Contents

Section 1: Current Consultations

1. Glasgow (Belmont) (Traffic Management) Order 2005 (Variation No 2) Order 201_- Consultation, Parking, closes TODAY, 15 October
2. East Dunbartonshire, Proposed Traffic Regulation Order – Killermont Avenue, Rannoch Drive and Woodvale Avenue, parking/loading restrictions, closes 21 October
3. Consultation on Scotland’s National Transport Strategy, closes 23 October
4. **NEW – ish** Keep National Cycle Route 75 Open During Public Events in Glasgow Green petition, closes 28 October
5. **NEW** Glasgow, George Square – is it time for change, closes 30 October
6. **NEW** Glasgow, Dalmarnock West, Commuter Parking Restrictions, closes 01 November
7. East Dunbartonshire Draft Local Transport Strategy, closes 12 November

Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations

1. Glasgow, Byres Road: delay in issuing TROs
2. Active Travel Event for Everyone event in Edinburgh, 19 October

Section 3: Consultation Feedback

1. East Dunbartonshire Council: LDP Newsletter No. 53
2. Glasgow, Glencairn Drive Traffic Calming – and we learn about Speed Cameras

Current Consultations, in date order for response

1.1 Glasgow (Belmont) (Traffic Management) Order 2005 (Variation No 2) Order 201_- Consultation, Parking, closes TODAY, 15 October

This consultation featured in our last Digest, Issue 44, Item 1.6 and is proposed in order to prohibit unsafe and obstructive parking in this residential area. We missed the absence of the formal TRO when we first published the information received; this appears to be a recent change of policy with GCC, ie to gauge opinion before going to the expense and formality of a Traffic Regulation Order. Here’s the GoBike letter of support. If you wish to join us in our view please get your comments in quick – consultation closes today.

1.2 East Dunbartonshire, Proposed Traffic Regulation Order – Killermont Avenue, Rannoch Drive and Woodvale Avenue, parking/loading restrictions, closes 21 October

More parking restrictions, here in the leafy suburbs of Bearsden, all around the car salesroom and near the access to residential areas and the golf club. All the details were in Digest 43, Item 1.7 and here’s the GoBike letter of support for the proposal.

1.3 Consultation on Scotland’s National Transport Strategy, closes 23 October

This is now the sixth appearance of this consultation in our Digests and our response will be submitted before the deadline. Responses will help set government strategy for the next 20 years so it’s important that views of the active travel community are heard.
Here’s the link to the government website and consultation details.

Our in-house expert on these long (and winding) documents will be attending the Active Travel Event for Everyone event in Edinburgh on 19 October (see Item 2.2 below) where some discussion on the Strategy is promised, before completing the GoBike response. However, we do understand that it’s a woolly document with few, if any, specific objectives.
Our friends in Cycling UK Scotland (and many of us are CUK members) have analysed the document and have issued a guide for completing the on-line questions, which is very handy. Here’s the link to the page on their website, scroll down to see the link to the suggested responses – and then make them your own; it’s easy to improve when you have a basic guide!
Not only that but Cycling UK Scotland have sent this message to their members, which gives you the option of a very short, barely 2-minute email submission – and you can adapt it to suit:

“Thank you for reaching out to your MSPs to fix the law on parking in a cycle lane. We are hugely disappointed that MSPs squandered the opportunity and voted against the law change, despite more than 6,000 emails being sent by supporters like you.

We will continue to push for this law change and for safer cycling on our roads. We really value your support and willingness to take action. That’s why we want to highlight another opportunity, this time to put cycling at the heart of Scottish transport.

The Scottish Government wants to hear your ideas for its new National Transport Strategy. This Strategy will set the agenda for Scottish transport for the next 20 years, so it’s critical that as many of us as possible have our say before the 23 October deadline.

To help you have your say in the consultation process we have designed a simple online form which will create a personalised and unique response which you can edit. The more detailed and personal your response is, the more effective it will be. 

Help us seize this opportunity to get cycling up the agenda in Scotland. Have your say before the deadline of 23 October.“

Do please fill in this short response form.

1.4 **NEW – ish** Keep National Cycle Route 75 Open During Public Events in Glasgow Green petition, closes 28 October

Covered in our post of 27 September, but new to the Digest, is this latest petition from GoBike and Cycling UK member, Bob Downie,
The National Cycle Route 75 through Glasgow Green is one of the busiest in the city, used by commuters, shoppers, tourists and learners – and also William, from the Glasgow Humane Society, last seen with a life belt on each handlebar of this bike, as he cycled along by the river to put them back in place.

If you haven’t already, do please sign this petition to keep this important route open at all times possible.

1.5 **NEW** Glasgow, George Square – is it time for change, closes 30 October

GoBike member, Rachel, alerted us to this on-line opinion poll/conversation concerning George Square.

“Between the 4th and 30th of October a citywide conversation will raise the question: George Square, is it time for change?

While George Square is a familiar landmark, the way it’s used has been shaped by generations of Glaswegians. Now it’s our turn! Let’s find out what place George Square has in Glasgow today and how it should be used in the future.

We’ll never know unless we talk honestly about how we think and feel, and also listen to what our fellow Glaswegians have to say.So let’s start talking! Here’s how to join the conversation:

• share how you feel about George Square today
• see how people think it could be used in future (and suggest your own)
• book a place on a workshop to have a deeper conversation
• apply to join the Co-Creation Forum that tests ways the results could be implemented

You can also join us on Facebook , Twitter or Instagram“

There are lots of environmentally friendly, active-travel friendly suggestions already – do support or add your own view.

1.6 **NEW** Glasgow, Dalmarnock West, Commuter Parking Restrictions, closes 01 November

In a new departure, noted in Item 1.1 above, by Glasgow City Council we have been sent a plan only of streets to the west of Dalmarnock Station where it is hoped to ban all-day parking. Depending on the response a Traffic Regulation Order will be issued to prevent the “pretty chaotic” (to quote a City Council employee) on-street parking
Here’s the email we received from Glasgow City Council on 04 October:

“Date: 04 October 2019 at 15:55
Subject: FW: The Glasgow City Council (Dalmarnock-West) (Traffic Regulation) Order 201_ – Consultation

MESSAGE SENT ON BEHALF OF KEVIN HAMILTON, HEAD OF ROADS, NEIGHBOURHOODS AND SUSTAINABILITY
Dear Sir / Madam
THE GLASGOW CITY COUNCIL , DALMARNOCK WEST) (TRAFFIC REGULATION) ORDER 201_
The Council propose to consider the introduction of the above named Traffic Regulation Order and I wish to establish the preliminary views of your organisation prior to the publication of these proposals.

Background to the proposed Order
These proposals will prevent all day commuter parking and improve road safety and pedestrian safety by prohibiting unsafe and obstructive parking practices.

Area affected by the proposed Order
The list of roads affected by these proposals are:-

Bonnar Street, Carstairs Street, Colvend Street, Dora Street, French Street, Martin Street, Norman Street, Reid Street, Rockcliffe Street, Solway Street, Strathclyde Street, Swanston Street, Webster Street, Unnamed Access Road.

Details of the proposed Order
The proposed Order (as depicted on the attached plans) will comprise of:-

·        No waiting at any time.

Please provide any comments you wish to make on these proposals within 28 days (reply by 1^st November 2019).
In the meantime, should you require any further information or clarification on any points arising from the proposals, do not hesitate to contact my assistant (name and phone number removed by GoBike)
Should the Council proceed with these proposals; a copy of the Notice of the proposed Order will be forwarded to you intimating an opportunity to lodge any objections to the proposals.
Yours faithfully” etc

Here’s the plan of the area proposed for this ban and you will notice that it extends from the station south to the river and along to the relatively new Police Scotland offices. Concerns have been expressed in the past about employees here parking on the cycle lane just across the river on Shawfield Road, so while GoBike will be supporting this restriction, we will express concerns about the possible knock-on effect for Shawfield Road.

Here’s the GoBike letter of support, including a couple of concerns about parking on Shawfield/Glasgow Road and about the lack of a ramped access, rather than steps, from the Police Scotland premises to NCN 75. Below is a screenshot, which demonstrates the concern for Shawfield Road.

Do please write in to support these proposals if you live, work or cycle in this area.

1.7 East Dunbartonshire Draft Local Transport Strategy, closes 12 November

Here’s the email we received from Chris McGough, Land Planning Policy Officer, Transport, for East Dunbartonshire Council on 26 September?

“The Council has continued work to produce a new Local Transport Strategy and has produced a Draft which is now open for consultation until 12 November 2019. The Draft Strategy, background report, corresponding Environmental Report and online survey is available at the following web page: https://www.eastdunbarton.gov.uk/draft-local-transport-strategy Any comments GoBike has at this stage would be welcome and would assist the Council in producing a final Strategy for publication and implementation. Please let me know if you have any queries.“

Drop-in sessions are being held and unfortunately we have missed the first 2, but 3 more are to be held and you might wish to attend one of these:

• Glazert Country House Hotel, Lennoxtown – Tuesday 22 October – 3pm-7pm
• Fraser Centre, Milngavie – Thursday 24 October – 3pm-7pm
• Kirkintilloch Leisure Centre – Wednesday 30 October – 3pm-7pm.

If you have any views on this document do please let us know at consultations@gobike.org and we will include them in our response.

Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations

2.1 Glasgow, Byres Road: delay in issuing TROs

Back at the end of August, and as we told you in Digest 42, Item 2.2, we were led to expect the issue of 3 Traffic Regulation Orders for Byres Road during September. The one we are particularly interested in is the second:

” Byres Road- Traffic Management and Parking Controls
This order will facilitate the proposed public realm improvements in Byres Road, including footway widening and new cycle lanes. The Order will propose a reduction in on-street car parking bays, the introduction of protected cycle lanes, additional disabled parking, the removal of the left-turn filter lane at the junction of Byres Road and Great Western Road and the introduction of a one-way arrangement on Byres Road and Church Street south of the Church Street junction.  The location of bus stops, loading bays and taxi ranks will be largely unchanged by the Order, although a new daytime taxi rank is proposed at Church Street to complement the University redevelopment works.“

Nothing was heard, so despite no news being good news, we contacted the City Council at the beginning of this month to find out that things are slightly behind programme due to internal issues but “The initial TRO consultation process will start next week with limited circulation to a number of consultees (Emergency Services, SPT etc.)  The public consultation is now likely to start in November and wind up just before Christmas.”
As soon as we hear we will let you know and we’ll be on the case.

2.2 Active Travel Event for Everyone event in Edinburgh, 19 October

Don’t forget this event that takes place on Saturday. Here’s the link to the eventbrite booking: https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/active-travel-for-everyone-tickets-73548851595?aff=ebdssbeac
It’s a free event, looking at issues that divide and unite the active travel community. Do go if you can.

Section 3: Consultation Feedback

3.1 East Dunbartonshire Council: LDP Newsletter No. 53

Here’s the latest update, September 2019, from East Dunbartonshire, that we received just after the last newsletter was issued on 24 September.

3.2 Glasgow, Glencairn Drive Traffic Calming – and we learn about Speed Cameras

In Digest 43, Item 1.2, we gave all the details for the proposals for speed reduction on Glencairn Drive, near Maxwell Park and we submitted this letter of objection – not to the intention to reduce speed but the manner in which it was proposed to be done.

On 10 October this reply came in:

“MESSAGE SENT ON BEHALF OF MICHAEL BRADY, GROUP MANAGER – TRAFFIC AND ROAD SAFETY, NEIGHBOURHOODS AND SUSTAINABILITY
Dear Ms Fort
Thank you for your response to the Traffic Calming proposals on Glencairn Drive.

I can advise that the smallest proposed gap between the kerbline and adjacent cushion is 0.8m, not 0.55m as stated. As well as this, the gap between the middle cushions is 1 metre, which should provide more than enough space for cyclists to pass whilst keeping them in the middle of their respective lane, without having to gravitate to the middle of the carriageway in order to travel to pass the middle cushions.

Regarding your request for the installation of chicanes, planters and cycle bypasses, I can advise that this location did not meet the usual criteria used for traffic calming.  However we were aware of speeding concerns at this location and used additional funding for this project to reduce vehicle speeds and make the street safer for all road users.  As such, there is a limited budget for this scheme, which is taken into account together with other factors when designing the layout.

I can also advise that the introduction of speed cameras lies outwith the remit of Glasgow City Council and that the responsibility for the installation of speed cameras lies with Safety Cameras Scotland, therefore any request for a speed camera to be installed at a location should be made to them directly at http://www.safetycameras.gov.scot/contact/.

I trust the above information is of assistance, however, should you require any further information please contact (name and phone number removed by GoBike).“

There are 4 factors of interest in this reply:

1. The selective response to the points raised in the GoBike letter, with some completely ignored.
2. The correctness, or otherwise, of one of the drawings issued with the TRO, see screenshot below of a section of one drawing.
3. The curious budgetting procedures of GCC.
4. The fascinating website for Safety Cameras Scotland, http://www.safetycameras.gov.scot/ which details terrifying reports of drivers doing almost double the speed limit but then goes on to give advice to these poor drivers, with little relative thought to the victims of any incident or the crime committed. That said perhaps GoBike should run a campaign to get more speed cameras installed? Do let us know what you think – email consultations@gobike.org

A reply was sent on 11 October, attaching both the screenshot view at the top of this item and a copy of the GCC drawing from which the drawing immediately above is taken.

“Dear Mr Brady,
Thank you for replying to our letter of 17 September and your response to some of the points made therein. For your reference I attach one of the drawings issued as part of this TRO, which clearly shows a gap of 0.55m between cushion and kerb. The GoBike response was based on this drawing. Will you please issue the correct version of the drawing?
I also attach a screenshot showing a view of the road that shows the setts in the gutter, which do not form an acceptable cycling surface. However, I note your comment about the space between the middle cushions and we have to hope that people will be confident enough to use this gap when they are cycling on this road.

It is unfortunate, in our view, that the City Council does not take a more global view when there are concerns expressed about speeding. Rather than maintain this wide road, and others, as one primarily for motor vehicles we would prefer a move towards streets for people. It is also a curious policy that you continue to spend public money to restrain motor drivers who choose to break speed limits, rather than requesting that speed cameras be installed. Thank you, though for the clarification on speed cameras and the link to the relevant website.
We maintain our support for the reduction of dangerous speeds but object to the proposed method of achieving your aims at this location.

Tricia Fort for Consultations, GoBike, Strathclyde Cycle Campaign, www.gobike.org“

That’s it for now, but do respond to as many of the requests for support as you can. Your next Digest is scheduled for 29 October.

Contents

Section 1: Current Consultations

1. Glasgow, Garscube Road, parking and loading restrictions to allow construction of 2-way cycle lane, closes 12 July
2. **NEW** University of Glasgow, IHW planning application, closes 12 July
3. Glasgow, Future Policy Development of Taxi and Private Hire Car Licensing, closes 29 July
4. Glasgow (North Kelvin, North Woodside and Woodlands)(Mandatory 20mph Speed Limit Zone) Order, closes 02 August
5. **NEW** Glasgow South City Way Traffic Management Order, 2-way cycle lane on Bridgegate and King Street, closes 09 August
6. Glasgow, St Enoch District Regeneration Framework Public Consultation, closes 06 September

Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations

1. Glasgow, Queen Margaret Drive, separated cycle lane, Traffic Regulation Order
2. Glasgow, Battlefield Street Design, Showcase Event, 23 July
3. Safer Streets Pollokshields
4. North Kelvin/Woodside potential Controlled Parking Zone
5. Dennistoun & Royston – Traffic Management & Parking Controls Order 201 drop-in events 24, 25 and 27 July

Section 3: Consultation Feedback

1. Glasgow, Broomfield Road, GoBike submission
2. Glasgow, Ladyloan Avenue, GoBike submission
3. Glasgow, Laurieston Phase 2, 20mph, GCC response No 2
4. Glasgow, Laurieston, Phase 2, Parking Controls, GCC response
5. Scotland, Default 20mph Bill, Scottish Government response
6. Glasgow, Denmark Street, No Waiting and Loading at Any Time, GCC response, with good news about the employment of more Parking Attendants
7. Glasgow, Sunnybank Street, Traffic Calming, GCC response

Section 1: Current Consultations, in date order for response

1.1 Glasgow, Garscube Road, parking and loading restrictions to allow construction of 2-way cycle lane, closes 12 July

All the information pertaining to the proposals for a two-way cycle lane on the east side of Garscube Road were published in Digest 36, Item 1.4 and we have now submitted this letter in response. The supportive and constructive comments were written by Calum. Iain provided the graphic for the type of side-street junction we would like to see at Sawmillfield Street.

There’s still time to get your comments in!

1.2 **NEW** University of Glasgow Institute of Health and Wellbeing. Planning application Ref 19/01636/MSC, closes 12 July

The University is progressing its development and the Institute of Health and Wellbeing is now being planned for the Institute of Health and Wellbeing on University Place, near to the junction with Byres Road, as shown on this plan. Having looked at the information available, see: https://publicaccess.glasgow.gov.uk/online-applications/simpleSearchResults.do?action=firstPage GoBike is submitting this letter of objection in based on their lip service to planning for active travel. The application mentions core paths nearby for cycling access, but conveniently ignores the fact that the University has been, to date, adamant that cycle lanes can not be accommodated on University Avenue to allow access to the site.

1.3 Glasgow, Future Policy Development of Taxi and Private Hire Car Licensing, closes 29 July

All the details of this consultation were in Digest 36, Item 1.5 and our considered response will be in the next Digest.

1.4 Glasgow (North Kelvin, North Woodside and Woodlands)(Mandatory 20mph Speed Limit Zone) Order, closes 02 August

Digest 37, Item 1.6 gave all the information for this next bit of Glasgow’s 20mph patchwork. Our response will be in the next Digest. Meanwhile, the Evening Times reported on 01 July that Glasgow City Council is still keen to see a city wide move to 20mph.
According to the article there are currently 80 mandatory 20mph zones in the city – that’s a lot of signage.

1.5 **NEW** Glasgow South City Way Traffic Management Order, 2-way cycle lane on Bridgegate and King Street, closes 09 August

Good news, the South City Way is approaching the Merchant City and we received this email from the City Council on 26 June:

“MESSAGE SENT ON BEHALF OF ANDY WADDELL, DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS, NEIGHBOURHOODS AND SUSTAINABILITY

Dear Sir or Madam,

THE GLASGOW CITY COUNCIL, (CITY CENTRE) (TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT) ORDER 2010, (VARIATION No25) (SOUTH CITY WAY) ORDER 201_

The Council propose to consider the introduction of the above named Traffic Regulation Order.
Please find enclosed a copy of the press notice of the proposed Order, relevant map, statement of reasons and detailed report.
Details of the proposals will also be available on the Glasgow City Council website at www.glasgow.gov.uk/proposedtro . 

As stated in the attached documentation, any person wishing to object to the proposed Order should send details of the grounds for objection in writing to Group Manager, Neighbourhoods and Sustainability, Exchange House, 231 George Street, Glasgow, G1 1RX or email land@glasgow.gov.uk and it must be received by Friday, 09 August 2019.

Yours faithfully” etc

Here are the documents: Press Notice, Plan, Statement of Reasons and Detailed Report.

We’ll be looking at this and, based on our experience elsewhere in the city, developing our response in good time for the closing date.

1.6 Glasgow, St Enoch District Regeneration Framework Public Consultation, closes 06 September

All the information we have was in Digest 37, Item 1.7 and as we said two weeks ago, our response will be developed when our main scrutineer of such high-level publications returns from holiday later this month. The very fact it’s high level means that detailed policy will be determined from it, so it’s crucial that we comment critically and constructively.
You might remember that the Broomielaw District Regeneration Framework; to which we responded at the beginning of April – details were in Digest 32, Item 3.1 and our response is here, – waxed lyrical about removing most of the traffic from the Broomielaw and transforming the area under the Kingston Bridge. Yes, this is the type of transformation that we are looking for and that the city needs if it’s to meet its aspirations, but we know the opposition will be intense.

Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations

2.1 Glasgow, Queen Margaret Drive, separated cycle lane, Traffic Regulation Order

The local traders on Queen Margaret Drive, which goes north from the junction of Byres Road and Great Western Road, as far as Maryhill Road, want to improve the environment outside their shops. They worked with the City Council and with Sustrans to develop proposals for a two-way cycle lane on the west side and there has been local consultation on this.
However, things have changed: we have had the Byres Road consultations with no decisive outcome and a new school is being built just north of Kelvinside Avenue, so both these things are being considered in relation to the Queen Margaret Drive proposals. Pleasingly though, we have now been told by the City Council that the Traffic Regulation Order will be issued within the next few weeks. Our breath is bated!

2.2 Glasgow, Battlefield Street Design, Showcase Event, 23 July

Sustrans have informed us of this event; here’s the email that was received on 03 July:

“I’m emailing you with an exciting update from Battlefield Street Design with the details of our showcase event on the 23^rd July and a focus group opportunity.

Thank you to everyone who has got involved in the Battlefield Street Design project and left your feedback for the initial design ideas. You can still view these designs and comments through our project website. Over the last few months we engaged with over 2,800 people through various events, activities and meetings. This feedback following the last nine months of engagement has helped refine the concept design which will be showcased at our upcoming public event on the 23^rd July (details below).

Showcase event: Tuesday 23^rd July 2019

On Tuesday 23 July, at Langside Parish Church in Glasgow, the public are invited to have the opportunity to

• Drop-in anytime between 4pm and 7pm to view the updated concept design for the following areas; Battlefield Road, Mount Florida corner, Battlefield Rest junction, Grange Road and Langside Road.
• Find out about activities in the area from Give a Dog a Bone, Urban Croft South Seeds, Battlefield Community Project, Langside Heritage Group and many more;
• Come and say hello to us outside Coffeescene between 3pm and 6pm where we’ll have a summary of the designs and some Sustrans freebies to give away“

Do get along if you can and contribute to making the area more active-travel-friendly. Here’s a link to the 23 July event with a bit more news: https://battlefieldproposals.commonplace.is/news/2019/07/03/battlefield-street-design-showcase-event:-23-july

2.3 Safer Streets Pollokshields

Further to the drop-in event on 17 June, we have now heard from Bill Fraser, chair of the Pollokshields Trust. The Baseline Study is now at draft stage and once it’s finalised it will be opened to community engagement. If you are interested keep your eyes peeled for further updates.

2.4 North Kelvin/Woodside potential Controlled Parking Zone

We have heard from GoBike member, Alasdair, who is on the local Community Council who tells us that there was a well-attended Community Council meeting earlier this month when the possibility of a Controlled Parking Zone in this area was discussed. Currently there is commuter parking in the area. The City Council will now consult with the Police etc as they draw up plans with a view to issuing a Traffic Regulation Order at some future date.

2.5 Dennistoun & Royston – Traffic Management & Parking Controls Order 201 drop-in events 24, 25 and 27 July

GoBike member Derek has told us about a forthcoming Traffic Management and Parking Controls Order for Dennistoun & Royston
Public exhibitions are to take place:
Wed 24 July, 2-7pm – Royston Library
Thu 25 July, 2-7pm – Dennistoun Library
Sat 27 July, 10am-1pm – Dennistoun Library
Dennistoun Community Council has been asking the City Council for some time to bring in such an order to stop commuters using area like a park and ride.
There will be charges for parking that might not go down well with some of the residents but if it reduces car parking overall then it could help moves towards providing separated cycle lanes on Duke Street and/or Alexandra Parade!

Section 3: Consultation Feedback

3.1 Glasgow, Broomfield Road, GoBike submission

Details of the proposals for traffic calming using speed cushions on Broomfield Road, in the north-east of the city, was detailed in Digest 37, Item 1.2 and we submitted our response last week, prior to the 05 July closing date.
While we accept that speed cushions do slow down traffic, we consider that roads such as this. near parks and schools, particularly in an area of low car ownership, in a city of low car ownership. should be made more active-travel friendly. Our response gives our reasons.

3.2 Glasgow, Ladyloan Avenue, GoBike submission

Carrying on the theme of slowing motor traffic down with speed cushions came this proposal to improve safety near St Clare’s Primary School in Drumchapel. Other schools in the city are about to start a trial of closed approach roads at start and finish times, but St Clare’s gets speed cushions. We suggest a more active travel solution ….. and this is our letter of response.

3.3 Glasgow, Laurieston Phase 2, 20mph, GCC response No 2

Soon after submitting our support (admittedly with concern about the localised nature of yet another 20mph zone in the city) we received an initial response from the City Council, which was published in Digest 36, Item 3.2. This explained why the City Council feels it can’t go for a city-wide zone (this view, might of course change with the demise of Mark Ruskell’s bill) but now we have received, on 28 June, this formal response:

“MESSAGE SENT ON BEHALF OF ANDY WADDELL, DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS, NEIGHBOURHOODS AND SUSTAINABILITY

Dear Ms Fort

THE GLASGOW CITY COUNCIL, (Laurieston Phase 2), (20mph Speed Limit) Order 2019

I refer to your support of the above named Traffic Regulation Order and can advise that your support was reported and considered. The Council have decided under its scheme of delegated functions to proceed with the proposal as advertised.

The Order was made on 24 June 2019 and an advert was placed in the Evening Times on 26 June 2019 stating that the Traffic Regulation Order has been made.
Should you require any further information on the above named Order please contact my assistant (name and phone no removed by GoBike).

Yours sincerely” etc

We have yet to see major opposition to these localised 20mph proposals, so why the concern when it comes to larger areas? Could it be a case of driving slowly near home but putting the foot down elsewhere?

3.4 Glasgow, Laurieston, Phase 2, Parking Controls, GCC response

To inhibit the sort of parking shown here, GoBike supported the proposals for waiting and loading restrictions in Laurieston Phase 2, where building is currently ongoing. Details were given in Digest 34, Item 1.7 and our response was given in Digest 35, Item 1.6

We have now, 28 June, received this response from the City Council:

“MESSAGE SENT ON BEHALF OF ANDY WADDELL, DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS, NEIGHBOURHOODS AND SUSTAINABILITY

Dear Ms Fort

THE GLASGOW CITY COUNCIL, (Laurieston Phase 2), (Traffic Regulation) Order 2019

I refer to your support of the above named Traffic Regulation Order and can advise that your support was reported and considered. The Council have decided under its scheme of delegated functions to proceed with the proposal as advertised.

The Order was made on 24 June 2019 and an advert will be placed in the Evening Times on 26 June 2019 stating that the Traffic Regulation Order has been made.
Should you require any further information on the above named Order please contact my assistant (name and phone no removed by GoBike).

Yours sincerely” etc

No details of the monitoring and compliance regime, so let’s hope for the best ….

3.5 Scotland, Default 20mph Bill, Scottish Government response

Many of us, I think, wrote to our MSPs to urge them to support the Restricted Roads (20mph) Bill that recently failed to get approval in the Scottish Parliament. Here’s a reply sent by Transport Scotland, on 27 June, in response to a plea direct to the Transport MInister, Michael Matheson, to support the bill:

“Roads Directorate
Victoria Quay, Edinburgh, EH6 6QQ

Thank you for your email of 8 June to Michael Matheson, Cabinet Secretary for Transport, Infrastructure & Connectivity, regarding the 20 mph Restricted Roads (20 mph Speed Limits)(Scotland) Bill. As I have responsibility for road safety policy the First Minister has asked that your letter be passed to me for reply.
The Scottish Government is committed to achieving our shared desired outcomes of a more active and healthier nation, with ultimate visions for Scotland to have the cleanest air in Europe and no fatalities on roads.
We are also committed to the long-term vision for active travel in Scotland where communities are shaped around people, with walking and cycling the most popular choice for shorter everyday journeys. We know that the perception of urban roads as unsafe is a barrier against these everyday journeys and the reduction of traffic speed can be a positive step in making our towns and cities safer places, where people are confident to walk and cycle more often.

As you may be aware the 20 mph Restricted Roads (20 mph Speed Limits)(Scotland) Bill fell at Stage 1 of the Scottish Parliamentary legislative process on 13 June 2019, with 83 members of the Scottish Parliament opposing the bill, 26 voting in favour and 4 abstaining. You can find the Official Report of the debate here:
http://www.parliament.scot/parliamentarybusiness/report.aspx?r=12183
During the debate, the Cabinet Secretary set out why the Scottish Government recommended that Parliament not agree to the general principles of the Bill. This rationale is provided below:

“This Bill brings two different issues which we need to ensure are not conflated:
The first is whether 20 mph limits are beneficial; and the Government is very clear that we support 20 mph speed limits implemented in the right environment because they have real potential to encourage more active travel and increase people’s perceptions of ‘feeling safe’.
The second is whether the blanket approach is the best way of achieving these desired benefits.

I am of the view that further consideration needs to be given to the process, impact and consequences of a nationwide default 20 mph limit including an assessment of Scotland’s road network before we can be sure that the proposed Bill will achieve its aim.
We need to ensure that there are no unintended consequences from the Bill such as whether reducing speed limits on restricted roads where a 20 mph limit could have detrimental effects or whether not reducing the limit on non-restricted roads, where a 20 mph limit would be desirable, inhibits consistency across Scotland.
We know that many drivers assess the speed limit not just by reading road signs but by using other road features such as the width of the carriageway, road markings, traffic level, and location to schools etc.
In order to achieve the benefits that 20 mph speed limits bring, particularly on road safety, we need to ensure their compliance. Police Scotland advise that speed limits should be effectively self-enforcing and seen to be appropriate by a significant majority of motorists.
By implementing speed limits which are appropriate to the road design and conditions, rather than applying a blanket 20 mph signs-only speed limit , it ensures that other speed limits are not brought into disrepute.
Both the Government and CoSLA have always recognised the ambition of this Bill and
understand the rationale. However, the practical challenges and financial implications of a one size-fits-all approach are significant. Both remain supportive of creating safer roads for all road users, but this must be achieved through identifying alternative, more flexible ways of widening the implementation of 20 mph zones and speed limits in Scotland.
Therefore we are committed to continuing to work with CoSLA and with our partners such as the Society of Chief Officers of Transportation in Scotland, taking time to reflect on what the Bill was trying to achieve by helping to identify more straightforward, efficient and effective procedures for Local Authorities in order to encourage wider use of 20 mph speed limits.
One example of work being undertaken is a review of the current Traffic Regulation Order process which will determine whether this does create a barrier to the implementation of 20 mph speed limits.
We have sought the views of local authorities on the TRO process and provided an opportunity for them to detail their concerns and consider whether the process could be streamlined. Once the analysis is complete, we will share the results with stakeholders and outline what options may be available for consideration.
These solutions will be found through collaborative working and any new proposal will need joint political agreement between CoSLA and Scottish Government. I consider that the blanket ‘sign only’ approach proposed within this Bill, without the identification of the roads which will be affected, will not achieve its aims. The road assessment is required in order to examine whether the current speed profile and road design would mind themselves to sign only 20 mph speed limits and will achieve the benefits that we would all wish to see”.
We have a commitment in Scotland’s Road Safety Framework to 2020 to encourage the implementation of 20 mph speed limits and have clear guidance for local authorities to support them in making decisions. We have also seen many local authorities taking those decisions in accordance with our guidance including Edinburgh and Fife.
And, as mentioned previously, we are also actively working with local authorities to identify actions which can be taken to ensure that more 20 mph speed limits are implemented in the right environments.
I hope you find this information helpful.
Kindest regards

Road Safety Policy Officer
www.transport.gov.scot”

So there we have it, a lot of words, from people who probably want a a 20mph limit outside their house and their local school, but let’s look forward to better things ..

3.6 Glasgow, Denmark Street, No Waiting and Loading at Any Time, GCC response, with good news about the employment of more Parking Attendants

In Digest 36, Item 1.2 we informed you of the proposals to prohibit obstructive parking on Denmark Street in the north of the city. We submitted an email response in the evening of the closing date, which was, fortunately, accepted and we now have this response, dated 05 July from the City Council:

“Thank you for your response to the above named traffic regulation order.
In order to address your points, I have numbered them accordingly:

1.  I can advise that City Parking, who are responsible for the employment of parking attendants, have recently employed 20 new parking attendants.  This will help with the enforcement of all existing and proposed restrictions within the Glasgow area.

2.  Your comments have been noted and passed to the Council’s Cycling Infrastructure department, however, this Order has been promoted in order to prevent the indiscriminate and obstructive parking practices which are occurring in Denmark Street, north of Hawthorn Street.  The Council have received complaints from local businesses at this location as larger vehicles find it difficult to access a number of premises as a result of the existing parking practices hence why this Order has focused on eradicating this issue.”

Here, as a reminder, is our response, sent on 18 June:

“Many thanks for the opportunity to comment on the proposals below. GoBike is ambivalent about this proposal but we do have the following questions:

1. Have the resources been identified to ensure that the restrictions are complied with? So often we respond to similar consultations and the standard response is that it is the responsibility of Police Scotland, or perhaps in this case, traffic/parking wardens to ensure compliance. Yet we are not aware of any increase in the budget of these bodies to ensure compliance and all around the city we see evidence of non-compliance with parking regulations, speed limits etc.

2. Why hasn’t a more imaginative scheme been developed? This is an area of lower than average car ownership in a city with relatively low car ownership, yet we see no evidence that active travel is being encouraged. Denmark Street is wide, there are amenities along it such as a community centre, yet there is no safe cycle route. The construction of cycle lanes would reduce the space available for the storage of motor vehicles and encourage the local populace to improve their health by becoming more active. The City Council should exploit all available opportunities to improve active travel in this city, rather than having specific cycle schemes.

We look forward to better things.”

Thus we have 2 items of good news here! The first is that more Parking Attendants are to be employed and the second is that we have sections of the Neighbourhoods and Sustainability Group within the City Council communicating with each other, and not only that, but telling us that they do.

3.7 Glasgow, Sunnybank Street, Traffic Calming, GCC response

On 20 June GoBike submitted this letter to Glasgow City Council about the proposals for Sunnybank Street – the initial information was in Digest 36, Item 1.3 and yesterday, just as this Digest should have been coming out to you, this response arrived:

“MESSAGE SENT ON BEHALF OF MICHAEL BRADY, GROUP MANAGER – TRAFFIC AND ROAD SAFETY, NEIGHBOURHOODS AND SUSTAINABILITY

Dear Ms Fort

Thank you for your undernoted email regarding the traffic calming proposals for Sunnybank Street.
I can advise that the Primary School has already received planning consent and as such there are no proposals to include any new cycle routes or lanes into the design at this late stage.
I can advise that the School Car Free Zones is a pilot project which will run for an initial trial period of 18 months across 6 selected schools where it is known that traffic related issues at the beginning and end of the school day already occur. If the trial proves successful, it is anticipated that this project will be extended to include additional schools in appropriate locations across the city and the new school on Sunnybank Street will be considered for inclusion.
Regarding the design of the speed cushions, I can advise that as per the drawing sent out alongside the consultation e-mail, there is a 1.2m gap from the kerb at either side for the safe passage of cyclists, as well as a gap of 1.1m in between the cushions themselves which both provide plenty of space for the safe passage of cyclists.

A recent speed survey found the 85^th percentile speed of vehicles on Sunnybank Street to be 28mph. It is anticipated that the introduction of the proposed Traffic Calming on Sunnybank Street will see the average speed of vehicles decrease further, which will in turn lead to better road safety conditions for all road users including, pedestrians, cyclists and motorists.
With regard to your concerns over the timescale for responses to our notification of the proposals, I can advise that the 21 day period for response was to begin from the date the email was sent. However, I will note your comments and ensure that the response period is more clearly stated in any future correspondence. Responses were also intended to be returned to the sender, LandServices.Mailroom@glasgow.gov.uk

Finally, I apologize for you not receiving a response to your email of 13^th June regarding the bus gate and can advise that whilst Sunnybank Street was previously intended for inclusion as part of a bus route, SPT never took up the option of providing a bus service on this route. Furthermore, a Traffic Regulation Order was never promoted to allow enforcement of this bus gate by Police Scotland. As part of the associated works to install traffic calming measures it is intended that the bus gate markings and signs on Sunnybank Street between Springfield Road and Garvald Street will be removed.
I trust the above information is of assistance, however, should you require any further information please contact (details removed by GoBike)”

While much of this reply was informative, one section was a wee bit perplexing – had a mistake been made in our letter about the position of the speed cushions? A check confirmed, phew, that our letter did not mention the spacing of the speed cushions, and this reply has been sent in for the attention of Michael Brady:

“Hello,
Many thanks for the comprehensive reply, which is very much appreciated.

Just one point: on this scheme the drawing clearly shows a 1.2m gap between the footway and the speed cushion. It is on your other schemes, Ladyloan Avenue and Broomfield Road, where the gap is shown as just 1m and I have commented on the narrow gap on both those proposals, but not on the scheme for Sunnybank Street. I attach a further copy of the GoBike letter of 20 June for clarification.

Best wishes,
Tricia Fort
for Consultations GoBike, Strathclyde Cycle Campaign, www.gobike.org”

It’s a bonus that we are getting detailed responses – long may this continue. This reply also shows why Community Councils are so important. Community Councils are able to respond to Planning Applications, while residents, unless in the immediate neighbourhood, are unable to comment. So we missed the boat on this one.

Your next Digest will be with you in 2 weeks, so stay safe on your bike until then – and beyond.

Contents

Section 1: Current Consultations

1. Closes TODAY! North Toryglen green space and active travel designs, open on-line until TODAY, 30 April
2. **NEW** Infrastructure Commission for Scotland, Call for Evidence, closes 03 May
3. Edinburgh Napier and Transform Scotland, Pedestrian Crossing Facilities User Survey, closes 10 May
4. **NEW** Scottish Government – Consultation on Environmental Principles and Governance in Scotland, closes 10 May
5. **NEW** Glasgow, B759, Cathkin Road, 30mph Speed Limit Traffic Regulation Order, closes 21 May
6. Glasgow Climate Change Survey, closes 31 May
7. **NEW** Petition for a safer crossing to Victoria Park at Westland Drive, Glasgow.

Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations

Yet again, we have no advance news.

Section 3: Consultation Feedback

1. Govan Partick Strategic Development Framework
2. Glasgow City Council, Byres Road Public Realm: Revised Concept Design, 23 April – SUCCESS, Segregated cycle lanes to be included
3. Glasgow, Elmbank Street: the City Council maintain their opposition to permeability
4. Glasgow, South City Way, Gorbals Street Traffic Regulation Order

Section 1: Current Consultations in date order for responses

1.1 Closes TODAY! North Toryglen green space and active travel designs, open on-line until TODAY, 30 April

This is a delightful community scheme, transforming wasteland and introducing active travel routes, which we featured in Digest 32. Do please have a look at the plans that are here: https://www.urbanroots.org.uk/workshops/northtoryglen/ and complete the survey. Then see if you can get something similar done where you live! Here’s the letter of support GoBike has sent in.

1.2 Infrastructure Commission for Scotland, Call for Evidence, closes 03 May

Here’s a survey that Transform Scotland told us about. It’s high level but this is where we need to get our views in if we want meaningful change for active travel. Here’s the link to the call for evidence.

Let’s see if we can get some iconic cycling infrastructure! The documents aren’t long ones but there is a form that you have to return with your submission!

1.3 Edinburgh Napier and Transform Scotland, Pedestrian Crossing Facilities User Survey, closes 10 May

We mentioned this survey last time, in Digest 32, and it’s a quick and easy one to do. It’s about road crossings and your preference for them/behaviour at them. Do please give it a go.

1.4 Scottish Government – Consultation on Environmental Principles and Governance in Scotland, closes 10 May

Here’s another one that Transform Scotland passed on to us and it’s about what happens to environmental controls when we leave the EU. It’s quite alarming how much work has been done, and there still is to do, about leaving. Ideally you need to know about environmental principles and current governance controls as they are handled in the EU, but there is information in the consultation paper. Here’s the link to the consultation, so give it a try.

1.5 **NEW** Glasgow, B759, Cathkin Road, 30mph Speed Limit Traffic Regulation Order, closes 21 May

This is one that we will support – unless you tell us you think Cathkin Road should remain at 40mph? This is the email that we received from Glasgow City Council on 24 April:

“MESSAGE SENT ON BEHALF OF ANDY WADDELL, DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS NEIGHBOURHOODS AND SUSTAINABILITY

Dear Sir or Madam,

THE GLASGOW CITY COUNCIL, (B759 Cathkin Road) (30mph peed Limit) Order 20__
Further to my consultation email of 26 March 2019 regarding the above named Traffic Regulation Order, and in accordance with statutory procedures, I now enclose a copy of the press notice of the proposed Order, relevant map, statement of reasons and detailed report.
I would once again ask that you pass this information on to all bus operators likely to be affected by these proposals.

Details of the proposals will also be available on the Glasgow City Council website at www.glasgow.gov.uk/proposedtro

As stated in the attached documentation, any person wishing to object to the proposed Order should send details of the grounds for objection in writing to Andy Waddell, Director of Operations, Neighbourhoods and Sustainability, Exchange House, 231 George Street, Glasgow, G1 1RX or by e-mail to land@glasgow.gov.uk by 21 May 2019.

Yours faithfully”

We did not receive a “consultation email of 26 March”, but it looks as if one or more bus operators were not too happy with whatever went out that day, or perhaps didn’t go out. Hence, it seems, this full consultation now.

The documents attached to the email are: Advert Statement of Reasons, Plan and Report.

1.6 Glasgow Climate Change Survey, closes 31 May

This was Item 1.6 in Digest 32 and although there is still one month to respond, there’s no time like the present!

Here’s the link to the survey and here’s the link to response suggestions that we got from Extinction Rebellion.
But you will no doubt, be able to think of many more measures to reduce pollution and climate change – realistic implementation and enforcement of the 20mph speed limit in the city centre, sorting out road drainage, clearing vehicles off our pavements so that we can walk along them, cycle lanes, segregated of course, on all the main roads into the city ……

1.7 **NEW** Petition for a safer crossing to Victoria Park at Westland Drive.

Off the back of one of last weekend’s many pop up Pedal on Parliament protests around Scotland, GoBike member Andy Watson has launched a petition asking for a safer crossing at Victoria Park. The protest was reported in Glasgow Live here. The notoriously dangerous double roundabout crossing that creates a real obstacle for families trying to reach the park has long been highlighted to the council. Sunday’s protest was attended by many local families as well as Carol Monaghan MP, Councillor Feargal Dalton and Robert McKay, chair of Jordanhill Community Council, who have all taken council reps to the roundabout to highlight the dangers. The council have so far maintained that as there have been no recorded fatalities at the crossing so far, it is “safe”. Help them reconsider by adding your name to this really quick petition.

Section 3: Consultation Feedback

3.1 Govan Partick Strategic Development Framework

Back in February, in Digest 27, Item 1.2, we published our response to this Framework Document and last month, 22 March (sorry about the delay in telling you) we got this acknowledgement:

“Thank you for your response to the draft Govan-Partick Strategic Development Framework consultation. Your response is currently being considered by the Council as it prepares the final version of the Strategic Development Framework.

We received a substantial and diverse range of commentary on the Strategic Development Framework and the input from all respondents to the consultation was greatly appreciated. We are currently reviewing the ideas, suggestions and representations that were submitted and these will be invaluable in informing the Finalised Draft Strategic Development Framework.  Many of the responses related to wider issues than just spatial planning and the commentary is also informing the Council’s approach to the regeneration of the area more generally.

We will be in touch again soon to clarify the timescales for moving towards formal adoption of the SDF.
If you have any further questions at this time please feel free to contact us at this email address.

Best regards
Spatial Strategy Team
Development & Regeneration“

3.2 Glasgow City Council, Byres Road Public Realm: Revised Concept Design, 23 April, SUCCESS, Segregated cycle lanes to be included

You can read the long-awaited decision on Byres Road here, from the City Council, Neighbourhoods, Housing and Public Realm City Policy Committee, Report by Executive Director of Regeneration and the Economy.

If you subscribe to our posts then you will have read this post which describes how the City Council have approved plans to incorporate segregated cycle lanes into the upgrade for Byres Road. If you haven’t read it then it’s well worth a read. Our thanks and congratulations go to everyone who was involved in the campaign. Unfortunately things haven’t gone so well right next door on University Avenue and we know we’ve still a long way to go before Glasgow City Council will accept, across the board, that safe active travel is a requirement on all redevelopment schemes.

Here’s some information from the twittersphere that explains why it has all taken to long to come to the Byres Road decision:

3.3 Glasgow, Elmbank Street: the City Council maintain their opposition to permeability

So a win above on Byres Road for active travel, but the situation on Elmbank Street appears to be a loser. If you have been following the sorry tale there with the loss of a route to Sauchiehall Street, you will be aware that GoBike received a favourable reception when we went to a meeting of Blythswood and Broomielaw Community Council. One of the local councillors, Bailie Philip Braat who was at that meeting, wrote in to Neighbourhoods and Sustainability and we reported on the reply he got in Digest 30, item 1.4
We were delighted to hear that the other councillor who attended that meeting, Bailie Christy Mearns wrote in to N&S on 24 April with this:

“Please could you confirm whether it is technically possible to construct a safe contra-flow cycle lane along Elmbank Street? Whether this is by removing three parking spaces, realigning kerbs, and/ or altering pavement and signals.

Many cyclists are frustrated that conta-flow cycling has been removed from this street which has made it more difficult to move about with ease. Given that contra-flow lanes are the Council’s policy, I am trying to ascertain why this decision was made and how feasible it would be to reintroduce it. Despite the nearby improvements to Sauchiehall Street, cycling infrastructure has actually got worse here and I want to understand how this has been justified.

It is safe, joined-up cycling infrastructure which gets more people cycling; and I worry we are going in the wrong direction, at encouraging active travel, with this move. I look forward to hearing from you on this.”

Almost quick as a flash, as if the answer was there on the shelf, came this reply just one day later, 25 April:

“Dear Bailie Mearns

Thank you for your email in relation to the non-inclusion of a contraflow cycle lane on Elmbank Street as part of the Sauchiehall Street Avenue.

A primary objective of the project was to provide an environment which would enhance social and economic wellbeing of Sauchiehall Street and lead to economic growth in the area re-population of the area.

The basis of the design for Sauchiehall Street is the upgrading of the pedestrian and public transport infrastructure and installation of cycling infrastructure. Circa 550m of 2 way segregated cycle lane has been installed in an area where previously there were no segregated cycling facilities, all in accordance with Glasgow City Council policy. Construction of the proposed cycling infrastructure and median strip, required the carriageway width of Sauchiehall Street to be reduced which meant that vehicles turning into Elmbank Street have a tighter turn. In addition an ‘Avenue’ of trees has been installed to further enhance the local environment of the area within a median strip. The new cycling infrastructure connects to the ‘Connecting Woodside’ proposals in the west and the possibility of providing a link to cycling infrastructure on Cambridge Street from Rose Street is to be investigated as part the works proposed for Sauchiehall Street Precinct.  

Prior to the works 53 parking bays, none of which were disabled bays, were located on Sauchiehall Street. On completion of the works 3 number disabled bays will be installed on Sauchiehall Street, ie a 95% reduction in the number of parking bays implemented to enable the construction of the segregated cycle route and median strip.

The area within which the site is located is a major part of the ‘night time’ economy for Glasgow City Centre therefore consultations with local businesses were undertaken and the issue of reduced levels of parking on Sauchiehall Street was highlighted. To mitigate this reduction the Council committed to providing parking bays on the streets between Sauchiehall Street and Bath Street where possible. The number of bays that could be incorporated at these locations was limited given the need to maintain taxi ranks, bus stands for public transport and loading facilities for businesses. The final scheme constitutes a significant overall reduction in the level of car parking in the area.  

An existing loading bay for Sauchiehall St businesses was located on Sauchiehall Street to the west of the junction with Elmbank Street. This bay had to be removed to accommodate the construction of the segregated cycle lane and median strip. It was relocated to the north west corner of Elmbank Street. In addition an existing loading bay was located on the south east quarter of Elmbank Street to provide servicing facilities to the businesses in  Elmbank Street area and this bay was retained.

The possibility of installing a contraflow cycle lane on the west side of Elmbank Street was investigated and the required buffer zone and cycle lane have been highlighted on the attached extract from the general arrangement. The turning requirement of vehicles into Elmbank Street was added and there is a clash between the two. The visibility of vehicles exiting the loading bay would have been compromised increasing the risk of injury to cyclists heading north. As a consequence of these risks a contraflow cycle lane was not installed at this location on safety grounds.

The possibility of installing a contraflow cycle lane on the east side was also investigated however the existing loading bay and parking at this location would require to be removed. The removal of these facilities would have had a detrimental impact on the economy of the area.

Given the various factors to be considered in the preparation of the proposed layouts, a balance had to be struck to accommodate the requirements of the various interest groups. Overall, the existing footways were upgraded for pedestrians, the addition of a  segregated cycle lane has improved cycling facilities, public transport infrastructure was upgraded and the number of parking bays available to private cars was substantially reduced whilst taking into account the impact on the economy of the area. It is accepted that, at this particular location, Elmbank Street, cycling facilities have not been incorporated into the works however when the full project is taken into consideration, segregated cycling facilities within the area have improved significantly and in accordance with Council policy.

I hope that this explanation of the consultation, care and attention that has gone into achieving the best overall balanced design for all users in the area clarifies the reasons why segregated cycling facilities were not included in Elmbank Street.

Andrew Harrison
Group Manager, Neighbourhoods & Sustainability”

Here’s the “extract from the general arrangement” referred to in the reply.

So there we have it folks – 550m of segregated cycle lane on Sauchiehall Street, but who cares whether we can actually reach it? A major part of our City Council just doesn’t get it that we cycle from A to B. Unless they think we are going to put our bikes on the back of a car, park in Elmbank Street, carry our bike across to Sauchiehall Street, and cycle up and down the 550m for an hour or two. Very disappointing indeed.

3.4 Glasgow, South City Way, Gorbals Street Traffic Regulation Order

In January we responded favourably to the consultation for the part of the South City Way that will be on Gorbals Street (see Digest 26, Item 1.3), and we have now, 18 April, received this acknowledgement:

” MESSAGE SENT ON BEHALF OF ANDY WADDELL, DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS, NEIGHBOURHOODS AND SUSTAINABILITY

Dear Ms Fort,

THE GLASGOW CITY COUNCIL, (SOUTH CITY WAY) (GORBALS STREET), ORDER 2019
I refer to your support of the above named Traffic Regulation Order and can advise that your support was reported and considered. The Council have decided under its scheme of delegated functions to proceed with the proposal as advertised.

The Order was made on Tuesday, 9 April 2019 and an advert was placed in the Evening Times on Wednesday, 17 April 2019 stating that the Traffic Regulation Order has been made.
Should you require any further information on the above named Order please contact my assistant Suzette Aidoo on 0141 287 9024.

So no response to our comment that unidirectional cycle lanes should be the norm, but let’s hope that the project gets a move on and we can all soon cycle from the Clyde to Queen’s Park.

So, that’s it for now – a relatively quiet fortnight, but with lots of activity for the Pedal on Parliament, we hope you enjoyed getting out on the streets.