start in June 2023.</p>



<p>The short survey asks you about issues like the LEZ area and the grace periods. See the&nbsp;<a href="https://glasgow.gov.uk/27143" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Glasgow LEZ consultation page</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.smartsurvey.co.uk/s/GCC_LEZ2021/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">LEZ online survey</a>. Closes on&nbsp;<strong>2 September 2021</strong>.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-five">1.5: Rosemount Development Trust – Royston Road Masterplan</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><a href="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Royston-Road_Presentation-Boards_High-p3-detail_925px.jpg?ssl=1"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="313" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Royston-Road_Presentation-Boards_High-p3-detail_925px.jpg?resize=525%2C313&#038;ssl=1" alt="Royston Road analysis – annotated photo" class="wp-image-14933" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Royston-Road_Presentation-Boards_High-p3-detail_925px.jpg?resize=600%2C358&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Royston-Road_Presentation-Boards_High-p3-detail_925px.jpg?resize=300%2C179&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Royston-Road_Presentation-Boards_High-p3-detail_925px.jpg?w=925&amp;ssl=1 925w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /></a><figcaption>Analysis of Royston Rd –&nbsp;note the hatching down middle of road (click to enlarge image)</figcaption></figure>



<p>Projects about Royston Rd seem to be like buses – none for ages then two at once. The last <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-92-3-august-2021-14734#one-two" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 92, Item 1.2, featured the Flourishing Molendinar project</a> about the area at the eastern (hilly) end of Royston Rd. The western (flat) end of Royston Rd is the focus of this project by <a href="https://www.facebook.com/RosemountTrust/photos/a.275977175841391/3866744590097947/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Rosemount Development Trust</a>. </p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><a href="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Royston-Road_Presentation-Boards_High-p5_16-9_2000px.jpg?ssl=1"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="296" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Royston-Road_Presentation-Boards_High-p5_16-9_2000px.jpg?resize=525%2C296&#038;ssl=1" alt="Plan with notes about future of Royston Road, Glasgow" class="wp-image-14920" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Royston-Road_Presentation-Boards_High-p5_16-9_2000px.jpg?resize=600%2C338&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Royston-Road_Presentation-Boards_High-p5_16-9_2000px.jpg?resize=300%2C169&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Royston-Road_Presentation-Boards_High-p5_16-9_2000px.jpg?resize=1536%2C864&amp;ssl=1 1536w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Royston-Road_Presentation-Boards_High-p5_16-9_2000px.jpg?w=2000&amp;ssl=1 2000w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Royston-Road_Presentation-Boards_High-p5_16-9_2000px.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /></a><figcaption>Board 5 from consultation has notes about future of Royston Rd –&nbsp;click to enlarge</figcaption></figure>



<p>This section is a crucial link from the city centre/Sighthill (to the west) up towards Blackhill (to the east). Current plans only mention cycling in passing, which is a concern. If cycleways don&#8217;t connect right along Royston Rd it risks cutting off not only Blackhill but also active travel routes from places in North Lanarkshire like Stepps and Cumbernauld. </p>



<p>If you know the area at all, please put a word in for cycling. See the <a href="https://forms.office.com/pages/responsepage.aspx?id=gUi6qJGtYkqwntSr9e8xsVoOG-pfsYdGh_JLYOVG80NUOTIxMDRGRks4NzFST1NISENNM0swWDlERS4u" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Royston regeneration survey</a> and <a href="https://photos.google.com/share/AF1QipOfRSa4KS5dZywsZU2SI2H2eQLXiFhjUYEOh9XN0w4F0amGWNRcWcbZj7pkJhguYg?key=OVdfZjZ4Zmp3dVV3OU1NMXJWa2tRQURaTVN1MkRB" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">information boards</a> (ends <strong>3 Sep</strong>). </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-six">1.6: Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;Inner East Strategic Development Framework</h4>



<p>East of High St out to Carntyne and Tollcross is the ‘Inner East’ area, covered in the latest SDF (as in&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-90-6-july-2021-14538#one-four" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 90, Item 1.4</a>). The ‘Connected’ section 4C mentions cycling infrastructure projects but also public transport and roads, including the so-called East End Regeneration Route (EERR) dual carriageway.</p>



<p>See the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.glasgowconsult.co.uk/KMS/dmart.aspx?strTab=PublicDMartCurrent&amp;NoIP=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Inner East consultation page</a>&nbsp;for link to the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.smartsurvey.co.uk/s/GCC_SDF_InnerEast/">SDF survey</a>&nbsp;(ends&nbsp;<strong>3 Sep</strong>).</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-seven">1.7: Renfrewshire Council –&nbsp;Improving Barshaw Park Junction, Paisley </h4>



<p><a href="https://www.scotsman.com/news/transport/revealed-20-black-spots-cycling-accidents-855824" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">In 2017, Sustrans identified this crossroads as a dangerous junction</a>. It&#8217;s at the entrance to Barshaw Park in Paisley where Arkleston Rd and Hawkhead Rd meet Glasgow Rd (A761, which becomes Paisley Rd West in Glasgow). Arkleston Rd runs south from the M8 and is used for car parking next to Barshaw Park. The park itself includes a BMX track and a mini street layout for children learning to cycle. </p>



<p>This month, <a href="https://www.renfrewshire.gov.uk/article/11796/MEDIA-RELEASE-Communities-asked-for-their-views-on-active-travel-upgrades-to-Barshaw-Park-junction" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Renfrewshire Council announced they had won Places for Everyone funding for the junction</a>. </p>



<p>The consultation has three options:</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>Glasgow Rd protected lanes (none on Arkleston Rd or Hawkhead Rd) plus &#8216;early start&#8217; cycle traffic lights (<a href="https://maps.renfrewshire.gov.uk/BarshawParkJunction/LTP%203958%20CO1%20GR%20C1%20-%20Unidirectional%20Cycle%20Provision%20Option%201%20-%20Consultation%20Drawing.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Option 1 PDF</a>)</li><li>All roads have protected lanes with &#8216;early start&#8217; cycle traffic lights (<a href="https://maps.renfrewshire.gov.uk/BarshawParkJunction/LTP%203958%20CO1%20GR%20C2%20-%20Unidirectional%20Cycle%20Provision%20Option%202%20-%20Consultation%20Drawing.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Option 2 PDF</a>)</li><li>A protected junction with protected lanes on all roads and bikes get their own signal phase (<a href="https://maps.renfrewshire.gov.uk/BarshawParkJunction/LTP%203958%20CO1%20GR%20C3%20-%20Unidirectional%20Protected%20Junction%20Consultation%20Drawing.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Option 3 PDF</a>)</li></ol>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="430" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/LTP-3958-CO1-GR-C3-Unidirectional-Protected-Junction-Consultation-Drawing_1016px.jpg?resize=525%2C430&#038;ssl=1" alt="Barshaw Park junction Option 3 drawing" class="wp-image-14938" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/LTP-3958-CO1-GR-C3-Unidirectional-Protected-Junction-Consultation-Drawing_1016px.jpg?resize=600%2C491&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/LTP-3958-CO1-GR-C3-Unidirectional-Protected-Junction-Consultation-Drawing_1016px.jpg?resize=300%2C245&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/LTP-3958-CO1-GR-C3-Unidirectional-Protected-Junction-Consultation-Drawing_1016px.jpg?w=1016&amp;ssl=1 1016w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Barshaw Park junction Option 3 drawing –&nbsp;the bus stop in-shot has shared path alongside it</figcaption></figure>



<p>Experience from Edinburgh with &#8216;early start&#8217; bike traffic lights is that not everyone wants/can get to the front of a traffic queue to make use of them. The last option seems best but it creates a bus stop in-shot with shared path alongside it (where Glasgow Rd would be narrowed from two lanes to one). The plans mention relocating the bus stop as another option (but it is next to the main park entrance). Any further protected cycle lanes on roads would be added in a later phase. </p>



<p>Nearly every comment about the plans on Facebook seems to be hostile to all three options (on posts by  <a href="https://www.facebook.com/RenfrewshireLive/posts/4988936927789519" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Renfrewshire Live</a>, <a href="https://www.facebook.com/millmagazine/posts/977840276327157">The Mill magazine</a> or <a href="https://www.facebook.com/barshawfriends" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Friends of Barshaw Park</a>). The most common point (apart from rants about cycling) was the lack of a right-turn filter/light from Arkleston Rd onto Glasgow Rd. If you know the area at all, see the <a href="https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/4a8a2a5b5aff4fe991be7c159c8c0031" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Barshaw Park junction community survey</a> to rate the options (ends <strong>5 September</strong>).</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-eight">1.8: East Dunbartonshire Council – Active Travel Discussion</h4>



<p>This has featured since&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-86-11-may-2021-13927#one-two" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 86, Item 1.2</a>, with its ‘<a href="https://edc.mapthis.place/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ideas Map</a>‘ for the area. It’s an opportunity to focus on active travel (walking, cycling and wheeling).&nbsp;</p>



<p>Online discussion events restart from 21 August (Bearsden &amp; Milngavie). See a full list of events and background info on the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.eastdunbarton.gov.uk/active-travel-discussion" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Active Travel Discussion webpage</a>. Closing date –&nbsp;<strong>28 Sep 2021</strong>.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations</strong></h3>



<p>None this time.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 3:</strong>&nbsp;<strong>Consultation Feedback</strong></h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-one">3.1: Glasgow City Council – Active Travel Forum network map</h4>



<p>We last heard from GCC&#8217;s <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-83-30-march-2021-13568#three-two" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Active Travel Forum when it restarted</a> in March (<a href="https://www.gobike.org/campaigns/active-travel-forum" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">the ATF has stopped and started a few times in its history</a>). The most recent meeting, in June, included a new <a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=53808&amp;p=0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><strong>proposal for a city network</strong></a>, which has now been published online. We&#8217;ve seen vague outlines before, like the City Ways map in the last Cycling Strategy. The new map isn&#8217;t that easy to follow (compared to similar <a href="https://www.southlanarkshire.gov.uk/downloads/download/982/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">network maps for South Lanarkshire Council</a>). However, this new Glasgow network map does seem to be more systematic than any previous ones. </p>



<p>The presentation about the network map talks about the method behind producing it, including an algorithm for key destinations and roads &gt;10m wide. Slides also mention soft segregation and filters as part of the network. So, it wouldn&#8217;t necessarily all be segregated but might go in quicker. The recent announcement about the <a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/index.aspx?articleid=27062" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Liveable Neighbourhoods project</a> (and its <a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=53409&amp;p=0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Toolkit</a>) may play a part in that. </p>



<p>Slide 10 talks about the density of the network, sets a timescale and another disclaimer:</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading"><em>&#8220;CITY Network Map</em></h5>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li><em>Proposed city network to be in place by 2030</em></li><li><em>Represents the required density of routes for a functional City Network</em></li><li><em>Not all of these streets identified here will form the City Network as delivered but form the start of the planning and prioritisation process</em></li><li><em>Delivered City Network must be of equivalent density and coherence by 2030 to enable easy everyday active journeys&nbsp;&#8220;</em></li></ul>



<p>So, the current routes on the map may not be the final ones (and there&#8217;s no key). </p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><a href="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Active_Travel_Forum_230621_presentation-11-map_1280px.jpg?ssl=1"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="439" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Active_Travel_Forum_230621_presentation-11-map_1280px.jpg?resize=525%2C439&#038;ssl=1" alt="Active Travel Forum Glasgow City Cycling Network Map" class="wp-image-14893" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Active_Travel_Forum_230621_presentation-11-map_1280px.jpg?resize=600%2C502&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Active_Travel_Forum_230621_presentation-11-map_1280px.jpg?resize=300%2C251&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Active_Travel_Forum_230621_presentation-11-map_1280px.jpg?w=1280&amp;ssl=1 1280w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Active_Travel_Forum_230621_presentation-11-map_1280px.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /></a><figcaption>The City Network Map presented by Glasgow City Council at the Active Travel Forum</figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>Main route corridors</strong> (striped lines, clockwise from north):</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>Springburn Road (A803)</li><li>Alexandra Parade/Cumbernauld Road/Edinburgh Road (A8)</li><li>Cumbernauld Road (A80)</li><li>London Road (A74)</li><li>Eglinton Street/Pollokshaws Road/Kilmarnock Road (A77)</li><li>Paisley Road West (A761)</li><li>Victoria Park Drive South/Dumbarton Road (A814)</li><li>Great Western Road (A82)</li><li>Maryhill Road (A81)</li></ul>



<p>All of the above are (at least) four lane A-roads but it&#8217;s not clear if these are intended as the main cycle routes. However, London Rd already has a section of permanent cycleway at either end with more phases planned. London Rd also has sections of soft segregation (with large gaps), as do parts of Cumbernauld Rd and Gt Western Rd. The empty area in the city centre would presumably connect to <a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/avenues" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Avenues project</a> routes. Most of the striped routes reach the city boundary, apart from London Rd and Edinburgh Rd. </p>



<p>The pink routes on the map include permanent infrastructure like the recently completed Garscube Rd cycleway and the very much ongoing South City Way. </p>



<p>The following slide shows &#8216;iterations&#8217; and distance/coverage (and has a key!). </p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Iteration/Distance map</h5>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><a href="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Active_Travel_Forum_230621_presentation-12-iterations_1610px.jpg?ssl=1"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="358" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Active_Travel_Forum_230621_presentation-12-iterations_1610px.jpg?resize=525%2C358&#038;ssl=1" alt="Map of proposed Glasgow City Network map with colours to show iterations and distance to cycle routes" class="wp-image-14894" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Active_Travel_Forum_230621_presentation-12-iterations_1610px.jpg?resize=600%2C409&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Active_Travel_Forum_230621_presentation-12-iterations_1610px.jpg?resize=300%2C205&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Active_Travel_Forum_230621_presentation-12-iterations_1610px.jpg?resize=1536%2C1048&amp;ssl=1 1536w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Active_Travel_Forum_230621_presentation-12-iterations_1610px.jpg?w=1610&amp;ssl=1 1610w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Active_Travel_Forum_230621_presentation-12-iterations_1610px.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /></a><figcaption>Most residential areas seem to have decent coverage except some parts of Summerston, Easterhouse, Baillieston, Toryglen, Castlemilk and Darnley</figcaption></figure>



<p>The map seems to show a fairly widespread first iteration/version of the network. It would be followed by additions to fill in gaps between these routes for later versions. The colours show pretty good coverage for most areas of the city compared to now (from &#8216;iteration 6&#8217;, presumably in 2030). Most of the pink areas (&gt;800m distance) are not residential –&nbsp;they include the Seven Lochs and Pollok Park. </p>



<p>All of this has to be taken with a big pinch of salt (especially the bits outside the GCC boundary at Renfrew and Thornliebank!). It also remains to be seen how it fits in with other council plans and priorities. For example, cycle routes seem to avoid the High St, despite the fact it&#8217;s not an Avenue but has its own <a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/index.aspx?articleid=23396" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">High St Area Strategy</a> project (as well as being part of the &#8216;Learning Quarter&#8217; district plan and Inner East SDF). Elsewhere, there are bus priority lanes in the works for Paisley Rd West –&nbsp;will they trump cycle lanes? </p>



<p>The presentation also mentions themes and objectives for the forthcoming Active Travel Strategy (slide 17 onwards). Slide 21 has more detail on &#8216;Proposed Theme 1: Infrastructure &amp; Networks&#8217;. Only time will tell how both the strategy and network map are put into practice. However, the map seems like a step towards a more comprehensive network. The proposals should go to committee later in the year.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-two">3.2: Urban Roots – Malls Mire</h4>



<p>Malls Mire gets a bit higher up the running order this time as the west and central areas of the new community woodland are due to open in mid-August. These will add much needed greenspace and a network of traffic-free paths in the Toryglen/Polmadie area. When the eastern end of the woodland opens, it will provide extra east-west links between the Southside of Glasgow and Rutherglen, South Lanarkshire. </p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="293" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Malls-Mire-map.jpg?resize=525%2C293&#038;ssl=1" alt="Malls Mire map" class="wp-image-12657" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Malls-Mire-map.jpg?resize=600%2C335&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Malls-Mire-map.jpg?resize=300%2C167&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Malls-Mire-map.jpg?w=914&amp;ssl=1 914w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Map of the Malls Mire site –&nbsp;Toryglen is to the west, Rutherglen to the east</figcaption></figure>



<p>Woodland paths aren&#8217;t a complete solution to the connection issues in the city network map but they&#8217;re certainly welcome. In future, Malls Mire may link to enhanced routes in South Lanarkshire Council&#8217;s <a href="https://www.southlanarkshire.gov.uk/downloads/file/13298/rutherglen_and_cambuslang_active_travel_network_plan" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Cambuslang/Rutherglen active travel network</a>, like NCN756 towards Shawfield and Glasgow Green.</p>



<p>See the <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Malls-Mire-Newsletter-July-2021.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Malls Mire July 2021 newsletter</a> for more information about the latest developments. Well done to Gemma and the rest of the team for all the progress so far.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-three">3.3: Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;Maryhill Road/North Woodside Road/Hopehill Road</h4>



<p>First covered in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-86-11-may-2021-13927#one-one" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 86, Item 1.1</a>, this novel junction layout caused a bit of head scratching due to its minimalist drawing. Options for the <a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=42014&amp;p=0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">crossing had already been in a consultation for Connecting Woodside</a>. However, there was another <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Glasgow-City-Council-Maryhill-Road_-North-Woodside-Road_-Hopehill-Road....pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">more detailed drawing for the new junction layout (PDF)</a>. </p>



<p>GoBike sent a letter of objection and received the following reply: </p>



<p><em>&#8220;In response to your comments regarding the desire line to travel north from Hopehill Road to Maryhill Road. I would advise that the design for the above junction does not prohibit cyclists wishing to travel, on the carriageway, from Hopehill Road northbound onto Maryhill Road. Cyclists wishing to travel on the carriageway are both encouraged and supported through the inclusion of Advanced Stop Lines (ASL) at all arms of the junction, to support their journey along either Maryhill Road or Hopehill Road. </em></p>



<p><em>Please note, whilst it is the objective of the proposed to improve the conditions for cycling on North Woodside Road and, encourage the uptake of cycling in the local area by introducing additional infrastructure that is suitable for use by all ages and abilities. It is not our objective to dissuade or restrict confident cyclists from using Maryhill Road to continue their journey and as such, we have incorporated dropped kerbs within the design of the junction to make this possible. </em></p>



<p><em>As you have stated, should cyclists ‘routinely ignore’ the TRO restricting their movements whilst on the proposed cycle crossing, this would be a matter for Police Scotland. As we advised previously, once approved, a TRO is a legal order and is enforceable by law. If you do however have concerns regarding the speed of vehicles travelling on Maryhill Road, or any of the surrounding roads, I would be happy to bring this to the attention of our Road Safety Team to investigate further.&#8221;</em> </p>



<p>It remains to be seen how intuitive, or not, this new junction turns out to be. Also, whether Police Scotland take any more interest in anyone ignoring the rules than they do with cars parked in bike lanes. Further phases of Connecting Woodside or results of the city network plan may have a bearing on the junction in future.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-four">3.4: Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;TRNSMT Festival and Access to NCN75</h4>



<p>The busy NCN path in Glasgow Green was recently kept open during the Euro 2020 Fanzone in the park. GoBike member Bob wrote to GCC about keeping access to the path in Glasgow Green while it holds the TRNSMT music festival (pronounced &#8216;Transmit&#8217;, kids). The last edition of the festival, in 2019, had closed the route with very poor signage of the diversion. This led to a <a href="https://www.glasgowconsult.co.uk/KMS/dmart.aspx?strTab=PublicPetitions&amp;noip=1&amp;PageType=item&amp;DMartId=58" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">previous petition about keeping NCN75 open</a>. </p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="296" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/NCN-diversion-sign_2019-07-12_180109_1200px.jpg?resize=525%2C296&#038;ssl=1" alt="NCN75 diversion sign 2019" class="wp-image-14959" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/NCN-diversion-sign_2019-07-12_180109_1200px.jpg?resize=600%2C338&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/NCN-diversion-sign_2019-07-12_180109_1200px.jpg?resize=300%2C169&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/NCN-diversion-sign_2019-07-12_180109_1200px.jpg?w=1200&amp;ssl=1 1200w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/NCN-diversion-sign_2019-07-12_180109_1200px.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Diversion route sign for NCN75 (facing the wrong way) <em>in July 2019</em></figcaption></figure>



<p>The council&#8217;s (edited) reply: </p>



<p><em>&#8220;…closure and diversion of the NCR 75 will only take place on the ‘Live Concert’ dates of this event. That will be Thursday 9 September – Sunday 12 September (4 days in total) and that all other dates during the build and break for the event, the NCR 75 will in the main be remain open.</em></p>



<p><em>…I would also like to advise that more permanent signage is in place around the diversion routes which when required can be opened to ensure users have a clearly marked route to follow in both directions. These signs will be supplemented with additional free standing signage at some locations.</em> <em>I believe those measures are fair and reasonable for the short term diversion of the route which are in line with other diversionary arrangements.</em></p>



<p><em>Lastly I note your objections to any closures but I should can advise that those proposed are governed under the delegated powers granted to the City and managed by Neighbourhoods, Regeneration and Sustainability and are not by their duration subject to consultation.&#8221;</em></p>



<p><a href="https://trnsmtfest.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">TRNSMT takes place from Friday 10 – Sunday 12 September 2021</a> but it sounds like NCN75 will close on Thursday 9 Sep, while they set up. </p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="296" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/NCN-diversion-signs-2021_1200px.jpg?resize=525%2C296&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-14971" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/NCN-diversion-signs-2021_1200px.jpg?resize=600%2C338&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/NCN-diversion-signs-2021_1200px.jpg?resize=300%2C169&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/NCN-diversion-signs-2021_1200px.jpg?w=1200&amp;ssl=1 1200w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/NCN-diversion-signs-2021_1200px.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>The new NCN diversion signs are better than paper ones but will they be clear to most people?</figcaption></figure>



<p>GoBike convenor Thomas posted a <a href="https://twitter.com/UrbanistTOC/status/1425781257183666179?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">thread on Twitter with photos of the diversion route</a> along Adelphi St to the St Andrews suspension bridge. It includes <a href="https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/broken-weir-causes-massive-subsitence-11080199" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">the Gorbals section of riverbank which collapsed in 2017</a> and remains fenced off. While passable, it&#8217;s not geared up for the level of pedestrian and cycle use NCN75 gets on an average weekend.  </p>



<p>We&#8217;ll try to find out why NCN75 was open for the Fanzone but closed for TRNSMT. </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-five">3.5: Multiplex –&nbsp;Glasgow Uni campus newsletter</h4>



<p>The latest update from the <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/MPX-UoG-August-2021-Newsletter.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Glasgow Uni campus August 2021 newsletter</a>. It sounds like people in the West End are due to see more activity during August as the foundations of the new Business School are laid.</p>



<p>The contact for the project has changed to Fergus Shaw. Best wishes to the previous contact Kieran Ronnie, who helped us with an issue with the temporary traffic lights on University Ave. </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-six">3.6: Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;Garnethill Traffic Management and Parking Controls Order</h4>



<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-91-20-july-2021-14629#one-three" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 91, Item 1.3</a>, we covered the parking controls for Garnethill. GoBike member Tim sent an objection to the plans. He had a response from the council on some of the points raised:</p>



<p><em>&#8220;I can advise that to accommodate the number of resident permits that are purchased for the Garnethill area we could not reduce the number of parking bays in the Garnethill area.</em></p>



<p><em>Please note that the reduction in permit price is being proposed to bring the Garnethill zone in line with all other restricted/controlled parking zones out with the City Centre(excluding Hillhead).&#8221;</em></p>



<p>Garnethill is one block from Sauchiehall St so most people would probably think of it as part of the city centre. It is close to main bus routes, train and underground stations but didn&#8217;t get any Bikehangar secure cycle parking. It&#8217;s also close to a large motorway junction at Charing Cross, which may have a bearing on the number of cars in the area. </p>



<p>The response also repeated previous statements about Police Scotland ruling out contraflow cycling on one-way streets. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14883</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consultation Digest (Local) Issue 86, 11 May 2021</title>
		<link>https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-86-11-may-2021-13927</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Y]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2021 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Consultation digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoBike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benalder St]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cambridge St]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canniesburn Toll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecting Woodside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East City Way]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Dunbartonshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Kilbride]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garscube Rd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Square]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glasgow city council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GUSM74]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London Rd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malls Mire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryhill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Lanarkshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royston Rd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Lanarkshire]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gobike.org/?p=13927</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Junctions squinty and scary plus permanent and pop-up lanes. Around the north of the city, plans for Maryhill Road&#8217;s squinty crossing are dwarfed by proposals for Canniesburn Toll roundabout in East Dumbartonshire. In the city centre, another Bank Holiday building fire means the road is fenced off on High St at the junction of George &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-86-11-may-2021-13927" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Consultation Digest (Local) Issue 86, 11 May 2021"</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Junctions squinty and scary plus permanent and pop-up lanes.</h2>



<p>Around the north of the city, plans for Maryhill Road&#8217;s squinty crossing are dwarfed by proposals for Canniesburn Toll roundabout in East Dumbartonshire. </p>



<p>In the city centre, another Bank Holiday building fire means the road is fenced off on High St at the junction of George St/Duke St. </p>



<p>The Scottish Parliament election has passed but it&#8217;s still a bit quiet on the consultations front. However, there are plenty of temporary and permanent projects going on so we have another Infrastructure Update. Most of them are in the city but East Kilbride is also getting in on the Spaces for People action. </p>



<span id="more-13927"></span>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="infra-update">Infrastructure Update </h3>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li><a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://twitter.com/BrunsMoore/status/1391691966442708999?s=20" target="_blank">Benalder St, Glasgow is having a cycleway installed</a> over the River Kelvin after works on nearby Bunhouse Rd and Old Dumbarton Rd (for Yorkhill &amp; Kelvingrove Cycling Village).</li><li><a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://twitter.com/RiderGlasgow/status/1389972124824186885?s=20" target="_blank">Cambridge St, Glasgow – Spaces for People cycle lanes</a> are up and running (including <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://twitter.com/GoBikeGlasgow/status/1388427198252691456?s=20" target="_blank">bike traffic lights at Renfrew St</a>)<span style="font-size: 1rem">. </span></li><li><a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://twitter.com/tofolo_1/status/1389980942039666690?s=20" target="_blank">East City Way phase 1</a> at London Rd/Mount Vernon may be nearly there – see 3.1, below.</li><li><a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://twitter.com/JoolzPedals/status/1388598294109114371?s=20" target="_blank">East Kilbride has Spaces for People lanes installed</a> between EK train station and shopping centre (via Brouster Hill) including <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://twitter.com/JoolzPedals/status/1387860403372298240?s=20" target="_blank">double decker planters on Cornwall St</a>.</li><li><a style="font-size: 1rem" rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://twitter.com/parcelorogues/status/1390755744853762050?s=20" target="_blank">Garscube Rd segregated lanes</a><span style="font-size: 1rem">, for the Connecting Woodside project, have almost reached </span><a style="font-size: 1rem" rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Garscube-Rd-Firhill-lights_9982_1200px.jpg" target="_blank">new bike traffic lights at Firhill St</a><span style="font-size: 1rem"> </span>(installed but<span style="font-size: 1rem"> not put into service yet).</span></li><li><a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://twitter.com/isersmalone/status/1382657762648330242?s=20" target="_blank">George Square gets planter boxes</a> and <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://twitter.com/iaindocherty/status/1388451557361000451?s=20" target="_blank">outdoor seating</a> (mostly for The Counting House).</li><li><a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://twitter.com/_OnBikes/status/1387711127665221632?s=20" target="_blank">Royston Rd, Glasgow – work started on Spaces for People lanes</a>. </li></ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="block-2e87f9c2-a8af-4262-bff7-8842c5412bae"><strong>Contents</strong><br>(new consultations in&nbsp;<strong>bold</strong> – link jumps to article)</h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 1: Current Consultations</h4>



<ol class="wp-block-list" id="block-bd8c9723-0178-460b-91f7-5728c4c50773"><li><strong><a href="#one-one">Glasgow City Council – Maryhill Road/North Woodside Road/Hopehill Road (Traffic Regulation) Order 2021</a>, (ends 18 June)</strong></li><li><a href="#one-two"><strong>East Dunbartonshire Council –&nbsp;Active Travel Discussion</strong></a></li><li><strong><a href="#one-three">East Dunbartonshire Council – Canniesburn Toll Signalisation Study</a></strong></li><li><a href="#one-four">North Lanarkshire Council –&nbsp;Town Hubs location surveys</a></li><li><a href="#one-five">Glasgow Urban Sports –&nbsp;GUSM74 Urban Sports Sculpture Park survey</a></li></ol>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations</h4>



<p><strong><a href="#two-one">Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;Pollok pop-up lanes consultation (Spaces for People)</a></strong></p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 3: Consultation Feedback</h4>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li><a href="#three-one">Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;East City Way Phase 1 (London Dr to Daldowie Rd) Order 2021</a></li><li><a href="#three-two">Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;London Road and Hamilton Road (30mph Speed Limit) Order 2021</a></li><li><a href="#three-three">Multiplex –&nbsp;Glasgow Uni campus, May newsletter</a></li><li><a href="#three-four">Urban Roots –&nbsp;Malls Mire,&nbsp;April Newsletter</a></li></ol>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="block-ad6eda16-21e7-4a1f-984d-21f675cbe2c1"><strong>Section 1: Current Consultations<br></strong>(in date order for responses)</h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-one">1.1: Glasgow City Council – Maryhill Road/North Woodside Road/Hopehill Road (Traffic Regulation) Order 2021</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="317" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Maryhill-Rd-N-Woodside-Rd_Plan-TRO_1200px.png?resize=525%2C317&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-13944" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Maryhill-Rd-N-Woodside-Rd_Plan-TRO_1200px.png?resize=600%2C362&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Maryhill-Rd-N-Woodside-Rd_Plan-TRO_1200px.png?resize=300%2C181&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Maryhill-Rd-N-Woodside-Rd_Plan-TRO_1200px.png?w=1011&amp;ssl=1 1011w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /></figure>



<p>This traffic order has a long title for a short stretch of junction. It creates a diagonal cycle crossing on Maryhill Rd between the two filtered sections of N Woodside Rd. This is part of the wider <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/article/21802/Connecting-Woodside" target="_blank">Connecting Woodside</a> project (which is installing other squinty crossings on Garscube Rd). </p>



<p>The accompanying report says it includes <em>&#8220;the installation of a signalised pedestrian and cycle crossing at the junction of Maryhill Road, North Woodside Road and Hopehill Road&#8221;</em>. It also restricts people cycling on the crossing from turning onto Maryhill Rd midway across. Presumably, in an effort to protect pedestrians who may be crossing alongside bikes. </p>



<p>The eastern side will have a 2-way cycle carriageway (according to the very small annotation, above). The order also prohibits motor vehicles from using the new cycle carriageway (the current road has been used for car parking). </p>



<p>There are the usual documents: <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Maryhill-Rd-N-Woodside-Rd_Plan-TRO.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">TRO plan</a>, <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Maryhill-Rd-N-Woodside-Rd_Draft_Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">TRO report</a>, <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Maryhill-Rd-N-Woodside-Rd_TRO-Press-Notice.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">TRO press notice</a> and (short) <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Maryhill-Rd-N-Woodside-Rd_Statement_of_Reasons.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">TRO statement of reasons</a>. The deadline for responses is Friday, 18 June 2021.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-two">1.2:&nbsp;East Dunbartonshire Council – Active Travel Discussion (11 May –&nbsp;28 Sept)</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="263" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/EDC-AT-webbanner.jpeg?resize=525%2C263&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-13973" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/EDC-AT-webbanner.jpeg?resize=600%2C300&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/EDC-AT-webbanner.jpeg?resize=300%2C150&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/EDC-AT-webbanner.jpeg?resize=1536%2C768&amp;ssl=1 1536w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/EDC-AT-webbanner.jpeg?w=2000&amp;ssl=1 2000w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/EDC-AT-webbanner.jpeg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>EDC&#8217;s Active Travel Discussion has just started</figcaption></figure>



<p>This item came up just before publication and we&#8217;ll no doubt have more to say about it. However, for now, we&#8217;ll just highlight the online events starting on 18 May (for the Lennoxtown, Milton of Campsie, Haughhead and Clachan of Campsie areas). There are about a dozen online events in the next few months for different areas (using MS Teams). Paper forms are also available from local libraries.</p>



<p>See a full list of events and background info on the <a href="https://www.eastdunbarton.gov.uk/active-travel-discussion" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Active Travel Discussion webpage</a>. EDC have set up an <a href="https://edc.mapthis.place/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">online map</a> to gather suggestions, with links to highlight paths, etc. in the area. This consultation will feed into a new Active Travel Strategy later in the year.  </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-three">1.3:&nbsp;East Dunbartonshire Council – Canniesburn Toll Signalisation Study</h4>



<p>Canniesburn Toll is a main junction between Bearsden and Glasgow, which links Switchback Rd and Drymen Rd to the A81 (Maryhill Rd/Milgavie Rd). East Dunbartonshire Council is going to add traffic lights and pedestrian crossings around the roundabout itself. At the same time EDC are proposing to add a cycle lane (using space gained by removing pavement around the centre of roundabout). </p>



<p>There are two options being put forward for the bike lane –&nbsp;one on the carriageway and one on the footway. While it&#8217;s good that EDC is looking at cycling infrastructure again (after ignoring Spaces for People), there are some obvious issues with both options. </p>



<p>Option 1, on the carriageway, seems to give priority for people cycling round the edge of the roundabout. However, there&#8217;s an obvious <a href="https://twitter.com/OConnorOisin/status/1391700806907334656?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">risk of a &#8216;left hook&#8217; collision, when cycling ahead from cars turning left across your path</a>. </p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="296" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Canniesburn-image15lq_1620058231952.png?resize=525%2C296&#038;ssl=1" alt="Canniesburn Toll, Option 1" class="wp-image-13936" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Canniesburn-image15lq_1620058231952.png?resize=600%2C338&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Canniesburn-image15lq_1620058231952.png?resize=300%2C169&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Canniesburn-image15lq_1620058231952.png?w=960&amp;ssl=1 960w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Canniesburn Toll, Option 1 –&nbsp;carriageway lane with priority but also &#8216;left hook&#8217; risk</figcaption></figure>



<p>Option 2, on the footway, should be safer but slower with multiple waits at traffic lights to cross each arm of the roundabout. </p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="296" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Canniesburn-looking_to_macfarlane_roadlq_1620125217927.png?resize=525%2C296&#038;ssl=1" alt="Canniesburn Toll, Option 2" class="wp-image-13937" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Canniesburn-looking_to_macfarlane_roadlq_1620125217927.png?resize=600%2C338&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Canniesburn-looking_to_macfarlane_roadlq_1620125217927.png?resize=300%2C169&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Canniesburn-looking_to_macfarlane_roadlq_1620125217927.png?w=960&amp;ssl=1 960w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption><em>Canniesburn Toll, Option</em> 2 –&nbsp;footway lane is out of traffic but would mean waiting at crossings</figcaption></figure>



<p>It&#8217;s not clear if either option is trying to recreate a <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://bicycledutch.wordpress.com/2015/10/13/explaining-the-dutch-roundabout-abroad/" target="_blank">Dutch roundabout</a>, which tend to be smaller, single-lane roundabouts with a cycle lane in a separate ring outside it (leaving a gap for cars to stop on each arm). There may not be enough space all the way around the roundabout to add bike lanes further out. However, there is a huge area in the middle of it.</p>



<p>The <a href="https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/01510c7eb11b474eb1bff3f62dfcf0cf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Canniesburn Toll consultation website</a> has background info and a link to the <a href="https://survey123.arcgis.com/share/?open=web&amp;embed=fullScreen&amp;id=63ec6e8609af4ff0a484991db4ff5f36&amp;hide=navbar,footer,theme" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">survey</a>, which takes general feedback and for each option. It&#8217;s apparently had a few technical issues which the consultants (Stantec) say are being resolved. If you have any issues with it you could try emailing <a href="mailto:canniesburntoll@stantec.com">canniesburntoll@stantec.com</a>. There&#8217;s no obvious closing date for this one. However, a &#8216;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/EDC-Technical-Notes-2021_Issue-22-Canniesburn-Toll-Improvement-Project-Tech-Note.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Technical Note</a>&#8216; by EDC for their councillors says detailed design will start in June 2021.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-four">1.4:&nbsp;North Lanarkshire Council –&nbsp;Town Hubs location surveys</h4>



<p>As covered in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-85-27-april-2021-13844#one-two" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 85, Item 1.2</a>. The Hubs are about creating community facilities through school refurbishments (or other redevelopment). While not strictly about cycling, the new hubs should be accessible by bike/active travel. The areas involved are: Airdrie, Bellshill, Coatbridge, Cumbernauld, Kilsyth, Motherwell, ‘Northern Corridor’ (Chryston), Shotts and Wishaw. </p>



<p>Each area is covered in one of the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.northlanarkshire.gov.uk/regeneration-and-investment/towns-and-communities/place-vision/town-and-community-hubs/town-hub-location-survey" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">videos on the consultation webpage</a>. You can watch them on the page or by clicking the red link to open them in a new tab/window. There are also videos at the foot of the page explaining the thinking behind the project. Each area has a link to a survey to give your views. There’s no obvious closing date for this one.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-five">1.5: GUS –&nbsp;GUSM74 Urban Sports Sculpture Park survey</h4>



<p>First covered in&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-81-2-march-2021-13315#one-nine" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 81, Item 1.9</a>, the GUSM74 skate park would transform an area under the motorway near West St underground station. The&nbsp;<a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/glasgowurban" target="_blank">GUSM74 survey</a>&nbsp;is still open for BMX riders, skaters, or their families, to have their say.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations</strong></h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="two-one">2.1: Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;Pollok pop-up lanes consultation (Spaces for People)</h4>



<p>The city council added pop-up cycle lanes in Pollok on Braidcraft Rd and Brockburn Rd (as mentioned in the Spaces for People Update in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-84-13-april-2021-13767" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 84</a>). As in other areas, the new lanes used &#8216;soft segregation&#8217; (black &amp; white &#8216;zebras&#8217;). They generated a lot of discussion on social media, especially Facebook. A <a href="https://www.facebook.com/CllrDavidMcDonald/posts/3777568095675219" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Facebook post by Cllr David McDonald</a> talked about a future GCC consultation. It was apparently due to start on 7 May but there doesn&#8217;t seem to be any further information so far. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 3:</strong>&nbsp;<strong>Consultation Feedback</strong></h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-one">3.1: Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;East City Way Phase 1 (London Dr to Daldowie Rd) Order 2021</h4>



<p>This was covered in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-80-16-february-2021-13179#one-five" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 80, Item 1.5</a> with further responses in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-82-16-march-2021-13425#three-one" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 82, 3.1</a>. GCC have emailed to confirm it&#8217;s going ahead as proposed. Hopefully, this and the image in the Infrastructure Update, mean the first phase is just about complete. </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-two">3.2: Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;London Road and Hamilton Road (30mph Speed Limit) Order 2021</h4>



<p>This order has gone hand-in-hand with the above since <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-80-16-february-2021-13179#one-six" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 80, Item 1.6</a>. It&#8217;s also been approved. Both orders were made on 30th April 2021 with adverts in the Evening Times on 6th May 2021.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-three">3.3: Multiplex –&nbsp;Glasgow Uni campus, May newsletter</h4>



<p>Quick off the mark this month are Multiplex with their <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Glasgow-Uni-May-2021.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">May newsletter</a> about the Glasgow Uni campus redevelopment. </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-four">3.4: Urban Roots –&nbsp;Malls Mire,&nbsp;April Newsletter</h4>



<p>First covered in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-74-24-november-2020-12604#three-four" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 74, Item 3.4</a>, we&#8217;re a wee bit late with the <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Malls-Mire-Newsletter-April-2021.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">April newsletter</a>. Apparently some paths may be rerouted to allow work to take place. On the plus side, the bike pump track is looking good!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">13927</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consultation Digest (Local) Issue 84, 13 April 2021</title>
		<link>https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-84-13-april-2021-13767</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Y]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2021 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Consultation digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoBike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ardrossan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barriers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Braidcraft Rd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brockburn Rd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cambridge St]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cowcaddens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dawsholm Park]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[districts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Dunbartonshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glasgow city council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GUSM74]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[learning quarter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London Rd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malls Mire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryhill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merchant City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[townhead]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gobike.org/?p=13767</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A handful of consultations and the latest on Spaces for People. This is the second Digest during the pre-election period so things are still a bit quiet. This Digest is mostly about Glasgow with a wee bit from North Ayrshire and East Dunbartonshire. Again, this Digest features an update about recent infrastructure developments. This time &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-84-13-april-2021-13767" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Consultation Digest (Local) Issue 84, 13 April 2021"</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A handful of consultations and the latest on Spaces for People. </h2>



<p>This is the second Digest during the pre-election period so things are still a bit quiet. This Digest is mostly about Glasgow with a wee bit from North Ayrshire and East Dunbartonshire.</p>



<p>Again, this Digest features an update about recent infrastructure developments. This time focusing on Glasgow&#8217;s latest Spaces for People measures (following on from Howard St last time). A few new lanes are going in Pollok and some in the north east of the city. The city centre has some new planter boxes and should get another new lane (eventually).</p>



<span id="more-13767"></span>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="infra-update">Glasgow Spaces for People Update</h3>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li><a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/26693" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Braidcraft Rd plans</a>.</li><li><a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/26692" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Brockburn Rd plans</a> and <a href="https://www.glasgowtimes.co.uk/news/19226857.cycling-group-hits-back-petition-lanes/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GoBike&#8217;s response to &#8216;bikelash&#8217; in Glasgow Times</a> making front page news!</li><li><a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/26735" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Cambridge St plans</a> which may not have started yet due to <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Cambridge-St-roadworks_9450_1000px.jpg" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">water main works</a> (and the usual considerate parking). </li><li><a href="https://twitter.com/RiderGlasgow/status/1377290772832206857?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Planter boxes installed on Candleriggs, Merchant City</a> (to make way for outdoor seating?). More on Bell Street, Wilson Street and Trongate.</li><li><a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/London-Rd-Fielden-St_9441_1000px.jpg" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">London Rd roadworks near Fielden St</a> and <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/London-Rd-Clyde-Gateway_9439_1000px.jpg" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">more near Celtic Park</a> (possibly to lay cable?). Missing zebras/armadillos have been replaced outside Celtic Park/Emirates and lane cleaned.</li><li><a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/26852" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Royston Rd plans</a>.</li><li><a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/26851" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Wallacewell Rd plans</a>.</li></ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Barriers Overload Update</h3>



<p><a href="https://twitter.com/langoo/status/1379473673044824070?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Eembeddedtimeline%7Ctwterm%5Eprofile%3Agobikeglasgow%7Ctwgr%5EeyJ0ZndfZXhwZXJpbWVudHNfY29va2llX2V4cGlyYXRpb24iOnsiYnVja2V0IjoxMjA5NjAwLCJ2ZXJzaW9uIjpudWxsfSwidGZ3X2hvcml6b25fdHdlZXRfZW1iZWRfOTU1NSI6eyJidWNrZXQiOiJodGUiLCJ2ZXJzaW9uIjpudWxsfX0%3D&amp;ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.gobike.org%2Fconsultation-digest-local-issue-83-30-march-2021-13568" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Dawsholm Park barriers</a> –&nbsp;three(!) sets added to new path.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="block-2e87f9c2-a8af-4262-bff7-8842c5412bae"><strong>Contents</strong><br>(new consultations in&nbsp;<strong>bold</strong>&nbsp;– link jumps to article)</h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 1: Current Consultations</h4>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li><strong><a href="#one-one">Ardrossan Connections –&nbsp;Design Festival</a> (workshops 14/21 April)</strong></li><li><a href="#one-two">Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;(Y)our City Centre Districts, (Y)our Ideas &amp; Proposals Workshops</a> (22/26 April)</li><li><a href="#one-three">East Dunbartonshire Council – Climate Conversation</a><span style="font-size: 1rem;">&nbsp;(online event 22 April)</span></li><li><a href="#one-four">Maryhill North Transformational Regeneration Area – Masterplan consultation</a>&nbsp;(ends 23 April)</li><li><a href="#one-five">Glasgow Urban Sports –&nbsp;GUSM74 Urban Sports Sculpture Park survey</a></li></ol>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations</h4>



<p>None this time.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 3: Consultation Feedback</h4>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li><a href="#three-one">Malls Mire newsletter – March 2021</a></li></ol>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="block-ad6eda16-21e7-4a1f-984d-21f675cbe2c1"><strong>Section 1: Current Consultations<br></strong>(in date order for responses)</h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-one">1.1:&nbsp;Ardrossan Connections –&nbsp;Design Festival</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="249" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Ardrossan-Connection-illustration.png?resize=525%2C249&#038;ssl=1" alt="Illustration of key areas of Ardrossan (looking south)" class="wp-image-13791" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Ardrossan-Connection-illustration.png?resize=600%2C285&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Ardrossan-Connection-illustration.png?resize=300%2C143&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Ardrossan-Connection-illustration.png?w=1521&amp;ssl=1 1521w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Ardrossan-Connection-illustration.png?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /></figure>



<p>First covered in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-78-19-january-2021-13078#one-two" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 78 (1.2)</a>, Ardrossan Connections is about improving links and public spaces in the Ayrshire coastal town. See the <a href="https://ardrossanconnections.commonplace.is/about" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">webpage about the project</a> or <a href="https://s3-eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/commonplace-customer-assets/ardrossandesignfestival/Information%20boards%20Ardrossan%20Connections%20March%202021.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">information boards</a> for more background or view comments on the <a href="https://ardrossanconnections.commonplace.is/comments" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ardrossan Commonplace map</a>.</p>



<p>The latest phase of the project is a &#8216;Design Festival&#8217; from 7–27 April.  In other words, some design workshops (announced just after the last Digest). GoBike members will probably be more interested in the &#8216;Connections&#8217; design workshops on 14 and 21 April. There are also &#8216;Placemaking&#8217; workshops on 20 and 26 April. Each workshop is shown on the <a href="https://ardrossandesignfestival.commonplace.is/overview" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Design Festival page</a> –&nbsp;click the one you want to go to its sign-up link. </p>



<p>Alternatively, if you can&#8217;t make any of the workshops, you might be able to use the <a href="https://en-gb.padlet.com/eilidhsustrans/Ardrossan" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ardrossan &#8216;padlet&#8217;</a> to add a design idea as a pin on the map (zoom in –&nbsp;a lot!).</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-two">1.2: Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;(Y)our City Centre Districts, (Y)our Ideas &amp; Proposals Workshops </h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="396" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Your-City-Centre-Districts-Base-Map.jpeg?resize=525%2C396&#038;ssl=1" alt="Map of (Y)our City Centre Districts with current phase highlighted (Cowcaddens, Townhead, 'Learning Quarter and Merchant City)" class="wp-image-13773" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Your-City-Centre-Districts-Base-Map.jpeg?w=530&amp;ssl=1 530w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Your-City-Centre-Districts-Base-Map.jpeg?resize=300%2C226&amp;ssl=1 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Map of (Y)our City Centre Districts with current phase highlighted</figcaption></figure>



<p>The city centre districts projects have been featured several times, including <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-74-24-november-2020-12604#one-two" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 74, 1.2</a>. These are about major regeneration, with an emphasis on transport and community. The four districts being consulted on in this phase are Cowcaddens, Townhead, Merchant City and &#8216;Learning Quarter&#8217; (Cathedral St, etc.). The <a href="https://yourcitycentre2020.commonplace.is/comments" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">districts Commonplace map</a> is still open but the focus will be on the outcome of the latest workshops.</p>



<p>Proposals Workshops are coming up for&nbsp;Merchant City on 22 April and &#8216;Learning Quarter&#8217; on 26 April. Timetables for each online event are on the <a href="https://www.glasgowcitycentrestrategy.com/city-centre-workshops" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">City Centre Strategy workshops page</a>. </p>



<p>Cowcaddens and Townhead have already had their workshops. The same webpage showcases the themes which came out of those. &#8216;(Y)our Ideas&#8217;, are numbered –&nbsp;clicking each takes you to a PDF summary about it. Underneath the themes is a button to a survey –&nbsp;it asks which ideas you see as highest priority. </p>



<p>In due course, a similar setup will probably appear for Merchant City/&#8217;Learning Quarter&#8217; after their workshops. </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-three">1.3:&nbsp;East Dunbartonshire Council – Climate Conversation&nbsp;</h4>



<p>This initiative was first covered in&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-82-16-march-2021-13425#one-seven" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 82, Item 1.7</a>. East Dunbartonshire Council didn&#8217;t apply for Spaces for People funding but sustainable transport is part of their <a href="https://www.eastdunbarton.gov.uk/climate-conversation">Climate Conversation webpage</a>. Subsequently, this will feed into three future consultations on the&nbsp;environment, including a new Active Travel Strategy.</p>



<p>The last of their&nbsp;<a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/east-dunbartonshire-climate-conversation-tickets-143700675589" target="_blank">Climate Conversation events</a> is on&nbsp;22 April (online, using MS Teams). The overall Climate Conversation itself will run until 2 May 2021.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-four">1.4: Maryhill North Transformational Regeneration Area – Masterplan consultation&nbsp;</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="321" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Maryhill-Visual-B-Annotated-min.jpeg?resize=525%2C321&#038;ssl=1" alt="Maryhill TRA – Kilmun St visual" class="wp-image-13784" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Maryhill-Visual-B-Annotated-min-scaled.jpeg?resize=600%2C367&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Maryhill-Visual-B-Annotated-min-scaled.jpeg?resize=300%2C183&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Maryhill-Visual-B-Annotated-min-scaled.jpeg?resize=1536%2C939&amp;ssl=1 1536w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Maryhill-Visual-B-Annotated-min-scaled.jpeg?resize=2048%2C1252&amp;ssl=1 2048w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Maryhill-Visual-B-Annotated-min-scaled.jpeg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption><em>Kimun St visual –</em> new housing and landscaping but no new pavements?</figcaption></figure>



<p>As mentioned in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-83-30-march-2021-13568#one-four" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 83, Item 1.4</a>, this regeneration project is looking at housing and public spaces in Gilshochill, south of Summerston train station. </p>



<p>There are many visualisations on the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.maryhillnorthtra.com/consultations/1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Maryhill North consultation page</a>, most of which look promising. However, there are some very sharp angles in the zigzag paths, which don&#8217;t look very bike-friendly (as seen in the feature photo at the top of this Digest). Also, some of the realigned streets appear to be &#8216;shared space&#8217;, without any pavements. The theory behind shared space is that drivers pay more attention if pavements and markings are removed. However, the reality is often pedestrians get startled by cars and have to dart out the way (or in this case, dive into a hedge!). </p>



<p>If you want to comment on the TRA plans, you have to register first on the above page. Consultation&nbsp;closes on 23 April.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-five">1.5: Glasgow Urban Sports –&nbsp;GUSM74 Urban Sports Sculpture Park survey</h4>



<p>A few comments in the city centre districts Commonplace map ask about more space for skaters. GUS&#8217;s M74 skatepark project would provide that under a flyover near West St subway station. First covered in&nbsp;<a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-81-2-march-2021-13315#one-nine" target="_blank">Digest 81, Item 1.9</a>, the&nbsp;<a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/glasgowurban" target="_blank">GUSM74 survey</a>&nbsp;is still open for BMX riders, skaters, or their families, to have their say about the park. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations</strong></h3>



<p>None this time.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 3:</strong>&nbsp;<strong>Consultation Feedback</strong></h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-one">3.1: Malls Mire newsletter – March 2021</h4>



<p>The first issue of this newsletter featured in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-74-24-november-2020-12604#three-four" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 74, Item 3.4</a>. The Malls Mire project is creating play areas and woodland paths between Toryglen and Rutherglen. </p>



<p>The <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Malls-Mire-Newsletter-March-2021.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">March 2021 newsletter</a> covers the latest construction news about the bike pump track, playgrounds, landscaping and more. See further background about the project on <a href="http://www.clydegateway.com/clyde-gateway-gives-malls-mire-a-new-lease-of-life-as-it-is-transformed-into-a-woodland-retreat/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Clyde Gateway&#8217;s Malls Mire webpage</a>.</p>



<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">13767</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consultation Digest (Local) Issue 83, 30 March 2021</title>
		<link>https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-83-30-march-2021-13568</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Y]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2021 14:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Consultation digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoBike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cessnock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[districts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East City Way]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Dunbartonshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garscube Rd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GUSM74]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard St]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ibrox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kinning Park]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ldp2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London Rd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryhill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nextbike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Lanarkshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plantation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SLCP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[south city way]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Lanarkshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strathclyde Country Park]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yorkhill]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gobike.org/?p=13568</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A little less consultation –&#160;a little more action? Sort of… As predicted in the last Digest, there aren&#8217;t so many consultations due to the pre-election period. This Digest is split between Glasgow and a few items each from East Dunbartonshire and Lanarkshire. However, there are often more developments on the ground around the city in &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-83-30-march-2021-13568" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Consultation Digest (Local) Issue 83, 30 March 2021"</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A little less consultation –&nbsp;a little more action? Sort of…</h2>



<p>As predicted in the last Digest, there aren&#8217;t so many consultations due to the pre-election period. This Digest is split between Glasgow and a few items each from East Dunbartonshire and Lanarkshire. </p>



<p>However, there are often more developments on the ground around the city in March, to complete works before the Public Sector&#8217;s end of Financial Year. Many of us might be restricted to our own council area right now. So, it can help to see that progress is happening somewhere, as it may not feel like it at times. That&#8217;s why this Digest features an Infrastructure Update to bring you up to speed. </p>



<span id="more-13568"></span>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="infra-update">Infrastructure Update</h3>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>Glasgow City Council have just installed <a href="https://twitter.com/UrbanistTOC/status/1376879069078417412?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Spaces for People segregation on the Howard St bike lane</a>. </li><li><a href="https://twitter.com/UrbanistTOC/status/1376871010658615298?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">South City Way now has electronic bike warning signs</a> installed on side streets off Victoria Rd (to alert drivers –&nbsp;triggered by bikes going past).</li><li>GCC have completed a section of <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Garscube-Rd_9234_1200px.jpg" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">segregated cycleway on Garscube Rd</a> from M8 to Sawmillfield St. Work is well underway on <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Garscube-Rd-St-Georges-Rd_9190_1200px.jpg" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">combined crossings at junction with Possil Rd/St George&#8217;s Rd</a>. The next section of route, going north on Garscube Rd, has also started.</li><li>GCC is also working on <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/London-Rd-ECW_9296_1200px.jpg" target="_blank">phase 1 of East City Way</a> on London Rd/Hamilton Rd near Mount Vernon station. Its <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Nextbike-Mt-Vernon_9297_1000px.jpg" target="_blank">new Nextbike station has already been installed</a>.</li><li>Nextbike Glasgow announced <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.nextbike.co.uk/en/glasgow/news/glasgow-nextbike-fleet-expands-as-city-celebrates-one-and-a-quarter-million-rentals/" target="_blank">10 new hire stations</a> (and the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://twitter.com/UrbanistTOC/status/1376614573076312071?s=20" target="_blank">end of the free 30 minutes scheme</a>).</li><li>North Lanarkshire Council are <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Strathy-Park-path-looking-East_9338_1200px.jpg" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">installing a wider shared path</a> at the <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Strathy-Park-path-looking-West_9340_1200px.jpg" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">western end of Strathclyde Park Loch</a> (but it <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Strathy-Park-path-looking-East_9345_1200px.jpg" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">peters out near the playpark</a>). The new path is west of the closed section of the park&#8217;s &#8216;spine road&#8217; –&nbsp;see map in <a href="#one-one">Item 1.1</a>, below.</li></ul>



<p>Ahead of the election in May, see the&nbsp;<a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://action.cyclinguk.org/page/75816/petition/1" target="_blank">Cycling for everyone election petition</a> by Cycling UK in Scotland (extended until 1 April) and <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://pedalonparliament.org/" target="_blank">Pedal on Parliament&#8217;s &#8216;Light the Way&#8217; campaign</a> (24 April).</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="block-2e87f9c2-a8af-4262-bff7-8842c5412bae"><strong>Contents</strong><br>(new consultations in <strong>bold</strong> – link jumps to article)</h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 1: Current Consultations</h4>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li><strong><a href="#one-one">North Lanarkshire Council – Strathclyde Park road closure <strong>consultation</strong></a></strong> <strong>(ends 31 March)</strong></li><li><strong><a href="#one-two">Kinning Park Complex –&nbsp;Sustaining Choices events</a> (1, 3 or 6 April)</strong></li><li><a href="#one-three">East Dunbartonshire Council – Climate Conversation</a> (online event 22 April)</li><li><strong><a href="#one-four">Maryhill North Transformational Regeneration Area – Masterplan consultation</a> (ends 23 April)</strong></li><li><a href="#one-five">Glasgow Urban Sports –&nbsp;GUSM74 Urban Sports Sculpture Park survey</a></li></ol>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations</h4>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li><a href="#two-one">Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;(Y)our &#8216;Learning Quarter&#8217; and Merchant City Proposals Workshops</a></li></ol>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 3: Consultation Feedback</h4>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li><a href="#three-one">Iceni Projects (Glasgow Harbour) –&nbsp;Yorkhill Quay Phase 2 response</a></li><li><a href="#three-two">Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;Active Travel Forum follow-up</a></li><li><strong><a href="#three-three">South Lanarkshire Council –&nbsp;South Lanarkshire Cycling Partnership meeting, 22 March</a></strong></li><li><a href="#three-four">East Dunbartonshire Council –&nbsp;Local Development Plan Newsletter</a></li></ol>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="block-ad6eda16-21e7-4a1f-984d-21f675cbe2c1"><strong>Section 1: Current Consultations<br></strong>(in date order for responses)</h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-one">1.1: North Lanarkshire Council –&nbsp;Strathclyde Park road closure </h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="350" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/strathclyde-park-road-closure-01-1-1000x666px.jpg?resize=525%2C350&#038;ssl=1" alt="Strathclyde Park Spine Road closed to through traffic" class="wp-image-13575" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/strathclyde-park-road-closure-01-1-1000x666px.jpg?resize=600%2C400&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/strathclyde-park-road-closure-01-1-1000x666px.jpg?resize=300%2C200&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/strathclyde-park-road-closure-01-1-1000x666px.jpg?w=1000&amp;ssl=1 1000w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Map showing section of spine road closed to motor traffic</figcaption></figure>



<p>In summer 2020, North Lanarkshire Council used Spaces for People funding to install gates to close off a 2km section of Strathclyde Country Park&#8217;s &#8216;spine road&#8217; to motor traffic. It goes from the roundabout at Bothwellhaugh Rd to the car park entrance near Haughview Rd, Motherwell. It includes part of the course for the 2014 Commonwealth Games triathlon.</p>



<p>NLC are now consulting about whether or not the closure should be made permanent. Most SfP measures in North Lanarkshire have ended (including <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://mars.northlanarkshire.gov.uk/egenda/images/att94089.pdf" target="_blank">other temporary road closures</a>). So, the Strathclyde Park gates are potentially the area’s only active travel legacy from the pandemic. </p>



<p>The road was previously used as a rat run by cars/vans, especially to avoid congestion on the M74 between junctions 5 and 6. Speeding in the park led to wide rubber speed bumps being fitted (but it could still be an issue in between). The road has no pavement, except near M&amp;D’s theme park. There are narrower paths around the loch and surrounding area but they often become crowded. A wider path is under construction at the western end of the loch (see <a href="#infra-update">Infrastructure Update</a>, above).</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="296" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Strathy-Park-gates-W-1000px_9078.jpg?resize=525%2C296&#038;ssl=1" alt="Strathclyde Park Spine Road at Bothwellhaugh roundabout showing bike tyre tracks in mud beside gate" class="wp-image-13572" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Strathy-Park-gates-W-1000px_9078.jpg?resize=600%2C338&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Strathy-Park-gates-W-1000px_9078.jpg?resize=300%2C169&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Strathy-Park-gates-W-1000px_9078.jpg?w=1000&amp;ssl=1 1000w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption><em>Bike tyre tracks in mud beside west gate</em> on Strathclyde Park spine road at Bothwellhaugh Rd roundabout </figcaption></figure>



<p>Since the motor traffic has gone the road has become even more popular with pedestrians and people on bikes (bicycle tyre tracks are visible in the mud either side of the west gates). The park attracts people from surrounding towns in both North and South Lanarkshire. So, keeping the closure would be a boost to active travel in the wider area. </p>



<p>See the survey on the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.strathclydepark.scot/" target="_blank">Strathclyde Park masterplan website</a> but you need to be quick as it ends TODAY 31 March. </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-two">1.2: Kinning Park Complex –&nbsp;Sustaining Choices events </h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="263" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/KP-Plnttn-Cssnck-Ibrx_Sustaining-Choices.jpeg?resize=525%2C263&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-13625" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/KP-Plnttn-Cssnck-Ibrx_Sustaining-Choices.jpeg?resize=600%2C300&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/KP-Plnttn-Cssnck-Ibrx_Sustaining-Choices.jpeg?resize=300%2C150&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/KP-Plnttn-Cssnck-Ibrx_Sustaining-Choices.jpeg?w=800&amp;ssl=1 800w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Graphic showing project area either side of Paisley Road West – Ibrox, Cessnock, Kinning Park and Plantation</figcaption></figure>



<p>Kinning Park Complex ran many community events before the pandemic. The physical centre is closed just now but they&#8217;re still working with the community. These events target areas around the section of Paisley Road West north of the motorway (and a wee bit south of the M8 too). </p>



<p>KPC say they&#8217;re: <em>&#8220;Bringing local people together to determine how walking, wheeling, and cycling can be made easier in Kinning Park, Plantation, Cessnock, and Ibrox.&#8221;</em></p>



<p>The events are part of a wider project called <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.becausewesayso.scot/" target="_blank">Because We Say So!</a> looking at wider community issues (with a nicely designed website). </p>



<p id="one-two">Events take place on 1, 3 and 6 April –&nbsp;see <a href="https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/sustaining-choices-kinning-park-plantation-cessnock-ibrox-tickets-145285098641" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sustaining Choices Eventbrite page</a> to signup.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-three">1.3: East Dunbartonshire Council –&nbsp;Climate Conversation</h4>



<p>This initiative first got a mention in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-82-16-march-2021-13425#one-seven" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 82, Item 1.7</a>. After missing out on Spaces for People funding, East Dunbartonshire Council are getting ahead of the COP26 game with their Climate Conversation surveys and events.</p>



<p>Their <a href="https://www.eastdunbarton.gov.uk/climate-conversation">Climate Conversation webpage</a> says: <em>&#8220;The Climate Conversation is the first stage in preparing an area-wide Climate Action Plan (CAP) for East Dunbartonshire&#8230; We are also commencing work during 2021 on new strategies that will support the objectives of the CAP: the Open Space Strategy; Circular Economy Strategy; and Active Travel Strategy.&#8221;</em> The last one will obviously be of most interest to GoBike (but the other two are also welcome). </p>



<p>EDC have various surveys to fill in –&nbsp;one general, one for businesses and one for young people (all want an email address upfront). There&#8217;s also the last of their <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/east-dunbartonshire-climate-conversation-tickets-143700675589" target="_blank">Climate Conversation events</a> online on&nbsp;22 April (using MS Teams). The overall Climate Conversation itself will run until<strong> </strong>2 May 2021.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-four">1.4: Maryhill North Transformational Regeneration Area – Masterplan Consultation</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="262" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Maryhill-Visual-A-Annotated-1200px.jpg?resize=525%2C262&#038;ssl=1" alt="Maryhill North TRA Masterplan area" class="wp-image-13590" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Maryhill-Visual-A-Annotated-1200px.jpg?resize=600%2C299&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Maryhill-Visual-A-Annotated-1200px.jpg?resize=300%2C149&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Maryhill-Visual-A-Annotated-1200px.jpg?w=1200&amp;ssl=1 1200w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Maryhill-Visual-A-Annotated-1200px.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>A visualisation of Maryhill North TRA Masterplan area from the consultation website (looking south)</figcaption></figure>



<p>GoBike member Colin passed on a link to this consultation for the Maryhill North Transformational Regeneration Area. According to <a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/article/18392/Maryhill-TRA" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Glasgow City Council&#8217;s page on Maryhill TRA</a>, the Maryhill North area is really Gilshochill. It&#8217;s north of Maryhill Rd between the canal locks and Summerston train station. This <a href="https://www.glasgowlive.co.uk/news/glasgow-news/residents-say-future-plans-north-20128545" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Glasgow Live article about the TRA</a> has some more background about the consultation and the masterplan. The main point of the regeneration seems to be improving housing in the area but it includes public spaces and connectivity as well.</p>



<p>The masterplan has a few new paths. The longer one (marked &#8216;B&#8217; in above visual) goes along the ridge north of the Fearnmore Rd tower blocks. Access seems to be from sets of steps and a zigzag path up the hill near Sandbank St. It&#8217;s not clear if it links to Cumlodden Drive (near St Mary&#8217;s Primary School). </p>



<p>Most of the visuals show existing pavements but there aren&#8217;t any in the image for Barrisdale Rd. It&#8217;s just a visualisation but looks like a &#8216;shared space&#8217;. These remove the kerbs that white stick users and guide dogs rely on. There&#8217;s also some sort of water feature next to the trees, which may be more attractive to midges than the locals. </p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="262" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Maryhill-Visual-D-Annotated-1200px.jpg?resize=525%2C262&#038;ssl=1" alt="Visualisation of realigned Barrisdale Rd" class="wp-image-13592" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Maryhill-Visual-D-Annotated-1200px.jpg?resize=600%2C299&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Maryhill-Visual-D-Annotated-1200px.jpg?resize=300%2C149&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Maryhill-Visual-D-Annotated-1200px.jpg?w=1200&amp;ssl=1 1200w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Maryhill-Visual-D-Annotated-1200px.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Visualisation of realigned Barrisdale Rd with built-in pinch points and no pavements</figcaption></figure>



<p>See bigger versions of the above images and more on the <a href="https://www.maryhillnorthtra.com/consultations/1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Maryhill North consultation page</a>. You have to register to leave comments –&nbsp;closes 23 April. </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-five">1.5: Glasgow Urban Sports – GUSM74 Urban Sports Sculpture Park survey</h4>



<p>A different kind of active travel project, which includes improving derelict space. First covered in <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-81-2-march-2021-13315#one-nine" target="_blank">Digest 81, Item 1.9</a>, it&#8217;s for a skate park under the M74 (near West St underground station). The <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/glasgowurban" target="_blank">GUSM74 survey</a> is still open for skaters, or their families, to have their say about what they want to see in the park.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations</strong></h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="two-one">2.1: Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;(Y)our Merchant City and &#8216;Learning Quarter&#8217; Proposals Workshops</h4>



<p>Workshops have been announced for the next few city centre districts – Merchant City (22 April) and &#8216;Learning Quarter&#8217; (29 April). These follow on from the Townhead and  Cowcaddens workshops in 24 March. See the <a href="https://www.glasgowcitycentrestrategy.com/city-centre-workshops" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Workshops page on the City Centre Strategy website</a> for further details.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 3:</strong>&nbsp;<strong>Consultation Feedback</strong></h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-one">3.1: Iceni Projects (Glasgow Harbour) –&nbsp;Yorkhill Quay Phase 2 response</h4>



<p>This high rise development near the Riverside Museum featured most recently in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-82-16-march-2021-13425#one-five" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 82, Item 1.5</a>. Tricia and other GoBike members put in email responses during its pre-application period. Points raised included building housing on a previously industrial site, lack of connectivity to Yorkhill/Finnieston and the height of the proposed buildings.</p>



<p>Iceni Projects (who represent Glasgow Harbour Ltd and other partners) sent out  a short acknowledgement:</p>



<p><em>&#8220;Thank you to you and GoBike members for taking the time to review the consultation proposals for the Yorkhill Quay site and for your comments. These will be reviewed by the project design team as plans for the site are developed.</em></p>



<p><em>Please feel free to get in touch if you have any additional queries.&#8221;</em></p>



<p>The next stage should be a full planning application to Glasgow City Council. </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-two">3.2: Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;Active Travel Forum follow-up</h4>



<p>Tricia followed up some points about Spaces for People after the ATF&#8217;s first online meeting in March. An email from Neighbourhoods Regeneration and Sustainability said: </p>



<p><em>&#8220;The project team are currently fully committed to installing a 2nd batch of measures (George Square and Merchant City planters, etc). After this will be a period of monitoring to assess use and impact of the works, accompanied by recording all correspondence of support or objection.<br>The department has been instructed to take all permeance decisions to the City Administration Committee. Therefore the monitoring work will accompany the report to committee, at which a decision will be made as to what projects are removed/revisited/made permanent, etc.&#8221;</em></p>



<p>It also says there&#8217;s no timescale for the above just yet. However, the current SfP TROs will run out in December 2021. Any measures that are continuing would really want to have a new order ready by then. </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-three">3.3: South Lanarkshire Council –&nbsp;South Lanarkshire&nbsp;Cycling Partnership meeting, 22 March</h4>



<p>Fewer consultations in this Digest mean there&#8217;s space for feedback from the last SLCP meeting. While Glasgow&#8217;s Active Travel Forum feeds into committees with published minutes and articles in local media, SLCP is a bit more under the radar. There is an <a href="http://southlancycling.org.uk/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">SLCP website</a> but it&#8217;s very generic and never really updated about what the partnership does.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Background </h5>



<p>SLCP is made up of roughly half council personnel, including a few councillors plus officers for Roads &amp; Transportation, Access, Air Quality, etc. The other half are from organisations including Sustrans, Cycling UK, Bike Town, NHS, SEPA, local cycling groups and development trusts. Various GoBike members have attended for a range of organisations. Jimmy Keenan has been GoBike&#8217;s official rep for many years. More recently your editor has represented GoBike (especially since the meetings went online in 2020). </p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Active Travel Studies</h5>



<p>In recent years, SLC have had a transport consultancy do an active travel study for each town/area in turn. A public consultation leads to stakeholder workshops then a final network map. The consultation and network maps are used to plan where initial active travel routes will go. SLC bids for funds for design (by Sustrans) and then construction. </p>



<p>The three <a href="https://www.southlanarkshire.gov.uk/downloads/download/982/active_travel_network" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">network maps</a> published in February brings the total to five. Consultations took place in Jan/Feb 2021 for three more areas (see <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-79-2-february-2021-13147#one-two" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 79, Item 1.2</a>) with workshops to follow. An ongoing project for an improved active travel link from Bothwell to the Raith Interchange will be looked at in the Blantyre/Bothwell/Uddingston study. </p>



<p>East Kilbride&#8217;s AT study was in 2018, which led to the first phase of segregated cycleway on West Mains Rd in 2020. The next phase is under construction (before a combined crossing junction planned for later in the year). Designs for Whitemoss Ave are due to go to consultation in the next few months.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="296" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/EK-W-Mains-Rd_Nov-2020_1200px.jpg?resize=525%2C296&#038;ssl=1" alt="Combined crossing on West Mains Rd, East Kilbride" class="wp-image-13608" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/EK-W-Mains-Rd_Nov-2020_1200px.jpg?resize=600%2C338&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/EK-W-Mains-Rd_Nov-2020_1200px.jpg?resize=300%2C169&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/EK-W-Mains-Rd_Nov-2020_1200px.jpg?w=1200&amp;ssl=1 1200w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/EK-W-Mains-Rd_Nov-2020_1200px.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Combined crossing on phase 1 of West Mains Rd, East Kilbride (black cycleway is due to weather to pink)</figcaption></figure>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Spaces for People</h5>



<p>A Spaces for People funded route is due to go from EK train station to Brouster Hill and Cornwall St in the town centre by May. SfP are also funding mandatory 20mph areas to be set up in the next few months at around 90 schools and some smaller town centres (Carluke, Lanark, Uddingston, Larkhall, Bothwell and Strathaven). Also, SfP money was spent on vegetation cutting on NCN75, which should be complete this month. </p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Make Your Way</h5>



<p>Sarah from Rural Development Trust&#8217;s Community Action Lanarkshire programme presented to the meeting. She spoke about the Make Your Way: Key Links projects in Abington, Douglas and Leadhills/Wanlockhead (<a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-75-8-december-2020-12699#one-three" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 75 Item 1.3</a>). These use Sustrans Places for Everyone funding (70%). Stage 2 concept designs are due soon with construction planned for 2022. </p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Tinto Hill Improvements</h5>



<p>The list of capital projects included an eye-catching £140,000 of Cycling Walking Safer Streets funding on car park improvements near Tinto Hill. Officer said irresponsible parking had caused knock-on effects for Thankerton/Carmichael/A73 (including for passing pedestrians and cyclists). Also, it helped access to a popular hillwalking route and the work included some cycle parking.</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Clyde Cycle Park</h5>



<p><a href="https://cambuslangcommunitycouncil.com/cambuslang-cycling-project/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Clyde Cycle Park</a> is a project to re-develop land as a national-standard road racing cycle circuit. The site is between Bogleshole Road and the River Clyde (near the Liberty steel plant). Planning is complete and ground investigation has started. Aiming to have track open by summer. SLC to look at connections to new facility as part of south bank route.  </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-four">3.4: East Dunbartonshire Council –&nbsp;Local Development Plan Newsletter</h4>



<p>Another appearance from East Dunbartonshire Council. The <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/East-Dunbarton-LDP-Newsletter-61-November-2020.docx.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">latest newsletter from their Land Planning Policy team</a> includes an update on their proposed LDP2. The consultation finished in January with 2,000+ responses. Also, they cover their Historic Environment Review, Forestry &amp; Woodland Strategy and Climate Action Plan. The countdown to their Active Travel Strategy presumably starts now…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">13568</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
