<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sustrans &#8211; GoBike</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.gobike.org/tag/sustrans/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.gobike.org</link>
	<description>Strathclyde Cycle Campaign</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 13:35:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">67217435</site>	<item>
		<title>Children&#8217;s Walking and Cycling Index published</title>
		<link>https://www.gobike.org/childrens-walking-and-cycling-index-published-23662</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GoBike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2025 16:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[GoBike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustrans]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gobike.org/?p=23662</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sustrans has created the first ever Children’s Walking and Cycling Index, designed to help better understand the behaviours, barriers and attitudes affecting how children walk, wheel and cycle in the UK. Children are often overlooked by decision-makers in transport except on journeys to and from school. This leaves out the role that travel plays in &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://www.gobike.org/childrens-walking-and-cycling-index-published-23662" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Children&#8217;s Walking and Cycling Index published"</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sustrans has created the first ever <a href="https://www.sustrans.org.uk/the-walking-and-cycling-index/childrens-walking-and-cycling-index/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Children’s Walking and Cycling Index</a>, designed to help better understand the behaviours, barriers and attitudes affecting how children walk, wheel and cycle in the UK.</p>
<p>Children are often overlooked by decision-makers in transport except on journeys to and from school.</p>
<p>This leaves out the role that travel plays in their day-to-day lives, supporting development of their independence, socialisation skills, overall mental health and wellbeing, and reducing the family workload.</p>
<p>This <a href="https://www.sustrans.org.uk/the-walking-and-cycling-index/childrens-walking-and-cycling-index/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">new report</a> gives a voice to children across the UK.</p>
<p><span id="more-23662"></span></p>
<p>And by listening to young people, decision-makers can change how they approach children’s journeys so we can make walking, wheeling and cycling a more attractive, and everyday way for children to travel.</p>
<blockquote>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Children’s needs must be prioritised</strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Sustrans are calling for children’s needs to be prioritised when councils are planning transport improvements in their area.</p>
<p><img data-recalc-dims="1" fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-23694" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Sustrans_WACI_Childrens_Image.png?resize=525%2C157&#038;ssl=1" alt="" width="525" height="157" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Sustrans_WACI_Childrens_Image.png?resize=600%2C179&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Sustrans_WACI_Childrens_Image.png?resize=300%2C90&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Sustrans_WACI_Childrens_Image.png?resize=1536%2C458&amp;ssl=1 1536w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Sustrans_WACI_Childrens_Image.png?w=1639&amp;ssl=1 1639w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Sustrans_WACI_Childrens_Image.png?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="(max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /></p>
<p>Transport design that is inclusive for children is safer and more accessible for everyone, opening up opportunities for healthier lives through giving people a real choice about how they make short journeys in their area.</p>
<p>Amid an obesity epidemic and an urgent need to reduce pressure on the National Health Service, walking and cycling offers both a prevention and a solution to poor health that is important to the mission of every government in the UK to improve people’s health.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="https://www.sustrans.org.uk/the-walking-and-cycling-index/childrens-walking-and-cycling-index/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://www.sustrans.org.uk/the-walking-and-cycling-index/childrens-walking-and-cycling-index/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">23662</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consultation Digest (Local) Issue 94, 31 August 2021</title>
		<link>https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-94-31-august-2021-15016</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Y]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2021 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Consultation digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoBike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auldhouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ayr Road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bellshill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[car parking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[city centre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COP26]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cycle parking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Dunbartonshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Renfrewshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gartnavel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glasgow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inner East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ldp2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LEZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London Rd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHS GG&C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Lanarkshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renfrewshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royston Rd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spaces for people]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustrans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TRNSMT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Woodside]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gobike.org/?p=15016</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Consultations baton change. As the 2020 Paralympics take place in Tokyo, how is Glasgow looking towards its own global event: COP26? Currently, the city council has a new, short notice consultation about suspending public access rights. You may have seen GoBike banners on the subject or media coverage of support from Scotland&#8217;s new Active Travel &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-94-31-august-2021-15016" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Consultation Digest (Local) Issue 94, 31 August 2021"</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Consultations baton change.</h2>



<p>As the 2020 Paralympics take place in Tokyo, how is Glasgow looking towards its own global event: COP26? Currently, the city council has a new, short notice consultation about suspending public access rights. You may have seen GoBike banners on the subject or media coverage of support from Scotland&#8217;s new Active Travel minister – Green MSP, Patrick Harvie. It&#8217;s also a last call for the survey on Glasgow&#8217;s Low Emission Zone.  </p>



<p>It&#8217;s a final fling for a handful of consultations around Glasgow (and one in Renfrewshire). There&#8217;s a bit longer for a few others –&nbsp;a new survey on secure cycle parking in the city centre and the last leg of East Dunbartonshire&#8217;s Active Travel Discussion. </p>



<span id="more-15016"></span>



<p>Your author is also going on holiday so the next Digest may or may not be in its usual slot or by its usual writer…</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="block-2e87f9c2-a8af-4262-bff7-8842c5412bae"><strong>Contents</strong><br>(new consultations in&nbsp;<strong>bold</strong>&nbsp;– link jumps to article)</h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 1: Current Consultations</h4>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li><span style="font-size: 1rem;"><a href="#one-one">Glasgow City Council – Low Emission Zone consultation</a> (ends 2 Sep)</span></li><li><strong><a href="#one-two">Glasgow City Council – COP 26 Section 11 Order: Suspension of Public Access Rights</a> (ends 3 Sep)</strong></li><li><a href="#one-three">Rosemount Development Trust – Royston Road Masterplan</a> (ends 3 Sep)</li><li><a href="#one-four">Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;Inner East Strategic Development Framework</a> (ends 3 Sep)</li><li><a href="#one-five">Renfrewshire Council –&nbsp;Improving Barshaw Park Junction, Paisley</a> (ends 5 Sep)</li><li><strong><a href="#one-six">Queens Cross Housing Association –&nbsp;Woodside Making Places:&nbsp;Planning Application</a></strong> <strong>(deadline: 6 Sep)</strong></li><li><strong><a href="#one-seven">NHS Greater Glasgow &amp; Clyde/Sustrans –&nbsp;Gartnavel Active Travel Feasibility Study</a> (<strong>ends 10 Sep)</strong></strong></li><li><a href="#one-eight">East Renfrewshire Council –&nbsp;Ayr Road (A77): Spaces for People, Phase 2</a></li><li><a href="#one-nine">East Dunbartonshire Council – Active Travel Discussion</a>&nbsp;(ends 28 Sep)</li><li><strong><a href="#one-ten">Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;Secure City Cycle Parking Survey</a> (ends 3 Oct)</strong></li></ol>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations</h4>



<p>None this time.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 3: Consultation Feedback</h4>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li><a href="#three-one">Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;TRNSMT Festival and Access to NCN75</a></li><li><a href="#three-two">North Lanarkshire Council – Bellshill Gateway &amp; Cycle Facilities project</a></li><li><strong><a href="#three-three">Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;London Rd Spaces for People lanes at Celtic Park</a></strong></li><li><strong><a href="#three-four">East Renfrewshire Council – Proposed Local Development Plan 2</a></strong></li><li><a href="#three-five">Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;Auldhouse Area Traffic Management Order</a></li></ol>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="block-cc85ef75-cc87-4a82-a726-8f744aa66a48"><strong>Section 1: Current Consultations<br></strong>(in date order for responses)</h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-one">1.1: Glasgow City Council – Low Emission Zone consultation </h4>



<p>It was&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-90-6-july-2021-14538#one-three" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 90, Item 1.3</a>&nbsp;when we first mentioned this consultation about phase 2 of the Low Emission Zone in Glasgow city centre. Phase 1 applied to local buses only.&nbsp;Phase 2&nbsp;will include all motor vehicles driven into the zone area between the M8, river and High St (unless exempt, like Blue Badge holders). </p>



<p>The LEZ area is smaller than the <a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=32491&amp;p=0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">City Centre Air Quality Management area</a>, which includes the M8 and parts of Bridge St and Royston Rd. There are only two other AQMAs in Glasgow – Byres Rd/Dumbarton Rd and Parkhead Cross –&nbsp;since the city-wide AQMA was <a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=36923&amp;p=0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">revoked in 2016</a>. Further background is on <a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/index.aspx?articleid=18863" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Glasgow&#8217;s Local Air Quality Management pages</a>.</p>



<p>The area the LEZ covers is one of the questions asked in the survey. Enforcement is another –&nbsp;it&#8217;s only due to start in June 2023 (or 2024 for people who live in the city centre). </p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" decoding="async" width="525" height="340" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Glasgow-LEZ-area_1200px.jpg?resize=525%2C340&#038;ssl=1" alt="Glasgow LEZ area map" class="wp-image-14684" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Glasgow-LEZ-area_1200px.jpg?resize=600%2C388&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Glasgow-LEZ-area_1200px.jpg?resize=300%2C194&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Glasgow-LEZ-area_1200px.jpg?w=1200&amp;ssl=1 1200w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Glasgow-LEZ-area_1200px.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="(max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>The Glasgow LEZ area –&nbsp;detail overload (maybe better maps would help response rates?)</figcaption></figure>



<p>When enforcement does start, fines will escalate for repeat offences (doubling each time within a 90 day period). </p>



<p>The city council have sent GoBike a few reminder emails about this one, which suggests they&#8217;re not getting the level of response they were looking for. If you want to influence the shape of the zone (literally) or when it kicks in, see the&nbsp;<a href="https://glasgow.gov.uk/27143" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Glasgow LEZ consultation page</a>, <a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=53713&amp;p=0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">LEZ consultation document</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.smartsurvey.co.uk/s/GCC_LEZ2021/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">LEZ online survey</a>. Closes on Thursday <strong>2 September</strong>.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-two">1.2: Glasgow City Council – COP 26 Section 11 Order: Suspension of Public Access Rights</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" decoding="async" width="525" height="394" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/GB-COP26-banner-GlaGrn_1398_1200px.jpg?resize=525%2C394&#038;ssl=1" alt="GoBike paths petition banner on NCN7, one of the routes affected" class="wp-image-15119" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/GB-COP26-banner-GlaGrn_1398_1200px.jpg?resize=600%2C450&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/GB-COP26-banner-GlaGrn_1398_1200px.jpg?resize=300%2C225&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/GB-COP26-banner-GlaGrn_1398_1200px.jpg?w=1200&amp;ssl=1 1200w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/GB-COP26-banner-GlaGrn_1398_1200px.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="(max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption><em>GoBike put up banners about our path closures petition – this one is on NCN75 at Glasgow Gree</em>n <em>(photo &amp; banner design: </em><a href="https://dashedlines.uk/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Dashed Lines</a><em>, illustrations: </em><a href="https://twitter.com/Flood_Jo" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Josephine Flood</a><em>)</em></figcaption></figure>



<p>This is about main active travel routes being closed during October/November around the COP26 climate conference at the SEC. The &#8216;exclusion zone&#8217; would cover a large area from Ferry Rd to Finnieston St and bridges in Anderston. The cycling diversions will be much longer and less safe than the parts of NCN7 and the West City Way that they replace.  <a href="https://www.gobike.org/petition-to-keep-active-travel-routes-open-during-cop26-14721" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GoBike started a petition about keeping routes open</a> (for Glasgow residents only). We also proposed changes to the council&#8217;s plans. </p>



<p>See <a href="https://www.gobike.org/active-travel-lanes-needed-in-face-of-cop26-route-closures-15003" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">our blog about the closures</a> for more in-depth information and our social media for updates. <a href="https://www.glasgowconsult.co.uk/KMS/dmart.aspx?strTab=PublicDMartCurrent&amp;NoIP=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GCC access rights consultation</a> ends Friday <strong>3 September</strong>. </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-three">1.3: Rosemount Development Trust – Royston Road Masterplan </h4>



<p>This debuted last time in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-93-17-august-2021-14883#one-five" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 93, 1.5</a>. It&#8217;s about regenerating the western part of Royston Rd. It&#8217;s a part of the <a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=32491&amp;p=0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">City Centre AQMA</a> but not in the LEZ. That doesn&#8217;t seem to be mentioned while speeding, litter and other issues are. Equally, the project phases outlined in board 6 don&#8217;t include cycling at all. Surely it has to be part of the solution, especially with On Bikes&#8217; <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-92-3-august-2021-14734#one-two" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Flourishing Molendinar project</a> (Digest 92, Item 1.2) just up the same road? This Royston Rd project and theirs both need safe active travel connections to the city centre and Sighthill. </p>



<p>If you know the area at all, please put the case for cycling infrastructure. See the&nbsp;<a href="https://forms.office.com/pages/responsepage.aspx?id=gUi6qJGtYkqwntSr9e8xsVoOG-pfsYdGh_JLYOVG80NUOTIxMDRGRks4NzFST1NISENNM0swWDlERS4u" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Royston regeneration survey</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://photos.google.com/share/AF1QipOfRSa4KS5dZywsZU2SI2H2eQLXiFhjUYEOh9XN0w4F0amGWNRcWcbZj7pkJhguYg?key=OVdfZjZ4Zmp3dVV3OU1NMXJWa2tRQURaTVN1MkRB" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">information boards</a>&nbsp;(ends&nbsp;Friday <strong>3 September</strong>).</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-four">1.4: Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;Inner East Strategic Development Framework </h4>



<p>Another SDF (and another <a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=32493&amp;p=0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">AQMA –&nbsp;Parkhead Cross</a>) first covered in in&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-90-6-july-2021-14538#one-four" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 90, Item 1.4</a>. &#8216;Inner East&#8217; is an arbitrary area made up by the council, who&#8217;ve decided Parkhead is the main place East Enders want to get to. While the Forge Shopping Centre is important for many, there&#8217;s an assumption here that all roads lead to Parkhead (including phase 3 of the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glasgow_East_End_Regeneration_Route" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">East End Regeneration Route dual carriageway</a>). A train station for Parkhead gets a few mentions but that&#8217;s what the&nbsp;<a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20121004082411/http://www.glasgow.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/AF0E7C52-1258-4BF4-A435-B79A81501DB4/0/EELDS.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">East End Local Development Strategy</a>&nbsp;said back in 2008. Active travel is mentioned a lot but road-building still seems to be central.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="alignright size-medium"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="298" height="300" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Inner-East_Bridgeton-error_ScreenShot-2021_800px.jpg?resize=298%2C300&#038;ssl=1" alt="Bridgeton map with mistakes" class="wp-image-15407" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Inner-East_Bridgeton-error_ScreenShot-2021_800px.jpg?resize=298%2C300&amp;ssl=1 298w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Inner-East_Bridgeton-error_ScreenShot-2021_800px.jpg?resize=596%2C600&amp;ssl=1 596w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Inner-East_Bridgeton-error_ScreenShot-2021_800px.jpg?resize=150%2C150&amp;ssl=1 150w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Inner-East_Bridgeton-error_ScreenShot-2021_800px.jpg?resize=100%2C100&amp;ssl=1 100w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Inner-East_Bridgeton-error_ScreenShot-2021_800px.jpg?w=800&amp;ssl=1 800w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 298px) 100vw, 298px" /><figcaption>&#8216;Draft&#8217; Bridgeton map with Alexandra Parade and Duke St stations on it for some reason</figcaption></figure></div>



<p>There are many more assumptions (<em>&#8220;locals prefer to drive to the forge&#8221;</em>) and errors in this SDF. The maps seem rushed, especially the Bridgeton map with two wrong train stations superimposed on it. </p>



<p>On a more positive note, there are a few mentions of permeability. One is about the paths through the <a href="https://www.scottishconstructionnow.com/article/funding-boost-for-250-flat-project-at-glasgow-meatmarket" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Meatmarket site</a> (under construction at Duke St/Bellgrove St) and there are other examples not in the document, like <a href="https://www.riversidedalmarnock.co.uk/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Riverside Dalmarnock</a>. </p>



<p>The council talks up some recent developments by GCC and partners like Clyde Gateway, who have built a lot in the East End in the last decade or so (and do include <a href="https://goo.gl/maps/tHUFaakuP4C2ZzFC9" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">cycle parking in their developments</a>). However, people have to cycle through the car park of <a href="https://goo.gl/maps/F4soCrvaw9BMU7558" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Red Tree, Shawfield</a> as CG didn&#8217;t reconnect the path properly between NCN 756 and the <a href="https://goo.gl/maps/fNXdUHAvTs1ALcrT8" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Smartbridge</a> (despite being asked). GCC also missed an opportunity to add protected cycle lanes in its Calton-Barras Action Plan (CBAP). So, there are still lessons to be learned.   </p>



<p>See the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.glasgowconsult.co.uk/KMS/dmart.aspx?strTab=PublicDMartCurrent&amp;NoIP=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Inner East consultation page</a>&nbsp;for link to the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.smartsurvey.co.uk/s/GCC_SDF_InnerEast/">SDF survey</a>&nbsp;(ends <strong>3 September</strong>).</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-five">1.5: Renfrewshire Council –&nbsp;Improving Barshaw Park Junction, Paisley </h4>



<p>In <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-93-17-august-2021-14883#one-seven" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 93, 1.7</a> we mentioned the plans to improve safety for cycling at Barshaw Park junction. Option 3 had segregated cycle lanes on all roads, while options 1 and 2 only had them on the main road. There was some local hostility to the plans on Facebook  –&nbsp;while not surprising on that platform, the plans will need support to progress. </p>



<p>See the&nbsp;<a href="https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/4a8a2a5b5aff4fe991be7c159c8c0031" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Barshaw Park junction community survey</a>&nbsp;to rate the options&nbsp;(ends <strong>5 September</strong>). </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-six">1.6: Queens Cross Housing Association –&nbsp;Woodside Making Places:&nbsp;Planning Application</h4>



<p>Woodside Making Places is a wide-ranging project for the area around St George&#8217;s Rd and Braid Square, near Garscube Rd. The previous consultation was in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-79-2-february-2021-13147#one-four" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 79, Item 1.4</a> (and an earlier stage in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-65-21-july-2020-whats-happened-to-pavement-parking-proposals-approved-but-not-enacted-plus-a-request-to-contribute-to-the-streets-for-all-glasgow-commonplace-map-and-m-11719" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 65, 3.1</a>). This latest development wasn&#8217;t publicised much but was in a Glasgow Live article about <a href="https://www.glasgowlive.co.uk/news/glasgow-news/glasgows-woodside-transformed-under-regeneration-21267190" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Queens Cross Housing Association submitting a planning application</a>. </p>



<p>It&#8217;s <a href="https://publicaccess.glasgow.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&amp;keyVal=QW8PRNEXKGX00" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">application 21/02266/FUL</a> for &#8220;Renewal of public realm, gardens and greenspaces, including streets and lighting, with comprehensive green infrastructure improvements.&#8221; These include some playparks and a lot of tree planting. The most interesting part for GoBike is the &#8216;Quietway&#8217; cycle route in the <a href="https://publicaccess.glasgow.gov.uk/online-applications/files/D7DE60DF53BE1FA3A004BAE3E8BD1B16/pdf/21_02266_FUL-PHASE_1_-_WINDSOR_TERRACE_AND_N_WOODSIDE_ROAD__1.7___1.8_-4988852.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">plan for North Woodside Road</a>. </p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><a href="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/N_WOODSIDE_ROAD_21_02266_FUL-PHASE_1_1.7_1.8_-4988852_1500px.png?ssl=1"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="371" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/N_WOODSIDE_ROAD_21_02266_FUL-PHASE_1_1.7_1.8_-4988852_1500px.png?resize=525%2C371&#038;ssl=1" alt="N Woodside Rd plans, Woodside Making Places" class="wp-image-15019" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/N_WOODSIDE_ROAD_21_02266_FUL-PHASE_1_1.7_1.8_-4988852_1500px.png?resize=600%2C424&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/N_WOODSIDE_ROAD_21_02266_FUL-PHASE_1_1.7_1.8_-4988852_1500px.png?resize=300%2C212&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/N_WOODSIDE_ROAD_21_02266_FUL-PHASE_1_1.7_1.8_-4988852_1500px.png?w=1500&amp;ssl=1 1500w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/N_WOODSIDE_ROAD_21_02266_FUL-PHASE_1_1.7_1.8_-4988852_1500px.png?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /></a><figcaption>N Woodside Rd plans including red tarmac &#8216;Quietway&#8217; (click image to enlarge)</figcaption></figure>



<p>The red tarmac makes it look like a Dutch &#8216;bicycle street&#8217; (where bikes have priority and cars are &#8216;guests&#8217;). Whether or not it will work that way remains to be seen. However, N Woodside Rd is a residential street, which is already filtered to the west at the junction of Maryhill Rd and Hopehill Rd (as featured in <a href="http://N Woodside R" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 93, 3.3</a>).</p>



<p>N Woodside Rd&#8217;s eastern end will link to segregated cycle lanes on St George&#8217;s Rd, which are part of the Connecting Woodside Project (and lead to the protected junction at Garscube Rd). So, it should be an important link for the wider area. </p>



<p>There was also due to be an improved path south to Phoenix Rd and the planned &#8216;Underline&#8217; cycle route below the M8 between New City Road and Cambridge St. However, <a href="https://trafficscotland.org/tsgms02/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">M8 emergency repairs are underway on the Woodside Viaduct</a> so those Avenue works are being pushed back even further; potentially for a few years. </p>



<p>Deadline for any comments is <strong>6 Sep</strong>. See the <a href="https://www.woodsidemakingplaces.org.uk/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Woodside Making Places website</a> for more background about the project.  </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-seven">1.7: Sustrans –&nbsp;Gartnavel Active Travel Feasibility Study</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="256" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Gartnavel_proposal-1_1356px.jpg?resize=525%2C256&#038;ssl=1" alt="Illustration of proposed change to Gartnavel's north entrance gate" class="wp-image-15378" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Gartnavel_proposal-1_1356px.jpg?resize=600%2C292&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Gartnavel_proposal-1_1356px.jpg?resize=300%2C146&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Gartnavel_proposal-1_1356px.jpg?w=1356&amp;ssl=1 1356w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Gartnavel_proposal-1_1356px.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Illustration of proposed change to Gartnavel&#8217;s north entrance gate</figcaption></figure>



<p>This project first came up in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-60-12-may-2020-the-lockdown-goes-on-but-will-we-learn-from-it-11199" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 60, Item 3.3</a> and most recently in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-90-6-july-2021-14538#three-two" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 90, Item 3.2</a>. Several GoBike members know the area and engaged with early ideas for the site. A site visit took place in July, when GoBike member Caroline met with the design consultants, ERZ Studio. </p>



<p>The initial proposals from that process are now out for consultation:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>Three shared/side-by-side walking/cycling routes across the site.</li><li>Two new gates created in existing site wall.</li><li>Adjusting crossings at main road junctions.</li><li>Pedestrian precinct/plaza at main hospital buildings. </li><li>Improving access towards Hyndland train station.</li><li>Improving wayfinding signage. </li></ul>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><a href="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Gartnavel-proposals-overview_da5db839-fe94-4abb-fa61-8de61c6758ae.jpeg?ssl=1"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="404" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Gartnavel-proposals-overview_da5db839-fe94-4abb-fa61-8de61c6758ae.jpeg?resize=525%2C404&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-15379" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Gartnavel-proposals-overview_da5db839-fe94-4abb-fa61-8de61c6758ae.jpeg?resize=600%2C462&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Gartnavel-proposals-overview_da5db839-fe94-4abb-fa61-8de61c6758ae.jpeg?resize=300%2C231&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Gartnavel-proposals-overview_da5db839-fe94-4abb-fa61-8de61c6758ae.jpeg?resize=1536%2C1184&amp;ssl=1 1536w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Gartnavel-proposals-overview_da5db839-fe94-4abb-fa61-8de61c6758ae.jpeg?w=1600&amp;ssl=1 1600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Gartnavel-proposals-overview_da5db839-fe94-4abb-fa61-8de61c6758ae.jpeg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /></a><figcaption>Plan of proposed changes to Gartnavel site –&nbsp;click to enlarge</figcaption></figure>



<p>The new northern gate would be next to the existing exit road (as above). However, the proposed eastern gate would open up access from a new location east of the Beatson, through the current stone wall, to <a href="https://goo.gl/maps/17zpZxvVzV52CSqt7" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Hughenden Lane (where you can see the chimney near the </a><a href="https://goo.gl/maps/7HwntY2zLJWWe3tNA" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Beatson</a>).  This &#8216;Quietway&#8217; would be an alternative route between Hughenden and Crow Rd, avoiding the very busy Great Western Rd. While it meanders a bit, it should also link to the more direct Shelley Rd (to the north, alongside Bingham&#8217;s Pond). </p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="333" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Gartnavel_proposal-3_1356px.jpg?resize=525%2C333&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-15385" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Gartnavel_proposal-3_1356px.jpg?resize=600%2C381&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Gartnavel_proposal-3_1356px.jpg?resize=300%2C190&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Gartnavel_proposal-3_1356px.jpg?w=1356&amp;ssl=1 1356w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Gartnavel_proposal-3_1356px.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption><em>Illustration of proposed change to Gartnavel&#8217;s east wall to add a new entrance gate</em></figcaption></figure>



<p>The scope of the project seems to have grown slightly from NHS-owned land to include crossings but not cycleways on the main roads themselves, like Gt Western Rd. Instead, the consultants asked about routes between NHS sites, like Gartnavel and the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital. One query was about a route via the soon-to-be-built Partick–Govan bridge to the QEUH; a mile longer than using the Clyde Tunnel (but might have <a href="https://twitter.com/GoBikeGlasgow/status/1426172744362770438?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">less closures</a>?). </p>



<p>For now, see the <a href="https://www.surveylegend.com/survey/-MgGNrB1yqAUtgvcIySF" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Gartnavel survey</a> –&nbsp;ends <strong>10</strong> <strong>September</strong>.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-eight">1.8: East Renfrewshire Council –&nbsp;Ayr Road (A77): Spaces for People, Phase 2</h4>



<p>Covered in&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-91-20-july-2021-14629#one-five" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 91, Item 1.5</a>, Ayr Rd through Newton Mearns is in a phase 2 consultation. It’s about replacing the&nbsp;<a href="https://erspacesforpeople.commonplace.is/proposals/a-77-ayr-road-pop-up-bike-roll-corridor" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">phase 1 cones</a>&nbsp;with light segregation, removing some segregation and adding parking bays. For examples of the segregation, maps and more details, see the&nbsp;<a href="https://erspacesforpeople.commonplace.is/proposals/a-77-ayr-road-phase-2" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ayr Road Phase 2 Commonplace page</a>. No obvious deadline on this one (but still seems to be open).</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-nine">1.9: East Dunbartonshire Council – Active Travel Discussion&nbsp;</h4>



<p>What can we say about the EDC Active Travel Discussion that hasn&#8217;t already been said? There are two more online events left. See the <a href="https://www.eastdunbarton.gov.uk/active-travel-discussion" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Active Travel Discussion page</a> –&nbsp;ends <strong>28 September</strong>.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-ten">1.10: Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;Secure City Cycle Parking Survey</h4>



<p>Back in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-88-8-june-2021-14260" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 88</a>, in the Infra Update, we mentioned how <a href="https://twitter.com/glasgowcc/status/1394325647934230528?lang=en-gb" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GCC&#8217;s tweet about neighbourhood secure cycle parking drew comments about it missing out the city centre</a>. </p>



<p>Recently, the council launched a survey about <em>&#8220;secure cycle parking in the city centre at travel hubs and places of employment.&#8221;</em> They want to find out the following:</p>



<p><em> &#8220;a greater understanding of travel patterns, frequency of travel, and what type of provision would appeal to those who require to park their bicycle in the city.<br><br>The survey is anonymous and will take approximately 10 minutes to complete.&#8221;</em></p>



<p>Cadogan St multi-storey car park used to have a bike parking area but it wasn&#8217;t the most welcoming place. Perhaps Glasgow could aim for <a href="https://road.cc/content/news/are-these-uks-best-facilities-bike-commuters-283629" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">facilities like this office development in</a><a href="https://road.cc/content/news/are-these-uks-best-facilities-bike-commuters-283629" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> Bristol</a> or <a href="https://activetravel.tfgm.com/cycling/cycle-parking/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Manchester&#8217;s Cycle Hubs</a>.</p>



<p>Considering the spate of bike thefts across the city during the pandemic, this seems like a good chance to ask for more secure bike parking. See the <a href="https://www.glasgowconsult.co.uk/KMS/dmart.aspx?strTab=PublicDMartCurrent&amp;NoIP=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GCC city centre cycle parking consultation page</a> and <a href="https://www.smartsurvey.co.uk/s/GCC_SecureCycleParking/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">cycle parking survey</a> – ends <strong>3 October</strong>.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations</strong></h3>



<p>None this time.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 3:</strong>&nbsp;<strong>Consultation Feedback</strong></h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-one">3.1: Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;TRNSMT Festival and Access to NCN75</h4>



<p>In <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-93-17-august-2021-14883#three-four" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 93, Item 3.4</a> we featured an email from GCC about the closure of NCN75 during the upcoming music festival. GoBike convenor <a href="https://twitter.com/UrbanistTOC/status/1425781257183666179?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Thomas tweeted about issues with the diversion route</a> and replied to the council&#8217;s email. A further response from GCC sounds more constructive than before:</p>



<p><em>&#8220;To advise we are working to improve wherever possible the diversion route… which would hopefully make this route not only a suitable diversion for Major Events within Glasgow Green but also an optional route on a day to day basis.&#8221;</em></p>



<p>The council also wanted to organise a meeting between GoBike and council officers. They said: <em>&#8220;we can walk the route highlighting where we will be making improvements&#8221;. </em>Also, they would: <em>&#8220;allow you an opportunity to speak directly with those planning/managing any works.&#8221;</em> We wait to see the improvements but this <a href="https://twitter.com/SmacKk_/status/1431249899132182529?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">new ramp was spotted on the route</a>.</p>



<p>Lastly, GCC will <em>&#8220;consider a short term working group to hopefully give an opportunity to facilitate improved joint working for the longer term solution to this particular challenge.&#8221;</em></p>



<p>Thomas will set up the meeting shortly and we hope to have further news. </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-two">3.2: North Lanarkshire Council – Bellshill Gateway &amp; Cycle Facilities project</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="394" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Bellshill-Orbiston-St-path_1561-1000px.jpg?resize=525%2C394&#038;ssl=1" alt="Shared use path at Orbiston Rd, Bellshill" class="wp-image-15365" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Bellshill-Orbiston-St-path_1561-1000px.jpg?resize=600%2C450&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Bellshill-Orbiston-St-path_1561-1000px.jpg?resize=300%2C225&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Bellshill-Orbiston-St-path_1561-1000px.jpg?w=1000&amp;ssl=1 1000w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Path into the proposed Velo Park site from Orbiston Rd, Bellshill</figcaption></figure>



<p>In <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-92-3-august-2021-14734#one-nine" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 92, Item 1.9</a> we featured initial plans for a proposed Velo Park and enhanced entrance to Strathclyde Country Park from Bellshill. A GoBike member was at a recent meeting between local groups and council staff. They&#8217;re from NLC&#8217;s new Greenspace Projects team, which will have responsibility for &#8216;Country Parks for the Future&#8217; initiatives at Strathclyde Park (as well as Drumpellier Park in Coatbridge and Palacerigg Park, near Cumbernauld). </p>



<p>The officer clarified a few points, including that the planned mountain bike trails would only be in the north-east of the site. The paths around the South Calder Water would form a loop for walking and cycling as a local exercise route. </p>



<p>The team are looking at a few other issues like the underused hire bikes at the Watersports Centre (including some adapted bikes). Also, a potential cycle hub near Motherwell train station (perhaps in a building nearby). </p>



<p>A bid is due to go in to Sport Scotland by the end of August. </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-three">3.3: Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;London Rd Spaces for People lanes at Celtic Park</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="349" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/London-Rd-paint-Iona.jpeg?resize=525%2C349&#038;ssl=1" alt="'Paint is not protection' stencilled on London Rd, Glasgow" class="wp-image-15374" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/London-Rd-paint-Iona.jpeg?resize=600%2C399&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/London-Rd-paint-Iona.jpeg?resize=300%2C200&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/London-Rd-paint-Iona.jpeg?w=810&amp;ssl=1 810w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Paint is not Protection stencil on London Rd where &#8216;soft&#8217; segregation was removed</figcaption></figure>



<p>In <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-90-6-july-2021-14538#three-one" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 90, Item 3.1</a>, we covered the removal of the temporary &#8216;zebras&#8217;/&#8217;armadillos&#8217; on London Rd outside Celtic Park and the Emirates. As well as contacting the council, some <a href="https://www.glasgowlive.co.uk/news/removal-cycle-lane-bumps-celtic-21009807" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GoBike members put our message on London Rd itself</a>.</p>



<p>GCC have taken a while to respond, perhaps because they had homework to do –&nbsp;according to their response… </p>



<p><em>&#8220;a survey of many similar sports facilities around the UK was undertaken and no examples of cycle segregation directly outside these facilities was found. Those that did have cycle facilities had a painted line only. GCC has improved on that by installing a ridged line to provide an audio and visual warning to drivers.</em></p>



<p><em>The Department explored alternative options including traffic delineator wands, such as those used on Great Western Road and a combination wand / armadillo design as currently used in Edinburgh City Centre. However, both of these also resulted in significant risk and possible increased risk in the case of the traffic delineator wand.</em>&#8220;</p>



<p>The <a href="https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/people-tripping-cycle-lane-cardiff-21238326" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">&#8216;combination design&#8217; became a trip hazard on a high street in Cardiff</a>. However, the above seems to rule out a &#8216;traffic delineator wand&#8217; (temporary bollard) because it <em>might</em> be a risk. </p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Circumstantial evidence?</h5>



<p>Several GoBike members were sceptical of the reasons given about &#8216;armadillos&#8217; being a trip hazard. The council&#8217;s response says it depends on the circumstances:</p>



<p><em>&#8220;<em>We do not consider that in normal circumstances armadillos represent a high risk trip hazard. However,… mass evacuation… (of)</em> almost 60,000 individuals… would result in a tightly knit, panicked and distressed crowd. Under these circumstances, there would be little visibility of the armadillos and there is a significant concern of serious injury or fatality due to trips / falls and subsequent crush injury.&#8221;</em> </p>



<p>There was a <a href="https://www.glasgowlive.co.uk/news/glasgow-news/celtic-hold-independent-review-derby-15125746" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">crush outside Celtic Park in 2018</a>, where a few fans were injured. However, it was at the confined Janefield St side of the stadium, not the open London Rd side.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="297" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Celtic-Way-ScreenShot-Oct-2020.jpg?resize=525%2C297&#038;ssl=1" alt="StreetView of Celtic Park, London Rd in October 2020" class="wp-image-15371" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Celtic-Way-ScreenShot-Oct-2020.jpg?resize=600%2C339&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Celtic-Way-ScreenShot-Oct-2020.jpg?resize=300%2C170&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Celtic-Way-ScreenShot-Oct-2020.jpg?w=1000&amp;ssl=1 1000w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>View of Celtic Park from London Rd, October 2020. Which is the greater risk – &#8216;armadillos&#8217; or bollards?</figcaption></figure>



<p>Apparently, the decision to remove was: <em>&#8220;assessed in conjunction with advice from Police Scotland but no formal record has been kept&#8221;.</em> There was no Equalities Impact Assessment<em> &#8220;as this process is not appropriate for this type of alteration. None of the protected characteristics as outlined in the Equalities Act are negatively affect by the alterations.&#8221;</em></p>



<p>GCC talk about policy then make an interesting statement. <em>&#8220;<em>Designers have a duty under Construction Design and Management regulations to design out risk wherever possible.</em>&#8220;</em></p>



<p>Lastly, they turn from the temporary Spaces for People project to mention the permanent East City Way route on London Rd. <em>&#8220;We note your comment about the new East City Way and can confirm that the SFP project officers have discussed these issues with the East City Way officer with a view to designing out the risk as far as reasonably possible within the long term plans.&#8221;</em> So, that seems to depends on the circumstances as well. </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-four">3.4: East Renfrewshire Council – Proposed Local Development Plan 2</h4>



<p>We covered East Ren&#8217;s proposed Local Development Plan 2 in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-47-12-november-2019-good-news-and-bad-news-from-glasgow-city-council-9355" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 47</a>, Item 1.4 in late 2019. It was submitted to the Scottish Government for its Reporters to consider in their <a href="///Users/nhsl-graphics/Downloads/780253%20(1).pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">435-page report</a>! It contains several mentions of GoBike, and our convenor Thomas (with his surname spelled correctly most of the time!). </p>



<p>One of these mentions – &#8216;(e) Schedule 6: Proposal D8.13: Netherlee to Giffnock&#8217; – was about a potential feasibility study for a footbridge across the railway at Gordon Dr. The report shows there were two people in favour and 19 against so the proposal has been dropped (and will not be in any of their back yards). However, other measures GoBike supported will be included. The <a href="///Users/nhsl-graphics/Downloads/780247.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">22-page recommendation document</a> details the text changes ahead of publication. </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-five">3.5: Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;Auldhouse Area Traffic Management Order</h4>



<p>These measures for Auldhouse, in the Southside, appeared in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-92-3-august-2021-14734#one-eight" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 92, Item 1.8</a>. <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/GoBike-Auldhouse-Area-traffic-mgt-response-040821-1.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GoBike&#8217;s response</a> made points about one-way streets and potential for contraflow cycling. The council sent a fairly predictable reply:</p>



<p><em>&#8220;…given the narrow carriageway widths and short lengths of carriageway within this self-contained residential area, contraflow cycle lanes were not deemed feasible. Unfortunately, I can therefore advise that cyclists will also be subject to the one way operations.&#8221;</em></p>



<p>GCC&#8217;s email goes on to say one-way streets will apparently &#8220;<em>enhance road safety for cyclists&#8221;.</em> Also: <em>&#8220;parking restrictions at road junctions will remove potential obstructions by vehicles at lowered kerbs which will assist pedestrians, wheelchair users and push chairs in crossing the road.&#8221;</em> There&#8217;s&nbsp;no mention of a joint decision with Police Scotland on enforcement. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15016</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consultation Digest (Local) Issue 79, 2 February 2021</title>
		<link>https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-79-2-february-2021-13147</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Y]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2021 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Consultation digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoBike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ardrossan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blantyre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bothwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Renfrewshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glasgow city council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glasgow University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larkhall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malls Mire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Gorbals Housing Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Ayrshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Lanarkshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queens Cross Housing Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Lanarkshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stonehouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strathaven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustrans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uddingston]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gobike.org/?p=13147</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Quick trips to the seaside, countryside and updates from around the city. In this Digest there are two projects by housing associations to improve active travel connections. The South Lanarkshire, (Y)our Districts and Woodside consultations are each from a wider ongoing series of events but could play a big part in shaping the areas they &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-79-2-february-2021-13147" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Consultation Digest (Local) Issue 79, 2 February 2021"</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Quick trips to the seaside, countryside and updates from around the city. </h2>



<p>In this Digest there are two projects by housing associations to improve active travel connections. The South Lanarkshire, (Y)our Districts and Woodside consultations are each from a wider ongoing series of events but could play a big part in shaping the areas they cover. Lastly there&#8217;s a follow-up about East Renfrewshire and a few newsletters. </p>



<p>If you&#8217;re in the city, see <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/not-1-but-3-infrastructure-rides-for-january-12877" target="_blank">Andy&#8217;s three infrastructure routes</a> around Glasgow to take in new Spaces for People infrastructure. He’s also started to inform GoBike about closures and diversions; if you hear of any please do let us know. </p>



<span id="more-13147"></span>



<p>This Digest includes links in the Contents page so you can jump straight to a topic if you want to.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="block-9c7271a9-0332-4a43-80bd-70877a1e08a4"><strong>Contents</strong><br>(new consultations in <strong>bold</strong>)</h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 1: Current Consultations</h4>



<ol class="wp-block-list" id="block-907efeea-1b1a-46e3-88b3-858151c4ec76"><li><a href="#one-one">North Ayrshire Council –&nbsp;Ardrossan Connections Project</a>, closes 3 February</li><li><a href="#one-two">South Lanarkshire Council –&nbsp;Active travel online consultations</a>, all close 8 February</li><li><a href="#one-three">Glasgow City Council – (Y)our Districts Online Ideas Workshops – &#8216;Learning Quarter&#8217;</a>, rescheduled online sessions Thursday 18th February</li><li><strong><a href="#one-four">Queens Cross Housing Association –&nbsp;Woodside Making Places:&nbsp;updated masterplan</a> and online public meeting – 25 February</strong></li></ol>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations</h4>



<p>None</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 3: Consultation Feedback</h4>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li><a href="#three-one">Fenwick Rd, East Refrewshire – online meeting follow-up</a></li><li><strong><a href="#three-two">New Gorbals Housing Association – Planning application 20/03363/FUL</a></strong></li><li><strong><a href="#three-three">Sustrans – Glasgow Cycle Counters</a></strong></li><li><a href="#three-four">Urban Roots – Malls Mire newsletter</a> </li><li><a href="#three-five">Multiplex – Glasgow University campus newsletters</a></li><li><a href="#three-six">North Lanarkshire Council –&nbsp;Local Development Plan Progress Update</a></li></ol>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 1: Current Consultations<br></strong>(in date order for responses)</h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-one">1.1: North Ayrshire Council –&nbsp;Ardrossan Connections Project (closes 3 February)</h4>



<p>As <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-78-19-january-2021-13078#one-two" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">covered in Digest 78</a>, Sustrans are running a Commonplace consultation about Ardrossan town centre for North Ayrshire Council and Ardrossan Community Development Trust. This project seems to focus on the on-road bit between NCN73 and NCN753. If you know the area, see the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://ardrossanconnections.commonplace.is/" target="_blank">Ardrossan Connections Commonplace map</a>. You&#8217;ll need to be quick as it closes tomorrow, 3 February.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-two">1.2: South Lanarkshire Council – Active travel online consultations (all close 8 February)</h4>



<p>Not one but <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-78-19-january-2021-13078#one-three" target="_blank">three consultations, as covered in Digest 78</a>. They&#8217;re for Blantyre/Bothwell/Uddingston; Larkhall and Strathaven/Stonehouse (and surrounding villages). NCN74 passes through these towns (except Strathaven) on a mixture of roads and shared paths. None have segregated cycleways for bikes only. What routes could be upgraded and added on to form a network? This is a great chance to ask for improvements. </p>



<p>Strathaven has a former rail line going east-west behind Sainsbury&#8217;s which could make a great cycle path. Most routes in Stonehouse are on road, including NCN74. The A71 cuts off part of its former rail line but it does have others towards Strathaven, Larkhall and Blackwood. In Larkhall, NCN74 moves onto shared paths from the back of the town centre towards Ferniegair and Chatelherault Country Park. </p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="394" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Larkhall-NCN74-junction_7453-1000px.jpg?resize=525%2C394&#038;ssl=1" alt="Hamilton Rd, Larkhall – NCN74 junction" class="wp-image-13166" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Larkhall-NCN74-junction_7453-1000px.jpg?resize=600%2C450&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Larkhall-NCN74-junction_7453-1000px.jpg?resize=300%2C225&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Larkhall-NCN74-junction_7453-1000px.jpg?w=1000&amp;ssl=1 1000w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>NCN74 off-road shared path at toucan crossing on Hamilton Rd, Larkhall </figcaption></figure>



<p>Blantyre currently has a section of NCN74 alongside the East Kilbride Expressway and Glasgow Rd. The latter could easily be widened before the section through Stonefield Park. It then links Station Rd, Blantyre via the David Livingstone Bridge over the River Clyde to Station Rd, Bothwell. The &#8216;Nature Trail&#8217; here shows what can be done with a former rail line. A new section of NCN74 is due to link from the Raith Interchange to Laighlands Rd, Bothwell. This section currently features a hay bale acting as a filter to stop drivers using the shared path as a rat run!</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="394" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Raith-path-haybale_8176-1000px.jpg?resize=525%2C394&#038;ssl=1" alt="Hay bale filter on shared path at Raith Interchange" class="wp-image-13165" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Raith-path-haybale_8176-1000px.jpg?resize=600%2C450&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Raith-path-haybale_8176-1000px.jpg?resize=300%2C225&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Raith-path-haybale_8176-1000px.jpg?w=1000&amp;ssl=1 1000w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Hay bale filter on shared path near Langside Rd, Bothwell –&nbsp;Raith Interchange footbridges in background</figcaption></figure>



<p>NCN74 continues into Uddingston on Wilkie Rd, where a new toucan crossing on Bellshill Rd has improved the route. It also links to NCN75, which goes past the train station and Uddingston Grammar School. SLC have already drawn up a network plan for Cambuslang and Newton after a similar consultation. That raised the prospect of finally re-routing NCN75 to avoid the climb up Westburn Rd – a missing link in the Clyde Walkway route that would benefit many, including local school children. Equally, a segregated route along Glasgow Rd from Uddingston towards Glasgow would be very popular.  </p>



<p>See <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.southlanarkshire.gov.uk/info/200230/public_and_community_transport/1933/active_travel_online_consultations" target="_blank">SLC&#8217;s active travel consultations page</a> for links to each survey/map. You&#8217;ve got less than a week to respond –&nbsp;deadline for all three is 8 February.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-three">1.3: Glasgow City Council – (Y)our Districts Online Ideas Workshops – &#8216;Learning Quarter&#8217;</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="351" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Learning-Quarter-District.jpg?resize=525%2C351&#038;ssl=1" alt="'Learning Quarter' District" class="wp-image-13128" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Learning-Quarter-District.jpg?resize=600%2C401&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Learning-Quarter-District.jpg?resize=300%2C200&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Learning-Quarter-District.jpg?w=900&amp;ssl=1 900w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>The &#8216;Learning Quarter&#8217; is named after the uni and college campuses but also includes the cathedral and GRI</figcaption></figure>



<p>GCC&#8217;s ongoing <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-78-19-january-2021-13078#two-one" target="_blank">Districts consultations were recently mentioned in Digest 78</a>. The planned <a href="https://twitter.com/YourCityCentre/status/1351853901922889728?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">&#8216;Learning Quarter&#8217; workshops were postponed</a> with a new date to follow. </p>



<p>The <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://yourcitycentre2020.commonplace.is/news/2021/02/02/rescheduled-your-learning-quarter-ideas-workshop-:-thursday,-18th-february" target="_blank">new workshops have been announced fo</a><a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://yourcitycentre2020.commonplace.is/news/2021/02/02/rescheduled-your-learning-quarter-ideas-workshop-:-thursday,-18th-february" target="_blank">r</a><a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://yourcitycentre2020.commonplace.is/news/2021/02/02/rescheduled-your-learning-quarter-ideas-workshop-:-thursday,-18th-february" target="_blank"> Thursday 18th February</a>. There&#8217;s an <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/rescheduled-your-learning-quarter-ideas-workshop-afternoon-session-tickets-139476252225" target="_blank">afternoon session</a> (2–4pm) and an <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/rescheduled-your-learning-quarter-ideas-workshop-evening-session-tickets-139482753671" target="_blank">evening session</a> (6–8pm) both using Zoom. You can still comment on the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://yourcitycentre2020.commonplace.is/" target="_blank">Districts Commonplace map</a>.</p>



<p>Other relevant consultations about the wider area appeared in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-74-24-november-2020-12604" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 74</a>, including <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-74-24-november-2020-12604#two-one" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Strathclyde Uni&#8217;s proposed active travel project</a> and the <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-74-24-november-2020-12604#one-five">North Glasgow Strategic Development Plan</a>.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-four">1.4: Queens Cross Housing Association –&nbsp;Woodside Making Places:&nbsp;updated masterplan and online public meeting – 25 February</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="376" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Woodside2144-View1000px.jpg?resize=525%2C376&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-13181" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Woodside2144-View1000px.jpg?resize=600%2C430&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Woodside2144-View1000px.jpg?resize=300%2C215&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Woodside2144-View1000px.jpg?w=1000&amp;ssl=1 1000w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Visualisation of Woodside Making Places, including active travel routes, greenery and shiny towers</figcaption></figure>



<p>The Woodside Making Places project last <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-65-21-july-2020-whats-happened-to-pavement-parking-proposals-approved-but-not-enacted-plus-a-request-to-contribute-to-the-streets-for-all-glasgow-commonplace-map-and-m-11719" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">appeared in Digest 65</a>. It covers an area around St George&#8217;s Rd, between Maryhill Rd and Garscube Rd. These are mainly residential streets with large blocks of low, mid and high rise flats (plus a few tenements). As well as the new segregated cycleway on St George&#8217;s Rd, crossings will be added on N Woodside Rd and other measures include gardens and outdoor play areas (there are three schools nearby). </p>



<p>GoBike received an email from the Making Places team: </p>



<p><em>&#8220;Plans to transform the landscape of Woodside have been advancing since the last phase of community consultation in Summer 2020, and you&nbsp;can now see on the&nbsp;<a class="" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://www.woodsidemakingplaces.org.uk/">updated Woodside Making Places<em> website</em></a>&nbsp;how the masterplan has evolved in response to your comments, as well as consultations with stakeholders and statutory bodies.&nbsp;</em></p>



<p><em>Please explore the updated masterplan design &#8211; which you can now zoom-in to and post additional comments directly onto. Your ongoing comments are valued, and will help us to further refine the design; you can see how&nbsp;we have responded to those submitted during the previous stage.&#8221;</em></p>



<p>The masterplan design is on an interactive map site called Placechangers (similar to Commonplace/Placecheck). Early comments seem to be from residents about anti-social behaviour and other concerns with the current environment, rather than the future plans. It should make for an interesting&nbsp;<a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.woodsidemakingplaces.org.uk/events" target="_blank">online public meeting</a> on Thursday 25th February.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations</strong></h3>



<p>None this time.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 3: Consultation Feedback</strong></h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-one">3.1: Fenwick Rd, East Refrewshire – online meeting follow-up</h4>



<p><a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-78-19-january-2021-13078#one-four" target="_blank">Digest 78 covered the Fenwick Rd situation</a> in Giffnock . This meeting took place on 18 January, right before its issue, and&nbsp;some local GoBike members took part. The meeting&#8217;s chair was Eastwood MSP Jackson Carlaw, whose background as a car salesman didn&#8217;t inspire confidence. However, it did represent active travel issues as mentioned in his email response: </p>



<p><em>&#8220;<em>A number of reasonable concerns were expressed, not about the principle of the temporary secure route but more specifically about its width and appearance and how it might subsequently be extended beyond Church Road.</em></em> <em>I am grateful for the constructive comments and suggestions from active cyclists in the immediate area who have been able to engage with neighbours and others locally. Having previously lived immediately adjacent to this scheme for some twelve years with young children, I do appreciate the various views.&#8221;</em></p>



<p>He mentions meeting Lorraine Macmillan, East Renfrewshire Council’s Chief Executive: </p>



<p><em>&#8220;I did feed in the positive support for safer streets initiatives, preferably segregated where possible, but noted the views expressed that when the temporary arrangements at Fenwick Road end and when a more permanent scheme might be considered, that this learn from the experience gained and views of those locally. I also noted the need to ensure that any proposal to extend the scheme should not prejudice local trading but ensure that this is secured together with the interests of all users.</em></p>



<p><em>I also took the opportunity to note the considerably increased wider cycling and pedestrian use of local streets over the last year which we have all witnessed. Some key routes which attract many are frankly not currently as safe or suitable as they might be at present. Making them so should be an objective for the immediate future. Many years ago (I am reaching back to the late 1960s here!) I can recall sections of Mearns Road being equally unsuitable and a solution achieved then was for a strip of land on the other side of the previous pavement/hedge boundary to be secured for pedestrians and cyclists. This may be a way forward and worth exploring on certain popular routes now.&#8221;</em></p>



<p>While we might not be asking Mr Carlaw for design tips, at least it&#8217;s a fairly pragmatic response and not the one-sided view it might have been. It remains to be seen how the rest of the Spaces for People trial progresses and what happens when it&#8217;s removed. You can still have your say on that – see&nbsp;<a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://erspacesforpeople.commonplace.is/overview" target="_blank">ERC Spaces for People surveys</a>.&nbsp;</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-two">3.2: New Gorbals Housing Association – Planning application 20/03363/FUL</h4>



<p>This came in from Tricia via a former colleague who writes: <em>&#8220;New Gorbals Housing Association has submitted designs to create a pedestrian link by opening up a railway arch between Laurieston Road and Cleland Lane. It&#8217;s part of a phased project aimed at improving pedestrian connections and public realm in the area, including turning adjacent greenspace into a park and reducing the width of four-lane Laurieston Road. Acting alongside Network Rail, which has planning permission to introduce commercial uses to a set of arches at Cleland Lane, the latest proposal will establish an east-west link to Gorbals Street, augmented at a later date with new paving and street crossings.&#8221;</em></p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="259" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/gorbals-tunnel2.jpg?resize=525%2C259&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-13174" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/gorbals-tunnel2.jpg?resize=600%2C296&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/gorbals-tunnel2.jpg?resize=300%2C148&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/gorbals-tunnel2.jpg?w=800&amp;ssl=1 800w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption><em>Visualisation of how the opened arch 12 could look –&nbsp; Cleland Lane looking through to Laurieston Rd</em></figcaption></figure>



<p>The arch is just past the Five Ways junction (Brazen Head) on the South City Way. While the link isn&#8217;t strictly a cycle route there could be benefits for cycling between Laurieston and the Gorbals. There seems to have been a short consultation period, which unfortunately closed for comments on Tuesday 26 January. See the <a href="https://publicaccess.glasgow.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&amp;keyVal=QLH7UVEXMOU00" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">archway plans on GCC&#8217;s Planning portal</a>, where you should be able to follow its progress. </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-three">3.3: Sustrans – Glasgow Cycle Counters</h4>



<p>GoBike member Peter has been in touch with Sustrans about cycle counters over the past few months. Glasgow has had two public counters (with the digital numbers, etc.) for a number of years. The one at Glasgow Green (near Saltmarket) has been setting record-breaking figures throughout 2020. The other, at the spiral on the West City Way, hasn&#8217;t been counting anything for the past few years since it stopped working. The expectation was a new counter would appear elsewhere to replace it.</p>



<p>That is happening but we&#8217;re getting two new counters – one for the WCW counter and another to replace the current Glasgow Green counter. According to a reply from Sustrans:</p>



<p>&#8220;<em>Further to your email below I can confirm that the two replacement cycle counters were installed in the following locations:&nbsp;</em></p>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li><em>NCN75 at St. Andrew’s Suspension Bridge&nbsp;</em></li><li><em>NCN75 at Cuningar Loop Footbridge.&#8221;</em> </li></ol>



<p>Assuming the first location is on the north bank, that is a very busy path. However, not everyone would use it depending on where they were going in the East End. Whereas most of Glasgow cycled on the path near Saltmarket at one time or another last year. </p>



<p>The second location needs a bit of explaining. Cuningar Park (not officially a &#8216;Loop&#8217; anymore) is on the Rutherglen, South Lanarkshire side of the Clyde. After the Commonwealth Games the footbridge linked it to the former Athletes Village in Dalmarnock. While more people discovered the park during lockdown in 2020 it&#8217;s still a bit obscure. A lot more people might use it if the bridge actually linked directly to NCN75 below it, but it doesn&#8217;t (although there is a way to get there round the houses, literally). If the counter is actually on the NCN/Clyde Walkway itself, near the bridge, then it makes a bit more sense. </p>



<p>If any of you have seen these in the wild, feel free to tweet/send in photos of how the figures are doing. Meanwhile, we wish the Glasgow Green/Saltmarket counter a well earned rest and a happy retirement! </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-four">3.4: Urban Roots – Malls Mire newsletter</h4>



<p>We featured the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-74-24-november-2020-12604#three-four" target="_blank">first issue of the Malls Mire newsletter in Digest 74</a>. The <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Malls-Mire-Newsletter-January-2021.pdf" target="_blank">January 2021 issue</a> has a rough timetable for the project with milestones to look forward to in spring and summer. The rest is about NatureScot (formerly Scottish Natural Heritage) and Urban Roots themselves. The area looks like it could shape up to be a nice link between Toryglen and Rutherglen.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-five">3.5: Multiplex – Glasgow University campus newsletters</h4>



<p>Your editor forgot to include <a href="https://campusdevelopment.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/January-2021.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Multiplex&#8217;s January newsletter</a> (mainly about traffic management). So, it&#8217;s a double helping of Glasgow Uni campus news (four whole pages!). However, <a href="https://campusdevelopment.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/February-2021.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">their February issue</a> contains drainage works (from January) and a building named ARC (about 20 years after the <a href="https://www.gcu.ac.uk/arc/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Glasgow Caley ARC building</a>). Where would we be without these West End avant garde types, eh?</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-six">3.6: North Lanarkshire Council –&nbsp;Local Development Plan Progress Update</h4>



<p>GoBike received a brief update from North Lanarkshire Council:</p>



<p><em>&#8220;Our Local Development Plan – Modified Proposed Plan is currently progressing through the Planning and Environmental Appeals Division (DPEA) examination process.</em></p>



<p><em>The DPEA have made a number of requests for further information. We are working to provide all information requested, meantime you can&nbsp;<a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://lnks.gd/l/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJidWxsZXRpbl9saW5rX2lkIjoxMDEsInVyaSI6ImJwMjpjbGljayIsImJ1bGxldGluX2lkIjoiMjAyMTAxMjguMzQwOTYzMjEiLCJ1cmwiOiJodHRwOi8vd3d3LmRwZWEuc2NvdGxhbmQuZ292LnVrL0Nhc2VEZXRhaWxzLmFzcHg_SUQ9MTIxMTM1In0.32_YCE7YYRmyNLBTrjhPvdTn31MJj7YRnah_6x8FZM8/s/946610161/br/93850587433-l" target="_blank">follow progress online</a>.&#8221;</em></p>



<p>Just in case you were wondering how the plan was doing; now you know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">13147</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consultation Digest (Local) Issue 73, 10 November 2020: Good news on a protected junction survey and sad news for Pollok Park</title>
		<link>https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-73-10-november-2020-good-news-on-a-protected-junction-survey-and-sad-news-for-pollok-park-12455</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tricia Fort]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 18:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Consultation digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoBike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[covid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Dunbartonshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Renfrewshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EV Charging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glasgow city council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protected junctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustrans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic calming]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gobike.org/?p=12455</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Digests are changing! Hopefully, you saw the recent post by Jim Densham, who will now be writing a monthly article about national (Scotland and UK) consultations. These Digests, still to be fortnightly, will concentrate on issues from the Local Authorities where we have members. If you don&#8217;t get our blogs direct to your email &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-73-10-november-2020-good-news-on-a-protected-junction-survey-and-sad-news-for-pollok-park-12455" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Consultation Digest (Local) Issue 73, 10 November 2020: Good news on a protected junction survey and sad news for Pollok Park"</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>The Digests are changing! Hopefully, you saw the recent <a href="https://www.gobike.org/gobikes-new-national-consultation-digest-and-a-guide-to-the-road-safety-framework-12450" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">post by Jim Densham</a>, who will now be writing a monthly article about national (Scotland and UK) consultations. These Digests, still to be fortnightly, will concentrate on issues from the Local Authorities where we have members. <br>If you don&#8217;t get our blogs direct to your email inbox you can subscribe on the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/" target="_blank">GoBike website home page</a>, joining over 4,000 others who already do so. <br><br><strong>Reminder:</strong> <a href="https://www.gobike.org/go-bike-agm-and-public-meeting-2020-12365">GoBike AGM online</a>: 19th November 2020 (Pedal on Parliament AGM: 17th Nov).</p>



<span id="more-12455"></span>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Contents</strong> </h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 1: Current Consultations </h4>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>*NEW* Glasgow City Council, &#8220;Yorkhill Quay masterplan to fulfil River Clyde blue corridor vision&#8221;</li><li><span style="font-size: 1rem;">Glasgow City Council – new City Development Plan, closes 11 December</span></li><li><span style="font-size: 1rem;">East Dunbartonshire Council – Proposed Local Development Plan 2 (LDP2), closes 15 January 2021</span></li><li>OnBikes and St Paul’s Youth Forum – short survey for Sustrans’ Places for Everyone scheme</li><li>*NEW* Glasgow City Council – Protected Junction Trial consultation</li></ol>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations</h4>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>Traffic Regulation Orders to make Covid 19 pop-ups permanent </li></ol>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 3: Consultation Feedback</h4>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>Glasgow City Council (City Centre) (Traffic Management) Order 2010 (Variation No 27) Order 202, waiting and loading, plus EV parking, GCC response to our submission</li><li>Glasgow City Council (Ruchazie Road) Traffic Calming Scheme (OFFICIAL) and a query as to the effectiveness of these measures, survey information from GCC</li><li>East Renfrewshire Council, update on Proposed Local Development Plan 2</li><li>Glasgow City Council, Pollok Park planning application approved</li></ol>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 1:</strong> <strong>Current Consultations </strong><br>(in date order for responses)</h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">1.1: *NEW* Glasgow City Council, &#8220;Yorkhill Quay masterplan to fulfil River Clyde blue corridor vision&#8221;</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large is-resized"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Yorkhill-Quay.png?resize=525%2C394&#038;ssl=1" alt="Artist's impression of proposed development at Yorkhill Quay" class="wp-image-12534" width="525" height="394"/></figure>



<p>GoBike member Brenda tells us there&#8217;s an online consultation for a pre-planning application for the strip of land along the river between Riverside museum and the new distillery.&nbsp; Includes the offer of &#8216;live chat&#8217; on Thurs 12 Nov between 10am and 1pm.&nbsp; Looks like a row of massively tall blocks of flats surrounded by parking, with a relatively narrow, completely exposed strip along the riverside providing the advertised &#8216;complete permeability&#8217;. (I may be biased).<br>We think this is a requirement for major developments, and gets reported in the Design and Access Statement that forms part of the eventual planning application.&nbsp; Perhaps they even need to show that they&#8217;ve addressed concerns raised by respondents&#8230;<br>There&#8217;s a <strong><a target="_blank" href="https://www.urbanrealm.com/news/9080/Yorkhill_Quay_masterplan_to_fulfil_River_Clyde_blue_corridor_vision.html" rel="noreferrer noopener">summary of the possible proposal</a></strong> and a <a target="_blank" href="http://mcinally-associates.co.uk/yq/index.html#home" rel="noreferrer noopener">consultation</a>. <br>Available for viewing till 30 November.</p>



<p>Doesn&#8217;t look like Glasgow at all, does it?</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">1.2: Glasgow City Council – new City Development Plan <br>(Closes 11 December)</h4>



<p>First covered in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-72-27-october-2020-bike-storage-do-get-your-views-in-to-the-scottish-government-12342">Digest issue 72</a>, Item 1.7. GCC&#8217;s email said <em>&#8220;<em>We are working with our partners, The Future Fox to host an online engagement called Placebuilder. It is designed to help us understand the experiences and ideas of Glasgow’s different neighbourhood communities&nbsp;on what they think works, what could be better and what they would like to see change.</em>&#8220;</em> Plenty of scope there – <a href="https://placebuilder.io/glasgowplaces" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">link to Placebuilder online engagement</a>.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">1.3: East Dunbartonshire Council – <br>Proposed Local Development Plan 2 (LDP2) <br>(Closes 15 January 2021)</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="84" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/East-Dunbartonshire-Council.png?resize=525%2C84&#038;ssl=1" alt="East Dunbartonshire Council logo" class="wp-image-12376" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/East-Dunbartonshire-Council.png?w=562&amp;ssl=1 562w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/East-Dunbartonshire-Council.png?resize=300%2C48&amp;ssl=1 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /></figure>



<p>East Dunbartonshire were the only mainland council that didn&#8217;t bid for any funding from the Spaces for People programme by Sustrans. If you&#8217;d like to encourage EDC to improve on that record (and maybe finish the <a href="https://www.gobike.org/campaigns/mini-campaigns/friends-of-bearsway" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bearsway</a> or something) then you have a chance to mention it in this consultation. As covered in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-72-27-october-2020-bike-storage-do-get-your-views-in-to-the-scottish-government-12342" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest issue 72</a>, Item 1.8. See the Council website:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.eastdunbarton.gov.uk/LDP2" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.eastdunbarton.gov.uk/LDP2</a>. Apparently <em>&#8220;your representation should be submitted by e-mail to&#8221;</em>&nbsp;<a href="mailto:development.plan@eastdunbarton.gov.uk" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">development.plan@eastdunbarton.gov.uk</a>.&nbsp;</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">1.4: OnBikes and St Paul’s Youth Forum – short survey for Sustrans’ Places for Everyone scheme</h4>



<p>This <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdRjYngGGZTaojHa1NjhbIUn3lcuSxpj68IdsHuzrxEerZbtQ/viewform" target="_blank">multiple choice survey</a> (as covered in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-72-27-october-2020-bike-storage-do-get-your-views-in-to-the-scottish-government-12342">Digest issue 72</a>, Item 1.1) was originally looking for quick feedback but remains open. OnBikes and SPYF (St Paul’s Youth Forum) are working on a Places for Everyone project to improve active travel infrastructure in parts of North East Glasgow like Smithycroft, Riddrie and Blackhill. </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">1.5: **NEW** Glasgow City Council – Protected Junction Trial consultation</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="378" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Turning_right_for_cyclists.jpg?resize=525%2C378&#038;ssl=1" alt="Turning right at a protected junction" class="wp-image-12492" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Turning_right_for_cyclists.jpg?resize=600%2C432&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Turning_right_for_cyclists.jpg?resize=300%2C216&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Turning_right_for_cyclists.jpg?w=640&amp;ssl=1 640w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /></figure>



<p>Posters of a new junction on Victoria Road have been appearing on bus shelters around Glasgow (as seen by GoBike member Steph). The City Council&#8217;s website says: <br><em>&#8220;As part of the South City Way, we will be&nbsp;trialling protected junctions&nbsp;on Victoria Road at the Calder Street and Allison Street junctions. Protected junctions&nbsp;are widely and successfully used across Europe, however they are relatively new in the UK and these will be the&nbsp;first&nbsp;in the UK outside of London! </em><br><em>A &#8216;protected junction&#8217; is a road junction designed so that people travelling on foot, by cycle, and&nbsp;in vehicles are all separated as they pass through the junction. The aim is to make the junctions safer for all road users, and particularly for those on cycles. Unlike other junctions, which normally require right-turning cyclists to wait in the centre of the junction for a suitable gap in the traffic, the protected junction&nbsp;offers a safer alternative.&nbsp;Protected cycle tracks &#8211; like those on the South City Way &#8211; make it easier for people to make everyday journeys by cycle&nbsp;instead of by car.&nbsp;&#8221; </em></p>



<p>That last sentence may seem obvious but there will be plenty of people in the city who struggle to get their heads around it. The stately progress of the South City Way may be a source of frustration for many. However, it is innovative (for Scotland) and we do need to see more along similar lines. So, if you want to show support for the new junctions, or just find out more, see <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://glasgow.gov.uk/protectedjunctions" target="_blank">GCC&#8217;s Protected Junctions webpage</a> for further images, a video, a PDF document and a contact link. The junction trial will last two years but there&#8217;s no deadline mentioned for feedback. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations</strong></h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">2.1: Traffic Regulation Orders to make Covid 19 pop-ups permanent</h4>



<p>Michael Matheson spoke at the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.cycling.scot/cycling-scotland-conference" target="_blank">Cycling Scotland online conference</a> on 05 November. He was very hopeful that local authorities would choose, and be able, to make many of the measures permanent. TROs, which will come through the normal consultation channels, will be required.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 3: Consultation Feedback </strong></h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">3.1: Glasgow City Council (City Centre) (Traffic Management) Order 2010 (Variation No 27) Order 202, waiting and loading, plus EV parking, GCC response to our submission</h4>



<p>In <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-71-13-october-2020-how-do-we-talk-about-cycling-and-where-do-we-store-our-bikes-12249" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 71</a>, Item 1.5, we published this consultation and mentioned our concern that there was no mention of the proposed introduction of two-way cycling on Candleriggs. Here&#8217;s the letter we submitted on 26 October and on 29 October we received this response: </p>



<p>&#8220;<em>Thank you for your correspondence regarding the above named Traffic Regulation Order.</em></p>



<p><em>With regards to contraflow cycling on Candleriggs, I can advise that this aspect of the TRO has been withdrawn since the first consultation.&nbsp; This is as a result of an existing goods vehicle loading facility located on the west side of Candleriggs, approximately 15 metres south of Bell Street which will remain in place.&nbsp; It has been noted that the publicised drawing incorrectly shows existing double kerb markings at this location instead of single kerb markings and the removal of this proposal should have been included in the consultation email that stakeholders received. &nbsp;This was omitted in error after the implementation of this TRO was passed from our Project Services department to our Parking Services department.</em></p>



<p><em>In view of the above loading facility remaining in place, a decision was taken to remove contraflow cycling at this location in order to prevent the possibility of northbound cyclists having to cycle into the centre of the carriageway if a goods vehicle was situated at the above loading facility, with limited visibility of oncoming traffic and potentially come into conflict with an oncoming southbound vehicle.</em></p>



<p><em>I appreciate that you may feel frustrated at this decision, however, it has been taken with road safety in mind, particularly for cyclists.&nbsp; However, I would advise that the Council remain committed to introducing contraflow cycling where it is deemed safe and will keep this area under consideration for future proposed TRO’s.</em></p>



<p><em>I trust this is of assistance at this time.</em></p>



<p><em>Yours sincerely</em></p>



<p><em>Kevin Hamilton<br>Head of Roads<br>Neighbourhoods and Sustainability&#8221;</em></p>



<p>This is sad news and yet another blow for the permeability that cycles offer for getting around in Glasgow.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">3.2: Glasgow City Council, (Ruchazie Road) Traffic Calming Scheme (OFFICIAL) and a query as to the effectiveness of these measures, survey information from GCC</h4>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="alignright size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="337" height="150" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/speed-cushions.jpg?resize=337%2C150&#038;ssl=1" alt="Speed cushions with markings" class="wp-image-2693" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/speed-cushions.jpg?w=337&amp;ssl=1 337w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/speed-cushions.jpg?resize=300%2C134&amp;ssl=1 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 337px) 100vw, 337px" /></figure></div>



<p>In our last <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-72-27-october-2020-bike-storage-do-get-your-views-in-to-the-scottish-government-12342" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest, issue 72</a>, Item 3.4, we published Glasgow City Council&#8217;s confirmation that speed cushions will be installed on Ruchazie Road and in reply we asked the question as to before and after speed checks to confirm the effectiveness of speed cushions. Here&#8217;s the response we received on 02 November:</p>



<p>&#8220;<em>Thank you for your undernoted enquiry.<br><br>I can advise that due to the circumstances caused by Covid-19, we are still awaiting the results of the “after” surveys for the traffic calming schemes that were installed towards the end of the last financial year and this financial year.<br><br>I can however provide results for other locations at which we have installed speed cushions over the past 18 months. A survey was carried out prior to the implementation of traffic calming on Sunnybank Street, between 23/04/2019 and 29/04/2019, during which time the average speed of vehicles was found to be 22mph and the 85<sup>th</sup> percentile speed was 28mph. Although this may not seem excessive, it should be noted that there is a newly built primary school on this street and a bus gate adjacent to the school was to be removed as part of the works associated with the formation of school. After the traffic calming had been implemented, a survey was carried out between 25/11/2019 and 30/11/2019 and found the average speed had dropped to 17mph and the 85<sup>th</sup> percentile speed had significantly dropped to 21mph.</em><br><br><em>A survey was also carried out prior to the implementation of traffic calming on Kingsland Drive, between 11/02/2019 and 17/02/2019, during which time the average speed of vehicles was found to be 28mph and the 85<sup>th</sup> percentile speed was 33mph. After the traffic calming had been implemented, a survey was carried out between 19/02/2020 and 25/02/2020, during which the average speed had dropped to 21mph and the 85<sup>th</sup> percentile speed had significantly dropped to 25mph.<br><br>I can advise that, should you wish, once we receive the results of the most recent surveys and have comparable “before” and “after” data available for the latest schemes, I will forward these to you.<br><br>I trust the above information is of assistance, however, should you require any further information, please contact (details removed by GoBike).</em><br><br><em><strong>Kevin Hamilton</strong><br><strong>Head of Roads</strong>, <strong>Neighbourhoods And Sustainability</strong></em>&#8220;</p>



<p>GoBike has confirmed that we wish to see the results of any further before and after tests. The results look good but we have asked for details of how they are carried out.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">3.3: East Renfrewshire Council, update on Proposed Local Development Plan 2</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="400" height="218" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/east-ren-logo.png?resize=400%2C218&#038;ssl=1" alt="East Renfrewshire Council logo" class="wp-image-12502" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/east-ren-logo.png?w=400&amp;ssl=1 400w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/east-ren-logo.png?resize=300%2C164&amp;ssl=1 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px" /></figure>



<p>GoBike responded to the Local Development Plan 2 as reported in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-49-10-december-2019-highest-number-yet-of-current-consultations-and-surveys-with-one-closing-at-5pm-today-time-for-a-tea-break-9512" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 49</a>, Item 1.3 and received an initial response that was included in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-50-24-december-2019-2-on-line-consultations-for-you-to-do-and-a-variety-of-consultations-from-around-the-area-9568" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 50</a>, Item 3.9<br>East Renfrewshire Council have now informed us our <em>&#8220;representation has not been resolved&#8221;</em> about LDP2 and so Scottish Government reporters have been appointed to examine it: </p>



<p><em>&#8220;<strong>DPEA PLAN REF NO: LDP-220-3</strong></em></p>



<p><em>The above proposed plan was submitted to Scottish Ministers on&nbsp;18 August 2020&nbsp;for examination. &nbsp;The local development plan is a document that sets out which types of development should take place where, and which areas should be protected from development.&nbsp; It also contains policies that inform the planning authority’s decisions on planning applications.</em></p>



<p><em>You had previously made a representation regarding this plan when it was consulted upon from 21 October until 13 December 2019 and Scottish Ministers have been made aware that your representation has not been resolved.&nbsp;</em></p>



<p><em>The Scottish Ministers have appointed&nbsp;Mr Alasdair Edwards MA(Hons) and Mr Malcolm Mahony BA(Hons) MRTPI&nbsp;as the reporters who will carry out the examination of the above proposed plan.&nbsp; The administration of the examination will be carried out by the Scottish Government’s Planning and Environmental Appeals Division (DPEA).</em></p>



<p><em>We have provided the reporters with a summary of the issues that we consider should be assessed at the examination, and a copy of your full representation. &nbsp;Your representation will be considered by the reporters.&nbsp;</em></p>



<p><em>Please note that additional reporters may be appointed to support the speedy delivery of the report.</em></p>



<p><em>The reporters will now commence the examination of conformity with our participation statement as required by Section 19(4) of the Town and Country Planning Scotland Act 1997 (as amended).&nbsp; To comply with Section 19(7) of the Act, the examination of the above proposed plan under Section 19(3) of the Act will not commence until the examination of conformity with the participation statement has concluded, or until four weeks from the date of the appointment of the reporters, whichever is the latter.&nbsp; Therefore the earliest date upon which the examination of issues raised in representations will commence is 19 November 2020.&nbsp;</em></p>



<p><em>A notice regarding this examination has been published in the Evening Times and Barrhead News.</em></p>



<p><em>A copy of the proposed plan will be available for public viewing on our website: <a href="http://www.eastrenfrewshire.gov.uk/ldp2">http://www.eastrenfrewshire.gov.uk/ldp2</a></em></p>



<p><em>You do not need to take any action in response to this letter.&nbsp;&nbsp;The reporters are not expected to require further information from you, but if they do DPEA will write to you specifying what is needed and how and when you should submit it.</em></p>



<p><em>Information about the examination including a summary of the issues being addressed by the&nbsp;reporters&nbsp;(known as Schedule 4 Forms), Further Information Requests and Responses, Document Lists, any Hearing and Inquiry Statements, and in due course, the Recommendations by Issue Table and the Examination Report can be found at the DPEA’s website using the link below: <br></em><a href="http://www.dpea.scotland.gov.uk/CaseDetails.aspx?id=121161;"><em>http://www.dpea.scotland.gov.uk/CaseDetails.aspx?id=121161;</em></a></p>



<p><em>Further guidance on the examination process is available from the Scottish Government’s website using the weblink below: </em><br><a href="https://beta.gov.scot/policies/planning-architecture/development-plans/"><em>https://beta.gov.scot/policies/planning-architecture/development-plans/</em></a></p>



<p><em>A guidance note that explains development plan examinations for people who have submitted representations is available at the weblink below: </em><br><a href="https://beta.gov.scot/publications/development-plan-representations-guidance/"><em>https://beta.gov.scot/publications/development-plan-representations-guidance/</em></a></p>



<p><em>If you require further information about the progress of the examination please contact Jayne Anderson ,&nbsp;Planning and Environmental Appeals, 4 The Courtyard, Callendar Business Park , Falkirk , FK1 1XR,<strong>&nbsp;</strong>or telephone 0131 244 6934, or email&nbsp;<a href="mailto:Jayne.Anderson@gov.scot" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Jayne.Anderson@gov.scot</a></em></p>



<p><em>Please note that DPEA will be moving office with effect from Monday 16 November.&nbsp;</em></p>



<p><em>The new address will be Planning and Environmental Appeals Division, Scottish Government, Ground Floor, Hadrian House, Callendar Business Park, Callendar Road, Falkirk FK1 1XR</em></p>



<p><em>All telephone numbers and e-mail addresses will remain the same.</em></p>



<p><em>DPEA collect information if you take part in the planning process, use DPEA websites, send correspondence to DPEA or attend a webcast.&nbsp; To find out more about what information is collected, how the information is used and managed please read the&nbsp;<a target="_blank" href="https://beta.gov.scot/publications/planning-and-environmental-appeals-division-privacy-notice/" rel="noreferrer noopener">DPEA&#8217;s privacy notice</a>&nbsp;&#8211;&nbsp;<a target="_blank" href="https://beta.gov.scot/publications/planning-and-environmental-appeals-division-privacy-notice/" rel="noreferrer noopener">https://beta.gov.scot/publications/planning-and-environmental-appeals-division-privacy-notice/</a></em></p>



<p><em>Yours faithfully</em></p>



<p><em>Gillian McCarney<br>Head of Environment (Chief Planning Officer)&#8221;</em></p>



<p>We&#8217;ll update you on any further news.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">3.4 Glasgow City Council, Pollok Park planning application approved</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large is-resized"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Pollok-Park-access-road.jpg?resize=525%2C394&#038;ssl=1" alt="Road in Pollok Park, Glasgow" class="wp-image-11625" width="525" height="394" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Pollok-Park-access-road.jpg?resize=600%2C450&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Pollok-Park-access-road.jpg?resize=300%2C225&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Pollok-Park-access-road.jpg?resize=1536%2C1152&amp;ssl=1 1536w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Pollok-Park-access-road.jpg?w=2016&amp;ssl=1 2016w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Pollok-Park-access-road.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /></figure>



<p>You might have seen in the press that the planning application, 20/01352/FUL, to build a new access road into the Park has now been approved. See <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://publicaccess.glasgow.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=documents&amp;keyVal=QAZZ49EXIKO00" target="_blank">details on the City Council&#8217;s Planning website</a>.<br>In confirmation we received this email from the City Council yesterday, 09 November :</p>



<p>&#8220;<em>We are writing to let you know that the Planning Application for an Active Travel Management Plan in Pollok Country Park was approved on the 6<sup>th</sup> November 2020. The full application is available to view here (Reference Number 20/01352/FUL): <a href="https://publicaccess.glasgow.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?keyVal=QAZZ49EXIKO00&amp;activeTab=summary">https://publicaccess.glasgow.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?keyVal=QAZZ49EXIKO00&amp;activeTab=summary</a></em><br><br><em>The status of the application will be updated shortly.<br>Kind Regards,<br>Glasgow City Council/Glasgow Life</em>&#8220;</p>



<p>This <a href="https://www.glasgowtimes.co.uk/news/18840858.council-set-back-car-cut-park/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Glasgow Times article</a> reports on the forthcoming Council meeting that confirmed the decision. GoBike and one of our members are both quoted. It&#8217;s bad news: trees being removed to make way for cars in a park, of all places. Yes, we know it&#8217;s to a world-renowned museum; we just hope the private, non-blue-badge, cars are controlled and kept to the new car park at the edge of the park.</p>



<p>__________________________________________________</p>



<p>This Digest is a joint effort  by the old and a new compiler. If you would like to join our consultations team just drop an email to <a href="mailto:consultations@gobike.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">consultations@gobike.org</a> giving some details of your interests and/or skills in the topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">12455</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forth and Clyde canal cycling route: closed at Bowling for a week from 29 October.</title>
		<link>https://www.gobike.org/forth-and-clyde-canal-cycling-route-closed-at-bowling-for-a-week-from-today-29-october-12413</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tricia Fort]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2020 17:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cycle Rides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diversions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notice of Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cycle route]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diversions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustrans]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gobike.org/?p=12413</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[News just in from our members who are also Sustrans volunteers. Emergency works to repair a fault in cabling which is linked to the local hospital power supply have started today between Portpatrick Road and Bowling on the Forth and Clyde Canal and are expected to close the canal side cycle route for a week. &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://www.gobike.org/forth-and-clyde-canal-cycling-route-closed-at-bowling-for-a-week-from-today-29-october-12413" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Forth and Clyde canal cycling route: closed at Bowling for a week from 29 October."</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>News just in from our members who are also Sustrans volunteers. Emergency works to repair a fault in cabling which is linked to the local hospital power supply have started today between Portpatrick Road and Bowling on the Forth and Clyde Canal and are expected to close the canal side cycle route for a week.</p>



<p>See: https:/<a href="https://www.scottishcanals.co.uk/news/scottish-power-emergency-works-old-kilpatrick/?fbclid=IwAR20jDW-ucekrvqO6hJ1R9HQBXo9cEX_yTA7ANxMOJyVbJCgOrimVzWPrrU" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">/www.scottishcanals.co.uk/news/scottish-power-emergency-works-old-kilpatrick/?fbclid=IwAR20jDW-ucekrvqO6hJ1R9HQBXo9cEX_yTA7ANxMOJyVbJCgOrimVzWPrrU</a></p>



<p>If you were thinking of heading that way over the weekend or next week a new route will be needed. There is no indication of an alternative diversionary route on the information we have &#8211; sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">12413</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consultation Digest Issue 72, 27 October 2020: bike storage &#8211; do get your views in to the Scottish Government!</title>
		<link>https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-72-27-october-2020-bike-storage-do-get-your-views-in-to-the-scottish-government-12342</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tricia Fort]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 18:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Consultation digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diversions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoBike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bike parking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[car parking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diversions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Dunbartonshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EV Charging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glasgow city council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Lanarkshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[onbikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renfrewshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Road safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scottish Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed cushions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustrans]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gobike.org/?p=12342</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Another selection of items for you, but please do respond to the OnBikes survey and, if you are a tenement resident, let&#8217;s get some bike storage, see Item 1.5. Also, don&#8217;t forget the language survey in 1.4. Lots to keep you busy but do read on for even more. Contents Section 1: Current Consultations **NEW** &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-72-27-october-2020-bike-storage-do-get-your-views-in-to-the-scottish-government-12342" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Consultation Digest Issue 72, 27 October 2020: bike storage &#8211; do get your views in to the Scottish Government!"</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Another selection of items for you, but please do respond to the OnBikes survey and, if you are a tenement resident, let&#8217;s get some bike storage, see Item 1.5. Also, don&#8217;t forget the language survey in 1.4. Lots to keep you busy but do read on for even more.</p>



<span id="more-12342"></span>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Contents</strong></h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 1: Current Consultations</h4>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>**NEW** OnBikes and St Paul&#8217;s Youth Forum, short survey for Sustrans’ Places for Everyone scheme, please respond as soon as possible!</li><li>Glasgow City Council, Connecting Communities, Transport Strategy Public Conversation, Your Views, closes 30 October</li><li>Glasgow City Council (City Centre) (Traffic Management) Order 2010 (Variation No 27) Order 202, waiting and loading, plus EV parking, closes 30 October</li><li>The Guardian Newspaper, Why we need media reporting guidelines for road safety, closes 08 November</li><li>The Scottish Government, Programme for Reviewing and Extending Permitted Development Rights (PDR) in Scotland &#8211; Consultation on Phase 1 Proposals, closes 08 November</li><li>Transport Scotland, Scotland&#8217;s Road Safety Framework to 2030 &#8211; Draft Public Consultation, closes 01 December </li><li>**NEW** Glasgow City Council, new City Development Plan, closes 11 December</li><li>**NEW** East Dunbartonshire Proposed Local Development Plan 2 (LDP2), closes 15 January 2021</li></ol>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations</h4>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 3: Consultation Feedback</h4>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>NHS Lanarkshire, new Monklands Hospital, GoBike response</li><li>Glasgow Airport Investment Area (GAIA) project, newsletter, including new bridge over White Cart</li><li>Stockingfield Bridge diversion details</li><li>Glasgow City Council, Ruchazie Road speed cushion confirmation &#8211; and our question!</li><li>East Dunbartonshire Council, Local Development Plan Newsletter No 60</li></ol>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 1: Current Consultations in date order for responses</strong></h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">1.1 **NEW** OnBikes and St Paul&#8217;s Youth Forum, short survey for Sustrans’ Places for Everyone scheme, please respond as soon as possible!</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="242" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/necw2.png?resize=525%2C242&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-12347" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/necw2.png?resize=600%2C277&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/necw2.png?resize=300%2C139&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/necw2.png?w=1198&amp;ssl=1 1198w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/necw2.png?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /></figure>



<p>This is a reminder of the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="http://www.gobike.org/north-east-city-ways-needs-you-12345#more-12345" target="_blank">blog</a> that came out on 18 October. If you haven&#8217;t read it yet then please click <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="http://www.gobike.org/north-east-city-ways-needs-you-12345#more-12345" target="_blank">here</a>, read it and respond! The north east of the city needs you. The survey is quick and easy to do.</p>



<p>Responses are requested as soon as possible to meet Sustrans&#8217; funding timetable.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">1.2 Glasgow City Council, Connecting Communities, Transport Strategy Public Conversation, Your Views, closes 30 October</h4>



<p><br><br>This consultation from the City Council first appeared in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-70-29-september-2020-who-are-we-designing-streets-for-12131" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 70</a>, Item 1.9. The <a href="https://survey123.arcgis.com/share/eb02ec6ae8cf4443966bbaf1d2934aa2" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">survey</a> is a must-do for active travellers, so please do give it a go by Friday.</p>



<p></p>



<p></p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">1.3 Glasgow City Council (City Centre) (Traffic Management) Order 2010 (Variation No 27) Order 202, waiting and loading, plus EV parking, closes 30 October</h4>



<p>This consultation featured first in our previous <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-71-13-october-2020-how-do-we-talk-about-cycling-and-where-do-we-store-our-bikes-12249" target="_blank">Digest, 71</a>, Item 1.5 and here&#8217;s the GoBike <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/GoBike-City-Centre-parking-EV-charging-271020.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">letter in response</a>. In the letter there is reference to the Stage One consultation letter that we submitted; we were not able to publish that response at the time but <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/GoBike-City-Centre-Stage-One-020320-1.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">here it is</a> now, for reference.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">1.4 The Guardian Newspaper, Why we need media reporting guidelines for road safety, closes 08 November</h4>



<p>We know from the struggles of all under-represented groups that the use of language is important. In our case, some of the language used about cycling and those of us who cycle is very pejorative. This survey, taken from the Guardian newspaper, was in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-71-13-october-2020-how-do-we-talk-about-cycling-and-where-do-we-store-our-bikes-12249" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 71</a>, Item 1.6 and is well worth a few minutes of your time, if you haven&#8217;t already completed it. Here&#8217;s the <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/bike-blog/2020/sep/28/why-we-need-media-reporting-guidelines-for-road-safety?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">link</a> and you need to read a bit of text so that you can complete the very short survey.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">1.5 The Scottish Government, Programme for Reviewing and Extending Permitted Development Rights (PDR) in Scotland &#8211; Consultation on Phase 1 Proposals, closes 08 November</h4>



<p><br><br>Item 1.7 in <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-71-13-october-2020-how-do-we-talk-about-cycling-and-where-do-we-store-our-bikes-12249" target="_blank">Digest 71</a> gave the details for this consultation &#8211; a must for any cycling tenement dweller! Do please look at this <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://consult.gov.scot/planning-architecture/programme-reviewing-extending-pdr/consultation/" target="_blank">link</a> and get your views in.</p>



<p></p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">1.6 Transport Scotland, Scotland&#8217;s Road Safety Framework to 2030 &#8211; Draft Public Consultation, closes 01 December</h4>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="alignright size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="310" height="163" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Road-Safety-Framework.jpeg?resize=310%2C163&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-12301" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Road-Safety-Framework.jpeg?w=310&amp;ssl=1 310w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Road-Safety-Framework.jpeg?resize=300%2C158&amp;ssl=1 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 310px) 100vw, 310px" /></figure></div>



<p>This consultation, first featured in <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-69-15-september-2020-what-price-public-opinion-12044" target="_blank">Digest 69</a>, Item 1.13 and it&#8217;s clear, with an average of 3 people per week being killed on Scotland&#8217;s roads that something needs to be done about road safety.<br>Here&#8217;s the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.transport.gov.scot/consultation/scotlands-road-safety-framework-to-2030-draft-public-consultation/" target="_blank">link to the consultation information</a>.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">1.7 **NEW** Glasgow City Council, new City Development Plan, closes 11 December</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large is-resized"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/7692c1eb_m-600x131.png?resize=525%2C114&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-12373" width="525" height="114"/></figure>



<p>How good are our places? This is what the City Council wants to know, with this email from 21 October that GoBike member, Derek M, forwarded to us:</p>



<p>&#8220;<em>Good afternoon&nbsp;<br>Glasgow City Council is preparing a new&nbsp;<strong class="">City Development Plan</strong>&nbsp;and we want to hear your views on what it should say.&nbsp;We are working with our partners, The Future Fox to host an online engagement called Placebuilder. It is designed to help us understand the experiences and ideas of Glasgow’s different neighbourhood communities&nbsp;on what they think works, what could be better and what they would like to see change.&nbsp;<br>The engagement will run from Wednesday 21<sup class="">st</sup>&nbsp;October until Friday 11<sup class="">th</sup>&nbsp;December 2020.&nbsp;If you click on the image below you will be taken to the engagement home page where you can choose to answer questions about your neighbourhood. Or if you are really interested in a specific issue in a specific place you can tag the map and tell us more.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</em></p>



<p>Here&#8217;s the <a href="https://placebuilder.io/glasgowplaces" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">link from the image</a>. (The image, but not the link, copied from the email!)</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="294" height="240" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/image.png?resize=294%2C240&#038;ssl=1" alt="cid:image002.jpg@01D6A7A6.9C924650" class="wp-image-12374"/></figure>



<p><a class="" href="https://placebuilder.io/glasgowplaces"></a><em>We want to hear from all age groups including from younger people, and all backgrounds, circumstances, and locations so the Plan can reflect Glasgow’s diverse population. Understanding how everyday Glasgow works will help us create a Plan that leads to a better city experience as well as addressing the big issues we face like tackling climate change, helping to create more opportunities to work and improving health and wellbeing.<br></em><br><em>The Plan will also guide where we want new development to happen in order to make Glasgow a more healthy, liveable, and successful place. Things like the location of new housing and businesses, how we can improve our town centres or re-use vacant land and protect our important built and natural assets.<br><br>The new Plan will affect every neighbourhood in the Glasgow City Council Area and will guide how every part of the city should be developed in the future. We want this to be influenced by what you &#8211; the people of Glasgow, think about our city and what the local priorities for change are.&nbsp;By using the tools in this consultation we hope to get an understanding of how our different places need to be looked at in the new Plan. Your opinions will form an important part of the Plan’s evidence base which means it is responsive to our communities’ views and ideas.<strong>&nbsp;</strong>This is the start of the process and we will be taking more opportunities to speak to specific groups and gain ideas. It will take a number of years to gather all of the information and other evidence before we are able to share a draft plan but your comments and suggestions will help us prepare a Plan that reflects the priorities of all of Glasgow’s communities.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br><br>Development Plan, <br>Development and Regeneration Services<br>Glasgow City Council231 George Street, Glasgow, G1 1RX<br><a class="" href="mailto:developmentplan@glasgow.gov.uk">developmentplan@glasgow.gov.uk</a>&#8220;</em></p>



<p>So do please get your views in.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">1.8 **NEW** East Dunbartonshire Proposed Local Development Plan 2 (LDP2), closes 15 January 2021</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large is-resized"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/East-Dunbartonshire-Council.png?resize=525%2C84&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-12376" width="525" height="84" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/East-Dunbartonshire-Council.png?w=562&amp;ssl=1 562w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/East-Dunbartonshire-Council.png?resize=300%2C48&amp;ssl=1 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /></figure>



<p>Here&#8217;s the email that we received from East Dunbartonshire Council on 22 October, bearing the news forecast in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-70-29-september-2020-who-are-we-designing-streets-for-12131" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 70</a>, Section 2, Forthcoming Consultations:</p>



<p><em>&#8220;Dear Sir/ Madam, <br><br>East Dunbartonshire Council has published the proposed LDP2 and is notifying you of the representation period for the Proposed Plan, from Monday 19th October 2020 until Friday 15th January 2021. You have been sent this email because you have previously shown an interest in the development plan process. <br>The Proposed LDP2 sets out policies and proposals to guide land use change and improve the quality of development. It includes the following policies: <br>a development strategy, seven community policies and subject policies. </em><br><br><em>The Council is also consulting on the following related documents:   <br> · Environmental Report   <br> · Proposed Delivery Programme   <br> · Proposed Sustainability and Energy Statement form   <br> · Additional Site Assessments for Nine Sites Submitted During the Main Issues Report Consultation in 2019   <br> · Habitats Regulations Appraisal <br><br>The Proposed LDP2 and the other related five consultation documents may be viewed on the Council website: <a href="http://www.eastdunbarton.gov.uk/LDP2">www.eastdunbarton.gov.uk/LDP2</a> <br>Due to the restrictions in place due to the COVID-19 pandemic a hard copy of the LDP2 and the other documents will also be available to borrow in the following libraries as part of the Connect and Collect service, collection is by appointment only. <br>For further information on this service please check the East Dunbartonshire Leisure &amp; Culture Trust website <a href="https://www.edlc.co.uk/libraries/connect-collect">https://www.edlc.co.uk/libraries/connect-collect</a>, or telephone the following libraries between 10am and 1pm. </em><br> · Bearsden Library, 69 Drymen Road, Bearsden G61 3QT. Telephone 0141 777 3021 <br> · <em>Bishopbriggs Library, 170 Kirkintilloch Road, Bishopbriggs G64 2LX. Telephone 0141 777 3155 <br> · Lennoxtown Library, 46 Main Street, Lennoxtown G66 7JJ. Telephone 0141 777 3151 <br> · Milngavie Library, Allander Road, Milngavie G62 8PN. Telephone 0141 956 2776  <br>· William Patrick Library, 2-4 West High Street, Kirkintilloch G66 1AD. Telephone 0141 777 3141 <br><br>If you would like to make a representation to the Council on the Proposed LDP2 a representation form and further information is available on the Council website: <a href="http://www.eastdunbarton.gov.uk/LDP2">www.eastdunbarton.gov.uk/LDP2</a> <br>The Land Planning Policy Team is also available to answer any enquiries by telephone and email, Monday to Friday 9am ? 5pm, on 0300 123 4510. Your representation should explain clearly and concisely your reasons for seeking a change to, or supporting, the Proposed LDP2 and you are encouraged to use the representation form. Your representation should be submitted by e-mail to <a href="mailto:development.plan@eastdunbarton.gov.uk">development.plan@eastdunbarton.gov.uk</a> or by post to: Land Planning Policy Team Broomhill Depot Kilsyth Road Kirkintilloch G66 1TP <br>Representations should be submitted no later than 5pm on Friday 15th January 2021. </em>&#8220;</p>



<p>Plenty for you residents of East Dunbartonshire to get your teeth into there!</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations</strong></h3>



<p>No news again.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 3: Consultation Feedback</strong></h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">3.1 NHS Lanarkshire, new Monklands Hospital, GoBike response</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large is-resized"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/3-Wester-Moffat.jpg?resize=525%2C315&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-12313" width="525" height="315" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/3-Wester-Moffat.jpg?w=510&amp;ssl=1 510w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/3-Wester-Moffat.jpg?resize=300%2C180&amp;ssl=1 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /></figure>



<p>Item 1.1 in Digest 71 highlighted the consultation on the location for the proposed new Monklands Hospital, which closed on 18 October. Of the 3 possible sites GoBike favours the Wester Moffat site, shown above and here&#8217;s our <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/GoBike-Monklands-Hospital-site-161020.pdf" target="_blank">submission</a> of 16 October explaining why. This site is definitely the best for active travel and public transport for the nearby population.</p>



<p>Here&#8217;s the acknowledgement that we received on 20 October:</p>



<p><em>&#8220;Monklands Replacement Project </em><br><br><em>Thank you for your email. This is confirmation that the project team have received your email and your feedback has been noted.  </em><br><br><em>In the meantime, any updates will be published at <a href="http://www.monklands.scot.nhs.uk">www.monklands.scot.nhs.uk</a> </em>&#8220;</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">3.2 Glasgow Airport Investment Area (GAIA) project, newsletter, including new bridge over White Cart</h4>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="alignright size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="392" height="193" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Glasgow-City-Deal.jpg?resize=392%2C193&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-6163" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Glasgow-City-Deal.jpg?w=392&amp;ssl=1 392w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Glasgow-City-Deal.jpg?resize=300%2C148&amp;ssl=1 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 392px) 100vw, 392px" /></figure></div>



<p><br>Here&#8217;s the latest news from the Glasgow Airport Investment Area, received on 19 October:</p>



<p><br><br>&#8220;<em>We wanted to draw your attention to the following update on the GAIA City Deal project &#8230;</em></p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large is-resized"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/New-White-Cart-bridge.jpg?resize=525%2C203&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-12378" width="525" height="203" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/New-White-Cart-bridge.jpg?resize=600%2C232&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/New-White-Cart-bridge.jpg?resize=300%2C116&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/New-White-Cart-bridge.jpg?w=737&amp;ssl=1 737w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>New bridge over the White Cart at Wright Street under construction</figcaption></figure>



<p><em>As construction progresses at our Glasgow Airport Investment Area (GAIA) project, our contractor&nbsp;Wills Bros Civil Engineering, have issued the second GAIA newsletter which provides an update on progress of construction works on the project. You can view this from the related document section of our GAIA webpage at <a href="https://renfrewshire.us13.list-manage.com/track/click?u=d02f87f46188a80b76b3baef1&amp;id=6080b300fa&amp;e=046567d752" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.renfrewshire.gov.uk/gaia</a>.</em></p>



<p><strong>Second issue of official newsletter for the Glasgow Airport Investment Area (GAIA) project.</strong></p>



<p><em><a href="https://renfrewshire.us13.list-manage.com/track/click?u=d02f87f46188a80b76b3baef1&amp;id=cb7c400011&amp;e=046567d752" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">This newsletter</a>, which is the second&nbsp;in a series updates&nbsp;as the project progresses, includes: Project progress; Traffic management including lane closures required to allow construction to progress; Covid-19 safety measures; Community updates; and Next steps. You can download the newsletter from the related documents section of&nbsp;our GAIA project page at <a href="https://renfrewshire.us13.list-manage.com/track/click?u=d02f87f46188a80b76b3baef1&amp;id=1d307e765b&amp;e=046567d752" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">www.renfrewshire.gov.uk/gaia</a>.</em>&#8220;</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">3.3 Stockingfield Bridge diversion details</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large is-resized"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Bridge-picture-Stockingfield.jpg?resize=525%2C306&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-6147" width="525" height="306"/></figure>



<p>Here we have the latest news, received on 19 October via Sustrans:</p>



<p>&#8220;<em><strong>From:</strong> Communications [mailto:Communications@scottishcanals.co.uk]<br><strong>Sent:</strong> 19 October 2020 15:57<br><strong>Subject:</strong> Stockingfield Bridge Update</em><br><br><em>Good afternoon,<br><br>I want to update you on progress of the new Stockingfield Bridge, which will not only reconnect the communities of Ruchill, Gilshochill and Maryhill but complete the last link in the Forth &amp; Clyde Canal towpath, bringing a major active travel improvement.<br><br>Unfortunately, as part of the construction of the bridge it is necessary to temporarily close a section of the Forth &amp; Clyde Canal towpath between Ruchill Street in Maryhill and Stockingfield Junction from <strong>November 16, 2020 to approximately July 2022.</strong><br><br>This will impact anyone walking or cycling the following routes:</em></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li><em>Bowling to Falkirk</em></li><li><em>Bowling to Glasgow City Centre</em></li><li><em>Falkirk to Glasgow City Centre</em></li></ul>



<p>The canal will also be closed to boating traffic from November 1 to March 15<sup>,</sup> 2021.<br><br><em>A 4.4km towpath diversion has been put in place for walkers and cyclists that follows the River Kelvin, avoiding the traffic-heavy alternative of Maryhill Road. The route, which has been agreed with Sustrans and Glasgow City Council, will be clearly marked and letters are being distributed to local residents by our contractor.<br><br>An area of ground adjacent to the canal is also being provided for local dog walkers during this closure period, which will also be well signposted.<br><br>As well as opening up a new access route for people living in Ruchill, Gilshochill and Maryhill with the west end and city centre, the new bridge will allow walkers and cyclists to cross the canal at towpath level rather than having to drop off and negotiate the road tunnel at Lochburn Road before rejoining the path again.<br><br>The increased access to the canal and the design of the bridge structure with an integrated observation deck and landscaping on this currently underused site will encourage greater use of the canal.</em><br><br><em>As part of the development new traffic signals will also be installed on Lochburn Road to manage traffic through the Stockingfield Aqeduct.<br><br>If you require any more information, please get in touch.<br><br>Yours sincerely<br><strong>Alasdair Hamilton</strong><br>Technical Manager<br>Scottish Canals</em>&#8220;</p>



<p>The River Kelvin path will be busy then; shame the City Council hasn&#8217;t installed cycle lanes on Maryhill Road yet, but, on the bright side, we do have a diversion.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">3.4 Glasgow City Council, Ruchazie Road speed cushion confirmation &#8211; and our question!</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large is-resized"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Ruchazie-Road-map.png?resize=525%2C273&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-12077" width="525" height="273" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Ruchazie-Road-map.png?resize=600%2C312&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Ruchazie-Road-map.png?resize=300%2C156&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Ruchazie-Road-map.png?w=650&amp;ssl=1 650w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /></figure>



<p>Back in Digest 69, Item 1.10, we published proposals for speed cushions to be installed on Ruchazie Road. Here&#8217;s the<a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/GoBike-Ashgill-Cleeves-Ruchazie-Ryehill-Victoria-Park-Drive-traffic-calming-response-150920.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> letter of objection</a> to this and 4 other schemes across the city that we submitted on 15 September.</p>



<p>Glasgow City Council confirmed by email on 20 October that the scheme will go ahead as proposed with 40 speed cushions and 26 bollards to be installed.</p>



<p>GoBike, on 24 October, submitted this question in response to the City Council:</p>



<p>&#8220;<em>Hello,<br><br>Thank you for this response.<br><br>Many GoBike members ask about the effectiveness of speed cushions in reducing the speed of motor traffic and reducing collisions, both between motor vehicles and between motor vehicles and people. Thus could you please send me the results of your post-installation surveys so that we speed-cushion-sceptics may be reassured that the City Council is acting wisely to improve safety on our streets?<br><br>Many thanks</em>&#8220;</p>



<p>We&#8217;ll let you know if and when we get a reply.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">3.5 East Dunbartonshire Council, Local Development Plan Newsletter No 60</h4>



<p>Here&#8217;s the <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/LDP-Newsletter-60-October-2020.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">latest newsletter from EDC</a>, received on 21 October </p>



<p>In this newsletter:<br> Have Your Say on the Proposed Local Development Plan 2<br> Clydeplan Draft Forestry and Woodland Strategy Consultation<br> Electric Vehicles in East Dunbartonshire<br> Guide for Home Businesses</p>



<p>_____________________________________________________</p>



<p>That&#8217;s it for now, but watch out for more news in 2 weeks and some forthcoming changes in our Digests!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">12342</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consultation Digest Issue 62, 09 June 2020: Your views are needed!</title>
		<link>https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-62-09-june-2020-your-views-are-needed-11412</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tricia Fort]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2020 17:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consultation digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoBike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[covid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cycling UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Renfrewshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glasgow city council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scottish Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space for Distancing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustrans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Woodside]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gobike.org/?p=11412</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Lots and lots of requests for your views in this issue but, before you get your fingers tapping on that keyboard scoot to our very last item for details of how Glasgow got its first community-led pop-up bike lane &#8211; a good news story to start and end with. Yes, we have requests for your &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-62-09-june-2020-your-views-are-needed-11412" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Consultation Digest Issue 62, 09 June 2020: Your views are needed!"</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Lots and lots of requests for your views in this issue but, before you get your fingers tapping on that keyboard scoot to our very last item for details of how Glasgow got its first community-led pop-up bike lane &#8211; a good news story to start and end with.</p>



<span id="more-11412"></span>



<p>Yes, we have  requests for your views from the Scottish Government to Glasgow and East Renfrewshire councils and cycling organisations, so do please get those fingers clicking.<br>The majority have no closing dates but don&#8217;t delay, get your views in before the cars come back and your temperature rises.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Contents:</h4>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">Section 1: Current Consultations</h6>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>Scottish Government &#8211; Just Transition Commission, closes 30 June</li><li>**NEW** Glasgow, Pollok Country Park &#8211; Planning Application, closes 06 July</li><li>Scottish Parliament EHRi Committee, Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Equalities and Human Rights</li><li>Scottish Parliament, EEFW Commitee, COVID-19 &#8211; Impact on Scotland&#8217;s businesses, workers and economy</li><li>**NEW** Glasgow, Woodside, Urban Realm seek views on Public Realm Improvements</li><li>**NEW** East Renfrewshire, Spaces for People Commonplace Map, looking for your views</li><li>**NEW** Scottish Green Party, Street Space for Glasgow &#8211; Join our campaign, tell us your ideas</li><li>**NEW** Cycling UK in Scotland, Using the Widen My Path mapping tool to call for Space for Distancing measures</li><li>**NEW** Glasgow City Council Spaces for People &#8211; Glasgow Commonplace map</li></ol>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations</h6>



<p>We&#8217;ve drawn a blank again.</p>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">Section 3: Consultation Feedback</h6>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>Sustrans, Spaces to Move tool</li><li>Glasgow City Development Plan &#8211; Update</li><li>Glasgow, On Bikes: how did they get that cycle lane on Langdale Street?</li></ol>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 1: Current Consultations</h4>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">1.1 Scottish Government &#8211; Just Transition Commission, closes 30 June</h6>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full is-resized"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Scottish-Government.png?resize=525%2C98&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-8352" width="525" height="98" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Scottish-Government.png?w=517&amp;ssl=1 517w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Scottish-Government.png?resize=300%2C56&amp;ssl=1 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /></figure>



<p>This consultation first featured in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-60-12-may-2020-the-lockdown-goes-on-but-will-we-learn-from-it-11199" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 60</a>, Item 1.1 and here&#8217;s some information from the Government website:</p>



<p><em>The&nbsp;<a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="http://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2019/15/enacted" target="_blank">Climate Change (Emissions Reduction Targets)(Scotland) Act 2019</a>&nbsp;recently passed by the Scottish Parliament contains some of the most ambitious statutory emission reduction targets in the world.</em></p>



<p><em>The Just Transition Commission has been established to provide Scottish Ministers with practical, realistic, and affordable recommendations for action that will:</em></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li><em>maximise the economic and social opportunities that the move to a net-zero economy by 2045 offers</em></li><li><em>build on Scotland’s existing strengths and assets</em></li><li><em>understand and mitigate risks that could arise in relation to regional cohesion, equalities, poverty (including fuel poverty), and a sustainable and inclusive labour market</em></li></ul>



<p>If you follow the&nbsp;<a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://consult.gov.scot/just-transition-commission/just-transition-commission-call-for-evidence/" target="_blank">link</a>&nbsp;you will be able to respond to the call for evidence – since most of us have a bit more time at the moment do put your thoughts about maintaining road space for cycling, reducing emissions, etc in the boxes. Please do it for the sake of your health and the nation’s health. There are only about 6 questions, each with a box for your thoughts, so do get them in.</p>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">1.2 **NEW** Glasgow Pollok Country Park &#8211; Planning Application, closes 06 July</h6>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img data-recalc-dims="1" decoding="async" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/burrell-collection-pollok-park.jpg?w=525&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-7330"/></figure>



<p>This email arrived yesterday, 08 June; we haven&#8217;t had time to digest it yet but if you have any views please do respond yourself to the application but also let GoBike know by either emailing <a href="mailto:consultations@gobike.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">consultations@gobike.org</a> or, if you are an active GoBike member, use the Slack Consultations channel.</p>



<p>&#8220;<em>Hello,<br><br>Following an extensive period of public engagement, Glasgow City Council and Glasgow Life have submitted a planning application for an Active Travel Management Plan in Pollok Country Park. This Plan improves access to and within the park by promoting public transport and pedestrian links, modifying private car access and vehicular routes within the park, and improving connectivity to local areas.</em><br><br><em>The application is now available to view here (Reference Number 20/01352/FUL): <a href="https://publicaccess.glasgow.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?keyVal=QAZZ49EXIKO00&amp;activeTab=summary" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">https://publicaccess.glasgow.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?keyVal=QAZZ49EXIKO00&amp;activeTab=summary</a><br><br>A copy of the engagement feedback and responses will be available to view via the above link shortly.<br><br>If you have any questions about the application please get in touch.<br><br>Kind Regards,<br><br>Glasgow City Council/Glasgow Life</em>&#8220;</p>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">1.3 Scottish Parliament EHRi Committee, Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Equalities and Human Rights, closes 01 January 2021</h6>



<p>This open-ended survey was first covered in <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-60-12-may-2020-the-lockdown-goes-on-but-will-we-learn-from-it-11199" target="_blank">Digest 60</a>, Item 1.2 and here&#8217;s a quote from the<a href="https://yourviews.parliament.scot/ehrc/impact-covid-19-pandemic-equalities-human-rights/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> Parliament&#8217;s website</a>:</p>



<p>&#8220;<em>This inquiry seeks to identify the evidence that some groups of people are experiencing disproportionately negative impacts of the coronavirus, and by some of the measures taken to deal with it.</em><br><br><em>The inquiry will look at the measures the Scottish Government and other public bodies, including regulatory and oversight bodies, can take to help. It will also examine measures taken by public bodies and the impacts they may have on equality and human rights.</em></p>



<p><em>We want to hear your views on:</em></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li><em>which equality groups are being disproportionately negatively affected by the coronavirus, and by some of the measures taken to deal with it&nbsp;</em></li><li><em>what equality and human rights impacts there have been</em></li><li><em>what the Scottish Government can change or improve to mitigate against these impacts</em>&#8220;</li></ul>



<p>There is no doubt that the very people who suffer from the lack of an effective travel system are the ones who will be suffering from Covid-19. It is significant that many people have adopted the cycle as a means of transport during the pandemic and many more would walk and cycle if our streets were less congested by motor vehicles and the air were cleaner.<br>There are only 5 questions, each with a box for your thoughts, so please get them down in print.</p>



<p>Here&#8217;s the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://yourviews.parliament.scot/ehrc/impact-covid-19-pandemic-equalities-human-rights/consultation/intro/" target="_blank">link to start the survey</a>.</p>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">1.4 Scottish Parliament, EEFW Commitee, COVID-19 &#8211; Impact on Scotland&#8217;s businesses, workers and economy</h6>



<p>This is the 3rd nation-wide survey that is being aired here for the 3rd time, previously in <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-60-12-may-2020-the-lockdown-goes-on-but-will-we-learn-from-it-11199" target="_blank">Digest 60</a>, Item 1.3 and <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-61-26-may-2020-11310" target="_blank">Digest 61</a>, Item 1.5, and it applies specifically to businesses, workers and the economy &#8211; which basically affects all of us. Here&#8217;s a quote from the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.parliament.scot/parliamentarybusiness/CurrentCommittees/114924.aspx" target="_blank">Parliament&#8217;s website</a>:</p>



<p>&#8220;<em>The Scottish Parliament’s Economy, Energy and Fair Work Committee is here and ready to listen to your views at this challenging time. We are keen to hear from you on the impact of COVID-19 on businesses, workers and the economy in Scotland.</em>&#8220;</p>



<p>Views are invited by email, so it&#8217;s an open page for you to give your views. If you are involved in active travel, it&#8217;s particularly important to give your views &#8211; we are at the bottom of the pile just now, so any progress must be up!</p>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">1.5 **NEW** Glasgow, Woodside, Urban Realm seek views on Public Realm Improvements</h6>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="371" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Woodside-Urban-Realm.jpg?resize=525%2C371&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-11427" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Woodside-Urban-Realm.jpg?w=1500&amp;ssl=1 1500w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Woodside-Urban-Realm.jpg?resize=300%2C212&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Woodside-Urban-Realm.jpg?resize=600%2C424&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Woodside-Urban-Realm.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 767px) 89vw, (max-width: 1000px) 54vw, (max-width: 1071px) 543px, 580px" /></figure>



<p>GoBike member, Brenda, alerted us to this <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.urbanrealm.com/news/8768/Views_sought_on_Woodside_public_realm_improvements_.html" target="_blank">news from Urban Realm</a>. Here are some words from their <a href="https://www.urbanrealm.com/news/8768/Views_sought_on_Woodside_public_realm_improvements_.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">newsletter</a>:</p>



<p><em>Queens Cross Housing Association has opened a consultative website relaying its plans for a series of environmental improvements to the Woodside area of Glasgow to stimulate discussion around the future public realm.&nbsp;<br>Conducted in parallel with plans by Sustrans to introduce an&nbsp;<a href="https://www.urbanrealm.com/news/8614/Woodside_active_travel_network_takes_shape.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">active travel network</a>&nbsp;the Woodside Making Places initiative seeks to unify streets, parks and playgrounds as a single connected habitat of routes and spaces.<br>Indicative designs have been brought forward by landscape architects Raeburn Farquhar Bowen to show how key areas such as St George&#8217;s in the Fields; North Woodside Pool and the M8 motorway can be made to function as one with new planting, community gardens, cycle routes and a civic space at the junction of North Woodside and St Georges Roads.</em></p>



<p>This appears to link in, or even overlap, the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/avenues" target="_blank">Avenues Programme</a> for the Underline route linking Great Western Road with Cambridge Street. However, this current Urban Realm consultation is about the overall public realm whereas the Avenues Programme is more active travel focussed.</p>



<p>The newsletter goes on to say:</p>



<p>&#8220;<em>Feedback on these approaches is being sought remotely with interested parties invited to&nbsp;<a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.woodsidemakingplaces.org.uk/your-comments" target="_blank">share their thoughts</a>&nbsp;directly. All input received will help inform a planning application which is expected to be formally submitted in August, with phase one construction following by spring 2021.</em>&#8220;</p>



<p>Note that the designs are actually on the Queen&#8217;s Cross HA website. There is a link from the Urban Realm newsletter, but it is not obvious. It is the link in the fourth paragraph which says &#8216;<a href="https://www.woodsidemakingplaces.org.uk/your-comments" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">share their thoughts</a>&#8216;. This takes you to the QXHA Woodside Making Places site. You then have to click on &#8216;The Design&#8217; (top right) and this takes you to the detailed designs for each micro-community. You click on the relevant photographs.</p>



<p>So please enter your views as soon as you can.</p>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">1.6 **NEW** East Renfrewshire, Spaces for People Commonplace Map, looking for your views</h6>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full is-resized"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/social-distancing.jpg?resize=525%2C238&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-11428" width="525" height="238" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/social-distancing.jpg?w=512&amp;ssl=1 512w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/social-distancing.jpg?resize=300%2C136&amp;ssl=1 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /></figure>



<p>GoBike member, Duncan, alerted us first to this initiative from East Renfrewshire and then on 04 June we received this email from the Local Authority:</p>



<p>&#8220;<em>Subject: East Renfrewshire Council Transport Response to COVID-19<br><br>Dear Stakeholders,<br><br>The situation resulting from COVID-19 is unprecedented has resulted in profound changes to travel patterns and how people use streets and spaces in East Renfrewshire. In response to the emergency East Renfrewshire Council have recently approved a Transport Response to COVID-19, which outlines a dynamic and phased approach to help residents adapt and renew to the current emergency, as well as help mitigate virus transmission and a possible &#8216;second surge&#8217;.</em><br><br><em>We have recently launched an <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://eastrenfrewshire.maps.arcgis.com/apps/MapSeries/index.html?appid=bab9e74ba33b4a35b1be846c361222b1" target="_blank">interactive map</a> in order to provide further information on measures contained in the Transport Response to COVID-19 . This platform will give residents and stakeholders the opportunity to find out more about the Transport Response, proposed plans and the opportunity to provide feedback on specific measures across the area<br><br>Spaces for People in East Renfrewshire<br><br>East Renfrewshire Council have secured funding through the Sustrans and Transport Scotland ‘Spaces for People’ programme to identify temporary response measures that help residents practice physical distancing and to move around safely in public spaces during the COVID-19 emergency. This is in order to limit virus transmission and to enable residents to safely walk, cycle and wheel for essential journeys and exercise.</em><br><br><em>As part of this emergency response we looking for your views on issues and opportunities to improve safe physical distancing when walking, cycling and wheeling in your area. For more information and how you can help us identify areas where measures are required please visit &nbsp;<a href="https://erspacesforpeoplemap.commonplace.is" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">https://erspacesforpeoplemap.commonplace.is</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;<br><br>We hope this information is of use and please feel free to distribute to colleagues, contacts and social networks.<br><br>Kind regards<br><br>John Shelton – Senior Strategy Officer (Roads &amp; Transportation)<br><br>Angus Collins – Partnership Officer (Corporate and Community Services)</em>&#8220;</p>



<p>If, for any reason, you walk or cycle in East Renfrewshire, do please contribute to the map.</p>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">1.7 **NEW** Scottish Green Party, Street Space for Glasgow &#8211; Join our campaign, tell us your ideas</h6>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="alignright size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="200" height="200" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Scottish_Green_Party_Logo.svg_.png?resize=200%2C200&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-11432" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Scottish_Green_Party_Logo.svg_.png?w=200&amp;ssl=1 200w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Scottish_Green_Party_Logo.svg_.png?resize=150%2C150&amp;ssl=1 150w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Scottish_Green_Party_Logo.svg_.png?resize=100%2C100&amp;ssl=1 100w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 200px) 100vw, 200px" /></figure></div>



<p><br><br>GoBike has no political affiliation, although several of our members are in political parties and here&#8217;s a message from the Green Party on a topic close to our collective heart: </p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="638" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/StreetSpaceForglasgow-Greens-scaled.jpg?resize=525%2C638&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-11431" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/StreetSpaceForglasgow-Greens-scaled.jpg?w=2106&amp;ssl=1 2106w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/StreetSpaceForglasgow-Greens-scaled.jpg?resize=247%2C300&amp;ssl=1 247w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/StreetSpaceForglasgow-Greens-scaled.jpg?resize=494%2C600&amp;ssl=1 494w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/StreetSpaceForglasgow-Greens-scaled.jpg?resize=1263%2C1536&amp;ssl=1 1263w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/StreetSpaceForglasgow-Greens-scaled.jpg?resize=1684%2C2048&amp;ssl=1 1684w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/StreetSpaceForglasgow-Greens-scaled.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/StreetSpaceForglasgow-Greens-scaled.jpg?w=1575&amp;ssl=1 1575w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 767px) 89vw, (max-width: 1000px) 54vw, (max-width: 1071px) 543px, 580px" /></figure>



<p>The links were removed to get that message in but they are all <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/StreetSpaceForglasgow-Greens.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>. Do have a look &#8211; at least this is politicians looking for our views!</p>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">1.8 **NEW** Cycling UK in Scotland, Using the Widen My Path mapping tool to call for Space for Distancing measures</h6>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="alignleft size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="305" height="165" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/CyclingUK-in-Scotland.png?resize=305%2C165&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-9446" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/CyclingUK-in-Scotland.png?w=305&amp;ssl=1 305w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/CyclingUK-in-Scotland.png?resize=300%2C162&amp;ssl=1 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 305px) 100vw, 305px" /></figure></div>



<p>It&#8217;s important that our views are heard if we wish to make any gains for active travel out of this awful pandemic.<br><br>Cycling UK in Scotland is looking for your views, with this email that we received on 05 June:</p>



<p>&#8220;<em>Dear campaigners, groups and supporters<br><br>Apologies for the mass mailing and to anyone who is already using the Widen My Path tool.<br><br>This is a quick update about how we are using the Widen My Path campaign’s mapping tool in the next phase of our campaigning at Cycling UK in Scotland.<br></em><br><em>The number of Scottish councils applying to the Space for People fund is growing and we hope to see many more measures being put in place soon. At CUK we are now asking our members and supporters to use the Widen My Path campaign tool to 1) show there is still a need for all councils to provide space for distancing and 2) show where measure would be most helpful. Our <a href="https://www.cyclinguk.org/covid-19-safe-space-social-distancing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">campaign webpage</a> also helps supporters to contact their councillors to let them know they have used the tool.<br><br>Some councils are already consulting on where measures would be most helpful so we will be asked them to use the responses in the Widen My Path map in conjunction with any other mapping tools or decision-making processes.</em><br><br><em><strong>It would be great to get lots of ideas uploaded onto the Widen My Path map so if you are part of a local campaign please do encourage your group members, and their friends and relations, to use it </strong>either directly at <a href="https://www.widenmypath.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">https://www.widenmypath.com/</a> &nbsp;or through our <a href="https://www.cyclinguk.org/covid-19-safe-space-social-distancing" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">CUK webpage</a> where people can also send a message to their councillors.<br><br>Regards<br><br>Jim<br><strong>Jim Densham</strong><br><strong>Campaigns and Policy Manager &#8211; Scotland</strong>, <strong>Cycling UK in Scotland</strong></em>&#8220;</p>



<p>We need to make our voices heard so please contribute to this campaign.</p>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">1.9 Glasgow City Council Spaces for People &#8211; Glasgow Commonplace map</h6>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="alignright size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="120" height="120" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Glasgow-City-Council-logo.png?resize=120%2C120&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-10937" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Glasgow-City-Council-logo.png?w=120&amp;ssl=1 120w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Glasgow-City-Council-logo.png?resize=100%2C100&amp;ssl=1 100w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 120px) 100vw, 120px" /></figure></div>



<p>Glasgow City Council are working closely with Sustrans to provide Space For People, and have created their own CommonPlace map for this:&nbsp;</p>



<p>Here’s a link to the&nbsp;<a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://glasgowspacesforpeople.commonplace.is/" target="_blank">Spaces for People – Glasgow Commonplace map,</a>&nbsp;a project initiated, and information supplied, by&nbsp;<a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.sustrans.org.uk/scotland/our-work-scotland" target="_blank">Sustrans Scotland</a>,&nbsp;<a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.transport.gov.scot/" target="_blank">Transport Scotland</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/" target="_blank">Glasgow City Council</a></p>



<p>We in GoBike would like thank everyone for all your great ideas on our Streets for All Glasgow Commonplace site, developed in conjunction with Glasgow Eco Trust and On Bikes. We are hoping to work closely with Glasgow City Council and Sustrans Scotland to make sure these ideas contribute to the new #SpacesForPeople Commonplace from the City Council.</p>



<p>Our <a href="https://streetsforallglasgow.commonplace.is/comments" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Streets For All Glasgow commonplace</a> is still active and we still wish for folk to pass comments on it that are outside of Space For People, so that we can use this as data in the longer term to push for change.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations</h4>



<p>We&#8217;ve drawn a blank again, but there is plenty in Section 1 to keep you busy.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 3: Consultation Feedback</h4>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">3.1 Sustrans, Spaces to Move tool, looking for feedback</h6>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="alignleft size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="225" height="225" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Sustrans.jpg?resize=225%2C225&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-5780" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Sustrans.jpg?w=225&amp;ssl=1 225w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Sustrans.jpg?resize=150%2C150&amp;ssl=1 150w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Sustrans.jpg?resize=36%2C36&amp;ssl=1 36w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 225px) 100vw, 225px" /></figure></div>



<p>Adam Kesby in Sustrans Scotland  wrote to us on 29 May with this email:</p>



<p>&#8220;<em>As ever thanks for your bulletins/digests – really useful in my work to get folks to politicise and advocate for their interest in cycling.<br><br>At present I am pushing the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.sustrans.org.uk/space-to-move" target="_blank">Spaces to Move</a> tool – it’s UK-wide, trying to gather feedback on the temporary schemes:<br><br>Here’s Sustrans&#8217; tweet about it: <a href="https://twitter.com/sustrans/status/1258298042668716032">https://twitter.com/sustrans/status/1258298042668716032</a></em><br><br><em>Although not a formal monitoring tool – we are using it to collate responses to schemes – and I thought it would be of interest to you and your network! It’s not just for Spaces for People funded initiatives.</em>&#8220;</p>



<p>That&#8217;s a nice, short email giving GoBike both praise and information! If you have any feedback do please submit it.</p>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">3.2 Glasgow City Development Plan &#8211; Update</h6>



<p>Two of our members told us about this email that was issued by the City Council on 01 June:</p>



<p><em><strong>Subject:</strong> Glasgow City Development Plan &#8211; Update (OFFICIAL) &nbsp;<br><br><strong>OFFICIAL</strong><br><br>Dear Sir/Madam<br><br>Work has commenced on the production of Glasgow City Development Plan 2 and we wish to give you an update to our position at this time.<br><br>It is anticipated that the timescale for the production of the next LDP will emerge during the course of 2020 and will reflect changes to the planning system which are emerging through planning reforms.&nbsp; Detailed production of CDP 2 has been delayed until revised Development Planning Regulations have been produced in order to allow the new plan to align with emerging NPF4 policy priorities, the strategic context set out by the indicative Regional Spatial Strategy and other relevant strategies and outputs.<br><br>The timetable will be reflected in future updates of the Development Plan Scheme.</em><br><br><em>Early City Development Plan 2 activities have included:</em></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li><em>Early engagement with key statutory and non-statutory agencies to explore common challenges and opportunities;</em></li><li><em>Preparatory work on a comprehensive community engagement exercise, which will use the National Place Standard as the basis for communities to input towards new Plan priorities;</em></li><li><em>General background research to aid the new Plan preparation process. A series of Background Papers will be published online in due course;</em></li><li><em>An early public Call for Sites exercise aimed at identifying potential new sites for development, alternative use or protection (January 2019). All submissions received will be retained and reviewed and there will be further opportunity to submit new sites, given the time period that has elapsed since the original Call for Sites exercise. All sites put forward will be subject to strategic environmental assessment and a wider planning assessment as part of the plan preparation process.</em></li><li><em>The adoption of Glasgow&#8217;s Open Space Strategy</em></li></ul>



<p><em>Regular updates will be prepared and published on the Council’s website to keep you informed of progress on City Development Plan 2 <a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/article/17278/News-and-Timetables">https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/article/17278/News-and-Timetables</a><br><br>Development Plan Team<br>Glasgow City Council<br>231 George Street, Glasgow, G1 1RX<br><a href="mailto:developmentplan@glasgow.gov.uk">developmentplan@glasgow.gov.uk</a>&#8220;</em></p>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">3.3 Glasgow, On Bikes: how did they get that cycle lane on Langdale Street?</h6>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://i1.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Langdale-Road-cycle-lane-01-June-2020-rotated.jpg?fit=450%2C600&amp;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-11445" width="662" height="883" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Langdale-Road-cycle-lane-01-June-2020-rotated.jpg?w=480&amp;ssl=1 480w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Langdale-Road-cycle-lane-01-June-2020-rotated.jpg?resize=225%2C300&amp;ssl=1 225w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Langdale-Road-cycle-lane-01-June-2020-rotated.jpg?resize=450%2C600&amp;ssl=1 450w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /></figure>



<p>This short cycle lane is a major success story for <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.facebook.com/OnBikesGlasgow/" target="_blank">On Bikes</a> and the local community in Blackhill. Local people got together to discuss how to make Langdale Street safer for children to get to school, people  to get to work and for anyone who wishes to cycle.<br><br>Watch this super wee video to see Glasgow&#8217;s Lord Provost cycle the route and pronounce his support. Way to go, Blackhill!<br><a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://twitter.com/_OnBikes/status/1262787134160863234" target="_blank">https://twitter.com/_OnBikes/status/1262787134160863234</a><br><br>Originally, as seen in the video, the lane was marked out with old tyres, painted white with flowers from a major DIY store in them. Glasgow City Council then painted the lane at the junctions, put a white line along the route and protected it with cones. Unfortunately, the cones have now been removed &#8211; let&#8217;s hope it&#8217;s an administrative error &#8211; and cars are back parking there!<br>However, the City Council have promised to install physical separation &#8211; let&#8217;s hope it&#8217;s put in soon &#8211; and to look at the provision of a cycle lane on the other side of the street.<br><br>This is a wonderful example of Glasgow City Council listening to the community and supporting them to improve their neighbourhood. Democracy in action.</p>



<p>That&#8217;s quite a bundle of requests for your views. Please don&#8217;t disappoint them all; get your fingers clicking now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">11412</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consultation Digest Issue 60, 12 May 2020: the lockdown goes on, but will we learn from it?</title>
		<link>https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-60-12-may-2020-the-lockdown-goes-on-but-will-we-learn-from-it-11199</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tricia Fort]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2020 15:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consultation digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoBike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[covid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cycle route]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glasgow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Lanarkshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scottish Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustrans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temporary cycle facilities]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gobike.org/?p=11199</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Digest hits 60, so is it time to use the bus pass? No, certainly not; let&#8217;s keep cycling and we are now joined by so many others, it&#8217;s a delight. However, the news from North Lanarkshire is roads, roads and more roads but there are more promising signs from the Scottish Government and Parliament &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-60-12-may-2020-the-lockdown-goes-on-but-will-we-learn-from-it-11199" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Consultation Digest Issue 60, 12 May 2020: the lockdown goes on, but will we learn from it?"</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>The Digest hits 60, so is it time to use the bus pass? No, certainly not; let&#8217;s keep cycling and we are now joined by so many others, it&#8217;s a delight. However, the news from North Lanarkshire is roads, roads and more roads but there are more promising signs from the Scottish Government and Parliament on the effects of Covid 19 </p>



<span id="more-11199"></span>



<p>Our headline photo shows cycling on a temporary Covid 19 cycle lane in Berlin,  <em>Credit: Frank Masurat. Published under the unconditional Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal license.</em> </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Contents</h4>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">Section 1: Current Consultations</h6>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>Scottish Government — Just Transition Commission, closes 30 June</li><li>Scottish Parliament&nbsp;EHRi Committee,  Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on Equalities and Human Rights, No deadline given </li><li>Scottish Parliament,  EEFW Committee,  COVID-19 – impact on Scotland’s businesses, workers and economy, No deadline given </li><li>#SpaceForDistancing Campaign still needs your support.</li></ol>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations</h6>



<p>Nothing for you this time, sorry.</p>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">Section 3: Consultation Feedback</h6>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>Scotland, Planning for Place &#8211; Webinar &#8211; 30th April &#8211; Reallocating Road Space for Walking and Cycling During Covid-19, </li><li>North Lanarkshire Council, Hoiytown Link Road and City Deal update</li><li>Gartnavel, Glasgow, Sustrans and National Health Service, support for funding request</li><li>GoBike &#8220;meets&#8221; Glasgow Councillor, Anna Richardson, Chair of Sustainability and Carbon Reduction </li></ol>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 1: Current Consultations</h4>



<p><a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="Transform Scotland (opens in a new tab)" href="http://transformscotland.org.uk/" target="_blank">Transform Scotland</a> alerted us to these 3 consultations from Holyrood. They are all high-level but will inform the paths we take in the future. If any of you out there have views as to how GoBike should respond please either email <a href="mailto:consultations@gobike.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="consultations@gobike.org (opens in a new tab)">consultations@gobike.org</a> or, if you are a GoBike member, post your views on the Consultations channel on Slack</p>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">1.1 Scottish Government — Just Transition Commission, closes 30 June</h6>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-full is-resized"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Scottish-Government.png?resize=525%2C99&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-8352" width="525" height="99" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Scottish-Government.png?w=517&amp;ssl=1 517w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Scottish-Government.png?resize=300%2C56&amp;ssl=1 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /></figure>



<p>The Just Transition Commission has opened a call for evidence, 
inviting&nbsp;written submissions to inform the development of their final 
recommendations to be presented to Ministers in January 2021.</p>



<p>The Just Transition Commission has been established to provide Scottish Ministers with recommendations that will:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>maximise the economic and social opportunities that the move to a net-zero economy by 2045 offers</li><li>build on Scotland’s existing strengths and assets</li><li>understand and mitigate risks that could arise in relation to 
regional cohesion, equalities, poverty (including fuel poverty), and a 
sustainable and inclusive labour market</li></ul>



<p>The deadline for responses is 30 June (extended from 28 May), and to respond please visit the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)" href="https://consult.gov.scot/just-transition-commission/just-transition-commission-call-for-evidence/" target="_blank">Scottish Government website</a>.</p>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">1.2  Scottish Parliament&nbsp;EHRi Committee,  Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on Equalities and Human Rights, No deadline given </h6>



<p>
Deadline <strong>07 June 2020</strong></p>



<p>The Scottish Parliament Equalities and Human Rights Committee 
have launched a call for views on the Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on 
Equalities and Human Rights.</p>



<p>There is no deadline given. You can submit your response on the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)" href="https://www.parliament.scot/parliamentarybusiness/CurrentCommittees/114975.aspx" target="_blank">Scottish Parliament website</a>.</p>



<p>GoBike note: the above has been copied direct from the Transform Scotland notification and the lack of a deadline is repeated on the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="parliamentary websit (opens in a new tab)" href="https://www.parliament.scot/parliamentarybusiness/CurrentCommittees/114975.aspx" target="_blank">parliamentary websit</a>e, to give people and organisations time to consider and respond. However, it&#8217;s best, as it normally is with most things, to respond as soon as possible. There&#8217;s no doubt that Covid 19 is having a disproportionate effect on the poor and disadvantaged in society &#8211; the very ones who could benefit from the current decrease in pollution and an increase in walking and cycling.</p>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">1.3 Scottish Parliament,  EEFW Committee,  COVID-19 – impact on Scotland’s businesses, workers and economy, No deadline given </h6>



<p>
Deadline <strong>01 June 2020</strong></p>



<p>The Scottish Parliament’s Economy, Energy and Fair Work Committee
 launched a call for evidence on the impact of COVID-19 on Scotland’s 
businesses, workers and economy.</p>



<p>The information collected will be used to look at the support being 
offered to businesses and workers aimed at mitigating the impact of the 
virus.</p>



<p>The deadline for responses has not been set. To respond please visit the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)" href="https://www.parliament.scot/parliamentarybusiness/CurrentCommittees/114924.aspx" target="_blank">Scottish Parliament website</a>.</p>



<p>Again, the link to the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="Scottish Parliament website (opens in a new tab)" href="https://www.parliament.scot/parliamentarybusiness/CurrentCommittees/114924.aspx" target="_blank">Scottish Parliament website</a> does not give a deadline, but does say this: &#8221; <em>Please contact the Committee if you wish to share your views.&nbsp; There is no set timescale for this; please get in touch when it suits you and if you wish.</em>&#8221; We think our friends in Transform Scotland are being cautious by advising fairly prompt responses.</p>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading"> <strong>1.4 #SpaceForDistancing Campaign still needs your support.</strong> </h6>



<p>Edinburgh City Council outlined this week the spaces on&nbsp;which they plan to implement Space for Distancing measures and they are a plenty! T<a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="ake a look for yourself. (opens in a new tab)" href="https://democracy.edinburgh.gov.uk/documents/s24012/Item%206.8%20-%20Creating%20Safe%20Spaces%20for%20Walking%20and%20Cycling.pdf" target="_blank">ake a look for yourself here.</a>&nbsp; Glasgow City Council have already closed off Kelvin Way and have promised more to come, along the Broomielaw and Clyde&nbsp;Street in the first instance, and some press reports have also mentioned Byres Road, Partick, Dennistoun, Shawlands, Maryhill, Pollok, Drumchapel, Easterhouse and Castlemilk as places where temporary measures can be introduced. We hope that these can be implemented with urgency and will continue to keep a&nbsp;close eye on the developments.&nbsp;</p>



<figure class="wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-twitter wp-block-embed-twitter"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="525" data-dnt="true"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Ah, Kelvin Way&#8230; a nice calm place to get your thoughts in order! It’s great to see it closed to motor traffic to create <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/SpaceForDistancing?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#SpaceForDistancing</a> and I hope that we can keep it that way, as created lovely addition to the Kelvingrove and gives nice and safe corridor for <img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f6b6.png" alt="🚶" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /><img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f9d1-200d-1f9bd.png" alt="🧑‍🦽" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /><img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f6b4.png" alt="🚴" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />! <a href="https://t.co/HuFYfuq6vs">pic.twitter.com/HuFYfuq6vs</a></p>&mdash; Thomas O. Cornwallis (@UrbanistTOC) <a href="https://twitter.com/UrbanistTOC/status/1258724639171325952?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 8, 2020</a></blockquote><script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
</div></figure>



<p>Bordering councils to GCC such as East Renfrewshire Council have made positive noises in support, suggesting they will be applying&nbsp;for the Sustrans Spaces for People&nbsp;fund, but we have yet to see any concrete plans. So we really need you, particularly if you live there or in any other council bordering into Glasgow, to&nbsp;continue to show your support for this by writing to your councillors. Do also keep the support up in Glasgow itself to ensure that we do start to see the promises on the ground soon. We need measures put in place quickly before car use, already obviously on the rise, tips again towards horribly polluting congestion. Pedal on Parliament, who spearheaded the #SpaceForDistancing campaign have a useful <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="council active travel contact list up here (opens in a new tab)" href="https://pedalonparliament.org/active-travel-contacts/" target="_blank">council active travel contact list up here</a> .</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations</h4>



<p>We are not aware of imminent consultations but please, please, do ensure that during your permitted exercise cycle rides you are building up an encyclopaedic knowledge of where improvements are needed to our cycling infrastructure.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 3: Consultation Feedback</h4>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">3.1  Scotland, Planning for Place &#8211; Webinar &#8211; 30th April &#8211; Reallocating Road Space for Walking and Cycling During Covid-19 </h6>



<p>Two weeks ago, in <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="Digest 59 (opens in a new tab)" href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-59-28-april-2020-social-distancing-we-all-want-to-keep-to-the-guidelines-but-its-tricky-11056" target="_blank">Digest 59</a>, Item 2.1 we informed you of a webinar on this topic. GoBike members listened in, either directly as GoBike, or on behalf of Pedal on Parliament, their Community Council or other political or cycle interest. Here&#8217;s the follow-up email that GoBike received on 01 May:</p>



<p>&#8220;<em>You  are receiving this email as you were signed up to the “Reallocating  Space for Walking, Cycling and Wheeling during COVID-19” webinar on the  30<sup>th</sup> of April 2020. <br><br>Dear attendees,<br><br>A huge thank you to all who attended the <a href="https://www.improvementservice.org.uk/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)"> Improvement Service</a> webinar on <strong>“Reallocating Space for Walking, Cycling and Wheeling during COVID-19”</strong>.  For those unable to join the session, please accept our apologies. We  surged over the 500 attendee capacity and we will be better prepared  next  time!<br><br>As promised, you can now access a <strong>recording</strong> of the session <a href="https://youtu.be/_IRERSYyZ4I" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)">https://youtu.be/_IRERSYyZ4I</a> (YouTube)and a full (automated) <strong>transcript</strong> hosted <a href="https://khub.net/documents/29339238/309754159/Automated+transcript+from+the+webinar++Reallocating+road+space+for+walking%2C+cycling+and+wheeling+during+COVID.docx/9b8d6b1d-8e37-9ce5-0d41-8e58a9f02931?t=1588338382980" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)"> here on the Knowledge Hub</a>. (Word file).<br><br>The remarkable interest levels in this session  suggest a significant desire to enable safer distances for everyone and  to find out more about the contribution of the “<a href="https://www.sustrans.org.uk/our-blog/projects/2020/scotland/spaces-for-people-making-essential-travel-and-exercise-safer-during-coronavirus/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)">Spaces  for People</a>” initiative that SUSTRANS will facilitate.</em><br><br><em>We hope we achieved our aim to provide more clarity  on the wide ranging impact of having safer space for social distancing  during this pandemic. From reducing inequalities for our key workers to  assisting our businesses to attract safe  custom we heard a clear message of the need to move quickly to do our  part in resolving a public health issue that will intensify as lock down  relaxes.<br><br>During the session reference was made to the  Mobility and Access Committee for Scotland (MACS). For illuminating  insight we recommend this short <a href="https://khub.net/documents/29339238/309754159/COVID-19+-+Linda+-+Social+Distancing+as+a+Wheelie+%28PDF%29.pdf/124d87fe-501e-30ab-9e2d-ef7887f7ecea?t=1588338467971" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)"> blog</a> (pdf) from their National Convenor. Thank you Linda, a beautifully put message.<br><br>And, while we hate to put them at the end, we could  not have achieved any of this without our thought provoking, inspired  speakers (in order of appearance):</em></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li> <em>Daisy Narayanan, Director of Urbanism, SUSTRANS</em></li><li><em> Cllr Anna Richardson, City Convenor for Sustainability and Carbon Reduction, Glasgow City Council</em></li><li><em> Cllr Lesley Macinnes, Transport and Environment Convenor, City of Edinburgh Council</em></li></ul>



<p><em>We ended acknowledging that many more topics and  issues lie ahead as we all deal with the short, medium and long term  impact of COVID-19. If you would like to be informed about these then  please sign up to our newly formed <strong>mailing list</strong> via this <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)" href="http://eepurl.com/g1TMmv" target="_blank">Mailchimp form</a>. <br><br>Thank you again and go safely.<br><br>Irene Beautyman<br>Planning for Place Programme Lead<br>Improvement Service&#8221;</em></p>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">3.2 North Lanarkshire Council, Hoiytown Link Road and City Deal update</h6>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large is-resized"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Car_Headlights_2-North-Lanarkshire-City-Deal.jpg?resize=525%2C127&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-10616" width="525" height="127" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Car_Headlights_2-North-Lanarkshire-City-Deal.jpg?resize=600%2C146&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Car_Headlights_2-North-Lanarkshire-City-Deal.jpg?resize=300%2C73&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Car_Headlights_2-North-Lanarkshire-City-Deal.jpg?w=820&amp;ssl=1 820w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /></figure>



<p>Hot on the heels of Item 1.2 in <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="Digest 59 (opens in a new tab)" href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-59-28-april-2020-social-distancing-we-all-want-to-keep-to-the-guidelines-but-its-tricky-11056" target="_blank">Digest 59</a>, calling for views on the proposed new link road in Airdrie, comes this message from North Lanarkshire, received on 28 April:</p>



<h1 class="wp-block-heading">&#8220;<em>Holytown Link Road update</em></h1>



<figure class="wp-block-image"><img data-recalc-dims="1" decoding="async" src="https://i0.wp.com/content.govdelivery.com/attachments/fancy_images/UKNLC/2020/04/3326751/a8-m8-maxim_original.jpg?w=525&#038;ssl=1" alt="City Deal"/></figure>



<p><em>Following  a review of the projects being developed in North Lanarkshire as part  of the Glasgow City Region City Deal, we have agreed an updated  programme of work.<br><br>The  key priority for the council is to provide major road infrastructure to  support the redevelopment of Ravenscraig, as this is a nationally  important development site.&nbsp;</em><br><br><em>As a result of this, the Holytown link road and other projects will not be delivered through City Deal funding.<br><br>This important change allows us to focus&nbsp;on delivering the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)" href="https://lnks.gd/l/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJidWxsZXRpbl9saW5rX2lkIjoxMDEsInVyaSI6ImJwMjpjbGljayIsImJ1bGxldGluX2lkIjoiMjAyMDA0MjguMjA3NTY0MTEiLCJ1cmwiOiJodHRwczovL3d3dy5ub3J0aGxhbmFya3NoaXJlLmdvdi51ay9pbmRleC5hc3B4P2FydGljbGVpZD0zMzUyNSJ9.BSB-JQhtRC5Rzxr_3OrR9iTYg8pZ5RTqkeBsFSgVWXY/br/77950369137-l" target="_blank">Pan Lanarkshire Orbital Transport Corridor</a>,  which will create new and improved&nbsp;access into Ravenscraig and help  achieve&nbsp;the best economic, social and environmental benefits possible  for the whole of North Lanarkshire.<br><br>The overall North Lanarkshire City Deal investment has increased&nbsp;from £172.5 million to £202 million.<br><br>If you want more information on our ambitious plans for the area, please go to our <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://lnks.gd/l/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJidWxsZXRpbl9saW5rX2lkIjoxMDIsInVyaSI6ImJwMjpjbGljayIsImJ1bGxldGluX2lkIjoiMjAyMDA0MjguMjA3NTY0MTEiLCJ1cmwiOiJodHRwczovL3d3dy5ub3J0aGxhbmFya3NoaXJlLmdvdi51ay9pbmRleC5hc3B4P2FydGljbGVpZD0zMTkwMSJ9.peeSXQq4_3_1Gtpxf1KhEfQ3s39ego24nkRYqjUM7iM/br/77950369137-l" target="_blank">City Deal web pages</a>.</em>&#8220;</p>



<p>It&#8217;s incredibly disappointing that, while Glasgow and other local authorities are proposing increased space for walking and cycling, a neighbouring local authority only has roads and more roads on its agenda. If you live in North Lanarkshire do please contact your local councillors to let them know that you need more space for cycling and walking &#8211; at a safe distance from others.</p>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">3.3 Gartnavel, Glasgow, Sustrans and National Health Service, support for funding request</h6>



<p>In Digest 50, Item 3.14, back in December 2019 in the days when consultations were being carried out, we reported on a meeting that GoBike member, Caroline, had been to at Gartnavel. Sustrans, in conjunction with the NHS, are looking to improve active travel within the area that houses three hospitals:</p>



<p> 1. <em>Gartnavel General Hospital, a 500+ inpatient hospital that covers a range of healthcare specialities.</em></p>



<p>2. <em>Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Scotland’s largest cancer centre providing cancer services for 60% of the population.</em></p>



<p>3. <em>Gartnavel Royal Hospital, a 117-bed mental health hospital.   </em></p>



<p>GoBike was contacted on 06 May, with this email (edited) looking for support for a funding request to progress active travel changes:</p>



<p>&#8220;<em>Hello Go Bike team,&nbsp;      <br><br>             I am working on submitting an application for funding for a  feasibility study on behalf of NHS Greater Glasgow &amp; Clyde,&nbsp;that  would explore ways&nbsp;to improve access on and through Gartnavel Hospital  site.&nbsp;The site&nbsp;could be a strategic&nbsp;link in&nbsp;Glasgow West End active  travel&nbsp;network.&nbsp;             <br>             I am&nbsp;hoping to get a letter of support from Go Bike&nbsp;before the 15th May, which I realise isn&#8217;t far away!      &nbsp;      <br>             We are really keen to have Go Bike in the stakeholder group as the  project moves forward. We also&nbsp;have&nbsp;SPT, Scotrail and&nbsp;Sustrans​  supporting us&nbsp;along with&nbsp;NHS staff from both Estates and Public Health,  so there is a huge opportunity for collaboration.&nbsp;             <br>             I have attached a draft copy of the strategic vision as well as a  map. <br><br>             Looking forward to hearing from you and please don&#8217;t hesitate to get in touch if you require any further information.&nbsp;      <br><br>             Kind regards,      <br>             Mathilda.&nbsp; </em><br><em>Mathilda Heyman   Senior&nbsp;Active Travel Infrastructure Officer (Sustrans)                <strong>Embedded within NHS National Services Scotland</strong></em>&#8220;</p>



<p>Here are the 2 documents referred to: <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="Strategic Vision (opens in a new tab)" href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Strategic-vision-v1.pdf" target="_blank">Strategic Vision</a> and <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="Map (opens in a new tab)" href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Strategic-vision-v1.pdf" target="_blank">Map</a></p>



<p>GoBike returned this <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="letter of support (opens in a new tab)" href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/GoBike-Sustrans-Gartnavel-Hospital-support-090520.pdf" target="_blank">letter of support</a> on 09 May, albeit tempered with concern that the surrounding roads are far from cycle-friendly. It is really about time that the NHS started looking at active and public transport as realistic options for everyone, except the very ill or disabled who attends NHS facilities.</p>



<p>And here&#8217;s the email reply, which arrived yesterday morning, 11 May:</p>



<p>&#8220;<em>Hi Tricia,<br> <br>Thank you for getting back to me. This is fantastic, we&#8217;re delighted to have your support on this.<br><br>I&#8217;ll keep you informed on progress and next steps.<br><br> Many thanks,<br><br> Mathilda.&nbsp;&#8220;</em></p>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">3.4 GoBike &#8220;meets&#8221; Glasgow Councillor, Anna Richardson, Chair of Sustainability and Carbon Reduction</h6>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="alignright size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="120" height="120" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Glasgow-City-Council-logo.png?resize=120%2C120&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-10937" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Glasgow-City-Council-logo.png?w=120&amp;ssl=1 120w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Glasgow-City-Council-logo.png?resize=100%2C100&amp;ssl=1 100w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 120px) 100vw, 120px" /></figure></div>



<p><br>GoBike&#8217;s two Co-Convenors, Thomas and John, had a virtual meeting with Glasgow City Councillor Anna Richardson last Tuesday, 05 May, to discuss short term measures to provide for increased cycling in the city. Here&#8217;s a brief summary of the discussion:</p>



<p><strong>Temporary Infrastructure</strong></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>Councillor Richardson has a greatly reduced team/capacity, for variety of reasons.</li><li>As a result everyone is focusing on the temporary measures and submitting a proposal to get funding from the £10 million government fund that was recently announced for active travel social distancing.</li><li>Without the funding these can not go ahead.</li><li>The City Council is not looking at using things they already have, such as planters, nor are they currently looking at permeability.&nbsp; This would seem to be in part due to the reduced team and the way they have to work, ie remotely.</li><li>Clyde Street/Broomielaw will be done without this funding, however adjacent to the casino is the cause for the delay and making the junction safe.</li><li>These will be temporary measures using powers which can be in place for 3 weeks, with a 3 week renewal, after which they will need to see what other mechanisms they can use.</li><li>They are using emergency measures, therefore they need to be able to justify as an emergency and are Public Health related.</li><li>As a result most will be mainly short sections near busy areas such as shops and mixed use paths with heavy use.&nbsp; Cllr Richardson was clear they are not looking at a network.&nbsp; However, they are looking at key routes, in particular to shops.</li></ul>



<p><strong>SEC Path</strong>, <strong>National Cycle Route 75</strong><br><br>The council have no influence over the fence that has been installed adjacent to NCR 75 beside the SEC.&nbsp; This land has been taken over by the Scottish Government/NHS for the Loiusa Jordan Hospital.&nbsp; Cllr Richardson cycled along it at the weekend and agrees it is less than ideal.&nbsp; She is going to discuss with her team about putting in measures along Stobcross Road.</p>



<p><strong>Issues Raised</strong> <strong>by GoBike</strong></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>GoBike raised a number of issues.&nbsp; Cllr Richardson was clear that there is limited work being done on the roads at this time.&nbsp; Only emergency work.</li><li>There is no work being done on existing schemes as the team are all working on the bid and temporary measures.</li><li>Therefore &#8220;usual&#8221; topics weren&#8217;t discussed and will come back to these once the team have capacity.</li><li>Cllr Richardson was clear that the projects that are good to go are still good to go and as soon as work can start it will.&nbsp; It may result in some schemes being delivered quicker as there will be a wider desire from local communities.</li></ul>



<p><strong>New Cyclists/New Members</strong></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>Cllr Richardson asked a good question &#8220;what are we doing to get all these new &#8216;cyclists&#8217; as members?&#8221;</li><li>&#8220;These new cyclists are going to get a shock when cars come back&#8221;.&nbsp; It would be beneficial to harness these people for campaigning in the future.</li><li>Thus, if you are reading this and agree, please <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="join GoBike as a member (opens in a new tab)" href="https://membermojo.co.uk/gobike" target="_blank">join GoBike as a member</a> if you haven&#8217;t already and ask all your family, friends and anyone you contact who cycles, to <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="join GoBike (opens in a new tab)" href="https://membermojo.co.uk/gobike" target="_blank">join GoBike</a>.</li></ul>



<p>_______________________________</p>



<p>So not too much for you this time, giving you more time to clean your bike and get out on it. Do remember, though, to write to your councillors as we urged you to in our <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="blog of 08 May, Implementing Temporary Cycle Facilities (opens in a new tab)" href="https://www.gobike.org/blog-an-infrastructure-emergency-implementing-temporary-cycle-facilities-during-lockdown-11184" target="_blank">blog of 08 May, Implementing Temporary Cycle Facilities</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">11199</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consultation Extra: 18 February, additional South City Way event for Battlefield extension.</title>
		<link>https://www.gobike.org/consultation-extra-18-february-additional-south-city-way-event-for-battlefield-extension-10113</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tricia Fort]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2020 15:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Consultation digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glasgow city council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Segregated cycle lanes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustrans]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gobike.org/?p=10113</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[GoBike members and supporters will be very aware of the proposals for the South City Way to extend to Battlefield. Consultation events and proposals last year were well reported in our Digests and GoBike was involved in the consultation process with Sustrans and the City Council. However, it seems that residents on nearby Queen&#8217;s Drive &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-extra-18-february-additional-south-city-way-event-for-battlefield-extension-10113" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Consultation Extra: 18 February, additional South City Way event for Battlefield extension."</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>GoBike members and supporters will be very aware of the proposals for the South City Way to extend to Battlefield. Consultation events and proposals last year were well reported in our Digests and GoBike was involved in the consultation process with Sustrans and the City Council. However, it seems that residents on nearby Queen&#8217;s Drive claim to have been unaware that changes were afoot! Read on for a reprint of today&#8217;s article in the Glasgow Times by Catriona Stewart:</p>



<span id="more-10113"></span>



<h1 class="wp-block-heading">&#8220;<em>Southside community blasts consultation for potential Battlefield plans</em>&#8220;</h1>



<figure class="wp-block-image"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="287" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Battlefield-Rest-Feb20.jpg?resize=525%2C287&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-10114" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Battlefield-Rest-Feb20.jpg?w=650&amp;ssl=1 650w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Battlefield-Rest-Feb20.jpg?resize=300%2C164&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Battlefield-Rest-Feb20.jpg?resize=600%2C328&amp;ssl=1 600w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /></figure>



<p>   &#8220;<em>RESIDENTS have complained they were not involved in a community  consultation on ambitious proposals to redesign a South Side area. <br><br>   Battlefield Street Design is an ongoing project to make the centre of  Battlefield and Battlefield Road more pedestrian and cycle friendly. <br><br>   Community engagement on the scheme, developed by Sustrans </em><a href="https://www.glasgowtimes.co.uk/news/scottish-news/"><em>Scotland</em></a><em>, took place last year. <br><br>   But locals in Queen’s Drive, which is attached to Battlefield Road, said they were left out of the consultation process. <br><br>   Now Glasgow City </em><a href="https://www.glasgowtimes.co.uk/news/councilandpoliics/"><em>Council</em></a><em> bosses have said they will hold another event &#8211; and Queen’s Drive residents will be contacted directly to invite them. </em><br><br>  <em> Local councillor Soryia Siddique said: “Queen’s Drive residents  contacted me regarding not been included in the Sustrans consultation. <br><br>   “I raised this with Glasgow City Council and they have now arranged  another session allowing residents to discuss the concept design  drawings produced by Sustrans. <br><br>  “This is an opportunity for the local community’s views to be taken on board.” <br><br>   Although it is not part of the nearby South City Way, a cycle route  being developed to run from Queen’s Park, down Victoria Road to the  Merchant City, the potential new cycle route would form a connection to  it. </em><br><br>   <em>This would run along Battlefield Road to the Battlefield Rest and on to Mount Florida.<br><br>   Last year design ideas were on display from March 19 for three weeks  to give locals the chance to see the street design project plans. <br><br>   They are being delivered jointly by Sustrans Scotland and Glasgow City Council. <br><br>   The hope behind the scheme would be to make it easier for people of  all ages and abilities to walk and cycle through the area and to improve  the quality of the public spaces. <br><br>   In 2019 13 events were held locally with more than 700 attendees to  gather information and develop design ideas, including in Langside  Library and Langside Parish Church. </em><br><br>   <em>A meeting for Queen’s Drive residents should have been held in  December following a number of complaints to the council that the  consultation had not be geographically broad enough. <br><br>   But this meeting was delayed due to the </em><a href="https://www.glasgowtimes.co.uk/news/general-election/"><em>General Election</em></a><em>. <br><br>   An new meeting has now been arranged for February 18 between 4pm and 6pm in Langside Library on Sinclair Drive. <br><br>   Letters have been sent out to addresses on Queen’s Drive to ensure all residents know the event is taking place. <br><br>   It will give the chance to give feedback on plans, which have now been handed over to Glasgow City Council. </em><br><br>   <em>It is hoped the scheme will be funded by the Sustrans Places for Everyone fund. <br><br>   A spokesman for the council said: “There has been a very positive  response to the proposals to improve the streets and public spaces  connected to Battlefield Rest. <br><br>   “The plans extend out from Battlefield Rest in either direction to  Mount Florida and Govanhill and one of the main aims is to help make  these streets more attractive for active travel. </em>&#8220;</p>



<p>If you live, work or travel southside do please get along and support the proposals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">10113</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consultation Digest Issue 46, 29 October 2019: Queen Margaret Drive and Automated Vehicles are back, plus lots more.</title>
		<link>https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-46-29-october-2019-queen-margaret-drive-and-automated-vehicles-are-back-plus-lots-more-9284</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tricia Fort]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2019 13:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consultation digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoBike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[20mph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automated vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BearsWay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[car parking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cycle route]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Dunbartonshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[event]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glasgow city council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Low Emission Zone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Lanarkshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[permeability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scottish Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Segregated cycle lanes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shared footways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Lanarkshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed cushions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustrans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University Avenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[winter gritting]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gobike.org/?p=9284</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s news from Dundee, East Dunbartonshire, North Lanarkshire and South Lanarkshire as well as items from Glasgow, including a Glasgow University public meeting, covering University Avenue and a failure to acknowledge a dimension error, if you get to the very last item, in this wide-ranging mix of cycling interest. Do read on. Contents Section 1: &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-46-29-october-2019-queen-margaret-drive-and-automated-vehicles-are-back-plus-lots-more-9284" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Consultation Digest Issue 46, 29 October 2019: Queen Margaret Drive and Automated Vehicles are back, plus lots more."</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>There&#8217;s news from Dundee, East Dunbartonshire, North Lanarkshire and South Lanarkshire as well as items from Glasgow, including a Glasgow University public meeting, covering University Avenue and a failure to acknowledge a dimension error, if you get to the very last item, in this wide-ranging mix of cycling interest. Do read on.</p>



<span id="more-9284"></span>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Contents</h4>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">Section 1: Current Consultations</h6>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>Glasgow, George Square &#8211; is it time for change, closes TOMORROW, 30 October</li><li>Glasgow, Dalmarnock West, Commuter Parking restrictions, closes FRIDAY, 01 November</li><li>**NEW** South Lanarkshire, Filtering Silvertonhill Avenue, Snap Survey, closes?</li><li> **NEW** Dundee, Low Emission Zone, closes?</li><li>**NEW** Glasgow, Sighthill, Mandatory 20 mph Speed Limit Zone Order, closes 11 November </li><li>East Dunbartonshire, Draft Local Transport Strategy, closes 12 November</li><li>**NEW** Glasgow, Queen Margaret Drive cycle lanes, closes 15 November</li><li> **NEW** East Dunbartonshire, Proposed Traffic Regulation Order &#8211; A81 Milngavie Road &amp; A81 Maryhill Road Redetermination of passage to be by Pedal Cycle and foot only, closes 02 December</li><li>**NEW** Law Commission  Highly Automated Road Passenger Services, HARPS, public consultation, closes 16 January 2020 </li></ol>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations</h6>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li> East Dunbartonshire, Draft Local Transport Strategy, public consultation event TOMORROW, 30 October</li><li>Glasgow, University of Glasgow Campus Development Programme &#8211; public meeting, 15 November  &#8211; plus more disruption on University Avenue! </li><li>Glasgow, Skirving Street and Deanston Drive, place-making, 21 November</li></ol>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">Section 3: Consultation Feedback</h6>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>East Dunbartonshire, Proposed Traffic Regulation Order &#8211; Killermont Avenue, Rannoch Drive and Woodvale Avenue</li><li>North Lanarkshire, Work to start on Horsley Brae junction improvements</li><li>Scotland&#8217;s National Transport Strategy consultation: GoBike submission</li><li>Glasgow, Planning Application for 48 homes, Beith Street, Partick</li><li>East Dunbartonshire Council: LDP Newsletter No.54 </li><li>Glasgow, Winter Gritting Arrangements, now to include some cycle lanes </li><li>Glasgow City Council (Glencairn Drive) Traffic calming scheme</li></ol>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 1: Current Consultations in date order for responses</h4>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">1.1 Glasgow, George Square &#8211; is it time for change, closes TOMORROW, 30 October</h6>



<figure class="wp-block-image"><img data-recalc-dims="1" decoding="async" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/George-Square-2.jpg?w=525&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-5991"/></figure>



<p>We detailed this short survey in <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="Digest 45 (opens in a new tab)" href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-45-15-october-2019-commuter-parking-byres-road-delay-speed-cameras-and-a-gobike-members-petition-feature-in-this-issue-9215" target="_blank">Digest 45</a>, Item 1.5, so do please look at it before the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="survey (opens in a new tab)" href="https://www.george-square.com/" target="_blank">survey</a> closes tomorrow. It&#8217;s just a short survey with lots of views already in supporting the removal of motor traffic. Do add to this!</p>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">1.2 Glasgow, Dalmarnock West, Commuter Parking restrictions, closes FRIDAY, 01 November</h6>



<p>This was a new item in <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="Digest 45 (opens in a new tab)" href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-45-15-october-2019-commuter-parking-byres-road-delay-speed-cameras-and-a-gobike-members-petition-feature-in-this-issue-9215" target="_blank">Digest 45</a> &#8211; see Item 1.6, where we have detailed the parking chaos to the west of Dalmarnock Station across to the Police Scotland offices, which even spreads to the other side of the river at Shawfield. Here&#8217;s the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="letter (opens in a new tab)" href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/GoBike-Dalmarnock-West-Letter-151019.pdf" target="_blank">letter</a> GoBike sent in 2 weeks ago &#8211; do please add your support.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="242" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Shawfield-Glasgow-Road.png?resize=525%2C242&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-9251" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Shawfield-Glasgow-Road.png?w=1366&amp;ssl=1 1366w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Shawfield-Glasgow-Road.png?resize=300%2C138&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Shawfield-Glasgow-Road.png?resize=600%2C277&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Shawfield-Glasgow-Road.png?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 767px) 89vw, (max-width: 1000px) 54vw, (max-width: 1071px) 543px, 580px" /></figure>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">1.3  **NEW** South Lanarkshire, Filtering Silvertonhill Avenue, Snap Survey, closes?</h6>



<figure class="wp-block-image"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="295" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Image-from-iOS.png?resize=525%2C295&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-9287" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Image-from-iOS.png?w=1334&amp;ssl=1 1334w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Image-from-iOS.png?resize=300%2C169&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Image-from-iOS.png?resize=600%2C337&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Image-from-iOS.png?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 767px) 89vw, (max-width: 1000px) 54vw, (max-width: 1071px) 543px, 580px" /></figure>



<p>Here&#8217;s a drawing of the proposal to close the through route from Silvertonhill Avenue to Chestnut Crescent in Hamilton to motor vehicles, but maintain two-way cycle access. Here&#8217;s the information that GoBike member, Derek Y, sent in:<br><br>&#8221; South Lanarkshire Council have proposed a filter at bottom/north of Silvertonhill Avenue with cycle access. This cuts down through traffic on residential streets and makes it easier for children to cross to Woodside Primary School west of Johnstone Road. A shame it keeps 1-way at north without cycle contraflow &#8211; you might wish to suggest this in your response to the Survey (with plans on p2) at&nbsp;<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://slack-redir.net/link?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.snapsurveys.com%2Fwh%2Fs.asp%3Fk%3D157053578908">https://www.snapsurveys.com/wh/s.asp?k=157053578908</a>  &#8220;</p>



<p>Derek had tried to improve even further on permeability for cycling in this area so if you know this part of Hamilton do please advise South Lanarkshire Council of what more could be done &#8211; there&#8217;s a space in the survey to add comments.<br><br>This is just the sort of thing  that we&#8217;d love to see more of all over the Greater Glasgow and  Strathclyde area as modal filters make local areas nicer by  discouraging rat-running, short journeys by car more unattractive and  provide alternatives  for people travelling by bicycle. <br><br>There&#8217;s no apparent closing date for the survey so do respond to it quickly. It&#8217;s really easy and very short.</p>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">1.4  **NEW** Dundee, Low Emission Zone, closes?</h6>



<p><br>This is another quick survey that we have heard about from Friends of the Earth, but there is no indication of a closing date. You might only cycle in Dundee on your hols or travel to the city to visit the V&amp;A or the Discovery but  surely you will want the air to be as clean as it can be?<br><br>Here&#8217;s the email received on 24 October from FoE:</p>



<p>&#8221; <em>Everyone who lives, works or visits Dundee city centre is being exposed  to dangerous air pollution. The Council has a plan that will do little  to change that. That’s why we need everyone in Scotland to speak up.&nbsp;<br><br> Dundee Council are asking for the public’s views on their Low Emission  Zone (LEZ) plans. We have provided a step-by-step guide that will help  you respond quickly and effectively.&nbsp;<a href="https://scot.us2.list-manage.com/track/click?u=187e5daddf74f1b5255f3d9f9&amp;id=d4c4a9d096&amp;e=c037dfa86c" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)">Click to take action</a><br><br> A Low Emission Zone should restrict the worst polluting vehicles and  protect the health of people who live and work in the area. But Dundee’s  LEZ plans are a tiny zone which ignores Lochee Road &#8211; &nbsp;consistently one  of the most polluted roads in the whole of Scotland!&nbsp;<br><br> This Zone needs to improve air quality for anyone who spends time in  Dundee and that means making sure it cleans up the most polluted areas.&nbsp;</em><br><br> <em>The First Minister, and many councils, have declared a climate  emergency. But we’re still seeing business-as-usual ideas. Climate  emissions from transport are the same now as they were in 1990.&nbsp;<br><br> There is an opportunity for Dundee to show real leadership and move away  from fossil fuelled vehicles. If Dundee Council hear from enough people  demanding more ambition, they will have to pay attention.&nbsp;<br><br> Please take a few minutes to <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="respond to the consultation now (opens in a new tab)" href="https://consult.dundeecity.gov.uk/limesurvey/index.php/284592/lang/en/newtest/Y" target="_blank">respond to the consultation now</a> </em>&#8220;</p>



<p>I found the various option pictures a wee bit confusing so the FoE guidance was a big help.<br>Do respond to this quick survey and let&#8217;s get Low Emission Zones in all Scotland&#8217;s cities.</p>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">1.5 **NEW** Glasgow, Sighthill, Mandatory 20 mph Speed Limit Zone Order, closes 11 November</h6>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="alignleft"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="303" height="166" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Sighthill-regeneration.jpg?resize=303%2C166&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-9300" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Sighthill-regeneration.jpg?w=303&amp;ssl=1 303w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Sighthill-regeneration.jpg?resize=300%2C164&amp;ssl=1 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 303px) 100vw, 303px" /></figure></div>



<p><br>Sighthill redevelopment continues and Glasgow City Council is looking to introduce a 20mph speed limit for the area. Here&#8217;s the email that we received on 21 October:</p>



<p><br><strong><em>MESSAGE SENT ON BEHALF OF CHRISTINE FRANCIS, HEAD OF TECHNICAL SERVICES, NEIGHBOURHOODS AND SUSTAINABILITY </em></strong><em><br><br>Dear  Sir / Madam<br>THE GLASGOW CITY COUNCIL, (SIGHTHILL), </em><strong><em>(MANDATORY 20mph SPEED LIMIT ZONE) ORDER 201_</em></strong><em><br><br>The Council propose to consider the introduction of the above named Traffic Regulation Order and I wish to establish the preliminary views of your organisation prior to the publication of these proposals.<br><br>Background to the proposed Order <br>Glasgow City Council are proposing to implement a mandatory 20mph speed limit in Sighthill.&nbsp; </em><br><br><em>The purpose of the Mandatory 20mph Zone is to ensure that vehicle users reduce their speeds to 20mph or less, and therefore improve road safety for pedestrians, cyclists and all other vehicle users.&nbsp; By turn, it is anticipated that this will encourage more people to walk and cycle, which will naturally see improved health benefits.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br><br>Area affected by the proposed Order <br><br>The roads affected by these proposals are bounded by:-<br>The order will affect the residential area generally bounded by St. Rollox Drive to the north,&nbsp; Springburn Road to the east. The M8 motorway to the south and the railway line to the west.</em><br><br><em>The roads affected by the proposals are:<br>Cuddies, Campus Place, Fountainwell Drive, Fountainwell Gardens, Fountainwell Groove, Fountainwell Road, Hopepark Wynd, Hopepark Court, Huntingdon Street, Huntingdon Road, Huntingdon Close, Huttons Drive, Pinkston Road, Pinkston Drive, Pinkston Wynd, Sighthill Avenue, Sighthill Circus, Sighthill Park Gate,&nbsp; Sighthill Park Terrace, Stalk Court, Tower Place.<br><br>Details of the proposed Order <br>The proposed Order (as depicted on the attached plans) will comprise of:-<br><br>·&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The implementation of a 20mph speed limit.&nbsp; <br><br>Please provide any comments you wish to make on these proposals within </em><strong><em>21 days</em></strong><em> (reply by 11</em><sup><em>th</em></sup><em> November 2019).</em><br><br><em>In the meantime, should you require any further information or clarification on any points arising from the proposals, do not hesitate to contact my assistant (name and phone number removed by GoBike)<br><br>Should the Council proceed with these proposals; a copy of the Notice of the proposed Order will be forwarded to you intimating an opportunity to lodge any objections to the proposals.<br><br>Yours faithfully</em></p>



<figure class="wp-block-image"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="405" height="113" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/image-2.png?resize=405%2C113&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-9301" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/image-2.png?w=405&amp;ssl=1 405w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/image-2.png?resize=300%2C84&amp;ssl=1 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 405px) 100vw, 405px" /></figure>



<p><strong><em>Christine Francis</em></strong><em>, </em><strong><em>Head of Technical Services</em></strong><em>, </em><strong><em>Neighbourhoods and Sustainability</em></strong>&#8220;</p>



<p>The plan mentioned above is <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/05-Plan-20mph-Zone.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="here (opens in a new tab)">here</a>.</p>



<p>GoBike will be supporting this proposal, probably the first time such a large area has been covered by a 20mph TRO, our only concern being how compliance will be ensured. If you live in Sighthill or travel through there please do add your support to this move; Sighthill is a residential area where children, and everybody else, should be able to move about without fear of being mowed down by a motor vehicle going too fast.</p>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">1.6 East Dunbartonshire, Draft Local Transport Strategy, closes 12 November</h6>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="alignright"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="270" height="186" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/East-Dunbartonshire-Council.jpg?resize=270%2C186&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-9226"/></figure></div>



<p>This consultation was featured in <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="Digest 45 (opens in a new tab)" href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-45-15-october-2019-commuter-parking-byres-road-delay-speed-cameras-and-a-gobike-members-petition-feature-in-this-issue-9215" target="_blank">Digest 45</a>, Item 1.7 and there is now just one Consultation Event left to go to &#8211; and that&#8217;s tomorrow!<br><strong>Kirkintilloch Leisure Centre – Wednesday 30 October – 3pm-7pm</strong> </p>



<p>If you can get there please do, and send any views to consultations@gobike.org so that we can include them in our response.</p>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">1.7  **NEW** Glasgow, Queen Margaret Drive cycle lanes, closes 15 November</h6>



<figure class="wp-block-image"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="272" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/QMDmap.png?resize=525%2C272&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-4751" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/QMDmap.png?w=632&amp;ssl=1 632w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/QMDmap.png?resize=300%2C156&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/QMDmap.png?resize=600%2C311&amp;ssl=1 600w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /></figure>



<p>Work on the proposals initiated by local businesses was unfortunately postponed when concerns were raised about the initial proposals for Byres Road, but GoBike received this email on 18 October:</p>



<p><strong><em>MESSAGE SENT ON BEHALF OF CHRISTINE FRANCIS, HEAD OF TECHNICAL SERVICES, NEIGHBOURHOODS AND SUSTAINABILITY </em></strong><em><br><br>Dear Sir or Madam, </em><br><strong><em>THE GLASGOW CITY COUNCIL</em></strong><em>, </em><strong><em>(QUEEN MARGARET DRIVE), (TRAFFIC REGULATION) ORDER 201_</em></strong><em><br><br>The Council propose to consider the introduction of the above named Traffic Regulation Order. <br>Please find enclosed a copy of the press notice of the proposed Order, relevant plan (drawing 5126-001 A), statement of reasons and detailed report. <br><br>A copy of the draft order, the plan, statement of reasons and report for proposing to make the order are available for inspection at the following locations: <br><br>·&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Reception, Exchange House, 231 George Street, Glasgow, G1 1RX <br><br>·&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Hillhead Library, 348 Byres Road, Glasgow, G12 8AP </em><br><br><em>Details of the proposals will also be available on the Glasgow City Council website at <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)" href="http://www.glasgow.gov.uk/proposedtro" target="_blank">www.glasgow.gov.uk/proposedtro</a> .&nbsp; <br><br>As stated in the attached documentation, any person wishing to object to the proposed Order should send details of the grounds for objection in writing to Christine Francis, Head of Technical Services, Exchange House, Glasgow City Council, 231 George Street, Glasgow, G1 1RX or to Christine Francis by e-mail, to <a href="mailto:land@glasgow.gov.uk" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)">land@glasgow.gov.uk</a> by Friday 15 November 2019. <br><br>Yours faithfully </em></p>



<figure class="wp-block-image"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="224" height="62" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/image-1.png?resize=224%2C62&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-9293"/></figure>



<p><em>Christine Francis, Head of Technical Services, Neighbourhoods and Sustainability&#8221; </em></p>



<p>The documents mentioned in the email are here:  copy of the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="draft order (opens in a new tab)" href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/NoticeOfProposals-QueenMargaretDrive-230x114mm-RTO.pdf" target="_blank">draft order</a>, the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="plan (opens in a new tab)" href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/TRO-5126-0001-0003-Rev-A-QMD-MS.pdf" target="_blank">plan</a>, the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="statement of reasons (opens in a new tab)" href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/QMD-08-Statement-of-Reasons.pdf" target="_blank">statement of reasons</a> and the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="report (opens in a new tab)" href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/QMD-09-Draft-Report.pdf" target="_blank">report</a>.</p>



<p>We have already, 28 October, submitted a clear <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="GoBike response (opens in a new tab)" href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/GoBike-Queen-Margaret-Drive-response-281019.pdf" target="_blank">GoBike response</a> , written by Calum, but the main proposals, from the City Council, which you might wish to read before you read the GoBike view are given in the <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/QMD-09-Draft-Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)">report</a> and are repeated here:</p>



<p>&#8220;<em>The proposed Order (as depicted on the attached plans) will comprise of:-</em></p>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li> <em>Removal of parking and extension of the existing &#8216;No waiting, no loading at any time&#8217; restrictions on the West kerbline of Queen Margaret Drive between Clouston Street and Kelbourne Street. </em></li><li><em> Proposed segregated two-way cycleway on West footway of Queen Margaret Drive between Hamilton Drive and the existing bus stop located approximately 175m north of Hotspur Street. </em></li><li><em> Existing bus stops to be retained. </em></li><li><em> Existing loading bays to be retained. </em></li><li><em> Existing taxi rank, on East kerbline of Queen Margaret Drive, to be retained. </em></li><li><em> Removal of the existing bus lane on Queen Margaret drive from a point approximately 40m North of Kelbourne Street for a distance of approximately 220m north to accommodate a two-way segregated cycleway. </em>&#8220;</li></ol>



<p>While the proposals will improve things for people cycling on Queen Margaret Drive, we have found that issues we have highlighted on other schemes are repeated here. This is worrying but we have made clear our concerns in our <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/GoBike-Queen-Margaret-Drive-response-281019.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="submission (opens in a new tab)">submission</a>.</p>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">1. 8  **NEW** East Dunbartonshire, Proposed Traffic Regulation Order &#8211; A81 Milngavie Road &amp; A81 Maryhill Road Redetermination of passage to be by Pedal Cycle and foot only, closes 02 December </h6>



<p>Here&#8217;s the email that we received from East Dunbartonshire Council on 23 October:</p>



<p>&#8220;<em>The East Dunbartonshire Council (A81 Milngavie Road and A81 Maryhill Road, Bearsden)(Redetermination Of Means Of Passage To Be By Pedal Cycle And Foot Only) Order.     <br><br>The  Council is promoting the above mentioned Traffic Regulation Order. Enclosed  is a copy of the draft Order together with a copy of the plan indicating  the  locations of the footways and Statement of Reasons for the  proposal.  Also enclosed is a copy of the Notice that is to appear in  the Milngavie and Bearsden Herald that is published on 1st November 2019. Should you wish to comment on the proposal you must do so in writing by Monday,  2  December  2019.  Your  comments  should  be  sent  to Chief     Solicitor  &amp;  Monitoring Officer, 12 Strathkelvin Place, Kirkintilloch, G66 1TJ. (See  attached  file:  <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="191022  Draft  Redetermination  Order Cluny Park area.pdf) (opens in a new tab)" href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/191022-Draft-Redetermination-Order-Cluny-Park-area.pdf" target="_blank">191022  Draft  Redetermination  Order Cluny Park area.pdf)</a>     <br><br>Regards,     <br>Fiona Stirling, Legal Services, 12 Strathkelvin Place, Kirkintilloch, G66 1TJ&#8221;</em></p>



<p>Here&#8217;s a <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="further copy of the document (opens in a new tab)" href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/191022-Draft-Redetermination-Order-Cluny-Park-area.pdf" target="_blank">further copy of the document</a> from East Dunbartonshire Council, which includes a copy of the plan and the redetermination proposal.</p>



<p>This proposal is very near to the area where GoBike has supported the earlier proposal, see <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="Digest 45 (opens in a new tab)" href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-45-15-october-2019-commuter-parking-byres-road-delay-speed-cameras-and-a-gobike-members-petition-feature-in-this-issue-9215" target="_blank">Digest 45</a>, Item 1.2, to introduce parking and loading restrictions at the south end of Rannoch Drive.<br>It appears to be a move to ameliorate potential collisions and near misses at the junction of the A81 and the Switchback, by allowing people to cycle on the footway. It would have been better all round if the extension south of the Bears Way had been built.<br>GoBike will be submitting a response but if you do have views please get them to us, by emailing consultations@gobike.org </p>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">1.9  **NEW** Law Commission  Highly Automated Road Passenger Services, HARPS, public consultation, closes 16 January 2020 </h6>



<p><br>Here&#8217;s an interesting email that we received on 16 October from the UK Law Commission:</p>



<p>&#8220;<em>Dear All,<br><br>We  are pleased to announce the publication of the second consultation  paper in our three-year review of the UK’s regulatory framework for  automated vehicles. This launches  a three-month public consultation.</em><br><br><em>This  paper looks at the regulation of self-driving vehicles which could  travel empty or only with passengers, without a human driver or  user-in-charge. We focus on  self-driving vehicles providing mobility services to the public, which  we refer to as Highly Automated Road Passenger Services, HARPS. Today’s  paper builds on the work in our first consultation on safety assurance  and allocating legal responsibility. <br><br></em><strong><em>We invite you to respond to the paper by 16 January 2020</em></strong><em>.  We have set up an online  portal for submitting responses but welcome input in any format. If you  have ideas for consultation events or would like a meeting please get  in touch.</em><br><br><em>The consultation paper, summary and details for how to respond are available on our project page at <a aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)" rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/automated-vehicles/" target="_blank">https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/automated-vehicles/</a>  <br><br>Yours sincerely,</em><br><br><em>Automated Vehicles Team – Law Commissions<br><br></em><strong><em>Automated Vehicles</em></strong><em> | </em><strong><em>Law Commission </em></strong><em>| Public Law Team<br> 1st Floor, Tower, Post Point 1.54, 52 Queen Anne’s Gate, London SW1H 9AG</em>&#8220;</p>



<p>We weren&#8217;t too impressed with the first consultation on this topic, see <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="Digest 27 (opens in a new tab)" href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-27-05-february-2019-university-avenue-and-bears-way-under-threat-no-cycle-lanes-for-union-street-glasgow-but-a-wee-bit-of-good-news-as-well-7619" target="_blank">Digest 27</a>, Item 1.1<br>The banner picture above is from their email so they do acknowledge that these driverless vehicles will be operating near people walking or cycling. We&#8217;ll be conferring with other organisations as to their views, but if you have any do let us know.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations</h4>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">2.1  East Dunbartonshire, Draft Local Transport Strategy, public consultation TOMORROW, 30 October </h6>



<p>This event, tomorrow, mentioned also in Item 1.6 above, is the last in a series of public meetings about the Local Transport Strategy:</p>



<p><strong>Kirkintilloch Leisure Centre – Wednesday 30 October – 3pm-7pm</strong></p>



<p>Do please get there if you can.</p>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">2.2 Glasgow, University of Glasgow Campus Development Programme &#8211; public meeting, 15 November &#8211; plus more disruption on University Avenue!</h6>



<p><br><br><br>GoBike member, Derek M, told us about this meeting that might just be of interest? Here&#8217;s the email he forwarded to us:</p>



<p></p>



<p>&#8220;<em>F</em><strong><em>rom:</em></strong><em> Internal Communications &lt;</em><a href="mailto:communications@glasgow.ac.uk"><em>communications@glasgow.ac.uk</em></a><em>&gt;<br></em><strong><em>Date:</em></strong><em> 22 October 2019 at 12:50:48 BST<br></em><strong><em>To:</em></strong><em> Internal Communications &lt;</em><a href="mailto:communications@glasgow.ac.uk"><em>communications@glasgow.ac.uk</em></a><em>&gt;<br></em><strong><em>Subject:University of Glasgow Campus Development Programme &#8211; public meeting</em></strong><em><br><br>The  University of Glasgow will hold a public meeting on Wednesday 13  November to update about progress on its Campus Development Programme.<br><br>The event will be held in the </em><a href="https://moovitapp.com/index/en-gb/public_transportation-Wolfson_Medical_School_Building-Scotland-site_8144859-402"><em> Wolfson Medical Building</em></a><em> (Gannochy Room), from 18:30 &#8211; 20:00. You can register to attend through&nbsp;</em><a href="https://www.eventbrite.com/o/17825920042"><em>Eventbrite</em></a><em>.<br><br>The  meeting is open to the public and will focus on the ongoing and  upcoming work taking place on the Gilmorehill campus, particularly on  the site of the former Western Infirmary.<br><br>The agenda includes presentations from University project managers, as well as construction partners.</em><br><br><em>We intend to update on the following areas, however there will also be the opportunity for questions.</em></p>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li> <em>Infrastructure on University Avenue, University Place, and future demolitions along Church Street;</em></li><li><em> Construction update for the James McCune Smith Learning Hub and the Research Hub;</em></li><li><em> Overview of planning and final design for the Clarice Pears Building (Institute of Health &amp; Wellbeing);</em></li><li><em> Planning and anticipated programme for the Adam Smith Business School and landscaping for the Southern Gateway;</em></li><li><em> A look inside the James McCune Smith Learning Hub, the Research Hub, including community facilities;</em></li><li><em> Community benefits;</em></li><li><em> Q&amp;A.</em></li></ol>



<p> <em>Due  to a busy agenda, please note the event will start at 18:30 prompt.  Refreshments are available in the Atrium of the Wolfson Medical School  Building from 18:00.<br><br>Tickets are not required, however attendees are encouraged to&nbsp;</em><a href="https://uofgcampusdevelopment.eventbrite.com/"><em>register</em></a><em>, so that we have  an indication of numbers.&nbsp;<br><br>For  those who have attended these meeting before, the Gannochy Room is next  to the lecture theatre where the sessions are usually held.<br><br>Please direct queries to&nbsp;<a href="mailto:campus-development@glasgow.ac.uk" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)">campus-development@glasgow.ac.uk</a></em>&#8220;</p>



<p>Item 1 could keep the discussion going for quite a while! Do get along if you are studying or working at the university or if you have been involved in the campaign for good cycle infrastructure on University Avenue.</p>



<p>PLUS, just in case you don&#8217;t find negotiating University Avenue traumatic enough, here&#8217;s news of services works, that we received on 26 October:<br><br>&#8220;<em>I’m writing to let you know we will shortly be starting our project to upgrade the gas network in University Avenue, Glasgow. This essential work involves the replacement of old, metal gas mains with new plastic pipe to ensure a continued safe and reliable gas supply. </em><br><em>Following discussions with Glasgow City Council our project will start on Monday 4 November and last approximately ten weeks. We’ll be carrying out the work over two phases to help minimise disruption. </em><br><br><em>Each phase is described below. </em><br><br><em>Phase one – approximately five weeks </em><br><em>On Monday 4 November, we’ll begin working in University Avenue between Kelvin Way and Hillhead Street. During this phase, most of our work will be taking place on the footpath however, cycle lanes may be closed to allow pedestrian access. </em><br><br><em>Phase two – approximately five weeks</em><br><em>From Monday 6 January 2020, we’ll be working in University Avenue between Hillhead Street and University Gardens. During this phase, we’ll also be installing temporary three-way traffic lights in University Avenue at its junction with Hillhead Street. The lights will be manually controlled during peak hours to help minimise inconvenience as much as possible.We’ll be posting regular updates on our website&nbsp;<a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://slack-redir.net/link?url=https%3A%2F%2Fone.network%2F%3F112401221">https://one.network/?112401221</a>&nbsp;and using social media and traffic bulletins to keep residents and motorists informed. </em><br><em>Please feel free to share this information with your stakeholders and anyone else who may be impacted by our work.</em></p>



<figure class="wp-block-image"><img decoding="async" src="https://slack-imgs.com/?c=1&amp;o1=wi32.he32.si&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Fone.network%2Fapple-touch-icon-57x57.png" alt="one.network"/></figure>



<p><em>one.network</em><strong><a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://one.network/?112401221"><em>one.network</em></a></strong><em>One platform to plan, monitor, communicate and analyse traffic disruptions.&#8221;</em></p>



<p>No mention of temporary cycle lanes or cycle phases in the temporary traffic lights, but good that they will be keeping &#8220;motorists informed&#8221;!</p>



<p>If you attend the event on the 15th, you might wish to ask about this?<em> </em></p>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">2.3  Glasgow, Skirving Street and Deanston Drive, place-making, 21 November </h6>



<p>GoBike member, Alasdair, has told us about this Sustrans event to be held in Shawlands:</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="745" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Skirving-St-Deanston-Drive.png?resize=525%2C745&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-9316" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Skirving-St-Deanston-Drive.png?w=1748&amp;ssl=1 1748w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Skirving-St-Deanston-Drive.png?resize=211%2C300&amp;ssl=1 211w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Skirving-St-Deanston-Drive.png?resize=423%2C600&amp;ssl=1 423w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Skirving-St-Deanston-Drive.png?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Skirving-St-Deanston-Drive.png?w=1575&amp;ssl=1 1575w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 767px) 89vw, (max-width: 1000px) 54vw, (max-width: 1071px) 543px, 580px" /></figure>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Consultation Feedback</h4>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">3.1 East Dunbartonshire, Proposed Traffic Regulation Order &#8211; Killermont Avenue, Rannoch Drive and Woodvale Avenue</h6>



<figure class="wp-block-image"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="272" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Killermont-Drive-map.png?resize=525%2C272&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-9112" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Killermont-Drive-map.png?w=632&amp;ssl=1 632w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Killermont-Drive-map.png?resize=300%2C156&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Killermont-Drive-map.png?resize=600%2C311&amp;ssl=1 600w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /></figure>



<p>GoBike supported moves to prohibit parking and loading around the car showrooms in this area, see our last <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-45-15-october-2019-commuter-parking-byres-road-delay-speed-cameras-and-a-gobike-members-petition-feature-in-this-issue-9215" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="Digest, Issue 45 (opens in a new tab)">Digest, Issue 45</a>, Item 1.2 and we have now received this acknowledgement from East Dunbartonshire Council:</p>



<p>&#8220;<em>Good morning Tricia <br>Thank you for responding. A copy of your email with attached letter has been forwarded to the Council&#8217;s  Roads and Transportation. <br>Regards Fiona Stirling, Legal Services</em>&#8220;</p>



<p>This now appears to be part of moves to improve active travel in this part of Bearsden &#8211; see also Item 1.8 above.</p>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">3.2 North Lanarkshire, Work to start on Horsley Brae junction improvements</h6>



<p>GoBike gets very little information from North Lanarkshire but we doubt that the forthcoming changes to this area make an improvement for cycling. They will certainly speed up northbound through traffic and extend the potential conflict with merging motor traffic southbound. Read on for the message we received on 21 October:</p>



<h1 class="wp-block-heading">&#8220;<em>Work to start at Horsley Brae junction</em></h1>



<p><em>Work starts from today (21 October) on </em><a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)" href="https://lnks.gd/l/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJidWxsZXRpbl9saW5rX2lkIjoxMDEsInVyaSI6ImJwMjpjbGljayIsImJ1bGxldGluX2lkIjoiMjAxOTEwMjEuMTE3ODY2MTEiLCJ1cmwiOiJodHRwczovL3d3dy5ub3J0aGxhbmFya3NoaXJlLmdvdi51ay9pbmRleC5hc3B4P2FydGljbGVpZD0zNDYzOCJ9.QD-jmdw4-5BW8_ODROj2e0CMGTVevZI6fy_BwxuiWos/br/70367778592-l" target="_blank"><em>improvements to the road layout</em></a><em> at the A71 Horsley Brae junction with the B7011 Brownlee Road. <br><br>North  and South Lanarkshire Councils and Strathclyde Partnership for  Transport (SPT) are investing a total of £1.6 million in the project  which aims to reduce congestion at the busy junction.</em><br><br><em>The  A71 will be widened to create a right-turn lane northbound, for traffic  turning on to Brownlee Road, and a merging lane for traffic travelling  south on Brownlee Road and joining the A71.<br><br>A  contractor JH Civil Engineering Ltd has been appointed to carry out the  work, which is expected to take approximately 26 weeks. <br><br>Traffic  management will be used to allow vehicles to continue using the A71  during the majority of the works, however during certain phases of the  proposed works, it is expected that road closures will be necessary. The  most effcieint diversion routes will be advised in advance of the  closure.<br><br>“This  is a very busy junction particularly at morning and evening peak times,  with traffic queuing to turn right which leads to delays and congestion  back to the Garrion Bridge roundabout,” said Councillor Michael McPake,  Convener of the Environment and Transportation Committee.</em><br><br>“<em>By  creating a right-turn lane with capacity for approximately 14 cars, we  will reduce the queue of northbound cars while the southbound merging  lane will improve traffic flow away from the junction.<br><br>“Improvements will also be made to pedestrian routes across the junction to make the popular Clyde walkway safer.<br><br>“We  appreciate that the roadworks will cause delays over the coming months  but, when complete, we will see significant improvements in traffic flow  and road safety for drivers and pedestrians.”<br><br>Information about the project will be on the </em><a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://lnks.gd/l/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJidWxsZXRpbl9saW5rX2lkIjoxMDIsInVyaSI6ImJwMjpjbGljayIsImJ1bGxldGluX2lkIjoiMjAxOTEwMjEuMTE3ODY2MTEiLCJ1cmwiOiJodHRwczovL3d3dy5ub3J0aGxhbmFya3NoaXJlLmdvdi51ay9pbmRleC5hc3B4P2FydGljbGVpZD0zNDYzOCJ9.RQanDQHURgq258Zi99wtQBeXpSM-o5-jJo1onAS0bqU/br/70367778592-l" target="_blank"><em>web site</em></a><em> and updates posted on Facebook and Twitter @nlcpeople.<br><br>SPT are investing £800,000 in the project with both councils contributing £400,000 each.&#8221;</em></p>



<p>No mention of people cycling there and probably no allowance will be made for bikes during the works &#8211; although we live in hope &#8211; so do take care if you are out and about in this area.</p>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">3.3 Scotland&#8217;s National Transport Strategy consultation: GoBike submission</h6>



<figure class="wp-block-image"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="517" height="97" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Scottish-Government.png?resize=517%2C97&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-8352" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Scottish-Government.png?w=517&amp;ssl=1 517w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Scottish-Government.png?resize=300%2C56&amp;ssl=1 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 517px) 100vw, 517px" /></figure>



<p>This consultation closed on 23 October &#8211; details have been in our last few Digests &#8211; and our well-considered <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="submission (opens in a new tab)" href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/GoBike-National-Transport-Strategy-response-211019.pdf" target="_blank">submission</a> was sent in on 21 October. <a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="Here it is (opens in a new tab)" href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/GoBike-National-Transport-Strategy-response-211019.pdf" target="_blank">Here it is</a>, and we are very grateful to Brenda for giving it so much thought and investigation.</p>



<p>And we received this automatic reply:</p>



<p>&#8220;<em>Thank you for submitting your response to the draft National Transport Strategy consultation.&nbsp; An analysis of all responses will be carried out to allow us to shape the Strategy and help us all to achieve better outcomes for Scotland’s  citizens, communities and businesses.&nbsp; The results of the consultation  will be published on the Transport Scotland website by the end of 2019.&nbsp;  Once published, you will be notified by email and  an update on the next stage will be provided. <br><br>If you have any questions, please contact &nbsp;</em><strong><em><a href="mailto:NTS2@transport.gov.scot" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)">NTS2@transport.gov.scot</a></em></strong>&#8220;</p>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">3.4 Glasgow, Planning Application for 48 homes, Beith Street, Partick</h6>



<p>GoBike joined many others in opposing a residential development in the green space between Beith Street and the Expressway. Our objection was published in <a aria-label="Digest 42 (opens in a new tab)" rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-42-03-september-2019-we-take-the-hump-in-a-tale-of-two-cities-8966" target="_blank">Digest 42</a>, Item 3.6 and we have now been sent this message, dated 23 October:</p>



<p>&#8220;<em>Dear Sir/Madam</em></p>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><table><tbody><tr><td> <strong><em>GLASGOW CITY COUNCIL PLANNING LOCAL REVIEW COMMITTEE</em></strong><em> </em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><table><tbody><tr><td> <em>APPELLANT:</em> </td><td> <strong><em>Clydeside BSW Developments Ltd</em></strong><em> </em></td></tr><tr><td> <em>PLANNING REFERENCE: </em></td><td> <strong><em>19/02063/PPP</em></strong><em> </em></td></tr><tr><td> <em>REVIEW REFERENCE: </em></td><td> <strong><em>19/00080/LOCAL</em></strong><em> </em></td></tr><tr><td> <em>REVIEW ADDRESS: </em></td><td> <strong><em>Site To The South Of Crawford Street/Rosevale Street/ Beith Street Glasgow&nbsp; </em></strong><em> </em></td></tr><tr><td> <em>REVIEW PROPOSAL: </em></td><td> <strong><em>Erection of residential development (48 units)</em></strong><em> </em></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<p><em>I refer to representations made by you regarding the above application for Planning Permission.<br><br>I am writing to advise  you that Glasgow Planning Local Review Committee has received a request  to review the decision taken by the Appointed Officer under delegated  powers.<br><br>The Committee will take  into account your previous representations during its deliberations. Any  further representations you wish to make on the review should be  submitted to the address below within 14 days of  the date of this letter, quoting the review reference number. A copy of  the representations will be sent to the applicant for comment.</em><br><br><em>Planning Local Review Committee<br>Development &amp; Regeneration Services<br>231 George Street<br>Glasgow, G1 1RX<br>E-mail: </em><a href="mailto:onlineplanning@glasgow.gov.uk"><em>onlineplanning@glasgow.gov.uk</em></a><em>&nbsp; <br><br>A review of the case by  virtue of Section 43A(8) of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act  1997 (as amended) will be conducted by the Council’s Planning Local  Review Committee. Details of the date, time  and place of the meeting will be forwarded to you as soon as possible  after all the relevant information has been received. At that meeting,  the Planning Local Review Committee will consider if the review  documents provide sufficient information to enable  it to determine the review and may determine the review without further  procedure.</em><br><br><em>However, the Committee may determine that the review is to be conducted by one of, or a combination of the following:-</em><br></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li><em> by means of written submissions</em><ul><li><em> by the holding of one or more hearing sessions; and</em></li></ul><ul><li><em> by means of an inspection of the land to which the review relates</em></li></ul></li></ul>



<p><em>If the Committee decide to hold a hearing you will be contacted again and given the opportunity to attend.<br><br></em><strong><em>All the documentation relating to the review is available to view online at </em><a href="http://www.glasgow.gov.uk/onlineplanning"><em>www.glasgow.gov.uk/onlineplanning</em></a><em>. </em></strong><em><br><br>Please note that parties to a review will be expected to meet their own administration costs.</em>&#8220;</p>



<p>Let&#8217;s hope that in the face of well over 100 objections that this is the end of the road for such an anti-active-travel proposal that would destroy green space and bring more motor vehicles to this residential street.</p>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">3.5 East Dunbartonshire Council: LDP Newsletter No.54</h6>



<p>We received East Dunbartonshire&#8217;s LDP Newsletter 54 on 17 October with this explanatory email:</p>



<p>&#8220;<em>Please find attached the latest newsletter from East Dunbartonshire Council&#8217;s Land Planning Policy team. This edition includes details of the following:    <br>Local Development Plan 2 &#8216;Main Issues Report&#8217; consultation    <br>Draft Local Transport Strategy consultation</em> &#8220;</p>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">3.6 Glasgow, Winter Gritting Arrangements, now to include some cycle lanes</h6>



<p>GoBike&#8217;s co-Convenor, John, has been involved in discussions about the gritting of cycle lanes and now GoBike members, Derek M and Alasdair, have sent this link to the arrangements for this coming winter:</p>



<p><a rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label=" (opens in a new tab)" href="https://glasgowgis.maps.arcgis.com/apps/MapJournal/index.html?appid=d383df28e39d48b294e66826d2c1456d" target="_blank">https://glasgowgis.maps.arcgis.com/apps/MapJournal/index.html?appid=d383df28e39d48b294e66826d2c1456d</a></p>



<p>Do take care, though, when you are out and about.</p>



<h6 class="wp-block-heading">3.7 Glasgow City Council (Glencairn Drive) Traffic calming scheme</h6>



<figure class="wp-block-image"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="224" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Glencairn-Drive-view.png?resize=525%2C224&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-9076" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Glencairn-Drive-view.png?w=1366&amp;ssl=1 1366w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Glencairn-Drive-view.png?resize=300%2C128&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Glencairn-Drive-view.png?resize=600%2C256&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Glencairn-Drive-view.png?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 767px) 89vw, (max-width: 1000px) 54vw, (max-width: 1071px) 543px, 580px" /></figure>



<p>In <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-45-15-october-2019-commuter-parking-byres-road-delay-speed-cameras-and-a-gobike-members-petition-feature-in-this-issue-9215" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" aria-label="Digest 45 (opens in a new tab)">Digest 45</a>, Item 3.2 we published the reply sent by Glasgow City Council to our concerns about the proposed traffic calming scheme for Glencairn Drive near Maxwell Park, along with our response.<br>On 28 October this further reply was received, showing absolutely no acknowledgement of the concern that there appeared to be a mistake on one of their drawings!</p>



<p>&#8220;<strong><em>MESSAGE SENT ON BEHALF OF MICHAEL BRADY, </em></strong><em> </em><strong><em>GROUP MANAGER – TRAFFIC AND ROAD SAFETY</em></strong><em>, </em><strong><em>NEIGHBOURHOODS AND SUSTAINABILITY</em></strong><em><br><br>Dear Ms Fort<br><br>Thank you for your undernoted e-mail, I can advise that your comments will be taken on board  for future proposals.</em><br><br><em>As  previously advised, the responsibility for the installation of speed  cameras lies with  Safety Cameras Scotland, who have their own criteria for the  installation of speed cameras, which is stricter than our criteria for  the installation of traffic calming.<br><br>I  trust the above information is of assistance, however, should you  require any further information please contact (name and phone number removed by GoBike).</em><br><br><strong><em>Michael Brady</em></strong><em>, </em><strong><em>Group Manager – Traffic and Road Safety</em></strong><em>, </em><strong><em>Neighbourhoods and Sustainability</em></strong></p>



<p><strong><em>From:</em></strong><em> Tricia Fort [</em><a href="mailto:consultations@gobike.org"><em>mailto:consultations@gobike.org</em></a><em>] <br> </em><strong><em>Sent:</em></strong><em> 11 October 2019 16:04<br> </em><strong><em>To:</em></strong><em> Mailroom, Land Services (NS) &lt;</em><a href="mailto:LandServices.Mailroom@glasgow.gov.uk"><em>LandServices.Mailroom@glasgow.gov.uk</em></a><em>&gt;<br> </em><strong><em>Subject:</em></strong><em> Re: FW: The Glasgow City Council (Glencairn Drive) Traffic calming scheme &#8211; Mail id no 393585</em><br><br><em>Dear Mr Brady,<br><br>Thank you for replying to our letter of 17  September and your response to some of the points made therein. For your  reference I attach one of the drawings issued as part of this TRO,  which clearly shows a gap of 0.55m between cushion  and kerb. The GoBike response was based on this drawing. Will you  please issue the correct version of the drawing?</em><br><br><em>I also attach a screenshot showing a view of the  road that shows the setts in the gutter, which do not form an  acceptable cycling surface. However, I note your comment about the space  between the middle cushions and we have to hope that  people will be confident enough to use this gap when they are cycling  on this road.<br><br>It is unfortunate, in our view, that the City  Council does not take a more global view when there are concerns  expressed about speeding. Rather than maintain this wide road, and  others, as one primarily for motor vehicles we would prefer  a move towards streets for people. It is also a curious policy that you  continue to spend public money to restrain motor drivers who choose to  break speed limits, rather than requesting that speed cameras be  installed. Thank you, though for the clarification  on speed cameras and the link to the relevant website.<br><br>We maintain our support for the reduction of  dangerous speeds but object to the proposed method of achieving your  aims at this location.</em><br><br><em>Tricia Fort<br>for Consultations, GoBike, Strathclyde Cycle Campaign, <a href="http://www.gobike.org">www.gobike.org</a></em>&#8220;</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="280" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Screenshot-Glencairn-Drive-Drg-3-west-end.png?resize=525%2C280&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-9238" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Screenshot-Glencairn-Drive-Drg-3-west-end.png?w=1366&amp;ssl=1 1366w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Screenshot-Glencairn-Drive-Drg-3-west-end.png?resize=300%2C160&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Screenshot-Glencairn-Drive-Drg-3-west-end.png?resize=600%2C320&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Screenshot-Glencairn-Drive-Drg-3-west-end.png?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 767px) 89vw, (max-width: 1000px) 54vw, (max-width: 1071px) 543px, 580px" /></figure>



<p>A telephone call to the City Council has elicited the information that the drawing issued, with the critical dimension shown above, was incorrect, but who knows what the final as-built arrangement will be?</p>



<p>Almost world-wide news in this edition, but we hope you have found it of interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">9284</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
