<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>north glasgow &#8211; GoBike</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.gobike.org/tag/north-glasgow/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.gobike.org</link>
	<description>Strathclyde Cycle Campaign</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2023 20:28:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">67217435</site>	<item>
		<title>Some Thoughts on the Proposals for the North East Active Travel Routes (NEATR)</title>
		<link>https://www.gobike.org/some-thoughts-on-the-proposals-for-the-north-east-active-travel-routes-neatr-20790</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GoBike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2023 20:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[GoBike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glasgow city council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEATR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north glasgow]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gobike.org/?p=20790</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By Alasdair Macdonald, GoBike member I was disappointed by recent unbalanced coverage of Glasgow City Council proposals to develop North East Active Travel Routes (NEATR) in the Springburn area. Glasgow Times reported on a local group, supported by two Labour councillors, which was opposed to the plans. The reporting focused on cycle lanes on Wallacewell &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://www.gobike.org/some-thoughts-on-the-proposals-for-the-north-east-active-travel-routes-neatr-20790" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Some Thoughts on the Proposals for the North East Active Travel Routes (NEATR)"</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><em>By Alasdair Macdonald, GoBike member</em></p>



<p>I was disappointed by recent unbalanced coverage of Glasgow City Council proposals to develop North East Active Travel Routes (NEATR) in the Springburn area. Glasgow Times reported on a local group, supported by two Labour councillors, which was opposed to the plans. The reporting focused on cycle lanes on Wallacewell Road (ironically, championed by a previous Labour councillor). However, it ignored the wider plans for the area.</p>



<span id="more-20790"></span>



<p>The proposals will connect Wallacewell Road to new lanes on Broomfield Road, Red Road and Northgate Road. In future, these could link with Petershill Drive towards Royston and Petershill Road towards Sighthill and the city centre. There are a number of primary schools in the area and NEATR will provide safer crossings. The lanes will allow some children to wheel to school by scooter or bike and the improved footways will make walking more attractive. Junctions will be redesigned so that vehicles can turn safely without inhibiting pedestrians on the footways.</p>



<p>I am not a resident, but I have been leading bike rides in the area for groups of asylum seekers and people who are in recovery. I use the paths in Springburn Park to build confidence, then take the groups on Wallacewell Road&#8217;s segregated cycle lanes. This helps them to get experience of riding safely alongside traffic. This one kilometre-long road provides a 2 km ride; out and back. I also have to attend clinics occasionally at Stobhill Hospital, near proposed new lanes on Broomfield Road. To block or remove the lanes would disadvantage people who want to cycle or wheel.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Crossing points</h2>



<p>One of the major deficiencies in the Springburn area is the almost complete absence of pedestrian crossings. Wallacewell Road has a single zebra crossing at the extreme eastern end. There are no pedestrian crossings over main roads like Balornock Road, Broomfield Road and Balgrayhill Road. This a barrier to safe access to the superb Springburn Park. NEATR will provide these crossings and more.</p>



<p>One of the Glasgow Times pieces gave a full page to a ‘horror’ accident suffered by a local resident, who tripped on an ‘armadillo’ while crossing Wallacewell Road. He suffered a broken arm and other injuries. I wish him a full recovery. However, the Times article implicitly, but not very subtly blamed the cycling infrastructure stating that parts of the armadillo are black and not easily seen. There are, literally, thousands of kilometres of kerbs lining Glasgow’s roads as well as railings and other barriers. Everyday some people somewhere in the city trip over these, fortunately with no serious injury in most cases. But, where is the righteous demands to remove kerbs and barriers in our media?</p>



<p>As I indicated, Wallacewell Road has <strong>one</strong> pedestrian crossing. A street of that length with housing along it, shops, a playground, a park, a health centre, etc. ought to have at least six crossings. Had there been enough then the unfortunate gentleman may not have had to hurry across the carriageway, resulting in his misfortune.</p>



<p>It is disgraceful that Springburn has been so poorly provided for in terms of safer streets and crossings. I sympathise with the anger of some local people. However, focussing attacks on cycling provision on Wallacewell Road, diverts attention away from the main purpose of creating safer streets for people. They can use these to access schools, parks and green spaces, the hospital, shops, etc.</p>



<p>The project helps inclusion for school children, asylum seekers, people in recovery – voices not often heard in these debates. Councillors should bear that principle in mind and seek to represent all residents. </p>



<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">20790</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consultation Digest (Local) Issue 78, 19 January 2021</title>
		<link>https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-78-19-january-2021-13078</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Y]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 18:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Consultation digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoBike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ardrossan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blantyre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bothwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[east ayrshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Renfrewshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Giffnock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glasgow city council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Larkhall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Ayrshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north glasgow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Lanarkshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spaces for people]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stonehouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strathaven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uddingston]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gobike.org/?p=13078</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[We approach Burns Night with some news from Rabbie&#8217;s home county, a few other shires and the city. This Digest is within a week of Burns Night so it&#8217;s fitting that we have some news from Ayrshire. A few consultations have come in from East Renfrewshire and South Lanarkshire. Also, a last chance to comment &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-78-19-january-2021-13078" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Consultation Digest (Local) Issue 78, 19 January 2021"</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">We approach Burns Night with some news from Rabbie&#8217;s home county, a few other shires and the city. </h2>



<p>This Digest is within a week of Burns Night so it&#8217;s fitting that we have some news from Ayrshire. A few consultations have come in from East Renfrewshire and South Lanarkshire. Also, a last chance to comment on plans for North Glasgow. So, is 2021 starting to pick up slightly? As Burns said: &#8220;<em>Hope springs exulting on triumphant wing.</em>&#8220;</p>



<p>Since there have been a few breaks in the weather maybe there will be more chances to try some of <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/not-1-but-3-infrastructure-rides-for-january-12877" target="_blank">Andy&#8217;s three infrastructure routes</a> around Glasgow. </p>



<p>There’s still time to sign the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.glasgowconsult.co.uk/KMS/dmart.aspx?strTab=PublicPetitions&amp;noip=1&amp;PageType=item&amp;DMartId=65" target="_blank">petition for segregated cycle lanes at the Kelvin Way-University Avenue junction</a> (until 28 January). </p>



<span id="more-13078"></span>



<p>This Digest includes links in the Contents page so you can jump straight to a topic if you want to.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="block-259e4a8e-c2dd-4b93-8092-fa1d57790843"><strong>Contents</strong><br>(new consultations in <strong>bold</strong>)</h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 1: Current Consultations</h4>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li><a href="#one-one">Glasgow City Council – North Glasgow Strategic Development Framework (SDF)</a>, closes 29 January 2021</li><li><strong><a href="#one-two">North Ayrshire Council –&nbsp;Ardrossan Connections Project</a>, closes 3 February</strong></li><li><strong><a href="#one-three">South Lanarkshire Council –&nbsp;Active travel online consultations</a>, all close 8 February</strong></li><li><strong><a href="#one-four">East Refrewshire Council –&nbsp;Spaces for People A77 &#8216;Bike and Roll&#8217; corridor</a></strong></li></ol>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations</h4>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li><strong>UPDATE: <a href="#two-one">Glasgow City Council – (Y)our Districts Online Ideas Workshops – &#8216;Learning Quarter&#8217;</a></strong></li></ol>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 3: Consultation Feedback</h4>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li><a href="#three-one"><strong>East Ayrshire Council –&nbsp;NCN Route 73, Crosshouse Bridge infill, Cycle Diversion</strong></a></li></ol>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 1: Current Consultations<br></strong>(in date order for responses)</h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-one">1.1: Glasgow City Council – North Glasgow Strategic Development Framework (SDF),<br>(closes 29 January 2021)</h4>



<p>It&#8217;s the last few weeks of this consultation, which first featured in <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-74-24-november-2020-12604#one-five" target="_blank">Digest 74, Item 1.5</a> with the&nbsp;<a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/GoBike-NGlasgowSDF-letter-171120.pdf" target="_blank">GoBike response written by Brenda</a>. It covers a large area north of the M8 to Possil and from Maryhill Rd to Springburn. It&#8217;s been a while in the making, so much so that the Sighthill Bridge might be completed before the final report is published. However, it is due to cover the next few decades. See the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.glasgowconsult.co.uk/KMS/dmart.aspx?strTab=PublicDMartCurrent&amp;NoIP=1" target="_blank">North Glasgow SDF consultation</a> on GCC&#8217;s website before 29 January. </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-two">1.2: North Ayrshire Council –&nbsp;Ardrossan Connections Project (closes 3 February)</h4>



<p>GoBike&#8217;s monthly rides would occasionally make it to the Ayrshire coast and Ardrossan has a choice of train stations for the trip back (or a ferry to Arran). Sustrans are running a Commonplace consultation about the town for North Ayrshire Council and Ardrossan Community Development Trust (as spotted by our member Steph). </p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="525" height="296" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Ardrossan-Saltcoats-2021-01-18_1612px.jpg?resize=525%2C296&#038;ssl=1" alt="Ardrossan map" class="wp-image-13089" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Ardrossan-Saltcoats-2021-01-18_1612px.jpg?resize=600%2C338&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Ardrossan-Saltcoats-2021-01-18_1612px.jpg?resize=300%2C169&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Ardrossan-Saltcoats-2021-01-18_1612px.jpg?resize=1536%2C864&amp;ssl=1 1536w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Ardrossan-Saltcoats-2021-01-18_1612px.jpg?w=1612&amp;ssl=1 1612w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Ardrossan-Saltcoats-2021-01-18_1612px.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="(max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Map of Ardrossan – coastal&nbsp;NCN routes highlighted in pink</figcaption></figure>



<p>Ardrossan has coastal off-road paths running past the town – NCN73, from neighbouring Saltcoats, goes to the harbour. NCN753 heads north to the outskirts of West Kilbride. This project seems to focus on the on-road bit between them at the town centre. If you&#8217;ve visited or know the area, see the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://ardrossanconnections.commonplace.is/" target="_blank">Ardrossan Connections Commonplace map</a>. You&#8217;ve only got a few weeks until 3 February. </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-three">1.3: South Lanarkshire Council – Active travel online consultations (all close 8 February)</h4>



<p>GoBike member Marc alerted us to a new round of active travel consultations in South Lanarkshire. Previous ones included East Kilbride, which had its first section of segregated cycleway laid last year. The next lot of active travel studies are being run by Aecom –&nbsp;these are for: </p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="alignright size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" decoding="async" width="344" height="600" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/SL-Bothwell-Stonehouse-2021-01-18_1604px.jpg?resize=344%2C600&#038;ssl=1" alt="South Lanarkshire towns on NCN74" class="wp-image-13091" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/SL-Bothwell-Stonehouse-2021-01-18_1604px.jpg?resize=344%2C600&amp;ssl=1 344w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/SL-Bothwell-Stonehouse-2021-01-18_1604px.jpg?resize=172%2C300&amp;ssl=1 172w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/SL-Bothwell-Stonehouse-2021-01-18_1604px.jpg?resize=881%2C1536&amp;ssl=1 881w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/SL-Bothwell-Stonehouse-2021-01-18_1604px.jpg?w=920&amp;ssl=1 920w" sizes="(max-width: 344px) 100vw, 344px" /><figcaption>Map of South Lanarkshire showing towns on NCN74</figcaption></figure></div>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>Blantyre, Bothwell &amp; Uddingston; </li><li>Larkhall;</li><li>Strathaven &amp; Stonehouse (and surrounding villages). </li></ul>



<p>Strathaven boasts a few cycling clubs and some old railway lines, which could still be used for cycle paths. Stonehouse and Larkhall are linked by on-road sections of NCN74. Blantyre is currently on NCN74 but it&#8217;s due to re-route through Strathclyde Park, once a new link is built from the Raith Interchange to Laighlands Rd, Bothwell. Uddingston is where NCN routes 74 and 75 meet. It&#8217;s separated from Glasgow by part of North Lanarkshire, where Aecom are also doing an active travel audit. If you&#8217;ve ever wanted a cycleway on the Lanarkshire side, to link to the city&#8217;s segregated section past the Dog&#8217;s Trust, this is a great opportunity to mention it! Especially since GCC are building a new 2-way cycleway on London Rd past Mount Vernon station. </p>



<p>Again, these consultations take the form of a survey and Placecheck map for each area. However, after the issues with petrolheads swamping the comments of the previous Hamilton map, the format has changed slightly. This time, you have to complete the survey before you access the map. See <a href="https://www.southlanarkshire.gov.uk/info/200230/public_and_community_transport/1933/active_travel_online_consultations" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">SLC&#8217;s active travel consultations page</a> by 8 February.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-four">1.4: East Refrewshire Council –&nbsp;Spaces for People A77 &#8216;Bike and Roll&#8217; corridor</h4>



<p>Since the last Digest there&#8217;s been a lot of attention on the Spaces for People measures on Fenwick Rd/A77 in Giffnock (first mentioned in a <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/east-renfrewshire-is-making-positive-steps-for-active-travel-11695" target="_blank">blog post about East Ren last summer</a>). Or rather, there&#8217;s been noise about what they&#8217;re <em>not</em> going to be. A local business latched onto a draft plan on the council&#8217;s website and posted about the council removing car parking. Many angry posts about car parking and shops ensued on Facebook and in the consultation. In the midst of all this, you may have seen that GoBike member Iona updated one of our Evidence pages – <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/campaigns/bike-lanes-are-great-for-business" target="_blank">Bike Lanes are Great for Business</a>. </p>



<p>ERC quickly took down the draft document and added a <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://erspacesforpeople.commonplace.is/proposals/a-77-fenwick-road-south-pop-up-bike-roll-corridor" target="_blank">statement</a> to the consultation that it had been there in error and there were no current plans for Giffnock High St. A local Tory MSP later held an online event about the measures on 18 January, which some GoBikers took part in. </p>



<p>What is already in place on Fenwick Rd is &#8216;soft&#8217; segregation on the outside lanes of a section of the dual carriageway between Berryhill Road and Church Road. It started off as cones before &#8216;wands&#8217; were fixed down to replace them (upper photo in Twitter post, below). Further on, the current A77 cycle lanes were made mandatory and had cones added. However, some of the cones have been re-arranged by local drivers (lower photos in Twitter post, below)… </p>



<figure class="wp-block-embed-twitter wp-block-embed is-type-rich is-provider-twitter"><div class="wp-block-embed__wrapper">
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-width="525" data-dnt="true"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">We hope that <a href="https://twitter.com/EastRenCouncil?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@EastRenCouncil</a> enforce the Ayr Rd (A77) which are now mandatory cycle lanes.<br><br>What would be even better is (quicker) installation of soft segregation like seen on the Fenwick Rd to keep cycle lane unobstructed! <img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f6a7.png" alt="🚧" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/SpacesForPeople?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#SpacesForPeople</a> <a href="https://t.co/vsArDH9Npt">https://t.co/vsArDH9Npt</a> <a href="https://t.co/ihmtZJtIDG">pic.twitter.com/ihmtZJtIDG</a></p>&mdash; GoBike (@GoBikeGlasgow) <a href="https://twitter.com/GoBikeGlasgow/status/1350201145936007168?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 15, 2021</a></blockquote><script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
</div></figure>



<p>So, it seems we will hear more from East Ren on the age old debate about safe cycle lanes versus convenient car parking. If you know the area and want to comment on both these measures on the A77, see <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://erspacesforpeople.commonplace.is/overview" target="_blank">ERC Spaces for People surveys</a>. The map is closed but the survey pages don&#8217;t seem to list a closing date, so this one could go on for a while. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations</strong></h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="two-one">2.1: Glasgow City Council – (Y)our Districts Online Ideas Workshops – &#8216;Learning Quarter&#8217;</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" decoding="async" width="525" height="351" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Learning-Quarter-District.jpg?resize=525%2C351&#038;ssl=1" alt="'Learning Quarter' District" class="wp-image-13128" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Learning-Quarter-District.jpg?resize=600%2C401&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Learning-Quarter-District.jpg?resize=300%2C200&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Learning-Quarter-District.jpg?w=900&amp;ssl=1 900w" sizes="(max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>The &#8216;Learning Quarter&#8217; covers the area of colleges and universities around Cathedral St as well as Glasgow Royal Infirmary, the Necropolis and Glasgow Cathedral itself</figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>UPDATE:</strong> Online workshops were due to take place for the next city centre &#8216;Districts&#8217; in GCC&#8217;s ongoing series. Unfortunately, <a href="https://twitter.com/YourCityCentre/status/1349273639754076166?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">the Merchant City date has already passed</a>. However, the planned <a href="https://twitter.com/YourCityCentre/status/1351853901922889728?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">&#8216;Learning Quarter&#8217; workshops have been postponed with a new date to follow</a>. These events should be along similar lines to <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-74-24-november-2020-12604#one-two" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">previous Cowcaddens and Townhead workshops covered in Digest 74</a>. Hopefully we&#8217;ll have an update in the next Digest at the start of February.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 3: Consultation Feedback</strong></h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-one">3.1: East Ayrshire Council –&nbsp;NCN Route 73, Crosshouse Bridge infill, Cycle Diversion</h4>



<p>This issue was raised by our ride leader Andy, who&#8217;s been following up on a programme of works on former railway bridges and viaducts. The <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/55.6204/-4.5433&amp;layers=C" target="_blank">Crosshouse Bridge near Knockentiber</a> is on NCN73 between Kilmarnock and Irvine (one of Burns&#8217; old stomping grounds). Diversion routes will be signposted in both directions for drivers but not for cyclists. GoBike have sent a <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/GoBike-Knockentiber-Bridge-diversion-comment-13-01-2021.pdf" target="_blank">letter by Tricia</a> to East Ayrshire Council to ask for a signed cycle diversion in both directions. </p>



<p>As Burns wrote in &#8216;To A Mouse (On Turning Her Up In Her Nest With The Plough)&#8217;: <br>“<em>The best-laid schemes o’ mice an’ men / Gang aft agley.</em>”</p>



<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">13078</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consultation Digest (Local) Issue 77, 5 January 2021</title>
		<link>https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-77-5-january-2021-12949</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Y]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2021 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Consultation digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoBike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Dunbartonshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glasgow city council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glasgow Science Centre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ldp2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nextbike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north glasgow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protected junctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[School Streets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sdf]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gobike.org/?p=12949</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Happy New Year for 2021. Some long term consultations and a planning application for Pacific Quay. Not many new consultations to start the year. However, it&#8217;s a last chance to comment on some existing consultations and a planning application at the Science Centre/BBC has some feedback. The weather hasn&#8217;t helped but have you been able &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-77-5-january-2021-12949" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Consultation Digest (Local) Issue 77, 5 January 2021"</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Happy New Year for 2021. Some long term consultations and a planning application for Pacific Quay. </h2>



<p>Not many new consultations to start the year. However, it&#8217;s a last chance to comment on some existing consultations and a planning application at the Science Centre/BBC has some feedback. </p>



<p>The weather hasn&#8217;t helped but have you been able to try any of <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/not-1-but-3-infrastructure-rides-for-january-12877" target="_blank">Andy&#8217;s three infrastructure routes</a> around Glasgow?</p>



<p>There’s still time to sign the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.glasgowconsult.co.uk/KMS/dmart.aspx?strTab=PublicPetitions&amp;noip=1&amp;PageType=item&amp;DMartId=65" target="_blank">petition for segregated cycle lanes at the Kelvin Way-University Avenue junction</a> (until 28 January). It&#8217;s near Hillhead Primary School, with its School Street…</p>



<span id="more-12949"></span>



<p>This Digest includes links in the Contents page so you can jump straight to a topic if you want to.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Contents</strong><br />(new consultations in <strong>bold</strong>)</h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 1: Current Consultations</h4>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li><a href="#one-one">Glasgow City Council – School Streets, Glasgow (Prohibition of Motor Vehicles) Order 202_</a>, (closes 11 January 2021)</li><li><a href="#one-two">East Dunbartonshire Council – Proposed Local Development Plan 2 (LDP2)</a>, closes 15 January 2021</li><li><a href="#one-three">Glasgow City Council – North Glasgow Strategic Development Framework (SDF)</a>, closes 29 January 2021</li><li><a href="#one-four">Glasgow City Council – Protected Junction Trial consultation (Victoria Rd)</a></li></ol>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations</h4>



<p>None.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 3: Consultation Feedback</h4>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li><a href="#three-one">Glasgow Science Centre –&nbsp;Planning application 20/02068/FUL</a></li></ol>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 1: Current Consultations<br /></strong>(in date order for responses)</h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-one">1.1: Glasgow City Council – School Streets, Glasgow (Prohibition of Motor Vehicles) Order 202_, (closes 11 January 2021)</h4>



<p>As covered in&nbsp;<a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-75-8-december-2020-12699#one-four" target="_blank">Digest 75, Item 1.4</a>&nbsp;this order makes trials into permanent School Streets at six primary schools: Bankhead PS, Broomhill PS, Hillhead PS, Lourdes PS, Our Lady of the Rosary PS and St Blanes PS. GoBike backs this move and hopes members can show support too.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-two">1.2: East Dunbartonshire Council – Proposed Local Development Plan 2 (LDP2)<br />(closes 15 January 2021)</h4>



<p>The deadline is approaching for East Dunbartonshire Council&#8217;s proposed LDP2 (as seen in <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-72-27-october-2020-bike-storage-do-get-your-views-in-to-the-scottish-government-12342" target="_blank">Digest 72</a>, Item 1.8). If you want to comment on how EDC could include active travel in future developments, you&#8217;ll need to email them soon. Their track record includes the first phase of the Bearsway and not very much since. Certainly no Spaces for People projects as they were the only mainland council not to bid for funding. See <a href="http://www.eastdunbarton.gov.uk/LDP2">www.eastdunbarton.gov.uk/LDP2</a> and email:&nbsp;<a href="mailto:development.plan@eastdunbarton.gov.uk">development.plan@eastdunbarton.gov.uk</a>.&nbsp;</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-three">1.3: Glasgow City Council – North Glasgow Strategic Development Framework (SDF),<br />(closes 29 January 2021)</h4>



<p>This featured in <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-74-24-november-2020-12604#one-five" target="_blank">Digest 74, Item 1.5</a> with the&nbsp;<a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/GoBike-NGlasgowSDF-letter-171120.pdf" target="_blank">GoBike response written by Brenda</a>. It covers a large area north of the M8 to Possil and from Maryhill Rd to Springburn. It&#8217;s about to lose some of the canal path during the Stockingfield bridge works. Recent gains include St Rollox Dr (past Sighthill Cemetery) and the Spaces for People lanes (on Bilsland Drive and Hawthorn St). See the&nbsp;<a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.glasgowconsult.co.uk/UploadedFiles/Glasgow%20North%20SDF%2030-09-2020.pdf" target="_blank">North Glasgow SDF consultation document</a> (PDF) and the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.smartsurvey.co.uk/s/GOMKA1/" target="_blank">online survey</a>.&nbsp;The deadline was extended to 29 January 2021.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-four">1.4: Glasgow City Council – Protected Junction Trial consultation (Victoria Rd)</h4>



<p>GCC have a consultation open about the new protected junctions on the South City Way (as seen in <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-74-24-november-2020-12604#one-six" target="_blank">Digest 74, Item 1.6</a>). These are a trial for two years and the consultation doesn&#8217;t have a deadline. So, you should be able to submit comments about the new junctions at any time. They&#8217;re a first in Glasgow that GoBike would like to see repeated elsewhere. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations</strong></h3>



<p>None forthcoming this time.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 3: Consultation Feedback</strong></h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-one">3.1: Glasgow Science Centre –&nbsp;Public realm improvement works/alterations to road layout and car park (Planning Application 20/02068/FUL)</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large is-resized"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Science-Centre-arrangement-2392px.png?resize=525%2C318&#038;ssl=1" alt="Science Centre proposed landscaping" class="wp-image-12979" width="525" height="318" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Science-Centre-arrangement-2392px.png?resize=600%2C364&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Science-Centre-arrangement-2392px.png?resize=300%2C182&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Science-Centre-arrangement-2392px.png?resize=1536%2C931&amp;ssl=1 1536w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Science-Centre-arrangement-2392px.png?resize=2048%2C1241&amp;ssl=1 2048w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Science-Centre-arrangement-2392px.png?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Map of Science Centre landscaping/car park planning application –&nbsp;<em>proposed</em> cycle lane in pink (bridge added in red)</figcaption></figure>



<p>This planning application first featured in <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-69-15-september-2020-what-price-public-opinion-12044" target="_blank">Digest 69</a>, Item 1.5. The plans make some changes to the public space between the Science Centre and BBC building. Just now, you have to dodge concrete barriers between the Millennium Bridge and Pacific Quay service road.&nbsp;A direct path between them would help, since it can be a busy area. </p>



<p>However, this plan is for planting and seating outside the Science Centre with a new cycle path next to the road (in pink, above). This will run along the edge of the car park (replacing about 50 parking spaces) and across a side entrance road. It continues on what is currently a narrow grass strip, then goes across the pavement at a corner. It&#8217;s not clear if the pavement is shared use or if the cycle path joins the road. </p>



<p>The northern end of the cycle path leads to a curved shared space (marked 5), which  people will walk across to get to the car park. This path will be built on what is currently a road within the car park. The turning circle between the Science Centre and BBC building will also be reduced. There is a &#8216;sheltered cycle hub&#8217; with 94 bike parking spaces (marked at point 8). This seems to replace the small existing bike shelter for staff/visitors (maybe with double-deck bike parking). <s>However, the existing</s><s> Nextbike</s><s> hire station is not shown at all.</s> Update: seems Nextbike station is being retained (but isn’t marked on plan).</p>



<p>The plans do convert car parking spaces and some road space and into space for people walking and cycling. Overall, the scheme looks like it&#8217;s been planned for people visiting the Science Centre rather than people who cycle to work or for transport. The same company, Austin-Smith:Lord, are running the consultations about city centre districts. </p>



<p>See the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://publicaccess.glasgow.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=documents&amp;keyVal=QFBDOZEXIGP00" target="_blank">documents on Glasgow City Council&#8217;s planning portal</a>, including a GoBike response objecting to the route being less direct. These don&#8217;t seem to have been taken on board as the council has approved the plan, subject to conditions (GCC don&#8217;t give any further details). </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Looking forward…</h3>



<p>Further into 2021, new Spaces for People routes are due in Renfrewshire, East Renfrewshire and South Lanarkshire. Also, new cycle/pedestrian bridges are being built to Sighthill in Glasgow and Inchinnan, Renfrewshire. Perhaps we&#8217;ll have more next time. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">12949</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consultation Digest (Local) Issue 76, 22 December 2020</title>
		<link>https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-76-22-december-2020-12834</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Y]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2020 18:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Consultation digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoBike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dennistoun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Dunbartonshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glasgow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glasgow city council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glasgow University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LTN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monklands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multiplex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north glasgow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Lanarkshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protected junctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[School Streets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spaces for people]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gobike.org/?p=12834</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mostly long term consultations except for a sudden Spaces for People scheme in Dennistoun. Our blog post called it a &#8216;Low-ish Traffic Neighbourhood&#8217;. Does it qualify as an LTN? It&#8217;s included in one of Andy&#8217;s three infrastructure routes so you may get the chance to see for yourself if you&#8217;re in Glasgow. There&#8217;s also a &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-76-22-december-2020-12834" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Consultation Digest (Local) Issue 76, 22 December 2020"</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Mostly long term consultations except for a sudden Spaces for People scheme in Dennistoun.</h2>



<p>Our blog post called it a &#8216;Low-ish Traffic Neighbourhood&#8217;. Does it qualify as an LTN?  It&#8217;s included in one of <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/not-1-but-3-infrastructure-rides-for-january-12877" target="_blank">Andy&#8217;s three</a><a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/not-1-but-3-infrastructure-rides-for-january-12877" target="_blank"> </a><a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/not-1-but-3-infrastructure-rides-for-january-12877" target="_blank">infrastructure routes</a> so you may get the chance to see for yourself if you&#8217;re in Glasgow.</p>



<p>There&#8217;s also a recent <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.glasgowconsult.co.uk/KMS/dmart.aspx?strTab=PublicPetitions&amp;noip=1&amp;PageType=item&amp;DMartId=65" target="_blank">petition for segregated cycle lanes at the Kelvin Way-University Avenue junction</a> (open for signing until 28 January). It&#8217;s near Hillhead Primary School, which also features for its School Street…</p>



<span id="more-12834"></span>



<p>This Digest includes links in the Contents page so you can jump straight to a topic if you want to. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Contents</strong> <br>(new consultations in <strong>bold</strong>)</h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 1: Current Consultations</h4>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li><a href="#one-one">Glasgow City Council – School Streets, Glasgow (Prohibition of Motor Vehicles) Order 202_</a>, (closes 11 January 2021)</li><li><a href="#one-two">East Dunbartonshire Council – Proposed Local Development Plan 2 (LDP2)</a>, closes 15 January 2021</li><li><a href="#one-three">Glasgow City Council – North Glasgow Strategic Development Framework (SDF)</a>, closes 29 January 2021</li><li><a href="#one-four">Glasgow City Council – Protected Junction Trial consultation (Victoria Rd)</a></li></ol>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations</h4>



<p>None this time </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 3: Consultation Feedback</h4>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li><strong><a href="#three-one">Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;Spaces for People: Dennistoun Area – Low Traffic Neighbourhood (Temporary Traffic Regulation Order)</a></strong></li><li><a href="#three-two">Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;Lourdes Primary School, Glasgow (Temporary Traffic Regulation) Order 2020</a></li><li><a href="#three-three">NHS Lanarkshire –&nbsp;New Monklands Hospital, preferred site</a></li><li><a href="#three-four">Multiplex/University of Glasgow –&nbsp;Campus Development, December 2020 Newsletter</a></li></ol>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 1: Current Consultations<br></strong>(in date order for responses)</h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-one">1.1: Glasgow City Council – School Streets, Glasgow (Prohibition of Motor Vehicles) Order 202_, (closes 11 January 2021)</h4>



<p>As covered in <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-75-8-december-2020-12699#one-four" target="_blank">Digest 75, Item 1.4</a> this traffic order makes School Streets trials into a permanent fixture at six primary schools. They are Bankhead PS, Broomhill PS, Hillhead PS, Lourdes PS, Our Lady of the Rosary PS and St Blanes PS. GoBike supports Schools Streets and hopefully we have members near some of these schools who can show support. </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-two">1.2: East Dunbartonshire Council – Proposed Local Development Plan 2 (LDP2)<br>(closes 15 January 2021)</h4>



<p>If you&#8217;re at a loose end over the festive period, and know the East Dunbartonshire area, you still have time to comment on their proposed LDP2 (as seen in <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-72-27-october-2020-bike-storage-do-get-your-views-in-to-the-scottish-government-12342" target="_blank">Digest 72</a>, Item 1.8). Since EDC installed the first phase of the Bearsway they&#8217;ve become the Grinch of active travel as the only mainland council not to bid for Spaces for People funding. If you want to urge them to do better in future developments, see <a href="http://www.eastdunbarton.gov.uk/LDP2">www.eastdunbarton.gov.uk/LDP2</a> and email:&nbsp;<a href="mailto:development.plan@eastdunbarton.gov.uk">development.plan@eastdunbarton.gov.uk</a>.&nbsp;</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-three">1.3: Glasgow City Council – North Glasgow Strategic Development Framework (SDF), <br>(closes 29 January 2021)</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="371" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Glasgow-North-SDF-30-09-2020-33_active-map.png?resize=525%2C371&#038;ssl=1" alt="Glasgow North - principles of active travel map" class="wp-image-12646" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Glasgow-North-SDF-30-09-2020-33_active-map.png?resize=600%2C424&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Glasgow-North-SDF-30-09-2020-33_active-map.png?resize=300%2C212&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Glasgow-North-SDF-30-09-2020-33_active-map.png?w=1202&amp;ssl=1 1202w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Glasgow-North-SDF-30-09-2020-33_active-map.png?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>North Glasgow, active travel &#8216;principles&#8217;</figcaption></figure>



<p>North Glasgow SDF is another long term document, which covers a large area north of the M8 to Possil and from Maryhill Rd to Springburn. It&#8217;s a part of the city which doesn&#8217;t have much cycling infrastructure, unless you count the canal path. Since Stockingfield junction is about to be closed off, it will soon have even less. However, the new lanes on St Rollox Dr (past Sighthill Cemetery) and the recent Spaces for People lanes (on Bilsland Drive and Hawthorn St) show potential. The more of us who tell the council about that, the better. This featured in <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-74-24-november-2020-12604#one-five" target="_blank">Digest 74, Item 1.5</a> with the&nbsp;<a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/GoBike-NGlasgowSDF-letter-171120.pdf" target="_blank">GoBike response written by Brenda</a>. See the&nbsp;<a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.glasgowconsult.co.uk/UploadedFiles/Glasgow%20North%20SDF%2030-09-2020.pdf" target="_blank">North Glasgow SDF consultation document</a> (PDF) and the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.smartsurvey.co.uk/s/GOMKA1/" target="_blank">online survey</a>.&nbsp;The deadline was extended to 29 January 2021.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-four">1.4: Glasgow City Council – Protected Junction Trial consultation (Victoria Rd)</h4>



<p>GCC have a consultation open about the new protected junctions on the South City Way (as seen in <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-74-24-november-2020-12604#one-six" target="_blank">Digest 74, Item 1.6</a>). A recent <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://twitter.com/SustransScot/status/1337029286415507457?s=20" target="_blank">response from Sustrans on Twitter</a> clarified an issue with a CCTV mast (it was supposed to be moved pre-pandemic). Even if they&#8217;re not perfect, they&#8217;re a first in Glasgow that we&#8217;d like to see repeated elsewhere. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations</strong></h3>



<p>None forthcoming this time.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 3: Consultation Feedback</strong></h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-one">3.1: Glasgow City Council – Spaces for People: Dennistoun Area – Low Traffic Neighbourhood (Temporary Traffic Regulation Order)</h4>



<p>This is a follow up from the recent <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/glasgows-first-shot-at-a-low-traffic-neighbourhood-dennistoun-12802" target="_blank">GoBike blog about changes in Dennistoun</a>, which quoted this Temporary TRO (as it came in too late to make the last Digest). The order covers the area between Alexandra Parade and Duke St, known locally as The Drives (from the names of most of its east-west streets –&nbsp;Circus Dr, Roslea Dr, etc). </p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="394" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Dennistoun_LTN_visualisations_2.png?resize=525%2C394&#038;ssl=1" alt="Visualisation of Spaces for People measures on Armadale St" class="wp-image-12904" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Dennistoun_LTN_visualisations_2.png?resize=600%2C450&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Dennistoun_LTN_visualisations_2.png?resize=300%2C225&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Dennistoun_LTN_visualisations_2.png?w=800&amp;ssl=1 800w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Glasgow City Council visualisation of their Spaces for People measures –&nbsp;looking south on Armadale St at Alexandra Parade Primary School (with phantom traffic lights on Janny&#8217;s house)</figcaption></figure>



<p>The above is where your editor has lived for about 15 years and was involved in a <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://dashedlines.uk/cycling/dont-let-parking-controls-block-cycling-in-dennistoun/" target="_blank">plan to reduce &#8216;through&#8217; traffic in The Drives</a> in 2019, along with Michael from <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://twitter.com/space4theparade" target="_blank">Spaces for People Dennistoun</a> (before Sustrans nicked that name). That plan was a grassroots response to all the 1-way streets in GCC&#8217;s earlier <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="http://dennistouncc.org.uk/2019/07/08/dennistoun-and-royston-restricted-parking-zone-proposal/" target="_blank">Restricted Parking Zone (RPZ) plan for Dennistoun and Royston</a>. Which in turn followed concerns about more parking being displaced into Dennistoun by the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/article/20480/Celtic-ParkEmirates-Arena" target="_blank">Celtic Park/Emirates Event Day Parking Zone</a> plans. There&#8217;s also a history of other parking issues, including around Glasgow Royal Infirmary and the City Park building plus commuters using the area as a &#8216;park and ride&#8217; to the city centre. Many streets in the Drives have the familiar rows of parked cars down both sides, reducing the road width and visibility. </p>



<p>The parking plans have been shelved since all the Roads staff in GCC were redeployed to the Sustrans-funded Spaces for People program. This probably explains the similarities between some 1-ways in the RPZ plan and the new <a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/article/26417/Spaces-for-People-Dennistoun" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Dennistoun Spaces for People measures</a>.</p>



<p>It may also explain the use of 1-way streets to re-route &#8216;through&#8217; traffic. Many active travel advocates would expect an LTN to stop rat running altogether. The <a href="https://www.sustrans.org.uk/our-blog/get-active/2020/in-your-community/what-is-a-low-traffic-neighbourhood/#:~:text=A%20Low%20Traffic%20Neighbourhood%20(LTN,to%20get%20to%20another%20destination." target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sustrans definition of a Low Traffic Neighbourhood</a> is: </p>



<p><em>&#8220;&#8230;a scheme where motor vehicle traffic in residential streets is greatly reduced. This is done by minimising the amount of traffic that comes from vehicles using the streets to get to another destination. This is often referred to as ‘through-traffic’ or ‘rat-running’.<br><br>Private motorised vehicles still have easy access to all homes and businesses without driving directly through the neighbourhood.</em></p>



<p><em>This opens up networks of streets so people can safely travel through the area on foot, bicycle, by wheeling or by bus. Emergency vehicles can also be prioritised to reach their destinations quicker.</em></p>



<p><em>Traffic is reduced by using temporary or permanent barriers called “modal filters”. These can include putting up bollards or planters. Or they can be camera operated. Residents and businesses still have access to the neighbourhood by motor vehicle using different routes, but through-traffic is greatly reduced.&#8221; </em></p>



<p>Glasgow City Council&#8217;s TTRO contains the grand total of one modal filter (on Ark Lane). In your editor&#8217;s opinion, this is four filters short of an LTN. Stopping drivers taking shortcuts through the area would cut down traffic to just residents and deliveries. Allowing it through spreads traffic around the neighbourhood without properly calming the streets. Also, some drivers don&#8217;t follow established &#8216;No Entry&#8217; signs let alone new ones. </p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="394" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Dennistoun-1-way-Epc2uh8UcAEQYjT-600x450.jpeg?resize=525%2C394&#038;ssl=1" alt="New 1-way on Armadale St, Dennistoun" class="wp-image-12900" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Dennistoun-1-way-Epc2uh8UcAEQYjT.jpeg?resize=600%2C450&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Dennistoun-1-way-Epc2uh8UcAEQYjT.jpeg?resize=300%2C225&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Dennistoun-1-way-Epc2uh8UcAEQYjT.jpeg?resize=1536%2C1152&amp;ssl=1 1536w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Dennistoun-1-way-Epc2uh8UcAEQYjT.jpeg?w=2048&amp;ssl=1 2048w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Dennistoun-1-way-Epc2uh8UcAEQYjT.jpeg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>A car being driven past the new one way signs looking north on Armadale St, Dennistoun <br>(image: <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://twitter.com/UrbanistTOC" target="_blank">Thomas Cornwallis</a>)</figcaption></figure>



<p>The most eye-catching parts of the scheme are probably the extended pavement sections outside Alexandra Parade and St Denis&#8217;s primary schools. A row of planter boxes in the road will stop car parking around the school gates on Armadale St and Meadowpark St. This should improve road safety for schoolchildren. Outside the barriers, a painted cycle contraflow lane will go next to the existing road lane. Elsewhere the 1-way sections will allow contraflow cycling but without any marked lanes; just signage. </p>



<p>The rest of the order is mostly about short 1-way sections and double yellow lines near schools and nurseries. However, it also extends lines further on Ark Lane and Broomfield Drive than on the original drawing. There was no explanation but an educated guess is it might be to let bin lorries turn.</p>



<p>Like other SfP projects, the council used emergency powers so they didn&#8217;t have to consult local people (they may count <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://glasgowspacesforpeople.commonplace.is/" target="_blank">Glasgow&#8217;s Spaces for People Commonplace map</a> as consultation). This created a lot of confusion around the plans. The reaction online saw some support on Twitter but a lot of negative posts on Facebook. Many complained about loss of car parking and lack of consultation. The council&#8217;s &#8216;map&#8217; (really a technical drawing) didn&#8217;t help so your editor produced a new map instead. </p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large is-resized"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Initial-Dennistoun-map-DL.png?resize=525%2C369&#038;ssl=1" alt="Simplified map of Dennistoun Spaces for People measures" class="wp-image-12804" width="525" height="369" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Initial-Dennistoun-map-DL.png?resize=600%2C422&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Initial-Dennistoun-map-DL.png?resize=300%2C211&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Initial-Dennistoun-map-DL.png?w=1201&amp;ssl=1 1201w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Initial-Dennistoun-map-DL.png?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Simplified map of Dennistoun Spaces for People measures</figcaption></figure>



<p>Work on signage, barriers, etc. was supposed to be finished before Christmas (but seems to be behind schedule). The temporary trial will last about three months. It remains to be seen how people in cars and on bikes will react to the new cycle contraflows. However, it is a first step towards making the Drives a better place to walk and cycle (if a faltering one). Time will tell if GCC&#8217;s scheme brings the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.lcc.org.uk/articles/ltns-work-new-research-shows-evidence-of-success-on-multiple-criteria" target="_blank">benefits recorded in many London LTNs</a>. </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-two">3.2: Glasgow City Council – Lourdes Primary School, Glasgow (Temporary Traffic Regulation) Order 2020</h4>



<p>Following on from the permanent orders, above, is this <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Lourdes-Primary-School-Advert-11.12.20.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Temporary TRO for Lourdes Primary School</a> in the Cardonald area. It seems to add double yellow lines to part of the entrance road to the school (after the roundabout). That&#8217;s about it, really. </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-three">3.3: NHS Lanarkshire –&nbsp;New Monklands Hospital, preferred site</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="320" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/WesterMoffat-map-2020-12-16.jpg?resize=525%2C320&#038;ssl=1" alt="Map of NCN75 between Airdrie and Caldercruix" class="wp-image-12851" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/WesterMoffat-map-2020-12-16.jpg?resize=600%2C366&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/WesterMoffat-map-2020-12-16.jpg?resize=300%2C183&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/WesterMoffat-map-2020-12-16.jpg?resize=1536%2C938&amp;ssl=1 1536w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/WesterMoffat-map-2020-12-16.jpg?w=2002&amp;ssl=1 2002w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/WesterMoffat-map-2020-12-16.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Map of NCN75 from Airdrie, past Wester Moffat site and Plains to Caldercruix</figcaption></figure>



<p>The latest part of the process to choose a new hospital site was mentioned in <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-71-13-october-2020-how-do-we-talk-about-cycling-and-where-do-we-store-our-bikes-12249" target="_blank">Digest 71</a>. A <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/GoBike-Monklands-Hospital-site-161020.pdf" target="_blank">GoBike response</a> in the next Digest was in favour of the Wester Moffat site for active travel. </p>



<p>On 16th December, <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://twitter.com/NHSLanarkshire/status/1339296739241627657" target="_blank">Lanarkshire NHS Board approved Wester Moffat as its preferred site</a>. </p>



<p>A hospital being built at Wester Moffat brings a lot of potential for improvements to NCN75. The site is just east of Airdrie between the current Wester Moffat community hospital (off Towers Rd) and Easter Moffat golf course. NCN75 is currently on the busy A89 past the site. The off-road route following the Airdrie-Bathgate rail line begins near Caldercruix. If a new off-road path could link Drumgelloch station to the new hospital and Caldercruix it would greatly improve safety and encourage more people to cycle to work, appointments or visiting. </p>



<p>The new <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.northlanarkshire.gov.uk/regeneration-and-investment/glasgow-city-region-city-deal/pan-lanarkshire-orbital-transport/east" target="_blank">East Airdrie Link Road</a> is due to cut through the site (north-south) and was much more of a factor than cycling. However, the Fairer Scotland Duty report, which GoBike referenced, was mentioned a lot in the Board meeting. The new hospital could help regeneration in nearby neighbourhoods like Craigneuk and villages like Plains. </p>



<p>The Cabinet Secretary for Health, Jeane Freeman, has the final decision. Even if it&#8217;s approved, it will be several years before the hospital and any new transport links are built.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-four">3.4: Multiplex/University of Glasgow –&nbsp;Campus Development, November 2020 Newsletter</h4>



<p>Another few pages of updates in the December 2020 Newsletter. If nothing else, the newsletter helps identify Uni buildings that you&#8217;ve seen but never knew what they were called. This month it&#8217;s the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://universitystory.gla.ac.uk/building/?id=42#tabs=0" target="_blank">Pontecorvo building</a>, the Brutalist concrete tower on the corner of Church St and Dumbarton Rd. If you don&#8217;t like it, don&#8217;t worry; it&#8217;s about to be demolished! </p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-large is-resized"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://i1.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/holly-bike-icon.png" alt="holly/bike icon" class="wp-image-12869" width="204" height="131"/></figure></div>



<p>Talking of seeing the back of things, this is the last 2020 Digest. This year&#8217;s horrendous circumstances obviously overshadow everything. However, the Spaces for People programme created around 10km of &#8216;soft segregated&#8217; cycle lanes in Glasgow. These have offered protection to hundreds of new Nextbike users and thousands of people who returned to cycling in and around the city. </p>



<p>If you&#8217;re wondering where to ride in Glasgow over the festive period, why not try out some of the above on <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/not-1-but-3-infrastructure-rides-for-january-12877" target="_blank"></a><a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/not-1-but-3-infrastructure-rides-for-january-12877" target="_blank">Andy&#8217;s three infrastructure routes</a>?</p>



<p>Take care and hope you can still have a Merry Christmas and a Guid New Year. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">12834</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consultation Digest (Local) Issue 74, 24 November 2020</title>
		<link>https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-74-24-november-2020-12604</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Y]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2020 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Consultation digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoBike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[city centre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[City College]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cowcaddens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[districts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Dunbartonshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glasgow city council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ldp2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malls Mire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[north glasgow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[onbikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protected junctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roadworks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rutherglen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Lanarkshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streetscore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toryglen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[townhead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[university of strathclyde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urban Roots]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gobike.org/?p=12604</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Shaping the north of the city plus your reactions to roadworks and more speed cushions. It&#8217;s like buses –&#160;wait for ages for a consultation about the north of the city then loads come along at once. In this case, workshops for a few northern city centre &#8216;districts&#8217;, a future consultation about the uni/college campuses around &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-74-24-november-2020-12604" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Consultation Digest (Local) Issue 74, 24 November 2020"</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Shaping the north of the city plus your reactions to roadworks and more speed cushions.</h2>



<p>It&#8217;s like buses –&nbsp;wait for ages for a consultation about the north of the city then loads come along at once. In this case, workshops for a few northern city centre &#8216;districts&#8217;, a future consultation about the uni/college campuses around Cathedral St and a strategic document about North Glasgow. </p>



<span id="more-12604"></span>



<p>This Digest also includes links in the Contents page so you can, hopefully, jump straight to a topic if you want to. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Contents</strong> <br>(new consultations in <strong>bold</strong>)</h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 1: Current Consultations</h4>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li><strong><a href="#one-one">Steer Energy –&nbsp;Streetscore &#8211; Impact of Streetworks Survey</a></strong>, <strong>respond by end November</strong></li><li><strong><a href="#one-two">Glasgow City Council – (Y)our Districts Online Ideas Workshops</a>, Townhead: 2 December / Cowcaddens: 7 December</strong></li><li><a href="#one-three">Glasgow Harbour Ltd – Yorkhill Quay masterplan/&#8221;River Clyde blue corridor vision&#8221;</a>, closes 4 December</li><li><a href="#one-four">East Dunbartonshire Council – Proposed Local Development Plan 2 (LDP2)</a>, closes 15 January 2021</li><li><strong><a href="#one-five">Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;North Glasgow Strategic Development Framework (SDF)</a>, *deadline extended* –&nbsp;closes 29 January 2021</strong></li><li><a href="#one-six">Glasgow City Council – Protected Junction Trial consultation (Victoria Rd)</a></li><li><a href="#one-seven">OnBikes and St Paul’s Youth Forum – short survey for Sustrans’ Places for Everyone scheme</a></li></ol>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations</h4>



<ol class="wp-block-list" id="block-2fe65492-7d15-4b11-8647-53cd2ad123c6"><li><strong><a href="#two-one">University of Strathclyde –&nbsp;Early Engagement Information: Creating people first infrastructure, a city centre context</a></strong></li></ol>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 3: Consultation Feedback</h4>



<ol class="wp-block-list" id="block-2fe65492-7d15-4b11-8647-53cd2ad123c6"><li><a href="#three-one">Glasgow City Council (Maxwell Park area) Traffic Calming Scheme</a></li><li><a href="#three-two">Glasgow City Council (Ryehill Road) Traffic Calming Scheme</a></li><li><a href="#three-three">East Dunbartonshire Council –&nbsp;LDP2 Newsletter</a></li><li><a href="#three-four">Urban Roots –&nbsp;Malls Mire/Toryglen Greenspace &amp; Active Travel Project</a></li></ol>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="block-96eb2584-3877-4536-9fa1-a5301d33d259"><strong>Section 1:</strong> <strong>Current Consultations</strong><br>(in date order for responses)</h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-one"><strong>1.1:</strong> <strong>Steer Energy –&nbsp;Streetscore &#8211; Impact of Streetworks Survey, respond by end November</strong></h4>



<p>If you&#8217;ve ever had an annoying experience trying to get around roadworks, here&#8217;s a chance to get it off your chest. Thomas at GoBike was contacted by Megan from Steer Energy, who are doing a survey about the effects of roadworks on different groups; including cyclists. Her message says:</p>



<p><em>&#8220;Steer Energy are carrying out research to engage with people who can give their expert opinion on what the challenges people may face when encountering streetworks in their everyday life. We are targeting the following groups:</em></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li><em>People living with disabilities &nbsp;</em></li><li><em>People living with dementia &nbsp; &nbsp;</em></li><li><em>People with mental health issues &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</em></li><li><em>Neurodiverse people </em>[including people on the autism spectrum]</li><li><em>Carers &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</em></li><li><em>Cyclists</em></li></ul>



<p><em>The aim is to gather opinions and ideas from people with lived experience journeying through street works that may have found the experience challenging.</em></p>



<p><em>We would be keen to include the experience of cyclists across Scotland and encourage you to share with any other groups and communities you work with:<br><a href="https://www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/steerstreetworks" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">https://www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/steerstreetworks</a></em></p>



<p><em>Our aim is to gather as much information as possible about the current impacts of streetworks and how they can be better designed with more people in mind.&#8221;</em></p>



<p>We asked for a few more details about what this involved and got a very quick response:</p>



<p><em>&#8220;The design of all streetwork in the UK is carried out using the same national guidelines which is basically a manual used in training and design. Steer Energy is challenging that manual and asking that it be amended to become more accessible and include better designed streetworks to decrease isolation and disruption to peoples lives, especially those who do not use cars and those groups who require more space to move around in public (wheelchair users, people with mobility problems,&nbsp;disabled people, neurodiverse people, etc).&#8221;</em></p>



<p>If you&#8217;d like to take part, see the SurveyMonkey link, above –&nbsp;preferably before the end of November to allow time for the report to be put together.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-two">1.2: Glasgow City Council – (Y)our Districts Online Ideas Workshops (Townhead: 2 December/Cowcaddens: 7 December)</h4>



<p>We received emails about upcoming consultations and events for the District Regeneration Frameworks project by Glasgow City Council. These are very wide-ranging consultations covering housing, business, leisure, etc. as well as transport. The &#8216;districts&#8217; are areas around the city centre – some have already had plans completed, including Blythswood, Central, Broomielaw and St Enoch – see the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.glasgowcitycentrestrategy.com/city-centre-districts" target="_blank">Districts page on the City Centre Strategy website</a> (under their huge map). </p>



<p>The project&#8217;s <strong>CommonPlace map </strong>for all Districts can be found at the links, below. </p>



<p><em>&#8220;You can check out what’s been said so far and contribute your thoughts online at&nbsp;<a target="_blank" href="http://url8988.commonplace.is/ls/click?upn=nSX9oJDE2dLgmKTcQYJRqtVElJUBoW1-2BQ4-2Fyv1aQB3za2qYGwMGHJvmpFxa3edanalRs6BN0QnvShGLXfHBZYQ-3D-3DtCRp_zSdhWDREQyxqtNEH3IGDBe3byPW2b56Hwg0uIWlEL03W-2FQ6xZNcElK-2BhK09IFWjqSK3MjR-2Fpud41BJCELU-2FHjzFnTB06gd20TS-2BZbUvt7X79qmW6i48d-2BOOOgx90-2FRFkiwCYJx-2FVxhJ5yKmZ4sciy9YVntcK0ubYkUvT8LtV-2BsAk2EQmBGpqi0RNjfRq2nel2wUTa15u-2BSClhVLH8OqLTxxcRUk6wp5yLjtAE0CmW6YL1ZBWNpjkVE48E21CMz5U44-2FTytCr4cAB-2FS6i2ArIxKGuXT-2BpJVu0hewJiz1wIC4snF0bN9c0w5o02kPrqxIVDHfRd1cg8NugGRRzUD85EkvUQCNMa4Ik0PpAIe475KstuZdhm0bzQM6iKQ18Jmg7jMhuDm1-2B8JX8E5256PkXIk47iwChGsvo1JrkknzzRtM-3D" rel="noreferrer noopener">https://yourcitycentre2020.commonplace.is/</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a target="_blank" href="http://url8988.commonplace.is/ls/click?upn=pLPX9h3jCRW2L9eCTHMYiYg7uPaUFy7kl7KMPHf0A-2F6IZB5ivfDwrOCkRIXzzG3j8jdu_zSdhWDREQyxqtNEH3IGDBe3byPW2b56Hwg0uIWlEL03W-2FQ6xZNcElK-2BhK09IFWjqSK3MjR-2Fpud41BJCELU-2FHjzFnTB06gd20TS-2BZbUvt7X79qmW6i48d-2BOOOgx90-2FRFkiwCYJx-2FVxhJ5yKmZ4sciy9YVntcK0ubYkUvT8LtV-2BsAk2EQmBGpqi0RNjfRq2nelx-2BHVnUGMcO0L-2Bm-2FgDhJhrSf7TRYKG6CRwjzDaZwFpG3XYZghuIq-2BqL3WWLfW-2FZ-2FHdtkxcXTEASdRKS-2BOPSdyXzr6fv1D-2FqzlNSV91PlOyw0ilyxTMh0PRbKs25trI5fDPuW-2F6UqmV1BOQtdW3ZUi1j-2BsfjT-2BWMi4-2BcE8HFxKm75znHfJUvQWb4DeeDL77d-2F7N1MAPCD23K7hOfJGvuBmGUiTWPirYOYA8EDJ3qL2XEA-3D" rel="noreferrer noopener">http://www.yourplacemap.org/</a>.&#8221;</em></p>



<p>The next two areas with consultation events arranged are Townhead and Cowcaddens (with Merchant City and the &#8216;Learning Quarter&#8217; to follow at some point).</p>



<p><a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.glasgowcitycentrestrategy.com/project/townhead" target="_blank"><strong>Townhead district</strong></a> covers the area you might expect from Cathedral St to&nbsp;the M8. The  &#8220;potential bridge&#8221; in the map is the new pedestrian/cycle bridge to Sighthill (due Spring 2021). The &#8220;route of potential Avenues&#8221; on Castle St and Springburn Rd isn&#8217;t in the current version of the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/avenues" target="_blank">Avenues Programme</a> (but would be very welcome if GCC want to update it).</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="365" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Townhead-District.jpg?resize=525%2C365&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-12623" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Townhead-District.jpg?resize=600%2C417&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Townhead-District.jpg?resize=300%2C209&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Townhead-District.jpg?w=900&amp;ssl=1 900w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Townhead map</figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>(Y)our Townhead Online Ideas Workshops (via Zoom) –&nbsp;Wednesday 2 December</strong></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>Afternoon Workshop: 2pm – 4pm,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/your-townhead-ideas-workshop-afternoon-session-tickets-129478201787" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Tickets to the Townhead Workshop, Afternoon session</a></li><li>Evening Workshop: 6pm – 8pm,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/your-townhead-ideas-workshop-evening-session-tickets-129550574255" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Tickets to the Townhead workshop, Evening Session</a></li></ul>



<p><strong><a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.glasgowcitycentrestrategy.com/project/cowcaddens" target="_blank">Cowcaddens district</a></strong> goes from Buchanan Bus Station to an area north of the M8 at St George&#8217;s Cross. This is where the &#8216;Underline&#8217; from GCC&#8217;s <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/avenues" target="_blank">Avenues Programme</a> was due to go (from Cambridge St) but it&#8217;s missing from the map.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="335" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Cowcaddens-District.jpg?resize=525%2C335&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-12624" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Cowcaddens-District.jpg?resize=600%2C383&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Cowcaddens-District.jpg?resize=300%2C192&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Cowcaddens-District.jpg?w=900&amp;ssl=1 900w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Cowcaddens map</figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>(Y)our Cowcaddens Online Ideas Workshops (via Zoom) –&nbsp;Monday 7 December</strong></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>Afternoon Workshop: 2pm – 4pm, <a target="_blank" href="http://url8988.commonplace.is/ls/click?upn=nSX9oJDE2dLgmKTcQYJRqn6jppcj37yW9d4h9gNIobi-2BSfB8aOdAW8sxAyebFxbThe0K8ECzcS0Qmbp12KaMwUFdpPOk84wfashg1gEd4zfVM3v4vGKWmc2ina57jfSmX4XjGr-2FfvuabTlcqsZVH4w-3D-3Dj06b_zSdhWDREQyxqtNEH3IGDBe3byPW2b56Hwg0uIWlEL03W-2FQ6xZNcElK-2BhK09IFWjqSK3MjR-2Fpud41BJCELU-2FHjzFnTB06gd20TS-2BZbUvt7X79qmW6i48d-2BOOOgx90-2FRFkiwCYJx-2FVxhJ5yKmZ4sciy9YVntcK0ubYkUvT8LtV-2BsAk2EQmBGpqi0RNjfRq2nel-2FKmcxl11KBqsqbqnhRU4EO53hi20I2KrIvGb2nmutudaWImKczOjUZfiP8RkJqY74kz7nYzqNvP88QnUV6zoJtNAPZAV05XOfjs10ClgPHMUyk9-2FMSUj7NeoSdPaOqS8jx2-2B3CvueXIY97ChM3Lwo4ZcEqZHje91RfxxngIk0EuMBsvJ16Zi083m6MKv77HkEtlvlQI0YWuJhqhmmV-2BtRR9Q-2BF-2F-2FwWewU8JrHYUknaY-3D" rel="noreferrer noopener">Tickets to the Cowcaddens Afternoon Workshop</a>.</li><li>Evening Workshop: 6pm – 8pm,&nbsp;<a target="_blank" href="http://url8988.commonplace.is/ls/click?upn=nSX9oJDE2dLgmKTcQYJRqn6jppcj37yW9d4h9gNIobi-2BSfB8aOdAW8sxAyebFxbThe0K8ECzcS0Qmbp12KaMwVYtyzh4RkRX-2Fcgq2FAxVCYkcUrChqgsTVVebIpm3yIxCnDt2q5stkD0Cya-2Fg2Kj1A-3D-3DYjjv_zSdhWDREQyxqtNEH3IGDBe3byPW2b56Hwg0uIWlEL03W-2FQ6xZNcElK-2BhK09IFWjqSK3MjR-2Fpud41BJCELU-2FHjzFnTB06gd20TS-2BZbUvt7X79qmW6i48d-2BOOOgx90-2FRFkiwCYJx-2FVxhJ5yKmZ4sciy9YVntcK0ubYkUvT8LtV-2BsAk2EQmBGpqi0RNjfRq2nel00vBux0XciOVsMLhAMmlHRWwDLauXMImi1C5YNMOctv3WoRjJW2uNlcuTHyqxPkYh2roUIcOZfMZy8hQ2PuIaLzGqM-2FsvtiL-2F-2FS32hrOONMYwW7tbePjDnVx5VJCAhYDSyfKYHhU3TnSJc80mwYHhmRBwzYtM3-2Bz0QRem6r84xA8TzYeWX7btJ-2Bxv2zH844zcLnyNbYjDnWg-2BK3BBSDuPIrarKR4itFG1dqsFwv5Ido-3D" rel="noreferrer noopener">Tickets to the Cowcaddens Evening Workshop</a>.</li></ul>



<p><em>&#8220;Each session will be facilitated by the (Y)our City Centre project team. We hope to map out with you issues and ideas you feel will help make the difference and improve Cowcaddens in the future.</em></p>



<p><em>Sign Up on Eventbrite and join in with these Workshops. If you do not have access to the internet contact the Freephone line number listed below to enable you to #ShareYourIdeas.</em></p>



<p><em>Further Workshops will be scheduled in early 2021 and we hope to arrange some [physical] events&#8230; when Covid restrictions allow.&#8221;</em></p>



<p>These events, and the forthcoming consultation under item 2.1, mean big changes could be  coming for the north of the city centre. They also tie in with the North Glasgow SDF –&nbsp;see item 1.5. </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-three">1.3: Glasgow Harbour Ltd – Yorkhill Quay masterplan</h4>



<p>This was covered in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-73-10-november-2020-good-news-on-a-protected-junction-survey-and-sad-news-for-pollok-park-12455">Digest Issue 73</a>, Item 1.1. However, it arrived just before the Digest went out and we missed a few details. The consultation is by Glasgow Harbour/Peel L&amp;P (not the city council –&nbsp;apologies). </p>



<p>It&#8217;s about potentially building high-rises on the strip of land at the river between Riverside Museum and the new distillery. The intro video talks about a &#8220;long derelict site&#8221; without mentioning Peel (formerly Clydeport) have used it for storage for several years. It&#8217;s a pre-planning consultation as no planning application has gone in yet. There&#8217;s a <a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://www.urbanrealm.com/news/9080/Yorkhill_Quay_masterplan_to_fulfil_River_Clyde_blue_corridor_vision.html">summary of the possible proposal</a> (on Urban Realm), <a rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank" href="https://peellandp.co.uk/news/online-public-consultation-launched-for-over-1-000-new-homes-at-glasgow-waters/">article by Peel L&amp;P</a>, <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Yorkhill-Quay-boards.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Yorkhill Quay &#8216;boards&#8217;</a> (PDF) and <s><a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="http://mcinally-associates.co.uk/yq/index.html#home" target="_blank">consultation website</a></s> [removed Dec 2020]. Deadline for &#8220;formal&#8221; comments is 4 December (but deadline to view plans/ask questions is 30 November –&nbsp;email: <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="mailto:advice@mcinally-associates.co.uk" target="_blank">advice@mcinally-associates.co.uk</a>).</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-four">1.4: East Dunbartonshire Council – Proposed Local Development Plan 2 (LDP2), <br>(closes 15 January 2021)</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="84" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/East-Dunbartonshire-Council.png?resize=525%2C84&#038;ssl=1" alt="East Dunbartonshire Council logo" class="wp-image-12376" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/East-Dunbartonshire-Council.png?w=562&amp;ssl=1 562w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/East-Dunbartonshire-Council.png?resize=300%2C48&amp;ssl=1 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /></figure>



<p>As covered in <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-72-27-october-2020-bike-storage-do-get-your-views-in-to-the-scottish-government-12342" target="_blank">Digest issue 72</a>, Item 1.8. You&#8217;ve to email EDC if you want to comment about local development issues, like the lack of Spaces for People projects or phase 2 of the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/campaigns/mini-campaigns/friends-of-bearsway" target="_blank">Bearsway</a>, for example. See the EDC website:&nbsp;<a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="http://www.eastdunbarton.gov.uk/LDP2" target="_blank">www.eastdunbarton.gov.uk/LDP2</a>. </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-five">1.5: Glasgow City Council – North Glasgow Strategic Development Framework</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="371" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Glasgow-North-SDF-30-09-2020-33_active-map.png?resize=525%2C371&#038;ssl=1" alt="Glasgow North - principles of active travel map" class="wp-image-12646" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Glasgow-North-SDF-30-09-2020-33_active-map.png?resize=600%2C424&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Glasgow-North-SDF-30-09-2020-33_active-map.png?resize=300%2C212&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Glasgow-North-SDF-30-09-2020-33_active-map.png?w=1202&amp;ssl=1 1202w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Glasgow-North-SDF-30-09-2020-33_active-map.png?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>An active travel map from the Glasgow North SDF</figcaption></figure>



<p>This document is about a huge area north of the M8 from the length of Maryhill Rd across to Milton, Springburn and Royston. It&#8217;s looking decades ahead and has already been five years in the making. Brenda has written a detailed <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/GoBike-NGlasgowSDF-letter-171120.pdf" target="_blank">GoBike response to the North Glasgow SDF</a>. See the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.glasgowconsult.co.uk/KMS/dmart.aspx?strTab=PublicDMartCurrent&amp;NoIP=1" target="_blank">North Glasgow SDF consultation</a> on GCC&#8217;s website. The deadline has been extended to 29 January 2021.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-six">1.6: Glasgow City Council – Protected Junction Trial consultation</h4>



<p>This consultation is about the new protected junctions on Victoria Rd, at Calder St and Allison St, as part of the South City Way. It was covered in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-73-10-november-2020-good-news-on-a-protected-junction-survey-and-sad-news-for-pollok-park-12455" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 73</a>, Item 1.5. If you want to show support for the new junctions, or just find out more, see <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://glasgow.gov.uk/protectedjunctions" target="_blank">GCC&#8217;s Protected Junctions webpage</a> for further images, a video, a PDF document and a contact link. The junction trial will last two years but there&#8217;s no deadline mentioned for feedback. </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-seven">1.7: OnBikes and St Paul’s Youth Forum – short survey for Sustrans’ Places for Everyone scheme</h4>



<p>This <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdRjYngGGZTaojHa1NjhbIUn3lcuSxpj68IdsHuzrxEerZbtQ/viewform" target="_blank">multiple choice survey</a> (as covered in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-72-27-october-2020-bike-storage-do-get-your-views-in-to-the-scottish-government-12342">Digest issue 72</a>, Item 1.1) was originally looking for quick feedback but remains open. OnBikes and St Paul’s Youth Forum are working on a Places for Everyone project to improve active travel infrastructure in parts of North East Glasgow like Smithycroft, Riddrie and Blackhill. </p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 2:</strong> <strong>Forthcoming Consultations</strong></h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="two-one">2.1: Glasgow –&nbsp;Early Engagement Information: Creating people first infrastructure, a city centre context</h4>



<p>This is potentially a lot more important than the vague title would suggest. We received an email from Stantec (a multi-national design/engineering company) on behalf of the University of Strathclyde. They want to develop active travel routes through their campus and the &#8216;Learning Quarter&#8217; around Cathedral St and North Hanover St: </p>



<p><em>&#8220;The University of Strathclyde, in partnership with, City of Glasgow College and Glasgow City Council have secured Sustrans&#8217; Places for Everyone funding for the project &#8216;Creating People-First Infrastructure in a City Centre Campus&#8217;. Stantec are assisting the project team in this exciting endeavour.</em></p>



<p><em>The vision of this project is to create an attractive, safe and walkable &#8216;learning quarter&#8217; in the north-east of the city centre through the design of an innovative urban realm, which improves the physical environment and allows the general public, residents, students and staff to travel to, and move freely between the University of Strathclyde, City of Glasgow College, nearby Glasgow Caledonian University and the rest of the city centre.</em></p>



<p><em>The improvements that are being explored in the project area will provide significant value to the extended community. By aligning this project with other projects being delivered by Glasgow City Council, &#8216;Creating People-First Infrastructure in a City Centre Campus&#8217; will also benefit a range of other people who live, work and travel through the city centre.&nbsp;The&nbsp;<a target="_blank" href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/avenues" rel="noreferrer noopener">Avenues Programme</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a target="_blank" href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/spacesforpeople" rel="noreferrer noopener">Spaces for People</a>&nbsp;are examples of Glasgow City Council’s ambitions to rebalancing streets in favour of people walking cycling or wheeling in the city centre.</em></p>



<p><em>The key routes to be enhanced in the learning quarter as part of this project have been identified through a feasibility and options appraisal process and are shown in the figure below.&#8221;</em></p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="371" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/learning-quarter-routes.jpg?resize=525%2C371&#038;ssl=1" alt="Map of proposed active travel routes to north-east of George Square" class="wp-image-12607" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/learning-quarter-routes.jpg?resize=600%2C424&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/learning-quarter-routes.jpg?resize=300%2C212&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/learning-quarter-routes.jpg?w=1141&amp;ssl=1 1141w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/learning-quarter-routes.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Route A –&nbsp;Glasgow Queen St. Station –&nbsp;Cathedral Square; <br>Route B –&nbsp;Buchanan Bus Station/Glasgow Caledonian University –&nbsp;Merchant City; <br>Route C –&nbsp;Sighthill Bridge –&nbsp;Cathedral St; <br>Route D –&nbsp;High St. Station –&nbsp;&#8216;Heart of the Campus&#8217; (Rottenrow); <br>Other Routes in Study (Minor Upgrades); <br>Avenues Programme and Intervention (delivered by other projects).</figcaption></figure>



<p><em>&#8220;In the next few weeks we will be launching a public consultation website to present and receive feedback on proposals developed for the learning quarter so far. This site will be updated as the project progresses, proving an important resource. We hope that you will be able to contribute to this consultation to help shape the project for your local community by viewing proposals, leaving feedback and sharing the consultation website with your networks.</em></p>



<p><em>For any further information in the meantime please contact the project team at&nbsp;<a href="mailto:PfEGlasgow@stantec.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">PfEGlasgow@stantec.com</a></em></p>



<p><em>Kind regards, <br>The Project Team&#8221;</em></p>



<p>This may be of interest to current and former students of the universities/colleges in this area. It sounds quite wide-ranging but seems to emphasise walking rather than cycling. A lot of change is due in the next few years, including Strathclyde Uni demolishing the current &#8216;Strathy Union&#8217; on John St as part of their ongoing campus redevelopment (see their <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.strath.ac.uk/whystrathclyde/campusupdate/" target="_blank">Campus Update</a> for more details). </p>



<p>This consultation is also relevant to the &#8216;(Y)our Learning Quarter&#8217; district consultation due soon. Nearby streets are earmarked as &#8216;Avenues&#8217; and the <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://reglasgow.com/work-to-start-on-additional-people-friendly-avenues-on-edge-of-city-centre-in-2023/" target="_blank">&#8216;Avenues Plus&#8217; project</a> (due to be built between 2023–25). So, there&#8217;s a lot of potential to transform the area north-east of George Square. Once Stantec update us about the website, we&#8217;ll pass on the link.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 3: Consultations Feedback</strong></h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-one">3.1: Glasgow City Council – Maxwell Park area, Traffic Calming Scheme</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="229" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Maxwell-Park-area-map.png?resize=525%2C229&#038;ssl=1" alt="map of the Maxwell Park area" class="wp-image-11993" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Maxwell-Park-area-map.png?resize=600%2C262&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Maxwell-Park-area-map.png?resize=300%2C131&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Maxwell-Park-area-map.png?w=1334&amp;ssl=1 1334w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Maxwell-Park-area-map.png?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /></figure>



<p>We have a few more responses from the city council about traffic calming. Firstly, this one for the Maxwell Park area was first covered in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-68-01-september-2020-humps-all-the-way-in-glasgow-and-in-north-lanarkshire-its-roads-roads-and-more-roads-11968">Digest 68</a>, Item 1.8. I wonder if GCC have changed their mind about the speed cushions?</p>



<p>&#8220;<em>Further to my preliminary email of 25<sup>th</sup>&nbsp;August 2020, I can confirm that it is my intention to proceed with the introduction of the above named Traffic Calming Scheme.</em></p>



<p><em>I can confirm that there has been no changes to the original proposed scheme which will comprise of:</em></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li><em>5 sets of 3,&nbsp;2m wide 75mm high, speed cushions on Dolphin Road,</em></li><li><em>6 sets of 3, 2m wide 75mm high, speed cushions on Fotheringay Road,</em></li><li><em>11 sets of 3, 2m wide 75mm&nbsp;high, speed cushions on Springkell Avenue</em></li><li><em>The installation of 44 bollards</em></li></ul>



<p><em>Roads affected by the proposed Scheme:</em></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li><em><strong>Dolphin Road</strong></em></li><li><em><strong>Fotheringay Road</strong></em></li><li><em><strong>Springkell Avenue</strong></em></li></ul>



<p><em>I enclose a plan of the scheme.</em></p>



<p><em>Should you require any further information or clarification, please e-mail&nbsp;<a href="mailto:LESTraffic@glasgow.gov.uk" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">LESTraffic@glasgow.gov.uk</a>.&#8221;</em></p>



<p>Nope, nothing has changed despite GoBike&#8217;s letter of objection. The previous plans were in Digest 68, as above if you want to see them. </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-two">3.2: Glasgow City Council – Ryehill Road, Traffic Calming Scheme</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="303" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Ryehil-Road-map.png?resize=525%2C303&#038;ssl=1" alt="map of the area around Ryehill Road" class="wp-image-12074" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Ryehil-Road-map.png?resize=600%2C346&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Ryehil-Road-map.png?resize=300%2C173&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Ryehil-Road-map.png?w=885&amp;ssl=1 885w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /></figure>



<p>Here&#8217;s another one from the following <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-69-15-september-2020-what-price-public-opinion-12044">Digest 69</a>, Item 1.9. Maybe this response will be the one where GCC have a &#8216;road to Damascus&#8217;-style revelation and change their minds?</p>



<p><em>&#8220;Further to my preliminary email of 10<sup>th</sup>&nbsp;September 2020, I can confirm that it is my intention to proceed with the introduction of the above named Traffic Calming Scheme.</em></p>



<p><em>I can confirm that there has been no changes to the original proposed scheme which will comprise of:</em></p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li><em>The installation of 12 speed cushions</em></li><li><em>The supply and installation of 8 bollards</em></li></ul>



<p><em>I enclose a plan of the scheme.</em></p>



<p><em>Should you require any further information or clarification, please e-mail&nbsp;<a href="mailto:LESTraffic@glasgow.gov.uk" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">LESTraffic@glasgow.gov.uk</a>.&#8221;</em></p>



<p>Nope, no changes there either. Again, see Digest 69 to pore over the unchanged plans. </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-three">3.3 East Dunbartonshire Council –&nbsp;LDP2 November Newsletter</h4>



<p>On the subject of councils not changing their minds about things, here are EDC again with a nice <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/East-Dunbarton-LDP-Newsletter-61-November-2020.docx.pdf" target="_blank">LDP2 newsletter, November edition</a> (PDF).&nbsp;Previous issues on EDC&#8217;s <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.eastdunbarton.gov.uk/residents/planning-and-building-standards/planning-policy/newsletter" target="_blank">LDP2 Newsletters</a> webpage in case you want some light reading for the winter nights.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-four">3.4: Urban Roots –&nbsp;Malls Mire/Toryglen Greenspace &amp; Active Travel Project</h4>



<p>GoBike received an email from Dr Gemma Jennings at Urban Roots about an ongoing project: </p>



<p><em>&#8220;Dear All, <br>I am excited to share with you the latest news from the the North Toryglen Greenspace &amp; Active Travel Project, which following our community consultation has been rebranded simply as &#8216;Malls Mire&#8217;. Work begins on site this week and will run until summer 2021 &#8211; please find attached the first Malls Mire newsletter from Clyde Gateway for details. I have also attached details of path closures and diversions that will be in place for the first phase of works.&nbsp;<br>We will share ongoing project updates on social media via our Malls Mire facebook and twitter pages &#8211; both @MallsMire.&#8221;</em></p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="293" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Malls-Mire-map.jpg?resize=525%2C293&#038;ssl=1" alt="Malls Mire map" class="wp-image-12657" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Malls-Mire-map.jpg?resize=600%2C335&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Malls-Mire-map.jpg?resize=300%2C167&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Malls-Mire-map.jpg?w=914&amp;ssl=1 914w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Malls Mire site</figcaption></figure>



<p>Malls Mire is the name of the greenspace between Rutherglen and Toryglen. While it&#8217;s possible to trudge your bike over the hill next to the woods, upgrading the paths will make a big difference to the area. As mentioned, Urban Roots sent us drawings of closures and diversions – <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Malls-Mire-Site-Sketch-017-Rev001-201120.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">works on the west of Malls Mire</a> and <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Malls-Mire-site-sketch-018-161120.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">works on the east of Malls Mire</a>. There&#8217;s also a short <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Malls-Mire-Newsletter-Nov2020-reduced.pdf" target="_blank">newsletter about the Malls Mire project</a>.</p>



<p></p>



<p>Hope you like the changes in this Digest. New editor, new improved ideas, says the previous editor!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">12604</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
