<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LEZ &#8211; GoBike</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.gobike.org/tag/lez/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.gobike.org</link>
	<description>Strathclyde Cycle Campaign</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 07:03:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">67217435</site>	<item>
		<title>LEZ Community Support Fund to support environmental projects</title>
		<link>https://www.gobike.org/lez-community-support-fund-to-support-environmental-projects-23861</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GoBike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 08:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[GoBike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glasgow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LEZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Low Emission Zone]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gobike.org/?p=23861</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Environment-enhancing projects from across Glasgow will share £732,000, as penalties collected through the city&#8217;s Low Emission Zone are poured back into local communities. Eighteen organisations will receive grants of between £20,000 and £50,000 to deliver a broad range of schemes following successful bids to the council&#8217;s LEZ Community Support Fund. Projects include improvements to children&#8217;s &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://www.gobike.org/lez-community-support-fund-to-support-environmental-projects-23861" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "LEZ Community Support Fund to support environmental projects"</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><a href="https://glasgow.gov.uk/article/12791/732-000-from-LEZ-penalties-to-fund-community-led-environmental-projects" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Environment-enhancing projects from across Glasgow will share £732,000</a>, as penalties collected through the city&#8217;s Low Emission Zone are poured back into local communities.</p>



<p>Eighteen organisations will receive grants of between £20,000 and £50,000 to deliver a broad range of schemes following successful bids to the council&#8217;s LEZ Community Support Fund.</p>



<p>Projects include improvements to children&#8217;s play areas, free bike provision, establishing food growing spaces and enhancements to greenspaces.</p>



<p>Other initiatives involve peatland restoration, installing solar panels, air quality education projects, urban rewilding, and wildflower meadow planting.</p>



<span id="more-23861"></span>



<p><strong>Cllr Angus Millar Convener for Transport and Climate</strong>&nbsp;said that with funding now secured, the groups can deliver a wide range of local initiatives &#8211; all focused on improving Glasgow&#8217;s environment.</p>



<p>He added: &#8220;With £732,000 available to support a broad range of local environmental projects this year, the LEZ Community Support Fund will make a real difference.</p>



<p>&#8220;Organisations such as volunteer groups, community councils, housing associations, and those advocating for a cleaner, greener and healthier environment have all secured vital funding.</p>



<p>&#8220;Combined with £250,000 already committed to tree planting and greening activities, almost £1million of LEZ income will be invested into Glasgow, meaning we can deliver both cleaner air and greener streets in the city centre and beyond.&#8221;</p>



<p>Source: <a href="https://glasgow.gov.uk/article/12791/732-000-from-LEZ-penalties-to-fund-community-led-environmental-projects" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Glasgow City Council website</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">23861</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consultation Digest (Local) Issue 153, 22 February 2024</title>
		<link>https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-153-22-february-2024-21325</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Y]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2024 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Consultation digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoBike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Dunbartonshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Renfrewshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glasgow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LEZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Lanarkshire]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gobike.org/?p=21325</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bearing East? East Renfrewshire take their cycle tracks into town. East Dunbartonshire turn their back on the Bearsway to go rural. Moves to improve Glasgow&#8217;s air quality and conserve areas of North Lanarkshire. City streetspace allocation – favouring buses over bikes? Section 1: Current Consultations(in date order for responses) 1.1:&#160;A77/Ayr Road Active Corridor &#8211; Phase &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-153-22-february-2024-21325" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Consultation Digest (Local) Issue 153, 22 February 2024"</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Bearing East?</h2>



<p>East Renfrewshire take their cycle tracks into town. East Dunbartonshire turn their back on the Bearsway to go rural. Moves to improve Glasgow&#8217;s air quality and conserve areas of North Lanarkshire. City streetspace allocation – favouring buses over bikes?</p>



<span id="more-21325"></span>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="block-cc85ef75-cc87-4a82-a726-8f744aa66a48"><strong>Section 1: Current Consultations<br></strong>(in date order for responses)</h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-one">1.1:&nbsp;A77/Ayr Road Active Corridor &#8211; Phase 3</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="525" height="290" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/A77-consult-2024-map-icons.png?resize=525%2C290&#038;ssl=1" alt="A77 Active Corridor - Phase 3 consultation map showing traffic lights and continuous footways" class="wp-image-21328" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/A77-consult-2024-map-icons.png?resize=600%2C331&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/A77-consult-2024-map-icons.png?resize=300%2C165&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/A77-consult-2024-map-icons.png?resize=1536%2C847&amp;ssl=1 1536w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/A77-consult-2024-map-icons.png?w=1790&amp;ssl=1 1790w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/A77-consult-2024-map-icons.png?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="(max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Map of Phase 3 of A77 Ayr Road showing crossings and continuous footways</figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>Council:</strong> East Renfrewshire.<br><strong>Subject: </strong>Following <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-97-15669#one-seven">Phase 1</a> on a rural section of Ayr Road and <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-112-9-june-2022-17484#one-seven">Phase 2</a> in the Malletsheugh/Maidenhill area – Phase 3 will extend the route further into Newton Mearns, between Hunter Drive and Barrhead Road in the town centre. It will continue the new 1-way cycleways on each side from the previous phase (replacing painted lanes). Also, it&#8217;s due to add continuous footways at side roads – a rarity in Scotland (and controversial with some disability groups). Proposals include reducing the speed limit from 40mph to 30mph. Some parking bays are included – most houses on Ayr Road have driveways but also multiple cars. Consultation comments have quite a lot of negative responses so the plans will need as much support as possible. (Apologies for overlooking it for the previous issue.)<br><strong>Website links:</strong> <a href="https://a77activecorridor.commonplace.is/en-GB/proposals/a77-active-corridor-phase-3/step1">A77 Phase 3 Commonplace site</a> and <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/A77-Active-Corridor-Phase-3-Concept-Design-Plans.pdf">concept design plans</a>.<br><strong>Deadline: 25 February 2024.</strong></p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-two">1.2: A807 Active Travel Corridor</h4>



<p><strong>Council:</strong>&nbsp;East Dunbartonshire.<br><strong>Subject:&nbsp;</strong>An active travel route between the town of Milngavie and village of Torrance. Proposals seem to be a mix of on-road and shared path with options to choose from at one of the junctions. However, <a href="https://x.com/magnatom/status/1756686086737183164?s=20">narrower parts of the route may not get any infrastructure</a>. The three <a href="https://x.com/magnatom/status/1758181866824139014?s=20">public drop in events have already passed</a>. Hopefully, these proposals go down better than previous plans for the Bearsway but there are bound to be plenty of NIMBYs!<br><strong>Website links:</strong> <a href="https://www.eastdunbarton.gov.uk/a807-active-travel-corridor">A807 Active Travel Corridor consultation page</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/6bc6cd57eb1e4cea8fb1b88cf35be798">A807 StoryMap</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://arcg.is/LLW1y">A807 survey</a>.<br><strong>Deadline: 3 March 2024.</strong></p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-three">1.3: Glasgow Air Quality Action Plan (Draft) 2024</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" decoding="async" width="525" height="361" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Glasgow-roads-over-40pc-diesel-car-emissions_1080px.jpeg?resize=525%2C361&#038;ssl=1" alt="Map of central Glasgow roads highlighting &gt;40% diesel car emissions" class="wp-image-21331" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Glasgow-roads-over-40pc-diesel-car-emissions_1080px.jpeg?resize=600%2C412&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Glasgow-roads-over-40pc-diesel-car-emissions_1080px.jpeg?resize=300%2C206&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Glasgow-roads-over-40pc-diesel-car-emissions_1080px.jpeg?w=1080&amp;ssl=1 1080w" sizes="(max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Map of central Glasgow roads with over 40% emissions from diesel cars</figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>Council:</strong>&nbsp;Glasgow City Council.<br><strong>Subject:&nbsp;</strong>An update to the existing Glasgow Air Quality Action Plan (AQAP). Air pollution in the city centre has been gradually reducing and the Low Emission Zone (LEZ) has made a difference since 2018 (originally for buses). If trends continue, some of the city&#8217;s Air Quality Management Areas (AQMAs) may be revoked later this decade. These include the city centre and Dumbarton Rd/Byres Rd where active travel routes like Avenues and City Ways are part of the solution. However, emissions still haven&#8217;t reached guideline levels for nitrogen dioxide (NO<sub>2</sub>, especially around Hope St). Also, there&#8217;s a lot more to do on reducing single occupant car journeys, including expanding car clubs.<br><strong>Website links:</strong> <a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=61284&amp;p=0">Draft Glasgow AQAP 2024</a>, <a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/localairqualitymanagement">air quality information</a> and <a href="https://www.smartsurvey.co.uk/s/AirQualityPlan2024/">AQAP survey</a>.<br><strong>Deadline: 20 March 2024.</strong></p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-four">1.4: Conservation Area Consultations (Coatbridge/Cumbernauld)</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" decoding="async" width="525" height="361" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Cumbernauld-Village-conservation-area_1200px.jpeg?resize=525%2C361&#038;ssl=1" alt="Cumbernauld Village conservation area map" class="wp-image-21330" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Cumbernauld-Village-conservation-area_1200px.jpeg?resize=600%2C412&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Cumbernauld-Village-conservation-area_1200px.jpeg?resize=300%2C206&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Cumbernauld-Village-conservation-area_1200px.jpeg?w=1200&amp;ssl=1 1200w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Cumbernauld-Village-conservation-area_1200px.jpeg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="(max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Map of Cumbernauld Village Conservation Area</figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>Council:</strong>&nbsp;North Lanarkshire.<br><strong>Subject:&nbsp;</strong>Two consultations about lesser known Conservation Areas. The Coatbridge one is either side of Blairhill train station and the other is in Cumbernauld Village (the original settlement north of the town centre). While not directly related to cycling, the last few survey questions mention traffic and development.<br><strong>Website links:</strong> <a href="https://www.northlanarkshire.gov.uk/your-community/working-communities/consultations/live-consultations/coatbridge-blairhill-and-dunbeth-conservation-area-consultation">Coatbridge: Blairhill and Dunbeth Conservation Area Consultation</a> and <a href="https://www.northlanarkshire.gov.uk/your-community/working-communities/consultations/live-consultations/cumbernauld-village-conservation-area-consultation">Cumbernauld Village Conservation Area Consultation</a>.<br><strong>Deadline: 12 April 2024.</strong></p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 2: Consultation Feedback</strong></h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="two-one">2.1:&nbsp;Glasgow Streetspace Allocation Framework</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="368" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Glasgow-space-allocation-conflict-map_1200px.jpeg?resize=525%2C368&#038;ssl=1" alt="Glasgow space allocation conflict map" class="wp-image-21333" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Glasgow-space-allocation-conflict-map_1200px.jpeg?resize=600%2C421&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Glasgow-space-allocation-conflict-map_1200px.jpeg?resize=300%2C211&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Glasgow-space-allocation-conflict-map_1200px.jpeg?w=1200&amp;ssl=1 1200w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Glasgow-space-allocation-conflict-map_1200px.jpeg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption class="wp-element-caption">Glasgow space allocation conflict map</figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>Subject:&nbsp;</strong>Decision-making framework recently approved by Glasgow City Council. It tackles some thorny issues around streetspace, including bus vs cycle lanes. The further you go through the document the more cycling seems to lose out on main arterial routes. A key point on page 30 explains: <em>“This work has been commissioned as part of the Bus Partnership Fund corridor work.”</em> So, it was always likely to favour buses. It ends by identifying Pollokshaws Rd as a potential active travel corridor but then showing it as an example with <em>“cycle facilities on parallel route”</em>. A lot of question marks about where some sections of cycle route are going to go. <br><strong>Website links:</strong> <a href="https://glasgow.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=59965">Glasgow Streetspace Allocation Framework</a>.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 3: Proposed Traffic Regulation Orders</strong></h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-one">3.1:&nbsp;East Dunbartonshire TROs</h4>



<p><strong>Website links:</strong>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.eastdunbarton.gov.uk/residents/roads-pavements-and-parking/traffic-regulation-orders" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">East Dunbartonshire TROs</a>.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-one">3.2: Glasgow City TROs</h4>



<p><strong>Subject:</strong> Cowcaddens Rd restrictions prepare for its Avenues Plus transformation (deadline: 23 February 2024). More ‘made’ orders – Clarendon Place&#8217;s switch around and permanent bus lanes on Bothwell St and Paisley Road West. Also, a temporary order for the works building the last section of the South City Way to Trongate.<br><strong>Website links:</strong> <a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/index.aspx?articleid=18127">GCC Proposed Traffic Regulation Orders</a> and <a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/index.aspx?articleid=18878">GCC Proposed Traffic Calming Schemes</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">21325</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consultation Digest (Local) Issue 102, 23 December 2021</title>
		<link>https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-102-23-december-2021-16327</link>
					<comments>https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-102-23-december-2021-16327#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Y]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2021 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Consultation digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoBike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Dunbartonshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Renfrewshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glasgow city council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LEZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malls Mire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Lanarkshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Lanarkshire]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gobike.org/?p=16327</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Season&#8217;s greetings This time of year is known for excess and there&#8217;s a glut of consultations and responses in this issue. Contra-flow cycling is a theme with responses from Glasgow ruling it out while South Lanarkshire have quietly implemented it in East Kilbride. However, EK&#8217;s Spaces for People project (as seen in featured image, above) &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-102-23-december-2021-16327" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Consultation Digest (Local) Issue 102, 23 December 2021"</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Season&#8217;s greetings </h2>



<p>This time of year is known for excess and there&#8217;s a glut of consultations and responses in this issue. Contra-flow cycling is a theme with responses from Glasgow ruling it out while South Lanarkshire have quietly implemented it in East Kilbride. </p>



<p>However, EK&#8217;s Spaces for People project (as seen in featured image, above) is up for consultation and needs support to counter local criticism.</p>



<p>Without wanting to tread on the toes of our <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-national-issue-9-10-dec-2021-the-one-after-the-budget-16152" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">national consultations digest</a>, Transport Scotland&#8217;s long-delayed <a href="https://consult.gov.scot/transport-scotland/scotlands-pavement-parking-prohibitions/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">pavement parking consultation</a> has started. Most GoBike members will have experiences to add to that! </p>



<span id="more-16327"></span>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Contents</strong><br>(new/updated items in&nbsp;<strong>bold</strong>&nbsp;– link jumps to article)</h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 1: Current Consultations</h4>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li><a href="#one-one">Hyndland, Hughenden And Dowanhill West, Traffic Management/Parking Controls</a></li><li><a href="#one-two">Ayr Road (South) Active Travel Improvements</a>&nbsp;</li><li><a href="#one-three">A803, Kirkintilloch Road (and Side Roads) Bishopbriggs TRO</a></li><li><a href="#one-four"><strong>East Kilbride</strong>, <strong>Spaces for People</strong></a></li><li><strong><a href="#one-five">Low Emission Zone –&nbsp;Full proposal</a></strong></li><li><span style="font-size: 1rem;"><a href="#one-six">Dennistoun to Cranhill Liveable Neighbourhoods</a></span></li><li><a href="#one-seven">Govan to Kingston Liveable Neighbourhoods</a></li><li><a href="#one-eight">Queen Elizabeth University Hospital (QEUH)&nbsp;Green Space Survey</a></li><li><a href="#one-nine">Ruchill to Cowlairs Liveable Neighbourhoods</a></li><li><a href="#one-ten">Langside to Toryglen Liveable Neighbourhoods</a></li><li><a href="#one-eleven"><strong>Malls Mire survey</strong></a></li><li><a href="#one-twelve"><strong>Drumchapel Local Development Framework</strong></a></li><li><a href="#one-thirteen"><span style="font-size: 1rem;">Raeberry St Quietway&nbsp;(Connecting Woodside)</span></a></li><li><a href="#one-fourteen">Helensburgh to Garelochhead active travel route</a></li></ol>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 2: Consultation Feedback</h4>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li><a href="#two-one">Carmunnock Road (Service Road) TRO</a></li><li><a href="#two-two">FOI response on Dennistoun and London Rd SfP projects (GCC)</a> </li><li><a href="#two-three">Glasgow City Network</a></li><li><a href="#two-four">Motherwell train station works</a></li><li><a href="#two-five">East Renfrewshire Local Development Plan 2 adoption</a></li><li><a href="#two-six">Make Your Way Key Links: Douglas–NCN74 (A70)</a></li><li><a href="#two-seven">Malls Mire Newsletter</a></li></ol>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 1: Current Consultations</strong><br>(in date order for responses)</h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-one">1.1:&nbsp;Hyndland, Hughenden And Dowanhill West, Traffic Management/Parking Controls</h4>



<p><strong>Council:</strong>&nbsp;Glasgow City.<br><strong>Area:</strong>&nbsp;Clarence Drive in the West End (between Crow Rd and Hyndland Rd).<br><strong>Subject:</strong>&nbsp;Traffic Order&nbsp;to help make Spaces for People temporary infrastructure permanent. Existing painted lanes had been plagued by car parking so ‘soft segregation’ was added in late 2020.<br><strong>First featured:</strong>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-100-25-november-2021-16004#one-seven" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 100, Item 1.7</a>.<br><strong>Website links:</strong>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/32_5257_004-THE-GCC-HYNDLAND_HUGHENDEN-AND-DOWANHILL-WEST-TRAFFIC-MANAGEMENT-AND-PARKING-CONTROLS-ORDER-2019-VARIATION-NO-1-202_.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Clarence Dr plan</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/REPORT_THE-GCC-HYNDLAND_HUGHENDEN-AND-DOWANHILL-WEST-TRAFFIC-MANAGEMENT-AND-PARKING-CONTROLS-ORDER-2019-VARIATION-NO-1-202_.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Clarence Dr report</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/PRESS-NOTICE_THE-GCC-HYNDLAND_HUGHENDEN-AND-DOWANHILL-WEST-TRAFFIC-MANAGEMENT-AND-PARKING-CONTROLS-ORDER-2019-VARIATION-NO-1-202_.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Clarence Dr notice</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/SOR_THE-GCC-HYNDLAND_HUGHENDEN-AND-DOWANHILL-WEST-TRAFFIC-MANAGEMENT-AND-PARKING-CONTROLS-ORDER-2019-VARIATION-NO-1-202_.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Clarence Dr SoR</a>.<br><strong>Deadline:</strong>&nbsp;<strong>TODAY, 23 December.</strong></p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-two">1.2: Ayr Road (South) Active Travel Improvements</h4>



<p><strong>Council:</strong>&nbsp;East Renfrewshire.<br><strong>Area:</strong>&nbsp;Ayr Rd south from Newton Mearns.<br><strong>Subject:</strong>&nbsp;Build a replacement shared-use path on the north/west side of Ayr Road, between North Hillhead Road and the M77 overbridge.<br>(<em>Note:</em>&nbsp;the Ayr Rd, North consultation seems to have&nbsp;<a href="https://erspacesforpeople.commonplace.is/proposals/a-77-ayr-road-phase-2" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">ended on 30 November</a> with 712 comments.)<br><strong>First <meta charset="utf-8"><strong>featured</strong>:</strong>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-97-15669#one-seven" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 97, Item 1.7</a>.<br><strong>Website link:</strong>&nbsp;<a href="https://getinvolved.eastrenfrewshire.gov.uk/environment/ayr-road-south-active-travel-improvements/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">ERC Ayr Road South consultation page</a>.<br><strong>Deadline:</strong>&nbsp;<strong>24 December.</strong></p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-three">1.3: A803, Kirkintilloch Road (and Side Roads) Bishopbriggs TRO</h4>



<p><strong>Council:</strong>&nbsp;East Dunbartonshire.<br><strong>Area:</strong>&nbsp;South Bishopbriggs towards the town centre.<br><strong>Subject:</strong>&nbsp;Parking restrictions on the eastern side of the A803 from the end of Springburn Rd (at Colston Rd) to&nbsp;Bishopbriggs Cross, near the train station. Also, parking restrictions at junctions on side streets along the western side of Kirkintilloch Rd, from Coltpark Ave to Brackenbrae Rd.<br><meta charset="utf-8"><strong>First <meta charset="utf-8"><strong>featured</strong>:</strong>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-101-9-december-2021-16159#one-five" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 101, Item 1.5</a>.<br><strong>Website link: </strong><a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Proposed-A803-Kirkintilloch-Road-Side-Roads-Bishopbriggs-Waiting-Loading-Restrictions-Amendment.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">A803 &amp; Side Roads documents</a>&nbsp;(combined PDF of plans and report).<br><strong>Deadline: 7 January 2022.</strong></p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-four">1.4: East Kilbride, Spaces for People</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" decoding="async" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/CornwallSt-EK-East05_2411.jpeg?w=525&#038;ssl=1" alt="Cornwall St at Andrew St, EK SfP" class="wp-image-16360"/><figcaption>A nice side-by-side crossing at Andrew St then a &#8216;door zone&#8217; lane past the taxi rank</figcaption></figure>



<p><meta charset="utf-8"><strong>Council:</strong>&nbsp;South Lanarkshire.<br><strong>Area:</strong>&nbsp;<meta charset="utf-8">East Kilbride town centre.<br><meta charset="utf-8"><strong>Subject:</strong>&nbsp;Spaces for People project – protected <meta charset="utf-8">2-way cycle lanes on Cornwall St (replacing a road lane and a bus stop) and zebra/cycle crossings. One-way lanes towards the train station on part of Brouster Hill and a <a href="https://goo.gl/maps/1by2maEfEDVycxmz7" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">short contraflow cycle lane(!)</a> on Torrance Road. The quality is very high in places but dips elsewhere, especially at the Cornwall St taxi rank. The route is due to be extended east to Churchill Ave and west to the Queensway as part of <a href="https://www.southlanarkshire.gov.uk/downloads/file/13299/east_kilbride_active_travel_network_plan" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EK&#8217;s Active Travel network</a>.&nbsp;Had the Queensway link been done earlier, the lanes would probably have been a lot busier. The project has been criticised locally along with the duration of roadworks at a Places for Everyone project east of the station on West Mains Rd (adding a <a href="https://glasgow.gov.uk/protectedjunctions" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">protected junction, such as those on Victoria Rd</a>). Please support the SfP project – we don&#8217;t want another <a href="https://www.gobike.org/campaigns/mini-campaigns/friends-of-bearsway" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bearsway</a> or <a href="https://www.gobike.org/time-to-get-councillors-who-support-active-travel-holmston-road-cycle-lane-in-ayr-to-be-ripped-up-1938" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Holmston Rd</a> situation! <br><meta charset="utf-8"><strong>First featured: </strong><a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-86-11-may-2021-13927" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 89, Infrastructure Update</a>.<br><meta charset="utf-8"><strong>Website links: </strong><a href="https://wh1.snapsurveys.com/s.asp?k=163672080923">EK SfP online survey</a> and <a href="https://www.southlanarkshireview.scot/news/article/1219/Tell_us_your_views_on_safe_spaces">South Lanarkshire View article</a>.<br><strong>Deadline: 16 January 2022.</strong></p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-five">1.5: Low Emission Zone –&nbsp;Full proposal</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><a href="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/LEZ-area-before-after.jpg?ssl=1"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="186" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/LEZ-area-before-after.jpg?resize=525%2C186&#038;ssl=1" alt="LEZ boundary - before/after" class="wp-image-16366" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/LEZ-area-before-after.jpg?resize=600%2C213&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/LEZ-area-before-after.jpg?resize=300%2C106&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/LEZ-area-before-after.jpg?resize=1536%2C544&amp;ssl=1 1536w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/LEZ-area-before-after.jpg?resize=2048%2C725&amp;ssl=1 2048w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/LEZ-area-before-after.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /></a><figcaption>A festive game of &#8216;spot the difference&#8217; courtesy of GCC (click to enlarge)</figcaption></figure>



<p><meta charset="utf-8"><strong>Council:</strong>&nbsp;Glasgow City.<br><strong>Area:</strong>&nbsp;City centre.<br><meta charset="utf-8"><strong>Subject:</strong>&nbsp;Phase 2 of the <meta charset="utf-8">Low Emission Zone in the city centre (Phase 1 was buses only). Older, more polluting motor vehicles would be charged for driving into the zone. The boundary has changed slightly as shown in the image, above. Parts of some streets around the edges of the zone have been added to it and the GSA/Stow building has been left out. The LEZ is due to begin on 31 May 2022 but enforcement won&#8217;t kick in until a year later. When fines do come in they escalate for repeat offences. Some &#8216;grace periods&#8217; and exemptions apply, including for city centre residents, so the full zone wouldn&#8217;t be implemented until June 2024. <br><meta charset="utf-8"><meta charset="utf-8"><strong>First featured: </strong><a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-90-6-july-2021-14538#one-three" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 90, Item 1.3</a>.<br><strong>Website links: </strong><a target="_blank" href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=55545&amp;p=0" rel="noreferrer noopener">Full proposal document</a>, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=53693&amp;p=0" rel="noreferrer noopener">detailed map PDF</a> and&nbsp;<a target="_blank" href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/LEZ" rel="noreferrer noopener">further background on the LEZ website</a>.<br><meta charset="utf-8"><strong>Deadline: 20 January 2022.</strong></p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-six"><meta charset="utf-8">1.6: Dennistoun to Cranhill&nbsp;Liveable Neighbourhoods</h4>



<p><strong>Council:</strong>&nbsp;Glasgow City.<br><strong>Area:</strong>&nbsp;From Dennistoun (including the Necropolis but not GRI), Milnbank, Haghill, Riddrie, Carntyne to Cranhill.<br><strong>Subject:</strong>&nbsp;One of four LN consultations using Commonplace maps and the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.placestandard.scot/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Place Standard tool</a>. Transport links include roads like Duke St, Alexandra Parade, Cumbernauld Rd and Edinburgh Rd plus a few train stations. Apart from a few parks most big destinations are towards the city centre end –&nbsp;Necropolis, Tennents brewery and City Park offices. Glasgow Royal Infirmary is just outside western edge of area. Dennistoun has held on to a few Spaces for People measures (from its <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-88-8-june-2021-14260#three-two" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">failed LTN</a>) but there&#8217;s very little infrastructure elsewhere. Consultation had started in the community&nbsp;but <a href="https://dennistountocranhillln.commonplace.is/news" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">further events have been postponed</a>. Over 370 comments on the map so far. <br><strong><meta charset="utf-8"><strong>First featured:</strong></strong>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-100-25-november-2021-16004#one-nine" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 100, Item 1.9</a>.<br><strong>Website links:</strong>&nbsp;<a href="https://dennistountocranhillln.commonplace.is/comment" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Dennistoun to Cranhill LN Commonplace map</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.placestandard.scot/start/dennistoun-to-cranhill" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Dennistoun to Cranhill Place Standard survey</a>.<br><strong>Deadline:</strong>&nbsp;No obvious deadline.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-seven">1.7:&nbsp;Govan to Kingston&nbsp;Liveable Neighbourhoods</h4>



<p><strong>Council:</strong>&nbsp;Glasgow City.<br><strong>Area:</strong>&nbsp;From ‘Greater Govan’ (including Cessnock, Kinning Park, Plantation) and Ibrox to Kingston.<br><strong>Subject:</strong>&nbsp;&#8216;Everyday journeys&#8217; around major transport links including Govan bus station, subway stations, Paisley Road West, Clyde Tunnel, Squinty Bridge/Clyde Arc and the <a href="https://www.glasgowtimes.co.uk/news/19727969.govan-partick-bridge-work-start-30m-project-january/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">forthcoming footbridge</a>. Major destinations include Ibrox Stadium and the Southern General/Queen Elizabeth Uni Hospital (see next item). There&#8217;s some cycling infrastructure around Festival Park/Pacific Quay but no proper links to major routes like the nearby South West City Way. There have been over 190 comments on the map so far.<br><strong><meta charset="utf-8"><strong>First featured:</strong></strong>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-100-25-november-2021-16004#one-ten" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 100, Item 1.10</a>.<br><strong>Website links:</strong>&nbsp;<a href="https://govantokingstonln.commonplace.is/comment" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Govan to Kingston LN Commonplace map</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.placestandard.scot/start/govan-to-kingstonln" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Govan to Kingston Place Standard survey</a>.<br><strong>Deadline:</strong>&nbsp;No obvious deadline. </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-eight">1.8: Queen Elizabeth University Hospital (QEUH)&nbsp;Green Space Survey</h4>



<p><strong>Organisation:</strong>&nbsp;NHS Greater Glasgow &amp; Clyde.<br><strong>Area:</strong>&nbsp;The Southern General/Queen Liz hospital site in Govan.<br><strong>Subject:</strong>&nbsp;A survey about greenspace and active travel at QEUH has been open for a few months. There are half a dozen survey questions, which include active travel and accessibility as well as greenspace and biodiversity.<br><meta charset="utf-8"><strong><meta charset="utf-8"><strong>First featured:</strong></strong>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-101-9-december-2021-16159#one-eight" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 101, Item 1.8</a>.<br><strong>Website link: </strong><a href="https://link.webropolsurveys.com/Participation/Public/40ed62ff-91af-4e87-a25e-81224c0ef58a?displayId=Uni2279652" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">QEUH survey</a>, <a href="https://www.nhsggc.org.uk/about-us/media-centre/news/2021/05/improving-greenspace-at-qeuh/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">NHS GG&amp;C article</a>.<br><strong>Deadline:</strong>&nbsp;No obvious deadline.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-nine">1.9: Ruchill to Cowlairs Liveable Neighbourhoods</h4>



<p><strong>Council:</strong>&nbsp;Glasgow City.<br><strong>Area:</strong>&nbsp;North of the canal from Ruchill (at edge of Maryhill) across Possilpark, Hamiltonhill, Rockvilla, Craighall, Keppochhill and Port Dundas to Cowlairs (plus Sighthill Park).<br><strong>Subject:</strong>&nbsp;The edges of this area have been redeveloped with&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cyclestreets.net/location/153305/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">active travel routes along the canal</a>. Nearby Sighthill is being completely rebuilt including a segregated&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cyclestreets.net/location/111472/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">cycle route on St Rollox Dr</a>. Cowlairs, Ruchill and Possilpark have a lot of derelict sites. The&nbsp;<a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/index.aspx?articleid=26219" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Spaces for People lanes on Hawthorn St</a>&nbsp;have added a west-east cycle route (with some gaps). The map has just over 80 comments.<br><strong><meta charset="utf-8"><strong>First featured:</strong></strong>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-96-30-september-2021-15564#one-five" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 96, Item 1.5</a>.<br><strong>Website links:</strong>&nbsp;<a href="https://ruchilltocowlairsln.commonplace.is/comment?utm_campaign=NewCommonplaces29_09_2021&amp;lang=en-GB" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ruchill to Cowlairs LN Commonplace map</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.placestandard.scot/start/ln-north" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ruchill to Cowlairs Place Standard survey</a>.<br><strong>Deadline:</strong>&nbsp;No obvious deadline.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-ten">1.10: Langside to Toryglen Liveable Neighbourhoods</h4>



<p><strong>Council:</strong>&nbsp;Glasgow City.<br><strong>Area:</strong>&nbsp;From Langside (at edge of Shawlands) across Battlefield, Mount Florida and part of King’s Park to Toryglen (and Polmadie).<br><strong>Subject:</strong>&nbsp;A really random Liveable Neighbourhood area, including busy Langside and empty Polmadie.&nbsp; There’s not much active travel infrastructure between the <a href="https://battlefieldproposals.commonplace.is/proposals/handover-concept-design-for-battlefield-street-design-project" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">proposed SCW extension to </a><meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://battlefieldproposals.commonplace.is/proposals/handover-concept-design-for-battlefield-street-design-project" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Battlefield Rest</a> and Malls Mire at Toryglen, except the protected bit of Aitkenhead Rd and the unprotected Spean St path. Over 350 comments so far.<br><strong><meta charset="utf-8"><strong>First featured</strong>:</strong>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-96-30-september-2021-15564#one-four" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 96, Item 1.4</a>.<br><strong>Website links:</strong>&nbsp;<a href="https://langsidetotoryglenln.commonplace.is/comment?utm_campaign=NewCommonplaces29_09_2021&amp;lang=en-GB" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Langside to Toryglen LN Commonplace map</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.placestandard.scot/start/langside-to-toryglen-ln" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Langside to Toryglen Place Standard survey</a>.<br><strong>Deadline:</strong>&nbsp;No obvious deadline. </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-eleven">1.11: Malls Mire survey</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="394" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Malls-Mire-Toryglen-Rd_2685_1200px.jpeg?resize=525%2C394&#038;ssl=1" alt="Toryglen Rd entrance to Malls Mire" class="wp-image-16350" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Malls-Mire-Toryglen-Rd_2685_1200px.jpeg?resize=600%2C450&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Malls-Mire-Toryglen-Rd_2685_1200px.jpeg?resize=300%2C225&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Malls-Mire-Toryglen-Rd_2685_1200px.jpeg?w=1200&amp;ssl=1 1200w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Malls-Mire-Toryglen-Rd_2685_1200px.jpeg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Entrance to Malls Mire shared path at corner of <meta charset="utf-8">Toryglen Rd/Pinkerton Ave, Rutherglen</figcaption></figure>



<p><meta charset="utf-8"><strong>Organisation:</strong>&nbsp;Urban Roots.<br><strong>Area:</strong>&nbsp;Woodland park between Toryglen Asda, Polmadie Recycling Centre in Glasgow and Rutherglen Glencairn Football Club in South Lanarkshire.<br><strong>Subject:</strong>&nbsp;An evaluation about the newly created park and paths. The site wraps around a regenerated housing estate, linking former wasteground with the woodland and ponds. Trails, outdoor play equipment and a bike pump track have been installed. Also, there are 3m wide shared paths to create a lit, mostly traffic-free route. It links Prospecthill Circus west to Polmadie Rd and east to the corner of <meta charset="utf-8">Toryglen Rd/Pinkerton Ave in Rutherglen (about half a mile from <a href="https://www.biketown.org.uk/contact-us/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bike Town</a>&#8216;s workshop). <br><meta charset="utf-8"><meta charset="utf-8"><strong>First featured:</strong> <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-74-24-november-2020-12604#three-four" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 74, Item 3.4</a>.<br><strong>Website links:</strong>&nbsp;<meta charset="utf-8"><a href="https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfOH5WTZmCUYJgo6wp_23PsSENBJy2n-ofMg1IkhVoC1Xlbpw/viewform" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Malls Mire survey</a>.<br><meta charset="utf-8"><strong>Deadline:</strong>&nbsp;No obvious deadline. </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-twelve">1.12: Drumchapel Local Development Framework</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="328" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Drumchapel-map-screenshot_1200px.jpeg?resize=525%2C328&#038;ssl=1" alt="Drumchapel Commonplace map" class="wp-image-16371" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Drumchapel-map-screenshot_1200px.jpeg?resize=600%2C375&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Drumchapel-map-screenshot_1200px.jpeg?resize=300%2C188&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Drumchapel-map-screenshot_1200px.jpeg?w=1200&amp;ssl=1 1200w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Drumchapel-map-screenshot_1200px.jpeg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Drumchapel&#8217;s Commonplace map</figcaption></figure>



<p><strong><meta charset="utf-8"><strong>Council:</strong>&nbsp;</strong>Glasgow City.<br><meta charset="utf-8"><strong>Subject:</strong>&nbsp;The latest framework consultation, following previous strategic ones for Glasgow North, &#8216;Inner East&#8217;, etc. According to GCC: <em>&#8220;The purpose of the Drumchapel Local Development Framework will be to provide a structure for future development in the area. It will act as an overarching framework to identify urban planning priorities for Drumchapel and to help take them forward.&#8221;</em><br><meta charset="utf-8"><strong>Website links:</strong> <a href="https://drumchapelldf.commonplace.is/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Drumchapel Commonplace map</a>, <a href="https://survey123.arcgis.com/share/d7a453bccecf41eca2c1c0c83338ca33" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Drumchapel survey link</a> and <a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/drumchapelldf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">background</a>.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-thirteen">1.13: Raeberry St Quietway (Connecting Woodside)</h4>



<p><strong>Council:</strong>&nbsp;Glasgow City.<br><strong>Area:</strong>&nbsp;Raeberry St, North Woodside (west of Maryhill Rd).<br><strong>Subject:</strong>&nbsp;Part of Connecting Woodside with junction redesigns at either end of the street and new secure cycle parking. The Maryhill Rd end is narrowed and the crossing moved to make a direct link to Trossachs St (towards Garscube Rd and the canal). Car parking bays are set by the new North Kelvinside/Woodside <abbr title="Restricted Parking Zone">RPZ</abbr>.<br><strong><meta charset="utf-8"><strong>First featured:</strong></strong>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-99-11-november-2021-15879#one-twelve" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 99, Item 1.12</a>.<br><strong>Website links:</strong>&nbsp;<a href="https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/07a9a74755c14c258f8325c283bcbbd7" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Raeberry St Quietway ‘storymap’</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.dropbox.com/s/gih6bo8l2oc9zzb/32_5155_06_04_001-003%20Raeberry%20Prelim%20Design_REVA.pdf?dl=0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Raeberry St plans PDF</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://arcg.is/uyqja" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Raeberry St survey</a>.<br><strong>Deadline:</strong>&nbsp;No obvious deadline.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-fourteen">1.14:&nbsp;Helensburgh to Garelochhead active travel route</h4>



<p><strong>Council:</strong>&nbsp;Argyll and Bute.<br><strong>Area:</strong>&nbsp;Gare Loch east shore (A814/B872).<br><strong>Subject:</strong>&nbsp;Active travel route between Helensburgh and Garelochhead (by Faslane naval base).<br><strong><meta charset="utf-8"><strong>First featured</strong>:</strong>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-95-16-september-2021-15465#one-five" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 95, Item 1.5</a>.<br><strong>Website link:</strong>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.helensburgh-garelochhead.info/view-designs" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Helensburgh to Garelochhead active travel consultation</a>.<br><strong>Deadline:</strong>&nbsp;No obvious deadline.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 2:&nbsp;Consultation Feedback</strong></h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="two-one">2.1: Carmunnock Road (Service Road) TRO</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="242" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Carmunnock-Road-view.png?resize=525%2C242&#038;ssl=1" alt="Carmunnock Rd service road" class="wp-image-9862" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Carmunnock-Road-view.png?resize=600%2C277&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Carmunnock-Road-view.png?resize=300%2C139&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Carmunnock-Road-view.png?w=1366&amp;ssl=1 1366w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Carmunnock-Road-view.png?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /></figure>



<p><meta charset="utf-8"><strong>Council:</strong>&nbsp;Glasgow City.<br><strong>Area:</strong>&nbsp;<meta charset="utf-8">Carmunnock Road, south-west Glasgow.<br><meta charset="utf-8"><strong>Subject:</strong>&nbsp;A seriously delayed response to GoBike member Tricia&#8217;s objection to the one-way streets in this traffic order (from early 2020!). GCC say: <br><em>&#8220;I refer to your objection to the above named Traffic Regulation Order and can advise that your objection was reported and considered. However, the Council have decided under its scheme of delegated functions to proceed with the proposal as advertised.The Order was made on 8 December 2021 and an advert will be placed in the Glasgow Times on 14 December 2021 stating that the Traffic Regulation Order has been made.I realise that this may not be the outcome you wished for, however, in terms of road safety, there was insufficient road width at this location to propose contra-flow cycling. Contra-flow cycling is being developed through the current strategies being produced but unfortunately we could not provide it in this instance.&#8221;</em><br><meta charset="utf-8"><strong><strong>First featured:</strong></strong>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-52-21-january-2020-byres-road-back-in-the-news-plus-glasgow-takes-an-alphabetical-approach-to-traffic-calming-9795" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 52, Item 1.10</a>.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="two-two">2.2: FOI response on Dennistoun and London Rd SfP projects (GCC) </h4>



<p><strong>Council:</strong>&nbsp;Glasgow City.<br><strong>Area:</strong>&nbsp;&#8216;The Drives&#8217;, Dennistoun and London Rd at Celtic Park/Emirates.<br><strong>Subject:</strong>&nbsp;GoBike member Brenda put in a Freedom of Information request to the council about the following: <br><em>&#8220;Copies of the police advice provided to Glasgow City Council which led to:<br>1. The removal between December 2020 and April 2021 of the exemptions for cycling (introduced under Spaces for People) at No Entry signs for streets in Dennistoun including Armadale Street, Craiglea Street, Meadowpark Street, Marne Street, Ingleby Drive, Whitehill Street and Craigpark.<br>2. The removal of the light segregation along the London Road Spaces for People cycle lane at Parkhead.&#8221;</em><br>GCC response is attached, below. They say they don&#8217;t have any records to answer Q2. For Q1, an email is attached listing police concerns. Ironically, the police don&#8217;t offer any real evidence to back up their opinions. So, it&#8217;s still not clear why GCC can&#8217;t do something that South Lanarkshire Council have recently done in East Kilbride (see above).<br><meta charset="utf-8"><strong><strong>First featured:</strong></strong>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-76-22-december-2020-12834#three-one" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 76, Item 3.1</a> (Dennistoun SfP).<br><meta charset="utf-8"><strong>Website links:</strong> <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/GCC_FOI-response-SfP_LTN_Ldn-Rd.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GCC response on Dennistoun LTN/London Rd</a> and <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/GCC_FOI-SfP_LTN_PolAdv.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Police Scotland comments about contraflow cycling in Dennistoun</a>.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="two-three">2.3: Glasgow City Network</h4>



<p><meta charset="utf-8"><meta charset="utf-8"><strong>Council:</strong>&nbsp;Glasgow City.<br><meta charset="utf-8"><strong>Subject:</strong>&nbsp;A wee bit of feedback from GCC in response to a comment on the <a href="https://glasgowcitynetwork.commonplace.is/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Glasgow City Network Commonplace map</a>: <em>&#8220;…in this plan the Sustainable Transport Corridors would have segregated cycling. These corridors will also need to deliver significant improvements to public transport through the Bus Partnership Fund and the wider activities of the Glasgow Bus Partnership. This is why we have highlighted them compared with the rest of the City Network.&#8221;</em><br><strong><meta charset="utf-8"><strong>First featured:</strong></strong>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-93-17-august-2021-14883#three-one" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 93, Item 3.1</a>.<br><strong>Website link:</strong> <a href="https://glasgowcitynetwork.commonplace.is/comments/6169297423c4dcc95873ad55" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GCC response about &#8216;Sustainable Transport Corridors&#8217;</a>.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="two-four">2.4:&nbsp;Motherwell train station works</h4>



<p><meta charset="utf-8"><strong>Council:</strong>&nbsp;North Lanarkshire.<br><strong>Area:</strong>&nbsp;<meta charset="utf-8">Motherwell train station and A721<br><strong>Subject:</strong> An update on progress on the planning application last seen in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-92-3-august-2021-14734#three-one" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 92, 3.1</a>. It&#8217;s been approved and work is scheduled for early 2022. The new bit of road from the roundabout won&#8217;t have a cycleway but should at least improve access. The redevelopment of the station itself is ongoing. <br><meta charset="utf-8"><strong><strong>First featured:</strong></strong>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-61-26-may-2020-11310" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 61, Item 1.1</a>.<br><strong>Website link:</strong> <a href="https://www.northlanarkshire.gov.uk/regeneration-and-investment/glasgow-city-region-city-deal/pan-lanarkshire-orbital-transport-corridor/motherwell-town-centre-and-rail-station" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Motherwell town centre and rail station</a>.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="two-five">2.5: East Renfrewshire Local Development Plan 2 adoption</h4>



<p><meta charset="utf-8"><strong>Council:</strong>&nbsp;East Renfrewshire.<br><strong>Subject:</strong>&nbsp;The home straight in the marathon process for East Ren&#8217;s new Local Development Plan. It&#8217;s already been consulted on and submitted to the Scottish Government. Their Reporter has made recommendations, which ERC accepted. The modified plan was submitted to Scottish Ministers on 16 December. If there are no further changes it will be adopted by ERC. <br><meta charset="utf-8"><strong><meta charset="utf-8"><strong>First featured:</strong></strong>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-47-12-november-2019-good-news-and-bad-news-from-glasgow-city-council-9355" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 47, Item 1.5</a> (response: <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-49-10-december-2019-highest-number-yet-of-current-consultations-and-surveys-with-one-closing-at-5pm-today-time-for-a-tea-break-9512" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 49, 1.3</a>).<br><strong>Website link:</strong> <a href="https://www.eastrenfrewshire.gov.uk/ldp2" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">East Renfrewshire LDP2 page</a>.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="two-six">2.6:&nbsp;Make Your Way Key Links: Douglas–NCN74 (A70)</h4>



<p><meta charset="utf-8"><strong>Organisation:</strong>&nbsp;Community Action Lanarkshire.<br><strong>Area:</strong>&nbsp;Rural South Lanarkshire – Ayr Rd/A70 from Douglas to NCN74.<br><meta charset="utf-8"><strong>Subject:</strong>&nbsp;A project which was in the process of applying for Places for Everyone funding – sadly, not all have been selected. Sustrans say: <em>&#8220;Whilst the value of the Douglas to NCN route was acknowledged by the Panel, it was thought that this route was less well suited to the Places for Everyone programme than the Leadhills[–Wanlockhead] route, primarily as it was felt this route provided less opportunities for everyday journeys and would therefore have less impact on modal shift.&#8221;</em> <br>Sarah O&#8217;Sullivan (Project Officer, Active Travel) mentions in her email: <em>&#8220;how competitive the funding for Places for Everyone has become recently</em>&#8220;. Also: <em>&#8220;I am hopeful that other funding will be available to complete the path, if not to the strict Cycle By Design criteria, as required by the Places for Everyone funding, and have already discussed this with SLC [South Lanarkshire Council]&#8221;</em>. <br><meta charset="utf-8"><meta charset="utf-8"><strong><meta charset="utf-8"><strong>First featured:</strong></strong>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-75-8-december-2020-12699#one-three" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 75, Item 1.3</a>.<br><strong>Website link:</strong> <a href="https://www.communityactionlan.org/news-hub/item/sustainable-travel-action-plans" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sustainable Active Travel plans (includes Douglas and Leadhills)</a>.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="two-seven">2.7: Malls Mire Newsletter</h4>



<p><meta charset="utf-8"><strong>Organisation:</strong>&nbsp;Urban Roots.<br><strong>Subject:</strong>&nbsp;As above, a new woodland park that&#8217;s been created over the last year or so. This is the final Malls Mire newsletter about completed works and ongoing projects. It&#8217;s been nice to hear about developments and then see some of the completed site. For anyone who hasn&#8217;t made it there yet, <a href="https://goo.gl/maps/8K6v1HHbvU9V1aZ38" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">bits of Malls Mire have started to pop up on StreetView</a>. Thanks to Dr Gemma Jennings and the team for all their hard work and for keeping us updated.<br><meta charset="utf-8"><strong><meta charset="utf-8"><strong>First featured:</strong></strong>&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-74-24-november-2020-12604#three-four" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 74, Item 3.4</a>.<br><meta charset="utf-8"><strong>Website link:</strong> <a href="http://www.clydegateway.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Malls-Mire-Newsletter-December-2021-3_compressed.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Malls Mire Newsletter December 2021</a>.</p>



<p>Take care and hope you can still have a Merry Christmas and a Guid New Year.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="aligncenter size-full"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="204" height="131" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/holly-bike-icon.png?resize=204%2C131&#038;ssl=1" alt="Holly-bike icon" class="wp-image-16385"/></figure></div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-102-23-december-2021-16327/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">16327</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consultation Digest (Local) Issue 94, 31 August 2021</title>
		<link>https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-94-31-august-2021-15016</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Y]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2021 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Consultation digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoBike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auldhouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ayr Road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bellshill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[car parking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[city centre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COP26]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cycle parking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Dunbartonshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Renfrewshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gartnavel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glasgow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inner East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ldp2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LEZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London Rd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHS GG&C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Lanarkshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renfrewshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royston Rd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spaces for people]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustrans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TRNSMT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Woodside]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gobike.org/?p=15016</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Consultations baton change. As the 2020 Paralympics take place in Tokyo, how is Glasgow looking towards its own global event: COP26? Currently, the city council has a new, short notice consultation about suspending public access rights. You may have seen GoBike banners on the subject or media coverage of support from Scotland&#8217;s new Active Travel &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-94-31-august-2021-15016" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Consultation Digest (Local) Issue 94, 31 August 2021"</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Consultations baton change.</h2>



<p>As the 2020 Paralympics take place in Tokyo, how is Glasgow looking towards its own global event: COP26? Currently, the city council has a new, short notice consultation about suspending public access rights. You may have seen GoBike banners on the subject or media coverage of support from Scotland&#8217;s new Active Travel minister – Green MSP, Patrick Harvie. It&#8217;s also a last call for the survey on Glasgow&#8217;s Low Emission Zone.  </p>



<p>It&#8217;s a final fling for a handful of consultations around Glasgow (and one in Renfrewshire). There&#8217;s a bit longer for a few others –&nbsp;a new survey on secure cycle parking in the city centre and the last leg of East Dunbartonshire&#8217;s Active Travel Discussion. </p>



<span id="more-15016"></span>



<p>Your author is also going on holiday so the next Digest may or may not be in its usual slot or by its usual writer…</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="block-2e87f9c2-a8af-4262-bff7-8842c5412bae"><strong>Contents</strong><br>(new consultations in&nbsp;<strong>bold</strong>&nbsp;– link jumps to article)</h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 1: Current Consultations</h4>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li><span style="font-size: 1rem;"><a href="#one-one">Glasgow City Council – Low Emission Zone consultation</a> (ends 2 Sep)</span></li><li><strong><a href="#one-two">Glasgow City Council – COP 26 Section 11 Order: Suspension of Public Access Rights</a> (ends 3 Sep)</strong></li><li><a href="#one-three">Rosemount Development Trust – Royston Road Masterplan</a> (ends 3 Sep)</li><li><a href="#one-four">Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;Inner East Strategic Development Framework</a> (ends 3 Sep)</li><li><a href="#one-five">Renfrewshire Council –&nbsp;Improving Barshaw Park Junction, Paisley</a> (ends 5 Sep)</li><li><strong><a href="#one-six">Queens Cross Housing Association –&nbsp;Woodside Making Places:&nbsp;Planning Application</a></strong> <strong>(deadline: 6 Sep)</strong></li><li><strong><a href="#one-seven">NHS Greater Glasgow &amp; Clyde/Sustrans –&nbsp;Gartnavel Active Travel Feasibility Study</a> (<strong>ends 10 Sep)</strong></strong></li><li><a href="#one-eight">East Renfrewshire Council –&nbsp;Ayr Road (A77): Spaces for People, Phase 2</a></li><li><a href="#one-nine">East Dunbartonshire Council – Active Travel Discussion</a>&nbsp;(ends 28 Sep)</li><li><strong><a href="#one-ten">Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;Secure City Cycle Parking Survey</a> (ends 3 Oct)</strong></li></ol>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations</h4>



<p>None this time.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 3: Consultation Feedback</h4>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li><a href="#three-one">Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;TRNSMT Festival and Access to NCN75</a></li><li><a href="#three-two">North Lanarkshire Council – Bellshill Gateway &amp; Cycle Facilities project</a></li><li><strong><a href="#three-three">Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;London Rd Spaces for People lanes at Celtic Park</a></strong></li><li><strong><a href="#three-four">East Renfrewshire Council – Proposed Local Development Plan 2</a></strong></li><li><a href="#three-five">Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;Auldhouse Area Traffic Management Order</a></li></ol>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="block-cc85ef75-cc87-4a82-a726-8f744aa66a48"><strong>Section 1: Current Consultations<br></strong>(in date order for responses)</h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-one">1.1: Glasgow City Council – Low Emission Zone consultation </h4>



<p>It was&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-90-6-july-2021-14538#one-three" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 90, Item 1.3</a>&nbsp;when we first mentioned this consultation about phase 2 of the Low Emission Zone in Glasgow city centre. Phase 1 applied to local buses only.&nbsp;Phase 2&nbsp;will include all motor vehicles driven into the zone area between the M8, river and High St (unless exempt, like Blue Badge holders). </p>



<p>The LEZ area is smaller than the <a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=32491&amp;p=0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">City Centre Air Quality Management area</a>, which includes the M8 and parts of Bridge St and Royston Rd. There are only two other AQMAs in Glasgow – Byres Rd/Dumbarton Rd and Parkhead Cross –&nbsp;since the city-wide AQMA was <a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=36923&amp;p=0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">revoked in 2016</a>. Further background is on <a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/index.aspx?articleid=18863" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Glasgow&#8217;s Local Air Quality Management pages</a>.</p>



<p>The area the LEZ covers is one of the questions asked in the survey. Enforcement is another –&nbsp;it&#8217;s only due to start in June 2023 (or 2024 for people who live in the city centre). </p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="340" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Glasgow-LEZ-area_1200px.jpg?resize=525%2C340&#038;ssl=1" alt="Glasgow LEZ area map" class="wp-image-14684" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Glasgow-LEZ-area_1200px.jpg?resize=600%2C388&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Glasgow-LEZ-area_1200px.jpg?resize=300%2C194&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Glasgow-LEZ-area_1200px.jpg?w=1200&amp;ssl=1 1200w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Glasgow-LEZ-area_1200px.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>The Glasgow LEZ area –&nbsp;detail overload (maybe better maps would help response rates?)</figcaption></figure>



<p>When enforcement does start, fines will escalate for repeat offences (doubling each time within a 90 day period). </p>



<p>The city council have sent GoBike a few reminder emails about this one, which suggests they&#8217;re not getting the level of response they were looking for. If you want to influence the shape of the zone (literally) or when it kicks in, see the&nbsp;<a href="https://glasgow.gov.uk/27143" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Glasgow LEZ consultation page</a>, <a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=53713&amp;p=0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">LEZ consultation document</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.smartsurvey.co.uk/s/GCC_LEZ2021/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">LEZ online survey</a>. Closes on Thursday <strong>2 September</strong>.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-two">1.2: Glasgow City Council – COP 26 Section 11 Order: Suspension of Public Access Rights</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="394" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/GB-COP26-banner-GlaGrn_1398_1200px.jpg?resize=525%2C394&#038;ssl=1" alt="GoBike paths petition banner on NCN7, one of the routes affected" class="wp-image-15119" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/GB-COP26-banner-GlaGrn_1398_1200px.jpg?resize=600%2C450&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/GB-COP26-banner-GlaGrn_1398_1200px.jpg?resize=300%2C225&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/GB-COP26-banner-GlaGrn_1398_1200px.jpg?w=1200&amp;ssl=1 1200w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/GB-COP26-banner-GlaGrn_1398_1200px.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption><em>GoBike put up banners about our path closures petition – this one is on NCN75 at Glasgow Gree</em>n <em>(photo &amp; banner design: </em><a href="https://dashedlines.uk/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Dashed Lines</a><em>, illustrations: </em><a href="https://twitter.com/Flood_Jo" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Josephine Flood</a><em>)</em></figcaption></figure>



<p>This is about main active travel routes being closed during October/November around the COP26 climate conference at the SEC. The &#8216;exclusion zone&#8217; would cover a large area from Ferry Rd to Finnieston St and bridges in Anderston. The cycling diversions will be much longer and less safe than the parts of NCN7 and the West City Way that they replace.  <a href="https://www.gobike.org/petition-to-keep-active-travel-routes-open-during-cop26-14721" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GoBike started a petition about keeping routes open</a> (for Glasgow residents only). We also proposed changes to the council&#8217;s plans. </p>



<p>See <a href="https://www.gobike.org/active-travel-lanes-needed-in-face-of-cop26-route-closures-15003" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">our blog about the closures</a> for more in-depth information and our social media for updates. <a href="https://www.glasgowconsult.co.uk/KMS/dmart.aspx?strTab=PublicDMartCurrent&amp;NoIP=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GCC access rights consultation</a> ends Friday <strong>3 September</strong>. </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-three">1.3: Rosemount Development Trust – Royston Road Masterplan </h4>



<p>This debuted last time in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-93-17-august-2021-14883#one-five" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 93, 1.5</a>. It&#8217;s about regenerating the western part of Royston Rd. It&#8217;s a part of the <a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=32491&amp;p=0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">City Centre AQMA</a> but not in the LEZ. That doesn&#8217;t seem to be mentioned while speeding, litter and other issues are. Equally, the project phases outlined in board 6 don&#8217;t include cycling at all. Surely it has to be part of the solution, especially with On Bikes&#8217; <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-92-3-august-2021-14734#one-two" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Flourishing Molendinar project</a> (Digest 92, Item 1.2) just up the same road? This Royston Rd project and theirs both need safe active travel connections to the city centre and Sighthill. </p>



<p>If you know the area at all, please put the case for cycling infrastructure. See the&nbsp;<a href="https://forms.office.com/pages/responsepage.aspx?id=gUi6qJGtYkqwntSr9e8xsVoOG-pfsYdGh_JLYOVG80NUOTIxMDRGRks4NzFST1NISENNM0swWDlERS4u" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Royston regeneration survey</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://photos.google.com/share/AF1QipOfRSa4KS5dZywsZU2SI2H2eQLXiFhjUYEOh9XN0w4F0amGWNRcWcbZj7pkJhguYg?key=OVdfZjZ4Zmp3dVV3OU1NMXJWa2tRQURaTVN1MkRB" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">information boards</a>&nbsp;(ends&nbsp;Friday <strong>3 September</strong>).</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-four">1.4: Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;Inner East Strategic Development Framework </h4>



<p>Another SDF (and another <a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=32493&amp;p=0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">AQMA –&nbsp;Parkhead Cross</a>) first covered in in&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-90-6-july-2021-14538#one-four" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 90, Item 1.4</a>. &#8216;Inner East&#8217; is an arbitrary area made up by the council, who&#8217;ve decided Parkhead is the main place East Enders want to get to. While the Forge Shopping Centre is important for many, there&#8217;s an assumption here that all roads lead to Parkhead (including phase 3 of the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glasgow_East_End_Regeneration_Route" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">East End Regeneration Route dual carriageway</a>). A train station for Parkhead gets a few mentions but that&#8217;s what the&nbsp;<a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20121004082411/http://www.glasgow.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/AF0E7C52-1258-4BF4-A435-B79A81501DB4/0/EELDS.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">East End Local Development Strategy</a>&nbsp;said back in 2008. Active travel is mentioned a lot but road-building still seems to be central.</p>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="alignright size-medium"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="298" height="300" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Inner-East_Bridgeton-error_ScreenShot-2021_800px.jpg?resize=298%2C300&#038;ssl=1" alt="Bridgeton map with mistakes" class="wp-image-15407" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Inner-East_Bridgeton-error_ScreenShot-2021_800px.jpg?resize=298%2C300&amp;ssl=1 298w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Inner-East_Bridgeton-error_ScreenShot-2021_800px.jpg?resize=596%2C600&amp;ssl=1 596w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Inner-East_Bridgeton-error_ScreenShot-2021_800px.jpg?resize=150%2C150&amp;ssl=1 150w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Inner-East_Bridgeton-error_ScreenShot-2021_800px.jpg?resize=100%2C100&amp;ssl=1 100w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Inner-East_Bridgeton-error_ScreenShot-2021_800px.jpg?w=800&amp;ssl=1 800w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 298px) 100vw, 298px" /><figcaption>&#8216;Draft&#8217; Bridgeton map with Alexandra Parade and Duke St stations on it for some reason</figcaption></figure></div>



<p>There are many more assumptions (<em>&#8220;locals prefer to drive to the forge&#8221;</em>) and errors in this SDF. The maps seem rushed, especially the Bridgeton map with two wrong train stations superimposed on it. </p>



<p>On a more positive note, there are a few mentions of permeability. One is about the paths through the <a href="https://www.scottishconstructionnow.com/article/funding-boost-for-250-flat-project-at-glasgow-meatmarket" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Meatmarket site</a> (under construction at Duke St/Bellgrove St) and there are other examples not in the document, like <a href="https://www.riversidedalmarnock.co.uk/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Riverside Dalmarnock</a>. </p>



<p>The council talks up some recent developments by GCC and partners like Clyde Gateway, who have built a lot in the East End in the last decade or so (and do include <a href="https://goo.gl/maps/tHUFaakuP4C2ZzFC9" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">cycle parking in their developments</a>). However, people have to cycle through the car park of <a href="https://goo.gl/maps/F4soCrvaw9BMU7558" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Red Tree, Shawfield</a> as CG didn&#8217;t reconnect the path properly between NCN 756 and the <a href="https://goo.gl/maps/fNXdUHAvTs1ALcrT8" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Smartbridge</a> (despite being asked). GCC also missed an opportunity to add protected cycle lanes in its Calton-Barras Action Plan (CBAP). So, there are still lessons to be learned.   </p>



<p>See the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.glasgowconsult.co.uk/KMS/dmart.aspx?strTab=PublicDMartCurrent&amp;NoIP=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Inner East consultation page</a>&nbsp;for link to the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.smartsurvey.co.uk/s/GCC_SDF_InnerEast/">SDF survey</a>&nbsp;(ends <strong>3 September</strong>).</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-five">1.5: Renfrewshire Council –&nbsp;Improving Barshaw Park Junction, Paisley </h4>



<p>In <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-93-17-august-2021-14883#one-seven" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 93, 1.7</a> we mentioned the plans to improve safety for cycling at Barshaw Park junction. Option 3 had segregated cycle lanes on all roads, while options 1 and 2 only had them on the main road. There was some local hostility to the plans on Facebook  –&nbsp;while not surprising on that platform, the plans will need support to progress. </p>



<p>See the&nbsp;<a href="https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/4a8a2a5b5aff4fe991be7c159c8c0031" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Barshaw Park junction community survey</a>&nbsp;to rate the options&nbsp;(ends <strong>5 September</strong>). </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-six">1.6: Queens Cross Housing Association –&nbsp;Woodside Making Places:&nbsp;Planning Application</h4>



<p>Woodside Making Places is a wide-ranging project for the area around St George&#8217;s Rd and Braid Square, near Garscube Rd. The previous consultation was in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-79-2-february-2021-13147#one-four" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 79, Item 1.4</a> (and an earlier stage in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-65-21-july-2020-whats-happened-to-pavement-parking-proposals-approved-but-not-enacted-plus-a-request-to-contribute-to-the-streets-for-all-glasgow-commonplace-map-and-m-11719" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 65, 3.1</a>). This latest development wasn&#8217;t publicised much but was in a Glasgow Live article about <a href="https://www.glasgowlive.co.uk/news/glasgow-news/glasgows-woodside-transformed-under-regeneration-21267190" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Queens Cross Housing Association submitting a planning application</a>. </p>



<p>It&#8217;s <a href="https://publicaccess.glasgow.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&amp;keyVal=QW8PRNEXKGX00" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">application 21/02266/FUL</a> for &#8220;Renewal of public realm, gardens and greenspaces, including streets and lighting, with comprehensive green infrastructure improvements.&#8221; These include some playparks and a lot of tree planting. The most interesting part for GoBike is the &#8216;Quietway&#8217; cycle route in the <a href="https://publicaccess.glasgow.gov.uk/online-applications/files/D7DE60DF53BE1FA3A004BAE3E8BD1B16/pdf/21_02266_FUL-PHASE_1_-_WINDSOR_TERRACE_AND_N_WOODSIDE_ROAD__1.7___1.8_-4988852.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">plan for North Woodside Road</a>. </p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><a href="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/N_WOODSIDE_ROAD_21_02266_FUL-PHASE_1_1.7_1.8_-4988852_1500px.png?ssl=1"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="371" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/N_WOODSIDE_ROAD_21_02266_FUL-PHASE_1_1.7_1.8_-4988852_1500px.png?resize=525%2C371&#038;ssl=1" alt="N Woodside Rd plans, Woodside Making Places" class="wp-image-15019" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/N_WOODSIDE_ROAD_21_02266_FUL-PHASE_1_1.7_1.8_-4988852_1500px.png?resize=600%2C424&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/N_WOODSIDE_ROAD_21_02266_FUL-PHASE_1_1.7_1.8_-4988852_1500px.png?resize=300%2C212&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/N_WOODSIDE_ROAD_21_02266_FUL-PHASE_1_1.7_1.8_-4988852_1500px.png?w=1500&amp;ssl=1 1500w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/N_WOODSIDE_ROAD_21_02266_FUL-PHASE_1_1.7_1.8_-4988852_1500px.png?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /></a><figcaption>N Woodside Rd plans including red tarmac &#8216;Quietway&#8217; (click image to enlarge)</figcaption></figure>



<p>The red tarmac makes it look like a Dutch &#8216;bicycle street&#8217; (where bikes have priority and cars are &#8216;guests&#8217;). Whether or not it will work that way remains to be seen. However, N Woodside Rd is a residential street, which is already filtered to the west at the junction of Maryhill Rd and Hopehill Rd (as featured in <a href="http://N Woodside R" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 93, 3.3</a>).</p>



<p>N Woodside Rd&#8217;s eastern end will link to segregated cycle lanes on St George&#8217;s Rd, which are part of the Connecting Woodside Project (and lead to the protected junction at Garscube Rd). So, it should be an important link for the wider area. </p>



<p>There was also due to be an improved path south to Phoenix Rd and the planned &#8216;Underline&#8217; cycle route below the M8 between New City Road and Cambridge St. However, <a href="https://trafficscotland.org/tsgms02/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">M8 emergency repairs are underway on the Woodside Viaduct</a> so those Avenue works are being pushed back even further; potentially for a few years. </p>



<p>Deadline for any comments is <strong>6 Sep</strong>. See the <a href="https://www.woodsidemakingplaces.org.uk/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Woodside Making Places website</a> for more background about the project.  </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-seven">1.7: Sustrans –&nbsp;Gartnavel Active Travel Feasibility Study</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="256" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Gartnavel_proposal-1_1356px.jpg?resize=525%2C256&#038;ssl=1" alt="Illustration of proposed change to Gartnavel's north entrance gate" class="wp-image-15378" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Gartnavel_proposal-1_1356px.jpg?resize=600%2C292&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Gartnavel_proposal-1_1356px.jpg?resize=300%2C146&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Gartnavel_proposal-1_1356px.jpg?w=1356&amp;ssl=1 1356w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Gartnavel_proposal-1_1356px.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Illustration of proposed change to Gartnavel&#8217;s north entrance gate</figcaption></figure>



<p>This project first came up in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-60-12-may-2020-the-lockdown-goes-on-but-will-we-learn-from-it-11199" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 60, Item 3.3</a> and most recently in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-90-6-july-2021-14538#three-two" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 90, Item 3.2</a>. Several GoBike members know the area and engaged with early ideas for the site. A site visit took place in July, when GoBike member Caroline met with the design consultants, ERZ Studio. </p>



<p>The initial proposals from that process are now out for consultation:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>Three shared/side-by-side walking/cycling routes across the site.</li><li>Two new gates created in existing site wall.</li><li>Adjusting crossings at main road junctions.</li><li>Pedestrian precinct/plaza at main hospital buildings. </li><li>Improving access towards Hyndland train station.</li><li>Improving wayfinding signage. </li></ul>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><a href="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Gartnavel-proposals-overview_da5db839-fe94-4abb-fa61-8de61c6758ae.jpeg?ssl=1"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="404" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Gartnavel-proposals-overview_da5db839-fe94-4abb-fa61-8de61c6758ae.jpeg?resize=525%2C404&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-15379" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Gartnavel-proposals-overview_da5db839-fe94-4abb-fa61-8de61c6758ae.jpeg?resize=600%2C462&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Gartnavel-proposals-overview_da5db839-fe94-4abb-fa61-8de61c6758ae.jpeg?resize=300%2C231&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Gartnavel-proposals-overview_da5db839-fe94-4abb-fa61-8de61c6758ae.jpeg?resize=1536%2C1184&amp;ssl=1 1536w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Gartnavel-proposals-overview_da5db839-fe94-4abb-fa61-8de61c6758ae.jpeg?w=1600&amp;ssl=1 1600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Gartnavel-proposals-overview_da5db839-fe94-4abb-fa61-8de61c6758ae.jpeg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /></a><figcaption>Plan of proposed changes to Gartnavel site –&nbsp;click to enlarge</figcaption></figure>



<p>The new northern gate would be next to the existing exit road (as above). However, the proposed eastern gate would open up access from a new location east of the Beatson, through the current stone wall, to <a href="https://goo.gl/maps/17zpZxvVzV52CSqt7" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Hughenden Lane (where you can see the chimney near the </a><a href="https://goo.gl/maps/7HwntY2zLJWWe3tNA" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Beatson</a>).  This &#8216;Quietway&#8217; would be an alternative route between Hughenden and Crow Rd, avoiding the very busy Great Western Rd. While it meanders a bit, it should also link to the more direct Shelley Rd (to the north, alongside Bingham&#8217;s Pond). </p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="333" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Gartnavel_proposal-3_1356px.jpg?resize=525%2C333&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-15385" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Gartnavel_proposal-3_1356px.jpg?resize=600%2C381&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Gartnavel_proposal-3_1356px.jpg?resize=300%2C190&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Gartnavel_proposal-3_1356px.jpg?w=1356&amp;ssl=1 1356w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Gartnavel_proposal-3_1356px.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption><em>Illustration of proposed change to Gartnavel&#8217;s east wall to add a new entrance gate</em></figcaption></figure>



<p>The scope of the project seems to have grown slightly from NHS-owned land to include crossings but not cycleways on the main roads themselves, like Gt Western Rd. Instead, the consultants asked about routes between NHS sites, like Gartnavel and the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital. One query was about a route via the soon-to-be-built Partick–Govan bridge to the QEUH; a mile longer than using the Clyde Tunnel (but might have <a href="https://twitter.com/GoBikeGlasgow/status/1426172744362770438?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">less closures</a>?). </p>



<p>For now, see the <a href="https://www.surveylegend.com/survey/-MgGNrB1yqAUtgvcIySF" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Gartnavel survey</a> –&nbsp;ends <strong>10</strong> <strong>September</strong>.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-eight">1.8: East Renfrewshire Council –&nbsp;Ayr Road (A77): Spaces for People, Phase 2</h4>



<p>Covered in&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-91-20-july-2021-14629#one-five" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 91, Item 1.5</a>, Ayr Rd through Newton Mearns is in a phase 2 consultation. It’s about replacing the&nbsp;<a href="https://erspacesforpeople.commonplace.is/proposals/a-77-ayr-road-pop-up-bike-roll-corridor" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">phase 1 cones</a>&nbsp;with light segregation, removing some segregation and adding parking bays. For examples of the segregation, maps and more details, see the&nbsp;<a href="https://erspacesforpeople.commonplace.is/proposals/a-77-ayr-road-phase-2" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ayr Road Phase 2 Commonplace page</a>. No obvious deadline on this one (but still seems to be open).</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-nine">1.9: East Dunbartonshire Council – Active Travel Discussion&nbsp;</h4>



<p>What can we say about the EDC Active Travel Discussion that hasn&#8217;t already been said? There are two more online events left. See the <a href="https://www.eastdunbarton.gov.uk/active-travel-discussion" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Active Travel Discussion page</a> –&nbsp;ends <strong>28 September</strong>.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-ten">1.10: Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;Secure City Cycle Parking Survey</h4>



<p>Back in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-88-8-june-2021-14260" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 88</a>, in the Infra Update, we mentioned how <a href="https://twitter.com/glasgowcc/status/1394325647934230528?lang=en-gb" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GCC&#8217;s tweet about neighbourhood secure cycle parking drew comments about it missing out the city centre</a>. </p>



<p>Recently, the council launched a survey about <em>&#8220;secure cycle parking in the city centre at travel hubs and places of employment.&#8221;</em> They want to find out the following:</p>



<p><em> &#8220;a greater understanding of travel patterns, frequency of travel, and what type of provision would appeal to those who require to park their bicycle in the city.<br><br>The survey is anonymous and will take approximately 10 minutes to complete.&#8221;</em></p>



<p>Cadogan St multi-storey car park used to have a bike parking area but it wasn&#8217;t the most welcoming place. Perhaps Glasgow could aim for <a href="https://road.cc/content/news/are-these-uks-best-facilities-bike-commuters-283629" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">facilities like this office development in</a><a href="https://road.cc/content/news/are-these-uks-best-facilities-bike-commuters-283629" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> Bristol</a> or <a href="https://activetravel.tfgm.com/cycling/cycle-parking/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Manchester&#8217;s Cycle Hubs</a>.</p>



<p>Considering the spate of bike thefts across the city during the pandemic, this seems like a good chance to ask for more secure bike parking. See the <a href="https://www.glasgowconsult.co.uk/KMS/dmart.aspx?strTab=PublicDMartCurrent&amp;NoIP=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GCC city centre cycle parking consultation page</a> and <a href="https://www.smartsurvey.co.uk/s/GCC_SecureCycleParking/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">cycle parking survey</a> – ends <strong>3 October</strong>.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations</strong></h3>



<p>None this time.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 3:</strong>&nbsp;<strong>Consultation Feedback</strong></h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-one">3.1: Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;TRNSMT Festival and Access to NCN75</h4>



<p>In <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-93-17-august-2021-14883#three-four" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 93, Item 3.4</a> we featured an email from GCC about the closure of NCN75 during the upcoming music festival. GoBike convenor <a href="https://twitter.com/UrbanistTOC/status/1425781257183666179?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Thomas tweeted about issues with the diversion route</a> and replied to the council&#8217;s email. A further response from GCC sounds more constructive than before:</p>



<p><em>&#8220;To advise we are working to improve wherever possible the diversion route… which would hopefully make this route not only a suitable diversion for Major Events within Glasgow Green but also an optional route on a day to day basis.&#8221;</em></p>



<p>The council also wanted to organise a meeting between GoBike and council officers. They said: <em>&#8220;we can walk the route highlighting where we will be making improvements&#8221;. </em>Also, they would: <em>&#8220;allow you an opportunity to speak directly with those planning/managing any works.&#8221;</em> We wait to see the improvements but this <a href="https://twitter.com/SmacKk_/status/1431249899132182529?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">new ramp was spotted on the route</a>.</p>



<p>Lastly, GCC will <em>&#8220;consider a short term working group to hopefully give an opportunity to facilitate improved joint working for the longer term solution to this particular challenge.&#8221;</em></p>



<p>Thomas will set up the meeting shortly and we hope to have further news. </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-two">3.2: North Lanarkshire Council – Bellshill Gateway &amp; Cycle Facilities project</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="394" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Bellshill-Orbiston-St-path_1561-1000px.jpg?resize=525%2C394&#038;ssl=1" alt="Shared use path at Orbiston Rd, Bellshill" class="wp-image-15365" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Bellshill-Orbiston-St-path_1561-1000px.jpg?resize=600%2C450&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Bellshill-Orbiston-St-path_1561-1000px.jpg?resize=300%2C225&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Bellshill-Orbiston-St-path_1561-1000px.jpg?w=1000&amp;ssl=1 1000w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Path into the proposed Velo Park site from Orbiston Rd, Bellshill</figcaption></figure>



<p>In <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-92-3-august-2021-14734#one-nine" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 92, Item 1.9</a> we featured initial plans for a proposed Velo Park and enhanced entrance to Strathclyde Country Park from Bellshill. A GoBike member was at a recent meeting between local groups and council staff. They&#8217;re from NLC&#8217;s new Greenspace Projects team, which will have responsibility for &#8216;Country Parks for the Future&#8217; initiatives at Strathclyde Park (as well as Drumpellier Park in Coatbridge and Palacerigg Park, near Cumbernauld). </p>



<p>The officer clarified a few points, including that the planned mountain bike trails would only be in the north-east of the site. The paths around the South Calder Water would form a loop for walking and cycling as a local exercise route. </p>



<p>The team are looking at a few other issues like the underused hire bikes at the Watersports Centre (including some adapted bikes). Also, a potential cycle hub near Motherwell train station (perhaps in a building nearby). </p>



<p>A bid is due to go in to Sport Scotland by the end of August. </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-three">3.3: Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;London Rd Spaces for People lanes at Celtic Park</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="349" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/London-Rd-paint-Iona.jpeg?resize=525%2C349&#038;ssl=1" alt="'Paint is not protection' stencilled on London Rd, Glasgow" class="wp-image-15374" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/London-Rd-paint-Iona.jpeg?resize=600%2C399&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/London-Rd-paint-Iona.jpeg?resize=300%2C200&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/London-Rd-paint-Iona.jpeg?w=810&amp;ssl=1 810w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Paint is not Protection stencil on London Rd where &#8216;soft&#8217; segregation was removed</figcaption></figure>



<p>In <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-90-6-july-2021-14538#three-one" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 90, Item 3.1</a>, we covered the removal of the temporary &#8216;zebras&#8217;/&#8217;armadillos&#8217; on London Rd outside Celtic Park and the Emirates. As well as contacting the council, some <a href="https://www.glasgowlive.co.uk/news/removal-cycle-lane-bumps-celtic-21009807" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GoBike members put our message on London Rd itself</a>.</p>



<p>GCC have taken a while to respond, perhaps because they had homework to do –&nbsp;according to their response… </p>



<p><em>&#8220;a survey of many similar sports facilities around the UK was undertaken and no examples of cycle segregation directly outside these facilities was found. Those that did have cycle facilities had a painted line only. GCC has improved on that by installing a ridged line to provide an audio and visual warning to drivers.</em></p>



<p><em>The Department explored alternative options including traffic delineator wands, such as those used on Great Western Road and a combination wand / armadillo design as currently used in Edinburgh City Centre. However, both of these also resulted in significant risk and possible increased risk in the case of the traffic delineator wand.</em>&#8220;</p>



<p>The <a href="https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/people-tripping-cycle-lane-cardiff-21238326" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">&#8216;combination design&#8217; became a trip hazard on a high street in Cardiff</a>. However, the above seems to rule out a &#8216;traffic delineator wand&#8217; (temporary bollard) because it <em>might</em> be a risk. </p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Circumstantial evidence?</h5>



<p>Several GoBike members were sceptical of the reasons given about &#8216;armadillos&#8217; being a trip hazard. The council&#8217;s response says it depends on the circumstances:</p>



<p><em>&#8220;<em>We do not consider that in normal circumstances armadillos represent a high risk trip hazard. However,… mass evacuation… (of)</em> almost 60,000 individuals… would result in a tightly knit, panicked and distressed crowd. Under these circumstances, there would be little visibility of the armadillos and there is a significant concern of serious injury or fatality due to trips / falls and subsequent crush injury.&#8221;</em> </p>



<p>There was a <a href="https://www.glasgowlive.co.uk/news/glasgow-news/celtic-hold-independent-review-derby-15125746" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">crush outside Celtic Park in 2018</a>, where a few fans were injured. However, it was at the confined Janefield St side of the stadium, not the open London Rd side.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="297" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Celtic-Way-ScreenShot-Oct-2020.jpg?resize=525%2C297&#038;ssl=1" alt="StreetView of Celtic Park, London Rd in October 2020" class="wp-image-15371" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Celtic-Way-ScreenShot-Oct-2020.jpg?resize=600%2C339&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Celtic-Way-ScreenShot-Oct-2020.jpg?resize=300%2C170&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Celtic-Way-ScreenShot-Oct-2020.jpg?w=1000&amp;ssl=1 1000w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>View of Celtic Park from London Rd, October 2020. Which is the greater risk – &#8216;armadillos&#8217; or bollards?</figcaption></figure>



<p>Apparently, the decision to remove was: <em>&#8220;assessed in conjunction with advice from Police Scotland but no formal record has been kept&#8221;.</em> There was no Equalities Impact Assessment<em> &#8220;as this process is not appropriate for this type of alteration. None of the protected characteristics as outlined in the Equalities Act are negatively affect by the alterations.&#8221;</em></p>



<p>GCC talk about policy then make an interesting statement. <em>&#8220;<em>Designers have a duty under Construction Design and Management regulations to design out risk wherever possible.</em>&#8220;</em></p>



<p>Lastly, they turn from the temporary Spaces for People project to mention the permanent East City Way route on London Rd. <em>&#8220;We note your comment about the new East City Way and can confirm that the SFP project officers have discussed these issues with the East City Way officer with a view to designing out the risk as far as reasonably possible within the long term plans.&#8221;</em> So, that seems to depends on the circumstances as well. </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-four">3.4: East Renfrewshire Council – Proposed Local Development Plan 2</h4>



<p>We covered East Ren&#8217;s proposed Local Development Plan 2 in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-47-12-november-2019-good-news-and-bad-news-from-glasgow-city-council-9355" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 47</a>, Item 1.4 in late 2019. It was submitted to the Scottish Government for its Reporters to consider in their <a href="///Users/nhsl-graphics/Downloads/780253%20(1).pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">435-page report</a>! It contains several mentions of GoBike, and our convenor Thomas (with his surname spelled correctly most of the time!). </p>



<p>One of these mentions – &#8216;(e) Schedule 6: Proposal D8.13: Netherlee to Giffnock&#8217; – was about a potential feasibility study for a footbridge across the railway at Gordon Dr. The report shows there were two people in favour and 19 against so the proposal has been dropped (and will not be in any of their back yards). However, other measures GoBike supported will be included. The <a href="///Users/nhsl-graphics/Downloads/780247.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">22-page recommendation document</a> details the text changes ahead of publication. </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-five">3.5: Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;Auldhouse Area Traffic Management Order</h4>



<p>These measures for Auldhouse, in the Southside, appeared in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-92-3-august-2021-14734#one-eight" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 92, Item 1.8</a>. <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/GoBike-Auldhouse-Area-traffic-mgt-response-040821-1.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GoBike&#8217;s response</a> made points about one-way streets and potential for contraflow cycling. The council sent a fairly predictable reply:</p>



<p><em>&#8220;…given the narrow carriageway widths and short lengths of carriageway within this self-contained residential area, contraflow cycle lanes were not deemed feasible. Unfortunately, I can therefore advise that cyclists will also be subject to the one way operations.&#8221;</em></p>



<p>GCC&#8217;s email goes on to say one-way streets will apparently &#8220;<em>enhance road safety for cyclists&#8221;.</em> Also: <em>&#8220;parking restrictions at road junctions will remove potential obstructions by vehicles at lowered kerbs which will assist pedestrians, wheelchair users and push chairs in crossing the road.&#8221;</em> There&#8217;s&nbsp;no mention of a joint decision with Police Scotland on enforcement. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">15016</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consultation Digest (Local) Issue 93, 17 August 2021</title>
		<link>https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-93-17-august-2021-14883</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Y]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2021 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Consultation digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoBike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[active travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auldhouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ayr Road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bellshill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Dunbartonshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Renfrewshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garnethill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glasgow city council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glasgow University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inner East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LEZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malls Mire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maryhill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCN75]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Lanarkshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renfrewshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royston Rd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TRNSMT]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gobike.org/?p=14883</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Consultations from around Glasgow. This Digest covers most points of the compass in Glasgow and neighbouring areas to the west, south and east. Quite a few local and national petitions have been launched recently so this Digest has an update on those (instead of infrastructure). Petitions Update GoBike –&#160;Keep our paths open for COP26 (Glasgow &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-93-17-august-2021-14883" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Consultation Digest (Local) Issue 93, 17 August 2021"</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Consultations from around Glasgow.</h2>



<p>This Digest covers most points of the compass in Glasgow and neighbouring areas to the west, south and east. </p>



<p>Quite a few local and national petitions have been launched recently so this Digest has an update on those (instead of infrastructure). </p>



<span id="more-14883"></span>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Petitions Update</h3>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>GoBike –&nbsp;<a href="https://www.glasgowconsult.co.uk/KMS/dmart.aspx?strTab=PublicPetitions&amp;noip=1&amp;PageType=item&amp;DMartId=72" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Keep our paths open for COP26</a> (Glasgow residents only)</li><li>Cycling UK – <a href="https://action.cyclinguk.org/page/85451/act/1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Help fix our failing road traffic laws</a></li><li>Living Streets – <a href="https://e-activist.com/page/87240/action/1?utm_medium=email&amp;utm_source=engagingnetworks&amp;utm_campaign=pp&amp;utm_content=Pavement+Parking+Scotland+ban+MSP+prev+PP+actn&amp;ea.url.id=5427510&amp;forwarded=true" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">petition to bring forward the ban on pavement parking</a> (and there&#8217;s a <a href="https://twitter.com/Glasgow_LS/status/1426184522643673088?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">launch event for a new Glasgow branch of Living Streets</a>)</li><li>Progress for <a href="https://www.glasgowtimes.co.uk/news/19511145.review-public-toilets-glasgow-held-petition-gets-backing/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GoBike member Patricia&#8217;s petition on public toilets</a></li><li>A potential future <a href="https://twitter.com/nedboulting/status/1425733758808952837?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">petition about making cycling infrastructure fit for purpose</a> by the broadcaster/author Ned Boulting</li></ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="block-2e87f9c2-a8af-4262-bff7-8842c5412bae"><strong>Contents</strong><br>(new consultations in&nbsp;<strong>bold</strong>&nbsp;– link jumps to article)</h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 1: Current Consultations</h4>



<ol class="wp-block-list" id="block-94ad3f9e-5c10-4412-bc03-d3df722422ba"><li><a href="#one-one">Glasgow City Council – Auldhouse Area Traffic Management Order</a>&nbsp;(ends 20 Aug)</li><li><a href="#one-two">North Lanarkshire Council –&nbsp;Bellshill Entrance/Velo Park Project</a> (until end of Aug)</li><li><a href="#one-three">East Renfrewshire Council –&nbsp;Ayr Road (A77): Spaces for People, Phase 2</a></li><li><a href="#one-four">Glasgow City Council – Low Emission Zone consultation</a> (ends 2 Sep)</li><li><strong><a href="#one-five">Rosemount Development Trust – Royston Road Masterplan</a> (ends 3 Sep)</strong></li><li><a href="#one-six">Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;Inner East Strategic Development Framework</a> (ends 3 Sep)</li><li><strong><a href="#one-seven">Renfrewshire Council –&nbsp;Improving Barshaw Park Junction, Paisley</a> (ends 5 Sep)</strong></li><li><a href="#one-eight">East Dunbartonshire Council – Active Travel Discussion</a>&nbsp;(ends 28 Sep)</li></ol>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations</h4>



<p>None this time.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 3: Consultation Feedback</h4>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li><strong><span style="font-size: 1rem;"><a href="#three-one">Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;Active Travel Forum Network map</a></span></strong></li><li><a href="#three-two">Urban Roots – Malls Mire partial opening (and newsletter July 2021)</a> </li><li><span style="font-size: 1rem;"><a href="#three-three">Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;Maryhill Road/North Woodside Road/Hopehill Road</a></span></li><li><a href="#three-four">Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;TRNSMT Festival and Access to NCN75</a></li><li><a href="#three-five">Multiplex – Glasgow Uni campus contact changes (and newsletter August 2021)</a></li><li><a href="#three-six">Glasgow City Council – Garnethill Traffic Management and Parking Controls Order</a></li></ol>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="block-cc85ef75-cc87-4a82-a726-8f744aa66a48"><strong>Section 1: Current Consultations<br></strong>(in date order for responses)</h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-one">1.1: Glasgow City Council – Auldhouse Area Traffic Management Order</h4>



<p>The Auldhouse area order appeared in the last <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-92-3-august-2021-14734#one-eight" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 92, Item 1.8</a>. It applies to a triangle of land in the Southside, just off Kilmarnock Rd and Nether Auldhouse Rd. The TRO deals with parking restrictions and making some lanes access only for motor vehicles. See our <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/GoBike-Auldhouse-Area-traffic-mgt-response-040821-1.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GoBike response to the Auldhouse Area order</a>. See the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Auldhouse-Area-Traffic-Management-Order-plan.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Auldhouse plan</a> PDF or the above link for the rest of the documents (ends <strong>20 Aug</strong>). </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-two">1.2: North Lanarkshire Council – Bellshill Entrance/Velo Park Project</h4>



<p>As seen in the last <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-92-3-august-2021-14734#one-nine" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 92, Item 1.9</a>, the new velo park would be at the edge of Bellshill (next to Motherwell Rd/A721) with mountain bike trails down into Strathclyde Country Park. The project lead is due to meet local community groups in the next week or so. A GoBike member should be at one of the meetings so we&#8217;ll hopefully have feedback next time.</p>



<p>If you cycle in the park or the wider area, see the&nbsp;<a href="https://sway.office.com/RsgVUssczf0waxaJ?ref=Link" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bellshill Entrance &amp; Velo Park info page</a>. The page says the process should lead to a Sport Scotland application this month so email the council&nbsp;<strong>before the end of August</strong>. </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-three">1.3: East Renfrewshire Council – Ayr Road (A77): Spaces for People, Phase 2</h4>



<p>As covered in&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-91-20-july-2021-14629#one-five" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 91, Item 1.5</a>, Ayr Rd through Newton Mearns has a phase 2 consultation. It&#8217;s about replacing the&nbsp;<a href="https://erspacesforpeople.commonplace.is/proposals/a-77-ayr-road-pop-up-bike-roll-corridor" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">phase 1 cones</a>&nbsp;with light segregation, removing some segregation and adding parking bays. For examples of the segregation, maps and more details, see the&nbsp;<a href="https://erspacesforpeople.commonplace.is/proposals/a-77-ayr-road-phase-2" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ayr Road Phase 2 Commonplace page</a>. No obvious deadline on this one.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-four">1.4: Glasgow City Council – Low Emission Zone consultation</h4>



<p>As in&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-90-6-july-2021-14538#one-three" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 90, Item 1.3</a>&nbsp;this consultation is about phase 2 of the Low Emission Zone in Glasgow city centre (between the M8, river and High St). Phase 1 applied to local buses but phase 2&nbsp;will include all vehicles entering the zone area (unless exempt). However, enforcement is only due to start in June 2023.</p>



<p>The short survey asks you about issues like the LEZ area and the grace periods. See the&nbsp;<a href="https://glasgow.gov.uk/27143" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Glasgow LEZ consultation page</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.smartsurvey.co.uk/s/GCC_LEZ2021/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">LEZ online survey</a>. Closes on&nbsp;<strong>2 September 2021</strong>.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-five">1.5: Rosemount Development Trust – Royston Road Masterplan</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><a href="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Royston-Road_Presentation-Boards_High-p3-detail_925px.jpg?ssl=1"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="313" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Royston-Road_Presentation-Boards_High-p3-detail_925px.jpg?resize=525%2C313&#038;ssl=1" alt="Royston Road analysis – annotated photo" class="wp-image-14933" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Royston-Road_Presentation-Boards_High-p3-detail_925px.jpg?resize=600%2C358&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Royston-Road_Presentation-Boards_High-p3-detail_925px.jpg?resize=300%2C179&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Royston-Road_Presentation-Boards_High-p3-detail_925px.jpg?w=925&amp;ssl=1 925w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /></a><figcaption>Analysis of Royston Rd –&nbsp;note the hatching down middle of road (click to enlarge image)</figcaption></figure>



<p>Projects about Royston Rd seem to be like buses – none for ages then two at once. The last <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-92-3-august-2021-14734#one-two" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 92, Item 1.2, featured the Flourishing Molendinar project</a> about the area at the eastern (hilly) end of Royston Rd. The western (flat) end of Royston Rd is the focus of this project by <a href="https://www.facebook.com/RosemountTrust/photos/a.275977175841391/3866744590097947/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Rosemount Development Trust</a>. </p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><a href="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Royston-Road_Presentation-Boards_High-p5_16-9_2000px.jpg?ssl=1"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="296" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Royston-Road_Presentation-Boards_High-p5_16-9_2000px.jpg?resize=525%2C296&#038;ssl=1" alt="Plan with notes about future of Royston Road, Glasgow" class="wp-image-14920" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Royston-Road_Presentation-Boards_High-p5_16-9_2000px.jpg?resize=600%2C338&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Royston-Road_Presentation-Boards_High-p5_16-9_2000px.jpg?resize=300%2C169&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Royston-Road_Presentation-Boards_High-p5_16-9_2000px.jpg?resize=1536%2C864&amp;ssl=1 1536w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Royston-Road_Presentation-Boards_High-p5_16-9_2000px.jpg?w=2000&amp;ssl=1 2000w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Royston-Road_Presentation-Boards_High-p5_16-9_2000px.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /></a><figcaption>Board 5 from consultation has notes about future of Royston Rd –&nbsp;click to enlarge</figcaption></figure>



<p>This section is a crucial link from the city centre/Sighthill (to the west) up towards Blackhill (to the east). Current plans only mention cycling in passing, which is a concern. If cycleways don&#8217;t connect right along Royston Rd it risks cutting off not only Blackhill but also active travel routes from places in North Lanarkshire like Stepps and Cumbernauld. </p>



<p>If you know the area at all, please put a word in for cycling. See the <a href="https://forms.office.com/pages/responsepage.aspx?id=gUi6qJGtYkqwntSr9e8xsVoOG-pfsYdGh_JLYOVG80NUOTIxMDRGRks4NzFST1NISENNM0swWDlERS4u" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Royston regeneration survey</a> and <a href="https://photos.google.com/share/AF1QipOfRSa4KS5dZywsZU2SI2H2eQLXiFhjUYEOh9XN0w4F0amGWNRcWcbZj7pkJhguYg?key=OVdfZjZ4Zmp3dVV3OU1NMXJWa2tRQURaTVN1MkRB" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">information boards</a> (ends <strong>3 Sep</strong>). </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-six">1.6: Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;Inner East Strategic Development Framework</h4>



<p>East of High St out to Carntyne and Tollcross is the ‘Inner East’ area, covered in the latest SDF (as in&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-90-6-july-2021-14538#one-four" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 90, Item 1.4</a>). The ‘Connected’ section 4C mentions cycling infrastructure projects but also public transport and roads, including the so-called East End Regeneration Route (EERR) dual carriageway.</p>



<p>See the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.glasgowconsult.co.uk/KMS/dmart.aspx?strTab=PublicDMartCurrent&amp;NoIP=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Inner East consultation page</a>&nbsp;for link to the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.smartsurvey.co.uk/s/GCC_SDF_InnerEast/">SDF survey</a>&nbsp;(ends&nbsp;<strong>3 Sep</strong>).</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-seven">1.7: Renfrewshire Council –&nbsp;Improving Barshaw Park Junction, Paisley </h4>



<p><a href="https://www.scotsman.com/news/transport/revealed-20-black-spots-cycling-accidents-855824" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">In 2017, Sustrans identified this crossroads as a dangerous junction</a>. It&#8217;s at the entrance to Barshaw Park in Paisley where Arkleston Rd and Hawkhead Rd meet Glasgow Rd (A761, which becomes Paisley Rd West in Glasgow). Arkleston Rd runs south from the M8 and is used for car parking next to Barshaw Park. The park itself includes a BMX track and a mini street layout for children learning to cycle. </p>



<p>This month, <a href="https://www.renfrewshire.gov.uk/article/11796/MEDIA-RELEASE-Communities-asked-for-their-views-on-active-travel-upgrades-to-Barshaw-Park-junction" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Renfrewshire Council announced they had won Places for Everyone funding for the junction</a>. </p>



<p>The consultation has three options:</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>Glasgow Rd protected lanes (none on Arkleston Rd or Hawkhead Rd) plus &#8216;early start&#8217; cycle traffic lights (<a href="https://maps.renfrewshire.gov.uk/BarshawParkJunction/LTP%203958%20CO1%20GR%20C1%20-%20Unidirectional%20Cycle%20Provision%20Option%201%20-%20Consultation%20Drawing.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Option 1 PDF</a>)</li><li>All roads have protected lanes with &#8216;early start&#8217; cycle traffic lights (<a href="https://maps.renfrewshire.gov.uk/BarshawParkJunction/LTP%203958%20CO1%20GR%20C2%20-%20Unidirectional%20Cycle%20Provision%20Option%202%20-%20Consultation%20Drawing.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Option 2 PDF</a>)</li><li>A protected junction with protected lanes on all roads and bikes get their own signal phase (<a href="https://maps.renfrewshire.gov.uk/BarshawParkJunction/LTP%203958%20CO1%20GR%20C3%20-%20Unidirectional%20Protected%20Junction%20Consultation%20Drawing.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Option 3 PDF</a>)</li></ol>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="430" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/LTP-3958-CO1-GR-C3-Unidirectional-Protected-Junction-Consultation-Drawing_1016px.jpg?resize=525%2C430&#038;ssl=1" alt="Barshaw Park junction Option 3 drawing" class="wp-image-14938" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/LTP-3958-CO1-GR-C3-Unidirectional-Protected-Junction-Consultation-Drawing_1016px.jpg?resize=600%2C491&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/LTP-3958-CO1-GR-C3-Unidirectional-Protected-Junction-Consultation-Drawing_1016px.jpg?resize=300%2C245&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/LTP-3958-CO1-GR-C3-Unidirectional-Protected-Junction-Consultation-Drawing_1016px.jpg?w=1016&amp;ssl=1 1016w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Barshaw Park junction Option 3 drawing –&nbsp;the bus stop in-shot has shared path alongside it</figcaption></figure>



<p>Experience from Edinburgh with &#8216;early start&#8217; bike traffic lights is that not everyone wants/can get to the front of a traffic queue to make use of them. The last option seems best but it creates a bus stop in-shot with shared path alongside it (where Glasgow Rd would be narrowed from two lanes to one). The plans mention relocating the bus stop as another option (but it is next to the main park entrance). Any further protected cycle lanes on roads would be added in a later phase. </p>



<p>Nearly every comment about the plans on Facebook seems to be hostile to all three options (on posts by  <a href="https://www.facebook.com/RenfrewshireLive/posts/4988936927789519" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Renfrewshire Live</a>, <a href="https://www.facebook.com/millmagazine/posts/977840276327157">The Mill magazine</a> or <a href="https://www.facebook.com/barshawfriends" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Friends of Barshaw Park</a>). The most common point (apart from rants about cycling) was the lack of a right-turn filter/light from Arkleston Rd onto Glasgow Rd. If you know the area at all, see the <a href="https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/4a8a2a5b5aff4fe991be7c159c8c0031" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Barshaw Park junction community survey</a> to rate the options (ends <strong>5 September</strong>).</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-eight">1.8: East Dunbartonshire Council – Active Travel Discussion</h4>



<p>This has featured since&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-86-11-may-2021-13927#one-two" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 86, Item 1.2</a>, with its ‘<a href="https://edc.mapthis.place/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ideas Map</a>‘ for the area. It’s an opportunity to focus on active travel (walking, cycling and wheeling).&nbsp;</p>



<p>Online discussion events restart from 21 August (Bearsden &amp; Milngavie). See a full list of events and background info on the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.eastdunbarton.gov.uk/active-travel-discussion" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Active Travel Discussion webpage</a>. Closing date –&nbsp;<strong>28 Sep 2021</strong>.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations</strong></h3>



<p>None this time.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 3:</strong>&nbsp;<strong>Consultation Feedback</strong></h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-one">3.1: Glasgow City Council – Active Travel Forum network map</h4>



<p>We last heard from GCC&#8217;s <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-83-30-march-2021-13568#three-two" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Active Travel Forum when it restarted</a> in March (<a href="https://www.gobike.org/campaigns/active-travel-forum" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">the ATF has stopped and started a few times in its history</a>). The most recent meeting, in June, included a new <a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=53808&amp;p=0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><strong>proposal for a city network</strong></a>, which has now been published online. We&#8217;ve seen vague outlines before, like the City Ways map in the last Cycling Strategy. The new map isn&#8217;t that easy to follow (compared to similar <a href="https://www.southlanarkshire.gov.uk/downloads/download/982/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">network maps for South Lanarkshire Council</a>). However, this new Glasgow network map does seem to be more systematic than any previous ones. </p>



<p>The presentation about the network map talks about the method behind producing it, including an algorithm for key destinations and roads &gt;10m wide. Slides also mention soft segregation and filters as part of the network. So, it wouldn&#8217;t necessarily all be segregated but might go in quicker. The recent announcement about the <a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/index.aspx?articleid=27062" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Liveable Neighbourhoods project</a> (and its <a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=53409&amp;p=0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Toolkit</a>) may play a part in that. </p>



<p>Slide 10 talks about the density of the network, sets a timescale and another disclaimer:</p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading"><em>&#8220;CITY Network Map</em></h5>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li><em>Proposed city network to be in place by 2030</em></li><li><em>Represents the required density of routes for a functional City Network</em></li><li><em>Not all of these streets identified here will form the City Network as delivered but form the start of the planning and prioritisation process</em></li><li><em>Delivered City Network must be of equivalent density and coherence by 2030 to enable easy everyday active journeys&nbsp;&#8220;</em></li></ul>



<p>So, the current routes on the map may not be the final ones (and there&#8217;s no key). </p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><a href="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Active_Travel_Forum_230621_presentation-11-map_1280px.jpg?ssl=1"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="439" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Active_Travel_Forum_230621_presentation-11-map_1280px.jpg?resize=525%2C439&#038;ssl=1" alt="Active Travel Forum Glasgow City Cycling Network Map" class="wp-image-14893" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Active_Travel_Forum_230621_presentation-11-map_1280px.jpg?resize=600%2C502&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Active_Travel_Forum_230621_presentation-11-map_1280px.jpg?resize=300%2C251&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Active_Travel_Forum_230621_presentation-11-map_1280px.jpg?w=1280&amp;ssl=1 1280w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Active_Travel_Forum_230621_presentation-11-map_1280px.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /></a><figcaption>The City Network Map presented by Glasgow City Council at the Active Travel Forum</figcaption></figure>



<p><strong>Main route corridors</strong> (striped lines, clockwise from north):</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>Springburn Road (A803)</li><li>Alexandra Parade/Cumbernauld Road/Edinburgh Road (A8)</li><li>Cumbernauld Road (A80)</li><li>London Road (A74)</li><li>Eglinton Street/Pollokshaws Road/Kilmarnock Road (A77)</li><li>Paisley Road West (A761)</li><li>Victoria Park Drive South/Dumbarton Road (A814)</li><li>Great Western Road (A82)</li><li>Maryhill Road (A81)</li></ul>



<p>All of the above are (at least) four lane A-roads but it&#8217;s not clear if these are intended as the main cycle routes. However, London Rd already has a section of permanent cycleway at either end with more phases planned. London Rd also has sections of soft segregation (with large gaps), as do parts of Cumbernauld Rd and Gt Western Rd. The empty area in the city centre would presumably connect to <a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/avenues" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Avenues project</a> routes. Most of the striped routes reach the city boundary, apart from London Rd and Edinburgh Rd. </p>



<p>The pink routes on the map include permanent infrastructure like the recently completed Garscube Rd cycleway and the very much ongoing South City Way. </p>



<p>The following slide shows &#8216;iterations&#8217; and distance/coverage (and has a key!). </p>



<h5 class="wp-block-heading">Iteration/Distance map</h5>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><a href="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Active_Travel_Forum_230621_presentation-12-iterations_1610px.jpg?ssl=1"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="358" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Active_Travel_Forum_230621_presentation-12-iterations_1610px.jpg?resize=525%2C358&#038;ssl=1" alt="Map of proposed Glasgow City Network map with colours to show iterations and distance to cycle routes" class="wp-image-14894" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Active_Travel_Forum_230621_presentation-12-iterations_1610px.jpg?resize=600%2C409&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Active_Travel_Forum_230621_presentation-12-iterations_1610px.jpg?resize=300%2C205&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Active_Travel_Forum_230621_presentation-12-iterations_1610px.jpg?resize=1536%2C1048&amp;ssl=1 1536w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Active_Travel_Forum_230621_presentation-12-iterations_1610px.jpg?w=1610&amp;ssl=1 1610w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Active_Travel_Forum_230621_presentation-12-iterations_1610px.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /></a><figcaption>Most residential areas seem to have decent coverage except some parts of Summerston, Easterhouse, Baillieston, Toryglen, Castlemilk and Darnley</figcaption></figure>



<p>The map seems to show a fairly widespread first iteration/version of the network. It would be followed by additions to fill in gaps between these routes for later versions. The colours show pretty good coverage for most areas of the city compared to now (from &#8216;iteration 6&#8217;, presumably in 2030). Most of the pink areas (&gt;800m distance) are not residential –&nbsp;they include the Seven Lochs and Pollok Park. </p>



<p>All of this has to be taken with a big pinch of salt (especially the bits outside the GCC boundary at Renfrew and Thornliebank!). It also remains to be seen how it fits in with other council plans and priorities. For example, cycle routes seem to avoid the High St, despite the fact it&#8217;s not an Avenue but has its own <a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/index.aspx?articleid=23396" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">High St Area Strategy</a> project (as well as being part of the &#8216;Learning Quarter&#8217; district plan and Inner East SDF). Elsewhere, there are bus priority lanes in the works for Paisley Rd West –&nbsp;will they trump cycle lanes? </p>



<p>The presentation also mentions themes and objectives for the forthcoming Active Travel Strategy (slide 17 onwards). Slide 21 has more detail on &#8216;Proposed Theme 1: Infrastructure &amp; Networks&#8217;. Only time will tell how both the strategy and network map are put into practice. However, the map seems like a step towards a more comprehensive network. The proposals should go to committee later in the year.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-two">3.2: Urban Roots – Malls Mire</h4>



<p>Malls Mire gets a bit higher up the running order this time as the west and central areas of the new community woodland are due to open in mid-August. These will add much needed greenspace and a network of traffic-free paths in the Toryglen/Polmadie area. When the eastern end of the woodland opens, it will provide extra east-west links between the Southside of Glasgow and Rutherglen, South Lanarkshire. </p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="293" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Malls-Mire-map.jpg?resize=525%2C293&#038;ssl=1" alt="Malls Mire map" class="wp-image-12657" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Malls-Mire-map.jpg?resize=600%2C335&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Malls-Mire-map.jpg?resize=300%2C167&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Malls-Mire-map.jpg?w=914&amp;ssl=1 914w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Map of the Malls Mire site –&nbsp;Toryglen is to the west, Rutherglen to the east</figcaption></figure>



<p>Woodland paths aren&#8217;t a complete solution to the connection issues in the city network map but they&#8217;re certainly welcome. In future, Malls Mire may link to enhanced routes in South Lanarkshire Council&#8217;s <a href="https://www.southlanarkshire.gov.uk/downloads/file/13298/rutherglen_and_cambuslang_active_travel_network_plan" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Cambuslang/Rutherglen active travel network</a>, like NCN756 towards Shawfield and Glasgow Green.</p>



<p>See the <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Malls-Mire-Newsletter-July-2021.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Malls Mire July 2021 newsletter</a> for more information about the latest developments. Well done to Gemma and the rest of the team for all the progress so far.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-three">3.3: Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;Maryhill Road/North Woodside Road/Hopehill Road</h4>



<p>First covered in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-86-11-may-2021-13927#one-one" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 86, Item 1.1</a>, this novel junction layout caused a bit of head scratching due to its minimalist drawing. Options for the <a href="https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=42014&amp;p=0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">crossing had already been in a consultation for Connecting Woodside</a>. However, there was another <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Glasgow-City-Council-Maryhill-Road_-North-Woodside-Road_-Hopehill-Road....pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">more detailed drawing for the new junction layout (PDF)</a>. </p>



<p>GoBike sent a letter of objection and received the following reply: </p>



<p><em>&#8220;In response to your comments regarding the desire line to travel north from Hopehill Road to Maryhill Road. I would advise that the design for the above junction does not prohibit cyclists wishing to travel, on the carriageway, from Hopehill Road northbound onto Maryhill Road. Cyclists wishing to travel on the carriageway are both encouraged and supported through the inclusion of Advanced Stop Lines (ASL) at all arms of the junction, to support their journey along either Maryhill Road or Hopehill Road. </em></p>



<p><em>Please note, whilst it is the objective of the proposed to improve the conditions for cycling on North Woodside Road and, encourage the uptake of cycling in the local area by introducing additional infrastructure that is suitable for use by all ages and abilities. It is not our objective to dissuade or restrict confident cyclists from using Maryhill Road to continue their journey and as such, we have incorporated dropped kerbs within the design of the junction to make this possible. </em></p>



<p><em>As you have stated, should cyclists ‘routinely ignore’ the TRO restricting their movements whilst on the proposed cycle crossing, this would be a matter for Police Scotland. As we advised previously, once approved, a TRO is a legal order and is enforceable by law. If you do however have concerns regarding the speed of vehicles travelling on Maryhill Road, or any of the surrounding roads, I would be happy to bring this to the attention of our Road Safety Team to investigate further.&#8221;</em> </p>



<p>It remains to be seen how intuitive, or not, this new junction turns out to be. Also, whether Police Scotland take any more interest in anyone ignoring the rules than they do with cars parked in bike lanes. Further phases of Connecting Woodside or results of the city network plan may have a bearing on the junction in future.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-four">3.4: Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;TRNSMT Festival and Access to NCN75</h4>



<p>The busy NCN path in Glasgow Green was recently kept open during the Euro 2020 Fanzone in the park. GoBike member Bob wrote to GCC about keeping access to the path in Glasgow Green while it holds the TRNSMT music festival (pronounced &#8216;Transmit&#8217;, kids). The last edition of the festival, in 2019, had closed the route with very poor signage of the diversion. This led to a <a href="https://www.glasgowconsult.co.uk/KMS/dmart.aspx?strTab=PublicPetitions&amp;noip=1&amp;PageType=item&amp;DMartId=58" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">previous petition about keeping NCN75 open</a>. </p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="296" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/NCN-diversion-sign_2019-07-12_180109_1200px.jpg?resize=525%2C296&#038;ssl=1" alt="NCN75 diversion sign 2019" class="wp-image-14959" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/NCN-diversion-sign_2019-07-12_180109_1200px.jpg?resize=600%2C338&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/NCN-diversion-sign_2019-07-12_180109_1200px.jpg?resize=300%2C169&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/NCN-diversion-sign_2019-07-12_180109_1200px.jpg?w=1200&amp;ssl=1 1200w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/NCN-diversion-sign_2019-07-12_180109_1200px.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Diversion route sign for NCN75 (facing the wrong way) <em>in July 2019</em></figcaption></figure>



<p>The council&#8217;s (edited) reply: </p>



<p><em>&#8220;…closure and diversion of the NCR 75 will only take place on the ‘Live Concert’ dates of this event. That will be Thursday 9 September – Sunday 12 September (4 days in total) and that all other dates during the build and break for the event, the NCR 75 will in the main be remain open.</em></p>



<p><em>…I would also like to advise that more permanent signage is in place around the diversion routes which when required can be opened to ensure users have a clearly marked route to follow in both directions. These signs will be supplemented with additional free standing signage at some locations.</em> <em>I believe those measures are fair and reasonable for the short term diversion of the route which are in line with other diversionary arrangements.</em></p>



<p><em>Lastly I note your objections to any closures but I should can advise that those proposed are governed under the delegated powers granted to the City and managed by Neighbourhoods, Regeneration and Sustainability and are not by their duration subject to consultation.&#8221;</em></p>



<p><a href="https://trnsmtfest.com/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">TRNSMT takes place from Friday 10 – Sunday 12 September 2021</a> but it sounds like NCN75 will close on Thursday 9 Sep, while they set up. </p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="296" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/NCN-diversion-signs-2021_1200px.jpg?resize=525%2C296&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-14971" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/NCN-diversion-signs-2021_1200px.jpg?resize=600%2C338&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/NCN-diversion-signs-2021_1200px.jpg?resize=300%2C169&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/NCN-diversion-signs-2021_1200px.jpg?w=1200&amp;ssl=1 1200w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/NCN-diversion-signs-2021_1200px.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>The new NCN diversion signs are better than paper ones but will they be clear to most people?</figcaption></figure>



<p>GoBike convenor Thomas posted a <a href="https://twitter.com/UrbanistTOC/status/1425781257183666179?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">thread on Twitter with photos of the diversion route</a> along Adelphi St to the St Andrews suspension bridge. It includes <a href="https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/broken-weir-causes-massive-subsitence-11080199" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">the Gorbals section of riverbank which collapsed in 2017</a> and remains fenced off. While passable, it&#8217;s not geared up for the level of pedestrian and cycle use NCN75 gets on an average weekend.  </p>



<p>We&#8217;ll try to find out why NCN75 was open for the Fanzone but closed for TRNSMT. </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-five">3.5: Multiplex –&nbsp;Glasgow Uni campus newsletter</h4>



<p>The latest update from the <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/MPX-UoG-August-2021-Newsletter.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Glasgow Uni campus August 2021 newsletter</a>. It sounds like people in the West End are due to see more activity during August as the foundations of the new Business School are laid.</p>



<p>The contact for the project has changed to Fergus Shaw. Best wishes to the previous contact Kieran Ronnie, who helped us with an issue with the temporary traffic lights on University Ave. </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-six">3.6: Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;Garnethill Traffic Management and Parking Controls Order</h4>



<p>In&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-91-20-july-2021-14629#one-three" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 91, Item 1.3</a>, we covered the parking controls for Garnethill. GoBike member Tim sent an objection to the plans. He had a response from the council on some of the points raised:</p>



<p><em>&#8220;I can advise that to accommodate the number of resident permits that are purchased for the Garnethill area we could not reduce the number of parking bays in the Garnethill area.</em></p>



<p><em>Please note that the reduction in permit price is being proposed to bring the Garnethill zone in line with all other restricted/controlled parking zones out with the City Centre(excluding Hillhead).&#8221;</em></p>



<p>Garnethill is one block from Sauchiehall St so most people would probably think of it as part of the city centre. It is close to main bus routes, train and underground stations but didn&#8217;t get any Bikehangar secure cycle parking. It&#8217;s also close to a large motorway junction at Charing Cross, which may have a bearing on the number of cars in the area. </p>



<p>The response also repeated previous statements about Police Scotland ruling out contraflow cycling on one-way streets. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14883</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consultation Digest (Local) Issue 92, 3 August 2021</title>
		<link>https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-92-3-august-2021-14734</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Y]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2021 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Consultation digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoBike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auldhouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bellshill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bishopbriggs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cambridge St]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[City Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claypits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Dunbartonshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Renfrewshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flourishing Molendinar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garnethill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garscube Rd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GHA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glasgow city council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GUSM74]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirkintilloch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LEZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motherwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Lanarkshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sauchiehall St]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sighthill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[south city way]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St Paul&#039;s Youth Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stockingfield junction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[townhead]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gobike.org/?p=14734</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Consultations dropping in from around Glasgow. This Digest comes after Great Britain &#38; Northern Ireland won a handful of cycling medals at Toyko 2020. One was for mountain biking while the rest were in BMX (where Sir Chris Hoy started). Both are covered by the Velo Park proposal from North Lanarkshire Council (but NLC have &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-92-3-august-2021-14734" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Consultation Digest (Local) Issue 92, 3 August 2021"</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Consultations dropping in from around Glasgow.</h2>



<p>This Digest comes after Great Britain &amp; Northern Ireland won a handful of cycling medals at Toyko 2020. One was for mountain biking while the rest were in BMX (where Sir Chris Hoy started). Both are covered by the Velo Park proposal from North Lanarkshire Council (but NLC have dropped the cycleway to Motherwell train station). There are also several consultations for East Dunbartonshire and Glasgow plus one for East Renfrewshire.</p>



<p>The ban on pavement parking was made law in the Scottish Parliament in 2019. Last year, GoBike wondered when it would come into force (<a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-65-21-july-2020-whats-happened-to-pavement-parking-proposals-approved-but-not-enacted-plus-a-request-to-contribute-to-the-streets-for-all-glasgow-commonplace-map-and-m-11719" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 65, Item 3.4</a>) – it seems it&#8217;s due to be 2023. <a href="https://e-activist.com/page/87240/action/1?utm_medium=email&amp;utm_source=engagingnetworks&amp;utm_campaign=pp&amp;utm_content=Pavement+Parking+Scotland+ban+MSP+prev+PP+actn&amp;ea.url.id=5427510&amp;forwarded=true" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Living Streets want you to write to your MSPs about bringing it forward</a>. </p>



<p>People of all abilities can cycle at facilities run by <a href="https://twitter.com/freewheel_north/status/1417846827991195648?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Freewheel North – who are trying to fundraise just now</a>, in case you want to contribute. </p>



<span id="more-14734"></span>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Infrastructure Update</h3>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li><a href="https://twitter.com/EyeintheskyGla/status/1421811255279603713?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sighthill&#8217;s new pedestrian/cycle bridge has been installed over the M8</a><span style="font-size: 1rem;"> (but won&#8217;t be open for a while yet).</span> <a href="https://twitter.com/UrbanistTOC/status/1422272043060547586?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GoBike convenor, Thomas, spoke about it on STV!</a></li><li>At the canal, the Claypits nature reserve officially opened at the weekend, including the <a href="https://twitter.com/KineticsGlasgow/status/1421391556129574916?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">zigzag ramp from Garscube Rd</a>.</li><li>The <a href="https://twitter.com/Invest_Glasgow/status/1420749763310350347?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Stockingfield Bridge at the canal is being assembled</a> but won&#8217;t be up and running until next year. </li><li><a href="https://twitter.com/reglasgow_web/status/1417460267936534531?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">North Canal Bank St – work is getting there</a> but it missed its July re-opening date.</li><li>At Kelvin Hall, <a href="https://twitter.com/YorkhillT/status/1419778370989084673?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Argyle St/Bunhouse Rd has bike lights installed, but not yet operational</a>.</li><li>Thomas visited <a href="https://twitter.com/UrbanistTOC/status/1420724476996734980" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Corkerhill Rd&#8217;s soft segregated lanes</a>. </li><li>He also let us know <a href="https://twitter.com/UrbanistTOC/status/1422497685962170371?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"></a><a href="https://twitter.com/UrbanistTOC/status/1422497685962170371?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">South City Way&#8217;s new cycle counters are up-and-running</a>.</li><li><span style="font-size: 1rem;">Outdoor seating in the sun was popular along </span><a style="font-size: 1rem;" href="https://twitter.com/LinesDashed/status/1419022365971959809?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Sauchiehall St&#8217;s permanent lanes and the pop-ups at Candleriggs/George Square</a><span style="font-size: 1rem;"> and </span><a style="font-size: 1rem;" href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Cambridge-St-seating_1233.jpeg" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Cambridge St</a><span style="font-size: 1rem;">.</span> </li><li>In East Kilbride, University Hospital <a href="https://eastkilbride.cyclestreets.net/location/172687/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Hairmyres has a new path into south of site</a> (from Strathtay Ave).</li></ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="block-2e87f9c2-a8af-4262-bff7-8842c5412bae"><strong>Contents</strong><br>(new consultations in&nbsp;<strong>bold</strong>&nbsp;– link jumps to article)</h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 1: Current Consultations</h4>



<ol class="wp-block-list" id="block-94ad3f9e-5c10-4412-bc03-d3df722422ba"><li><a href="#one-one">Glasgow City Council – City Centre Traffic Management Order 2010: Variation No.29, GHA Parking Areas</a> (ends 3 Aug – <strong>today!</strong>)</li><li><a href="#one-two">St. Paul&#8217;s Youth Forum – Flourishing Molendinar second consultation</a> (ends 6 Aug)</li><li><a href="#one-three">Glasgow City Council – Garnethill Traffic Management and Parking Controls Order</a> (ends 13 Aug)</li><li><a href="#one-four">East Dunbartonshire Council – Bishopbriggs Town Centre Regeneration</a> (ends 15 Aug)</li><li><strong><a href="#one-five">East Dunbartonshire Council – Schools waiting and loading orders</a> (ends 16 Aug)</strong></li><li><strong><a href="#one-six">East Dunbartonshire Council – Lenzie Rd, Kirkintilloch waiting and loading order</a> (ends 16 Aug)</strong></li><li><strong><a href="#one-seven" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">East Dunbartonshire Council – Civic Way/Lenzie Rd, traffic management</a> (ends 16 Aug)</strong></li><li><strong><a href="#one-eight">Glasgow City Council – Auldhouse Area Traffic Management Order</a> (ends 20 Aug)</strong></li><li><strong><a href="#one-nine">North Lanarkshire Council – Bellshill Entrance/Velo Park Project</a> (until end of Aug)</strong></li><li><a href="#one-ten">East Renfrewshire Council – Ayr Road (A77): Spaces for People, Phase 2</a></li><li><a href="#one-eleven">Glasgow City Council – Low Emission Zone consultation</a> (ends 2 Sep)</li><li><a href="#one-twelve">Glasgow City Council – Inner East Strategic Development Framework</a> (ends 3 Sep)</li><li><a href="#one-thirteen">East Dunbartonshire Council – Active Travel Discussion</a> (ends 28 Sep)</li><li><a href="#one-fourteen">Glasgow Urban Sports – GUSM74 Urban Sports Sculpture Park</a></li></ol>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations</h4>



<p>None this time.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 3: Consultation Feedback</h4>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li><strong><a href="#three-one">North Lanarkshire Council –&nbsp;Planning Application (20/00345/FUL) Access to Motherwell train station</a></strong></li></ol>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="block-cc85ef75-cc87-4a82-a726-8f744aa66a48"><strong>Section 1: Current Consultations<br></strong>(in date order for responses)</h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-one">1.1: Glasgow City Council – City Centre Traffic Management Order 2010: Variation No.29, GHA Parking Areas</h4>



<p>Glasgow Housing Association&#8217;s parking areas are in Townhead, east of Buchanan Bus Station, behind the high flats.&nbsp;Resident’s parking spaces around Kennedy St and St Mungo Avenue have been used as free parking by shoppers/commuters. This order introduces parking restrictions (as covered in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-91-20-july-2021-14629#one-one" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 91, Item 1.1</a>). </p>



<p>GoBike agreed with these measures in our <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/GoBike-City-Centre-GHA-Townhead-Parking-Stage-One-response-010421.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Stage 1 GHA response</a> and <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/GoBike-City-Centre-GHA-Townhead-parking-response-280721.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">latest GHA response</a>. </p>



<p>There are the usual documents for a TRO:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/002-GCC-City-Centre-Traffic-Management-Order-2010-Variation-No.29....pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">plan of GHA parking areas</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/GCC-GHA-09.01-Draft-Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GHA areas draft report</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/GCC-GHA-11.01-Publication-of-Proposals-Press-Notice-Draft-Variation-29.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GHA areas press notice</a>&nbsp;and the usual&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/GCC-GHA-08.01-Statement-of-Reasons.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">statement of reasons</a>. Respond by e-mail to&nbsp;<a href="mailto:lestraffic@glasgow.gov.uk" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">lestraffic@glasgow.gov.uk</a>&nbsp; by<strong>&nbsp;3 August 2021</strong>.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-two">1.2: St. Paul’s Youth Forum –&nbsp;Flourishing Molendinar second consultation</h4>



<p>The Flourishing Molendinar project covers an area around Blackhill in the north east of Glasgow. As seen in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-91-20-july-2021-14629#one-two" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 91, Item 1.2</a>, the next stage of the&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/_OnBikes/status/1413513153124737026?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Flourishing Molendinar project has produced new plans</a> for consultation. Proposals include a pedestrianised section on Langdale St, segregated cycleways on Cumbernauld Rd and Royston Rd.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="372" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/FloMo-Royston-Rd_E53OsxdWUAA0G4m.jpg?resize=525%2C372&#038;ssl=1" alt="Proposal for Royston Rd at Langdale St/Robroyston Rd" class="wp-image-14745" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/FloMo-Royston-Rd_E53OsxdWUAA0G4m.jpg?resize=600%2C425&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/FloMo-Royston-Rd_E53OsxdWUAA0G4m.jpg?resize=300%2C212&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/FloMo-Royston-Rd_E53OsxdWUAA0G4m.jpg?w=1200&amp;ssl=1 1200w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/FloMo-Royston-Rd_E53OsxdWUAA0G4m.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Plans for a permanent cycletrack along Royston Rd at junction with Langdale St and Robroyston Rd</figcaption></figure>



<p>Permanent segregated lanes on Royston Rd would continue east of Provanmill Rd, where the current pop-up lanes peter out, past the Langdale St/Robroyston Rd junction. This wouldn&#8217;t just connect Blackhill towards the city centre, it&#8217;s also just across the M80 footbridge from Barmulloch. The junction is also a route to a school,&nbsp;<a href="https://twitter.com/_OnBikes/status/1401112056217030661?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">St Philomena&#8217;s RC Primary School, where pupils have been doing their own plans in Minecraft</a> software. </p>



<p>For more on the above, see the&nbsp;<a href="https://forms.office.com/Pages/ResponsePage.aspx?id=DQSIkWdsW0yxEjajBLZtrQAAAAAAAAAAAAMAADcjbltUNUg0SldZR0JBR1VPTEhOVDJLNTdCN0QwUC4u" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">FloMo survey</a>&nbsp;(ends&nbsp;<strong>6 August</strong>). </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-three">1.3: Glasgow City Council – Garnethill Traffic Management and Parking Controls Order</h4>



<p>Garnethill is perched above Sauchiehall St and Cambridge St, up some of the steepest streets in the city centre. As we said in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-91-20-july-2021-14629#one-three" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 91, Item 1.3</a>, it&#8217;s due to get parking controls, which stem from a&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/garnethill-car-parking-but-no-cycle-contraflow-public-exhibition-on-parking-controls-thursday-22-and-saturday-24-march-2018-4503" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">consultation event in 2018</a>. </p>



<p>Garnethill also has a lot of existing one way streets, which don&#8217;t allow for contraflow cycling. In our <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/GoBike-Garnethill-Parking-Stage1-response-090120.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Garnethill Stage 1 response</a>, GoBike objected to this and other measures. Very little had changed since, apart from a few parking spaces, so we re-iterated our objections in our <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/GoBike-Garnethill-Parking-response-300721.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">response to the published Garnethill order</a>.</p>



<p>See the restrictions in the TRO documents:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/05-Garnethill-Proposed-CPZ-Plan.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Garnethill plan</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Garnethill-09.01-Draft-Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Garnethill draft report</a>,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Garnethill-Press-Notice.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Garnethill press notice</a>&nbsp;and the standard&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Garnethill-08.01-Statement-of-Reasons.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Statement of Reasons</a>. Email:&nbsp;<a href="mailto:garnethillparking@glasgow.gov.uk" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">garnethillparking@glasgow.gov.uk</a>&nbsp;by&nbsp;<strong>13 August</strong>.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-four">1.4: East Dunbartonshire Council –&nbsp;Bishopbriggs Town Centre Regeneration</h4>



<p>This consultation is about not just Bishopbriggs town centre, but also&nbsp;<a href="https://www.eastdunbarton.gov.uk/residents/council-democracy/city-deal/delivery-brr5-and-westerhill-masterplan" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">phase 5 of Bishopbriggs Relief Road (BRR5)</a>&nbsp;and the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.eastdunbarton.gov.uk/residents/council-democracy/city-deal/a803-corridor-improvements" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">A803 corridor</a>. Cycling doesn&#8217;t get much of a mention, as we said in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-91-20-july-2021-14629#one-four" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 91, Item 1.4</a>. That&#8217;s despite Bishopbriggs being so close to the Forth &amp; Clyde canal and to Glasgow (where the A803 changes from Kirkintilloch Rd to Springburn Rd). If you want to put a word in for cycling, see the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.eastdunbarton.gov.uk/bishopbriggs-town-centre-regeneration-consultation" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bishopbriggs consultation webpage</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/7f0516541d9e45cc8d00ac151ae67143" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bishopbriggs Public Realm Plan survey</a> by&nbsp;<strong>15 August</strong>.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-five">1.5: East Dunbartonshire Council –&nbsp;Schools waiting and loading orders</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="208" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/EDC-Bishopbriggs-schools-ScreenShot-2021-08-02.jpg?resize=525%2C208&#038;ssl=1" alt="Map of St Matthews and Wester Cleddens primary schools, Bishopbriggs" class="wp-image-14771" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/EDC-Bishopbriggs-schools-ScreenShot-2021-08-02.jpg?resize=600%2C238&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/EDC-Bishopbriggs-schools-ScreenShot-2021-08-02.jpg?resize=300%2C119&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/EDC-Bishopbriggs-schools-ScreenShot-2021-08-02.jpg?w=1200&amp;ssl=1 1200w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/EDC-Bishopbriggs-schools-ScreenShot-2021-08-02.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Schools include St Matthew&#8217;s and Wester Cleddens primary schools, Bishopbriggs</figcaption></figure>



<p>A series of orders from East Dunbartonshire bring in parking restrictions around the following nine primary schools: </p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>Clober Primary School, Milngavie </li><li>Westerton Primary School, Bearsden </li><li>Meadowburn Primary School, Bishopbriggs </li><li>St Matthew’s Primary School, Bishopbriggs </li><li>Wester Cleddens Primary School, Bishopbriggs </li><li>Gartconner Primary School, Kirkintilloch </li><li>Holy Family Primary School, Kirkintilloch </li><li>Craighead Primary School, Milton of Campsie </li><li>Torrance Primary School, Torrance</li></ul>



<p>All include &#8216;no waiting&#8217; restrictions between 8.30 – 9.30am and 2.30 –&nbsp;4.30pm. The Clober, Westerton, Craighead and Torrance school plans have sections with no waiting at any time (mostly on corners/school entry roads).</p>



<p>See the plans and other PDF documents for details: <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Plans-Bearsden-Milngavie-schools-waiting-loading.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bearsden/Milngavie schools plans</a>, <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Draft-Order-Bearsden-Milngavie-schools-waiting-loading.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bearsden/Milngavie schools order</a>, <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Draft-Order-Schedules-Statement-of-reasons-west-schools-waiting-loading.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">&#8216;west&#8217; schools Schedules &amp; Statement of reasons</a>, <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Notice-Bearsden-Milngavie-schools-waiting-loading.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bearsden/Milngavie schools notice</a>, <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Plans-East-schools-waiting-loading.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bishopbriggs/Kirkintilloch/Milton of Campsie/Torrance schools plans</a>, <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Draft-order-Bishopbriggs-Kirkintilloch-Milton-of-Campsie-Torrance-schools-waiting-loading.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">&#8216;east&#8217; schools order</a>, <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Draft-Order-Schedules-statement-of-reasons-east-schools-waiting-Loading.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">&#8216;east&#8217; schools Schedules &amp; Statement of reasons</a>, <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Notice-Kirkintilloch-Bishopbriggs-Milton-of-Campie-Torrance-schools.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">&#8216;east&#8217; schools notice</a>, <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Order-for-amendment-Bishopbriggs-Consolidated-OCR.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bishopbriggs consolidated order</a> and <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Order-for-amendment-MoC-Consolidated-OCR.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Milton of Campsie consolidated order</a>. </p>



<p>Send any comments to the Chief Solicitor &amp; Monitoring Officer by post or email by <strong>16 August</strong>.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-six">1.6: East Dunbartonshire Council –&nbsp;Linnhe Ave/Thums Ave/Ochil Rd waiting and loading order</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="235" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Bishopbriggs_Linnhe-Thrums-Ave-ScreenShot-2021-08-02.jpg?resize=525%2C235&#038;ssl=1" alt="Map of Linnhe Ave/Thums Ave/Ochil Rd, Bishopbriggs
" class="wp-image-14773" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Bishopbriggs_Linnhe-Thrums-Ave-ScreenShot-2021-08-02-scaled.jpg?resize=600%2C269&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Bishopbriggs_Linnhe-Thrums-Ave-ScreenShot-2021-08-02-scaled.jpg?resize=300%2C134&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Bishopbriggs_Linnhe-Thrums-Ave-ScreenShot-2021-08-02-scaled.jpg?resize=1536%2C688&amp;ssl=1 1536w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Bishopbriggs_Linnhe-Thrums-Ave-ScreenShot-2021-08-02-scaled.jpg?resize=2048%2C917&amp;ssl=1 2048w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Bishopbriggs_Linnhe-Thrums-Ave-ScreenShot-2021-08-02-scaled.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Linnhe Ave/Thums Ave are either side of Woodhill Rd, south of Woodhill Primary School</figcaption></figure>



<p>Immediately east of the above map are Linnhe Ave, Thums Ave and the Ochil Rd cul-de-sac (near Wester Cleddens Rd). Linnhe Ave is due to have no waiting or loading at any time, across from the shops on Woodhill Rd. Thums Ave and Ochil Rd are due to have restrictions only between 8.30 – 9.30am and 2.30 –&nbsp;4.30pm. Presumably, the times relate to the nearby Thomas Muir Primary School and Bishopbriggs Academy, which have a gate on Ochil Rd. </p>



<p>See the PDF documents: <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Ochil-Rd-Thrums-Ave-Linnhe-Ave-plan.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Linnhe Ave/Thums Ave/Ochil Rd plan</a>, <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Draft-Order-Linnhe-Ave-Thrums-Ave-Ochil-Rd-waiting-loading.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Linnhe Ave/Thums Ave/Ochil Rd order</a> and <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Notice-Linnhe-Ave-Thums-Ave-Ochil-rd.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Linnhe Ave/Thums Ave/Ochil Rd notice</a>. Send any comments to the Chief Solicitor &amp; Monitoring Officer by post or email by <strong>16 August</strong>.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-seven">1.7: East Dunbartonshire Council –&nbsp;Civic Way/Lenzie Rd, traffic management</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" height="295" width="525" decoding="async" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/EDC_TJ-House_1000px-600x337.jpg?resize=525%2C295&#038;ssl=1" alt="F
ormer EDC headquarters building" class="wp-image-14838"/><figcaption><em>Tom Johnston House, the former EDC headquarters on Civic Way, Kirkintilloch</em></figcaption></figure>



<p>Civic Way, Kirkintinlloch was the site of the former East Dunbartonshire Council headquarters (<a href="https://www.kirkintilloch-herald.co.uk/news/bulldozers-move-demolish-landmark-2561377" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">the building was demolished in 2015</a>). <a href="https://www.urbanrealm.com/news/7951/Opinions_sought_on_Kirkintilloch_social_housing.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">New, affordable housing is being built</a> on the site, south of Civic Way. On the road itself, EDC plan to add a speed bump with parking restrictions round the corner on Lenzie Rd. </p>



<p>See the PDF documents: <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Lenzie-Road-Plan.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lenzie Rd plan</a>, <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Draft-Order-Lenzie-Road-waiting-loading-restrictions.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lenzie Rd order</a>, <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Notice-Lenzie-Road-no-waiting-and-no-loading.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Lenzie Rd notice</a>, <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Notice-for-Civic-Way-road-hump.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Civic Way notice</a>, <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Order-for-amendment-Kirkintilloch-consolidation-Order.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"></a><a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Order-for-amendment-Kirkintilloch-consolidation-Order.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Kirkintilloch consolidated order</a>. Send any comments to the Chief Solicitor &amp; Monitoring Officer by post or email by <strong>16 August</strong>.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-eight">1.8: Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;Auldhouse Area Traffic Management Order</h4>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="alignright size-large is-resized"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Auldhouse-ScreenShot-2021-08-02.png?resize=298%2C356&#038;ssl=1" alt="Auldhouse area map" class="wp-image-14813" width="298" height="356" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Auldhouse-ScreenShot-2021-08-02.png?resize=502%2C600&amp;ssl=1 502w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Auldhouse-ScreenShot-2021-08-02.png?resize=251%2C300&amp;ssl=1 251w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Auldhouse-ScreenShot-2021-08-02.png?w=694&amp;ssl=1 694w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 298px) 100vw, 298px" /></figure></div>



<p>The Auldhouse area in this order is just south of Pollokshaws East train station and the White Cart Water. It&#8217;s a triangle bounded by Kilmarnock Rd, Auldhouse Rd and Nether Auldhouse Rd. </p>



<p>It&#8217;s mostly along similar lines to other parking controls elsewhere. However, there are a few back lanes between Riverford Rd and Ellisland Rd which will be signed as &#8216;access only&#8217; for motor vehicles. If those are followed, they should allow bikes to have a slightly quieter north-south route. However, the road surfaces are either rough tarmac or cobbles so they might not be that quiet! </p>



<p>See the PDF documents: <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Auldhouse-Area-Traffic-Management-Order-plan.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Auldhouse plan</a>, <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Auldhouse-Area-Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Auldhouse report</a>, <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/NoticeOfProposals-AuldhouseRoad-230x85mm.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Auldhouse notice</a> and the catch-all <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Statement_of_Reasons.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Statement of Reasons</a>.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-nine">1.9: North Lanarkshire Council –&nbsp;Bellshill Entrance/Velo Park Project</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="375" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Strathy-Bellshill-entr_222069428_4318965511497271_8570776801464639653_n.jpg?resize=525%2C375&#038;ssl=1" alt="Map highlighting the northern part of Strathclyde Country Park around the South Calder Water" class="wp-image-14794" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Strathy-Bellshill-entr_222069428_4318965511497271_8570776801464639653_n.jpg?resize=600%2C428&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Strathy-Bellshill-entr_222069428_4318965511497271_8570776801464639653_n.jpg?resize=300%2C214&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Strathy-Bellshill-entr_222069428_4318965511497271_8570776801464639653_n.jpg?w=1231&amp;ssl=1 1231w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Strathy-Bellshill-entr_222069428_4318965511497271_8570776801464639653_n.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Map shows the South Calder Water (blue dashed line). Pink dashed line shows bus route between Bellshill and Motherwell train stations. Will people be able to take their BMX on the bus?</figcaption></figure>



<p>The &#8216;entrance&#8217; is a bit confusing as most people don&#8217;t realise Strathclyde Country Park goes past Bothwellhaugh Rd and the railway, up to Bellshill Rd (A721). The area north of the loch includes the South Calder Water, Bothwellhaugh Cemetery, Bellshill Golf Club and the South Calder Walkway off-road path network. NLC propose to thread mountain bike trails around these, as shown in image, below.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="479" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Strathy-Park-Velo-trails_k4HV2edxTMzIha.jpeg?resize=525%2C479&#038;ssl=1" alt="Map of proposed mountain bike trails around South Calder Water" class="wp-image-14795" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Strathy-Park-Velo-trails_k4HV2edxTMzIha.jpeg?resize=600%2C547&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Strathy-Park-Velo-trails_k4HV2edxTMzIha.jpeg?resize=300%2C273&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Strathy-Park-Velo-trails_k4HV2edxTMzIha.jpeg?w=800&amp;ssl=1 800w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Map of proposed mountain bike trails. The note about partially sharing one trail with pedestrians doesn&#8217;t sound like a good idea. The &#8216;green link to Ravenscraig&#8217; peters out around the Aquatec leisure centre</figcaption></figure>



<p>NLC have a patchy record with similar projects like mountain bike trails in Forgewood and skate ramps in Motherwell and Wishaw. However, there is a successful skatepark in Airdrie and a BMX race track in Cumbernauld. The council have taken some input from <a href="https://socialtrack.co.uk/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Socialtrack</a>, who created and run the excellent <a href="https://socialtrack.co.uk/pages/wishawhill-wood-pumptrack" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Wishawhill Wood pump track</a> in Craigneuk. These plans include a pump track but it&#8217;s not designed yet (there&#8217;s just an example track photo). </p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="360" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Bellshill-velo-park-hub_QBwa1bVg9vFZx_.jpeg?resize=525%2C360&#038;ssl=1" alt="Plan of proposed 'Hub and Skills area' including pump track" class="wp-image-14796" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Bellshill-velo-park-hub_QBwa1bVg9vFZx_.jpeg?resize=600%2C411&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Bellshill-velo-park-hub_QBwa1bVg9vFZx_.jpeg?resize=300%2C206&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Bellshill-velo-park-hub_QBwa1bVg9vFZx_.jpeg?w=826&amp;ssl=1 826w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Plan of proposed &#8216;Hub and Skills area&#8217; on the eastern edge of Bellshill</figcaption></figure>



<p>The &#8216;Hub/Skills area&#8217; of the new velo park would be at the edge of Bellshill (next to the roundabout on Motherwell Rd/A721). It could be a great facility for young people around the Bellshill area. The existing Greenlink path makes it more accessible from North Motherwell too (but it doesn&#8217;t link to Ravenscraig, as claimed). </p>



<p>The new route into Strathclyde Country Park should broaden active travel access from Bellshill and Motherwell. This project doesn&#8217;t include any paths near the Raith Interchange bridges (as <a href="https://www.facebook.com/nlccountryparks/photos/a.833729946687529/4330993900294432/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">suggested on Facebook</a>). The new routes are indirect and sloping, so are less likely to help cycle commuters around Bellshill. </p>



<p>If you cycle in the area, see the <a href="https://sway.office.com/RsgVUssczf0waxaJ?ref=Link" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bellshill Entrance &amp; Velo Park info page</a>. You can email comments to GreenspaceProjects@northlan.gov.uk. The page says the process should lead to a Sport Scotland application this month so email <strong>before the end of August</strong>.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-ten">1.10: East Renfrewshire Council – Ayr Road (A77): Spaces for People, Phase 2</h4>



<p>As covered in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-91-20-july-2021-14629#one-five" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 91, Item 1.5</a>, Ayr Rd through Newton Mearns is a main active travel route into Glasgow. This phase 2 consultation is about replacing the <a href="https://erspacesforpeople.commonplace.is/proposals/a-77-ayr-road-pop-up-bike-roll-corridor" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">phase 1 cones</a> with light segregation, removing some segregation and adding parking bays (one with the bike lane outside it and trialing a parking-protected bike lane for the other). </p>



<p>Light segregation options include &#8216;flexible delineator posts&#8217; or &#8216;wand orca&#8217; units. For examples, maps and more details, see the <a href="https://erspacesforpeople.commonplace.is/proposals/a-77-ayr-road-phase-2" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ayr Road Phase 2 Commonplace page</a>. No obvious deadline on this one.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-eleven">1.11: Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;Low Emission Zone consultation</h4>



<p>As in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-90-6-july-2021-14538#one-three" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 90, Item 1.3</a> this consultation is about phase 2 of the Low Emission Zone in Glasgow city centre (between the M8, river and High St). Phase 1 only applied to local buses. Phase 2&nbsp;will include all vehicles entering the zone area (unless exempt) but&nbsp;enforcement is only due to start in June 2023.</p>



<p>The short survey asks you about issues like the size of the LEZ area and the grace periods. See the&nbsp;<a href="https://glasgow.gov.uk/27143" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Glasgow LEZ consultation page</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.smartsurvey.co.uk/s/GCC_LEZ2021/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">LEZ online survey</a>. Closes on <strong>2 September 2021</strong>.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-twelve">1.12: Glasgow City Council – Inner East Strategic Development Framework</h4>



<p>The other side of High St out to Carntyne and Tollcross is the &#8216;Inner East&#8217; area, covered in the latest SDF (as in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-90-6-july-2021-14538#one-four" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 90, Item 1.4</a>). The &#8216;Connected&#8217; section mentions quite a few cycling infrastructure projects but the focus is still on public transport and roads, including the so-called East End Regeneration Route (EERR) dual carriageway.</p>



<p>See the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.glasgowconsult.co.uk/KMS/dmart.aspx?strTab=PublicDMartCurrent&amp;NoIP=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Inner East consultation page</a>&nbsp;for link to the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.smartsurvey.co.uk/s/GCC_SDF_InnerEast/">SDF survey</a> –&nbsp;ends <strong>3 September 2021</strong>.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-thirteen">1.13: East Dunbartonshire Council –&nbsp;Active Travel Discussion</h4>



<p>This has been featured since&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-86-11-may-2021-13927#one-two" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 86, Item 1.2</a>, including its ‘<a href="https://edc.mapthis.place/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ideas Map</a>‘ for the area. It&#8217;s an opportunity to focus on active travel (walking, cycling and wheeling). EDC were pioneers when they built phase 1 of the Bearsway cycletrack in Milngavie. However, <a href="https://www.scotsman.com/news/transport/hundreds-join-mass-cycle-back-scrapped-bears-way-bike-lane-extension-1463105" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">since phase 2 was scrapped</a>, they&#8217;ve fallen behind other local authorities; not even bidding for Spaces for People funding. </p>



<p>Further online discussion events are due later in August. See a full list of events and background info on the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.eastdunbarton.gov.uk/active-travel-discussion" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Active Travel Discussion webpage</a>. Closing date – <strong>28 Sep 2021</strong>.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-fourteen">1.14: Glasgow Urban Sports –&nbsp;GUSM74 Urban Sports Sculpture Park</h4>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="alignright size-large is-resized"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/GUS_m74-plaza-plan-small.jpeg?resize=301%2C301&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-14836" width="301" height="301" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/GUS_m74-plaza-plan-small.jpeg?resize=600%2C600&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/GUS_m74-plaza-plan-small.jpeg?resize=300%2C300&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/GUS_m74-plaza-plan-small.jpeg?resize=150%2C150&amp;ssl=1 150w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/GUS_m74-plaza-plan-small.jpeg?resize=100%2C100&amp;ssl=1 100w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/GUS_m74-plaza-plan-small.jpeg?w=929&amp;ssl=1 929w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 301px) 100vw, 301px" /><figcaption>A cut away view of the skate park plan</figcaption></figure></div>



<p>Charlotte Worthington&#8217;s gold medal at Tokyo 2020 in the BMX Freestyle Park event seems like a good reminder about <a href="https://glasgowurbansports.co.uk/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Glasgow Urban Sports</a>&#8216;&nbsp;skate park project. GUS want to bring land under the M74 extension into productive use as a park for ‘urban sports’ – BMX, skateboarding, inline skating, parkour, etc. Their site is between the back of West St Subway station and Eglinton St. The sculptures would enhance the area even when they didn&#8217;t have skaters jumping off them!</p>



<p>See <a rel="noreferrer noopener" href="https://www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/glasgowurban" target="_blank">GUS&#8217;s survey</a>&nbsp;to try and find out what skaters, or their families, want from the park. Or see the <a href="https://www.facebook.com/groups/177902472310943/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GUS Facebook</a> or <a href="https://twitter.com/GlasUrbSpo" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GUS Twitter</a> accounts.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations</strong></h3>



<p>None this time.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 3:</strong>&nbsp;<strong>Consultation Feedback</strong></h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-one">3.1: North Lanarkshire Council –&nbsp;Planning Application (20/00345/FUL) Access to Motherwell train station</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="302" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Motherwell-Station_GCR-External-Perspective-1.jpeg?resize=525%2C302&#038;ssl=1" alt="Visualisation of the new station" class="wp-image-14829" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Motherwell-Station_GCR-External-Perspective-1.jpeg?resize=600%2C345&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Motherwell-Station_GCR-External-Perspective-1.jpeg?resize=300%2C173&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Motherwell-Station_GCR-External-Perspective-1.jpeg?resize=1536%2C884&amp;ssl=1 1536w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Motherwell-Station_GCR-External-Perspective-1.jpeg?w=1768&amp;ssl=1 1768w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Motherwell-Station_GCR-External-Perspective-1.jpeg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption><em>Visualisation of the new station –&nbsp;the access road would come from behind the view in this image</em></figcaption></figure>



<div class="wp-block-image"><figure class="alignright size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="294" height="600" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Mwell-station-access_20_00345_FUL-General_Arrangement-1322173_12000px.jpg?resize=294%2C600&#038;ssl=1" alt="Plan of new access to west of Muir St" class="wp-image-14831" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Mwell-station-access_20_00345_FUL-General_Arrangement-1322173_12000px.jpg?resize=294%2C600&amp;ssl=1 294w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Mwell-station-access_20_00345_FUL-General_Arrangement-1322173_12000px.jpg?resize=147%2C300&amp;ssl=1 147w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Mwell-station-access_20_00345_FUL-General_Arrangement-1322173_12000px.jpg?w=590&amp;ssl=1 590w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 294px) 100vw, 294px" /><figcaption>Plan of new access to west of Muir St</figcaption></figure></div>



<p>The planning application for this City Deal project first came up back in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-61-26-may-2020-11310" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 61, Item 1.1</a>. It was to create a new access to the station from the roundabout at the junction of Hamilton Rd (A723), West Hamilton Rd (A721) and Merry St. Running along derelict land behind the row of shops on Muir St, it would join the current road at the station. It would include a bus lane, taxi rank, disabled parking and short cycleway. </p>



<p>However, the cycleway seems to have been dropped from the latest drawings (29 Jun 2021) –see <a href="https://eplanning.northlanarkshire.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&amp;keyVal=Q7HWDIBAGXS00" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">planning application 20/00345/FUL</a>. It would&#8217;ve been pretty short and isolated but would at least have helped cycle to the station from the south. Another example of NLC&#8217;s inconsistent approach –&nbsp;a few steps forward (like the <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-80-16-february-2021-13179#one-two" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">RATL path</a>) then a few steps back (like the <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-75-8-december-2020-12699#one-two" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">RAI dual carriageway</a>).</p>



<p><a href="https://eplanning.northlanarkshire.gov.uk/online-applications/files/BBF1588F0DEB7D45D2D230D860D5010B/pdf/20_00345_FUL-DECISION_NOTICE-1321427.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">North Lanarkshire Council have now granted planning permission</a> for this access road to go ahead. Redevelopment has already taken place at nearby Park &amp; Ride car parks. <a href="https://www.scotrail.co.uk/about-scotrail/news/work-continues-motherwell-station-redevelopment" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Work is now underway on the station building</a> (using the service road to get passengers down to the middle platforms while stairs are replaced). The Muir St works are expected to start late 2021 and finish summer 2022.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14734</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consultation Digest (Local) Issue 91, 20 July 2021</title>
		<link>https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-91-20-july-2021-14629</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Y]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2021 18:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Consultation digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GoBike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[active travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ayr Road]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beith St]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East City Way]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Dunbartonshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Renfrewshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flourishing Molendinar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garnethill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GHA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glasgow city council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inner East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LEZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London Rd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mount Vernon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sighthill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St Paul&#039;s Youth Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[townhead]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gobike.org/?p=14629</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Consultations around the edge of Glasgow (and city centre parking). There&#8217;s plenty in this Digest despite it being holiday time, with weather to match for a change (in Glasgow Fair!). This issue is mostly about the fringes – both inside and outside the city boundary; in more and less deprived areas. It&#8217;s also about city &#8230; <p class="link-more"><a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-91-20-july-2021-14629" class="more-link">Continue reading<span class="screen-reader-text"> "Consultation Digest (Local) Issue 91, 20 July 2021"</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Consultations around the edge of Glasgow (and city centre parking).</h2>



<p>There&#8217;s plenty in this Digest despite it being holiday time, with weather to match for a change (in Glasgow Fair!). </p>



<p>This issue is mostly about the fringes – both inside and outside the city boundary; in more and less deprived areas. It&#8217;s also about city centre parking and emissions, which is often linked to people driving in from areas around the edge of Glasgow. </p>



<p>The Infrastructure Update has a bit more from north and east but also a project from the West End, just in case anyone&#8217;s getting withdrawal symptoms…</p>



<span id="more-14629"></span>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Infrastructure Update</h3>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li><a href="https://twitter.com/mark_mcintyre/status/1417147339861602309" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">A thread about recent route developments in Glasgow,</a> looking great in sunshine.</li><li><a href="https://twitter.com/UrbanistTOC/status/1415259968035557380" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Beith St has new access and drop kerbs added</a>.</li><li><a href="https://www.glasgowlive.co.uk/news/removal-cycle-lane-bumps-celtic-21009807" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">London Rd has had soft segregation removed at Celtic Park (but chalk added)</a>.</li><li><a href="https://twitter.com/UrbanistTOC/status/1417040730242048004" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">At the other end of London Rd, photos of Mount Vernon junction</a>. It&#8217;s good this phase of the East City Way is complete but there are <a href="https://twitter.com/UrbanistTOC/status/1417071202238140416" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">issues going eastbound</a>, as <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-80-16-february-2021-13179#one-five" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GoBike warned previously</a>.</li><li><a href="https://www.reglasgow.com/in-pictures-transformation-in-progress-at-sighthill/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">A bird&#8217;s eye view of the new Sighthill</a> and a few close-ups of its new, but rusty, <a href="https://twitter.com/GlasgowCC/status/1414868471188533249?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">pedestrian/cycle bridge</a> before it&#8217;s installed.</li></ul>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="block-2e87f9c2-a8af-4262-bff7-8842c5412bae"><strong>Contents</strong><br>(new consultations in&nbsp;<strong>bold</strong>&nbsp;– link jumps to article)</h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 1: Current Consultations</h4>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li><strong><a href="#one-one">Glasgow City Council – City Centre Traffic Management Order 2010: Variation No.29, GHA Parking Areas</a> (ends 3 Aug)</strong></li><li><strong><a href="#one-two">St. Paul&#8217;s Youth Forum –&nbsp;Flourishing Molendinar second consultation</a> (ends 6 Aug)</strong></li><li><strong><a href="#one-three">Glasgow City Council – Garnethill Traffic Management and Parking Controls Order</a> (ends 13 Aug)</strong></li><li><strong><a href="#one-four">East Dunbartonshire Council –&nbsp;Bishopbriggs Town Centre Regeneration</a> (ends 15 Aug)</strong></li><li><strong><a href="#one-five">East Renfrewshire Council –&nbsp;Ayr Road (A77): Spaces for People, Phase 2</a></strong></li><li><a href="#one-six">Glasgow City Council – Low Emission Zone consultation</a> (ends 2 Sep)</li><li><a href="#one-seven">Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;Inner East Strategic Development Framework</a> (ends 3 Sep)</li><li><a href="#one-eight">East Dunbartonshire Council – Active Travel Discussion</a>&nbsp;(ends 28 Sep)</li></ol>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations</h4>



<p>None this time.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Section 3: Consultation Feedback</h4>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li><strong><a href="#three-one">Mount Florida Community Council – Letherby Triangle planning decision</a></strong></li><li><strong><a href="#three-two">St. Paul&#8217;s Youth Forum –&nbsp;Flourishing Molendinar first consultation feedback</a></strong></li></ol>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading" id="block-cc85ef75-cc87-4a82-a726-8f744aa66a48"><strong>Section 1: Current Consultations<br></strong>(in date order for responses)</h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-one">1.1: Glasgow City Council – City Centre Traffic Management Order 2010: Variation No.29, GHA Parking Areas</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="251" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Townhead-GHA_ScreenShot_2021-07-19.jpg?resize=525%2C251&#038;ssl=1" alt="Townhead area around Kennedy St and St Mungo Ave" class="wp-image-14652" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Townhead-GHA_ScreenShot_2021-07-19.jpg?resize=600%2C287&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Townhead-GHA_ScreenShot_2021-07-19.jpg?resize=300%2C144&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Townhead-GHA_ScreenShot_2021-07-19.jpg?w=1200&amp;ssl=1 1200w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Townhead-GHA_ScreenShot_2021-07-19.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Townhead –&nbsp;GHA parking areas are mostly side streets off Kennedy St and St Mungo Ave</figcaption></figure>



<p>&#8216;GHA Parking Areas&#8217; refers to land in Townhead owned by Glasgow Housing Association. The area is east of Buchanan Bus Station and Glasgow Caledonian University, behind the high flats. Resident&#8217;s parking spaces around Kennedy St and St Mungo Avenue have been used as free parking by shoppers/commuters. This order introduces parking restrictions which can be enforced. </p>



<p>There are the usual documents for a TRO: <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/002-GCC-City-Centre-Traffic-Management-Order-2010-Variation-No.29....pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">plan of GHA parking areas</a>, <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/GCC-GHA-09.01-Draft-Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GHA areas draft report</a>, <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/GCC-GHA-11.01-Publication-of-Proposals-Press-Notice-Draft-Variation-29.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">GHA areas press notice</a> and the usual <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/GCC-GHA-08.01-Statement-of-Reasons.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">statement of reasons</a>. Respond by e-mail to&nbsp;<a href="mailto:lestraffic@glasgow.gov.uk" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">lestraffic@glasgow.gov.uk</a>&nbsp; by<strong> 3 August 2021</strong>.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-two">1.2: St. Paul&#8217;s Youth Forum –&nbsp;Flourishing Molendinar second consultation </h4>



<p>The last mention of the Flourishing Molendinar project was in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-82-16-march-2021-13425#one-eight" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 82, Item 1.8</a> (when it changed to its current name). The main image on this Digest shows the area covered by the project in the north east of Glasgow. </p>



<p>The next stage of the <a href="https://twitter.com/_OnBikes/status/1413513153124737026?s=20" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Flourishing Molendinar project has produced some eye-catching plans</a>. In particular, the pedestrianised area proposed for Langdale St, which could be an example for other so-called &#8216;liveable&#8217; neighbourhoods. </p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="349" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/FloMo-Langdale-St_E53OswaXEAETiBg.jpg?resize=525%2C349&#038;ssl=1" alt="Flourishing Molendinar plan for Langdale St" class="wp-image-14655" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/FloMo-Langdale-St_E53OswaXEAETiBg.jpg?resize=600%2C399&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/FloMo-Langdale-St_E53OswaXEAETiBg.jpg?resize=300%2C199&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/FloMo-Langdale-St_E53OswaXEAETiBg.jpg?w=1200&amp;ssl=1 1200w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/FloMo-Langdale-St_E53OswaXEAETiBg.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Illustration of proposal for Langdale St, Blackhill (where St Paul&#8217;s Youth Forum are based –&nbsp;at bottom right of image)</figcaption></figure>



<p>However, there was also big news for anyone who cycles on Cumbernauld Rd (A80) across the M8 motorway. The bridge is a four/five lane dual carriageway, which many pupils have to cross to get to Smithycroft Secondary School. FloMo&#8217;s plan would reduce the (wide) lanes and add segregated cycleways. If it goes ahead, this would transform that stretch of road into a far more people-friendly place.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="406" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/FloMo-Cumb-Rd_E53OsvZXEAUt68U.jpg?resize=525%2C406&#038;ssl=1" alt="Flourishing Molendinar plan for Cumbernauld Rd (A80)" class="wp-image-14654" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/FloMo-Cumb-Rd_E53OsvZXEAUt68U.jpg?resize=600%2C464&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/FloMo-Cumb-Rd_E53OsvZXEAUt68U.jpg?resize=300%2C232&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/FloMo-Cumb-Rd_E53OsvZXEAUt68U.jpg?w=1200&amp;ssl=1 1200w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/FloMo-Cumb-Rd_E53OsvZXEAUt68U.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption><em>Illustration of proposal for</em> Cumbernauld Rd (A80) with amended on/off-ramps to <em>M8 junction 12</em> (on right of image –&nbsp;blue car is going the wrong way!)</figcaption></figure>



<p>For more on the above (and Royston Rd) go to the <a href="https://forms.office.com/Pages/ResponsePage.aspx?id=DQSIkWdsW0yxEjajBLZtrQAAAAAAAAAAAAMAADcjbltUNUg0SldZR0JBR1VPTEhOVDJLNTdCN0QwUC4u" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">FloMo survey</a> (ends <strong>6 August</strong>). We look forward to seeing what comes out of it. </p>



<p>For more about the phase 1 consultation, see Item 3.2.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-three">1.3: Glasgow City Council – Garnethill Traffic Management and Parking Controls Order</h4>



<p>Garnethill, north of Sauchiehall St, is known for (what&#8217;s left of) Glasgow School of Art. It&#8217;s also home to a few schools, places of worship, hotels and several thousand residents. The area has steep, tight streets and existing one-ways, as well as the usual parking issues. </p>



<p>GoBike posted about the <a href="https://www.gobike.org/garnethill-car-parking-but-no-cycle-contraflow-public-exhibition-on-parking-controls-thursday-22-and-saturday-24-march-2018-4503" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">consultation events for Garnethill back in March 2018</a>. The plans involve a lot of yellow lines, parking restrictions on back lanes and the creation of car parking bays. One thing that isn&#8217;t included in the plan is the <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-85-27-april-2021-13844#three-one" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">two-way section of Hill St, at St Aloysius College, created by TTRO in April</a> (Digest 85, 3.1). However, the parking bays are still included, which reduce the road to one car width. </p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><a href="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Garnethill-parking-plan_detail_ScreenShot_2482px.png?ssl=1" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="311" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Garnethill-parking-plan_detail_ScreenShot_2482px.png?resize=525%2C311&#038;ssl=1" alt="Detail of Garnethill parking plans" class="wp-image-14680" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Garnethill-parking-plan_detail_ScreenShot_2482px.png?resize=600%2C355&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Garnethill-parking-plan_detail_ScreenShot_2482px.png?resize=300%2C177&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Garnethill-parking-plan_detail_ScreenShot_2482px.png?resize=1536%2C908&amp;ssl=1 1536w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Garnethill-parking-plan_detail_ScreenShot_2482px.png?resize=2048%2C1211&amp;ssl=1 2048w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Garnethill-parking-plan_detail_ScreenShot_2482px.png?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /></a><figcaption>Detail of Garnethill parking plans showing St Aloysius College, GSA, etc. <strong>Click image to enlarge</strong></figcaption></figure>



<p>Any neighbourhood plan is of most interest to people who live in the area. However, issues in Garnethill could have a knock-on effect on Sauchiehall St and Cambridge St so it&#8217;s in our wider interest that it works. </p>



<p>Again, there are the usual TRO documents: <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/05-Garnethill-Proposed-CPZ-Plan.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Garnethill plan</a>, <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Garnethill-09.01-Draft-Report.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Garnethill draft report</a>, <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Garnethill-Press-Notice.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Garnethill press notice</a> and the standard <a href="https://www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Garnethill-08.01-Statement-of-Reasons.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Statement of Reasons</a>. Respond by email:&nbsp;<a href="mailto:garnethillparking@glasgow.gov.uk" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">garnethillparking@glasgow.gov.uk</a> by <strong>13 August 2021</strong>.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-four">1.4: East Dunbartonshire Council –&nbsp;Bishopbriggs Town Centre Regeneration</h4>



<p>This consultation covers Bishopbriggs town centre and two City Deal projects – <a href="https://www.eastdunbarton.gov.uk/residents/council-democracy/city-deal/delivery-brr5-and-westerhill-masterplan" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">phase 5 of Bishopbriggs Relief Road (BRR5)</a> and the <a href="https://www.eastdunbarton.gov.uk/residents/council-democracy/city-deal/a803-corridor-improvements" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">A803 corridor</a> (Springburn Rd/Kirkintilloch Rd). </p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="254" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Bishopbriggs-map_ScreenShot_1200px.jpg?resize=525%2C254&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-14661" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Bishopbriggs-map_ScreenShot_1200px.jpg?resize=600%2C290&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Bishopbriggs-map_ScreenShot_1200px.jpg?resize=300%2C145&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Bishopbriggs-map_ScreenShot_1200px.jpg?w=1200&amp;ssl=1 1200w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Bishopbriggs-map_ScreenShot_1200px.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Bishopbriggs map showing NCN754 (in red) and &#8216;Wester Way&#8217; (blue dashed line on right of image)</figcaption></figure>



<p>Bishopbriggs town centre is marooned between NCN754 (Forth &amp; Clyde canal) and the &#8216;Wester Way&#8217; shared path, without good active travel links to either. The Wester Way was built alongside the BRR on Westerhill Rd, where <a href="https://www.kirkintilloch-herald.co.uk/news/what-went-wrong-bishopbriggs-relief-road-project-284659" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">BRR phase 4 caused years of disruption</a>. Both road and path peter out opposite the Aviva offices, north of the rail line to Lenzie. BRR5 doesn&#8217;t have a route decided yet but could affect some paths in the area. </p>



<p>The striking thing about the town centre &#8216;Future&#8217; images is how little the infrastructure changes apart from slightly wider footways and planting more trees. There are a few cyclists in the images but no segregated cycle lanes. The town centre work is part of a City Deal project worth nearly £35m, so they&#8217;re not skint. </p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="233" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Bishopbriggs-Kirkie-Rd-before-after_ScreenShot_1247px.jpg?resize=525%2C233&#038;ssl=1" alt="Kirkintilloch Rd – before/after image" class="wp-image-14686" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Bishopbriggs-Kirkie-Rd-before-after_ScreenShot_1247px.jpg?resize=600%2C266&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Bishopbriggs-Kirkie-Rd-before-after_ScreenShot_1247px.jpg?resize=300%2C133&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Bishopbriggs-Kirkie-Rd-before-after_ScreenShot_1247px.jpg?w=1247&amp;ssl=1 1247w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Bishopbriggs-Kirkie-Rd-before-after_ScreenShot_1247px.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Kirkintilloch Rd –&nbsp;before/after visualisation showing very little change</figcaption></figure>



<p>If you&#8217;ve ridden any routes in the area, it&#8217;s worth putting a word in for cycling. See the <a href="https://www.eastdunbarton.gov.uk/bishopbriggs-town-centre-regeneration-consultation" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bishopbriggs consultation webpage</a> and <a href="https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/7f0516541d9e45cc8d00ac151ae67143" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Bishopbriggs Public Realm Plan survey</a>. Consultation closes <strong>15 August</strong>.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-five">1.5: East Renfrewshire Council – Ayr Road (A77): Spaces for People, Phase 2</h4>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="223" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Ayr-Rd-A77_ScreenShot-2021-07-19-attribution.jpg?resize=525%2C223&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-15110" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Ayr-Rd-A77_ScreenShot-2021-07-19-attribution.jpg?resize=600%2C255&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Ayr-Rd-A77_ScreenShot-2021-07-19-attribution.jpg?resize=300%2C127&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Ayr-Rd-A77_ScreenShot-2021-07-19-attribution.jpg?w=1078&amp;ssl=1 1078w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption><em>Ayr Road (A77) showing cones on painted cycle lane</em></figcaption></figure>



<p>The Ayr Rd section of the A77 route at Newton Mearns is south of the <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-78-19-january-2021-13078#one-four" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Fenwick Rd Spaces for People lanes, which we covered back in January 2021</a> (Digest 78, 1.4). GoBike staged a <a href="https://www.gobike.org/pedal-on-parliament-pop-up-protests-throughout-next-weekend-8308" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">local Pedal on Parliament event about parking on Ayr Rd&#8217;s bike lanes</a> back in 2019.  </p>



<p>The phase 2 consultation is partly about replacing the <a href="https://erspacesforpeople.commonplace.is/proposals/a-77-ayr-road-pop-up-bike-roll-corridor" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">phase 1 cones</a> with light segregation. However, it also removes the segregation in some sections (like at Mearns Cross). It includes adding parking bays with the bike lane outside it in one location but trialing a parking-protected bike lane at Ashtree Grove (as in image, below). </p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="293" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Ayr-Rd_A77_Ashtree-Grove-parking-protected-lane.png?resize=525%2C293&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-14681" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Ayr-Rd_A77_Ashtree-Grove-parking-protected-lane.png?resize=600%2C335&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Ayr-Rd_A77_Ashtree-Grove-parking-protected-lane.png?resize=300%2C168&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Ayr-Rd_A77_Ashtree-Grove-parking-protected-lane.png?w=1528&amp;ssl=1 1528w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Ayr-Rd_A77_Ashtree-Grove-parking-protected-lane.png?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Plan of bike lane protected <em>from carriageway</em> by car parking near Ashtree Grove</figcaption></figure>



<p>The mixed approach probably reflects that on-road, segregated cycleways are still very new in East Renfrewshire (or anywhere outside a city). Issues in other towns, like <a href="https://www.gobike.org/sunday-06-november-gobike-ride-and-bears-way-advocacy-ride-2008" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">the Bearsway extension being scrapped</a> and the <a href="https://www.gobike.org/time-to-get-councillors-who-support-active-travel-holmston-road-cycle-lane-in-ayr-to-be-ripped-up-1938" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">removal of lanes on Holmston Rd</a>, cast a long shadow. Newton Mearns is just as affluent and <a href="https://www.gov.scot/publications/scottish-household-survey-2019-supplementary-analysis/pages/6/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">around 90% of people in East Ren have access to a car</a>. However, it has younger demographics than either Milngavie or Ayr. </p>



<p>East Ren differ from Glasgow by only asking how to improve the scheme, not whether people want rid of it. If ERC wait to get feedback before making changes then that would be an improvement on London Rd too. A few comments in the Commonplace survey allude to Glasgow ripping out segregation so that seems to have had an effect beyond the city boundary. </p>



<p>Light segregation options include &#8216;flexible delineator posts&#8217; or &#8216;wand orca&#8217; units. For examples, maps and more details, see the <a href="https://erspacesforpeople.commonplace.is/proposals/a-77-ayr-road-phase-2" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ayr Road Phase 2 consultation page</a>. No obvious deadline on this one. </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-six">1.6: Glasgow City Council – Low Emission Zone consultation </h4>



<p>Glasgow&#8217;s city centre Low Emission Zone (LEZ) has only applied to some buses so far. GCC are consulting before it changes to include cars and other motor vehicles. It covers most of the city centre –&nbsp;north of the river, conveniently inside the M8 and eastwards to High St/Saltmarket. </p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="340" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Glasgow-LEZ-area_1200px.jpg?resize=525%2C340&#038;ssl=1" alt="Plan of boundary of Glasgow Low Emission Zone" class="wp-image-14684" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Glasgow-LEZ-area_1200px.jpg?resize=600%2C388&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Glasgow-LEZ-area_1200px.jpg?resize=300%2C194&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Glasgow-LEZ-area_1200px.jpg?w=1200&amp;ssl=1 1200w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Glasgow-LEZ-area_1200px.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Plan showing boundary of Glasgow Low Emission Zone</figcaption></figure>



<p>However, the LEZ won&#8217;t include cars any time soon as there are some &#8216;grace periods&#8217; built into the plan at the moment. One year until it comes in, so summer 2022. Then another year until it becomes enforceable –&nbsp;1 June 2023. There will be a further year&#8217;s grace for folk who live in the city centre (until 1 June 2024). Some exemptions apply to people with disabilities, emergency vehicles, etc. </p>



<p>One good thing about the short survey is it does ask you about the above. So, if you think the LEZ area is too small or the grace periods are too long, you can tick those boxes and add a comment too. </p>



<p>See the&nbsp;<a href="https://glasgow.gov.uk/27143" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Glasgow LEZ consultation page</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.smartsurvey.co.uk/s/GCC_LEZ2021/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">LEZ online survey</a>. Closes on <strong>2 September 2021</strong>.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-seven">1.7: Glasgow City Council –&nbsp;Inner East Strategic Development Framework</h4>



<p>The ‘Inner East’ goes from High St out to Carntyne and Tollcross, between the River Clyde and the M8 (just short of FloMo&#8217;s patch).&nbsp;Like previous SDFs for other areas, it has themes about connections and sustainability but is mostly about identifying development opportunities. Some planned cycle routes and the Avenues Plus active travel scheme are included on a map with &#8216;missing links&#8217;. There are some issues with the map, like the red line between Barrowfield and Parkhead, counting the bus lane on one side as &#8220;off road/segregated&#8221;. Although it&#8217;s patchy, it puts more focus on active travel than previous strategies about the East End.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><a href="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Inner-East_connects_ScreenShot-2021_1500px.png?ssl=1" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="350" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Inner-East_connects_ScreenShot-2021_1500px.png?resize=525%2C350&#038;ssl=1" alt="Map: Connected Inner East" class="wp-image-14691" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Inner-East_connects_ScreenShot-2021_1500px.png?resize=600%2C400&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Inner-East_connects_ScreenShot-2021_1500px.png?resize=300%2C200&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Inner-East_connects_ScreenShot-2021_1500px.png?w=1500&amp;ssl=1 1500w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Inner-East_connects_ScreenShot-2021_1500px.png?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /></a><figcaption><em>Draft map of &#8220;Seemless&#8221; Active Travel Routes –&nbsp;Freudian slip? </em><strong>Click image to enlarg</strong><em><strong>e</strong></em></figcaption></figure>



<p>A few of the rail improvements in the document have been talked about for over ten years, such as the Parkhead rail halt. However, it&#8217;s the East End Regeneration Route (EERR phase 3) that seems to be back on the agenda due to new funding. It&#8217;s&nbsp;a dual carriageway that would run through Hogarth Park and under Edinburgh Rd and Cumbernauld Rd to the M8. </p>



<p>See the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.glasgowconsult.co.uk/KMS/dmart.aspx?strTab=PublicDMartCurrent&amp;NoIP=1" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Inner East consultation page</a>&nbsp;for link to the PDF document and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.smartsurvey.co.uk/s/GCC_SDF_InnerEast/">SDF survey</a>. Ends <strong>3 September 2021</strong>.</p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="one-eight">1.8: East Dunbartonshire Council – Active Travel Discussion</h4>



<p>This was first in&nbsp;<a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-local-issue-86-11-may-2021-13927#one-three" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 86, Item 1.2</a>, with its ‘<a href="https://edc.mapthis.place/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Ideas Map</a>‘ for the area. Recently, East Dunbartonshire Council has brought in new <a href="https://www.kirkintilloch-herald.co.uk/news/people/bearsden-more-misery-at-new-allander-junction-traffic-lights-system-3302472" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">parking restrictions on Milngavie Rd</a>, opposite the remodeled junction to Allanton Sports Centre. It&#8217;s small but possibly the first parking restriction since the Bearsway was built? </p>



<p>The Bearsway was due to extend to Kessington on the way to Glasgow. While researching this Digest, it emerged it has one of the oldest populations in Scotland. <a href="https://www.nrscotland.gov.uk/files//statistics/population-estimates/sape-19/sape-19-publication.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">52% of people of Kessington West are over 65 years old</a> (page 19). Will the Bearsway ever get there? </p>



<p>There are no more consultation events until August/September. See a full list of events and background info on the&nbsp;<a href="https://www.eastdunbarton.gov.uk/active-travel-discussion" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Active Travel Discussion webpage</a>. Closing date – <strong>28 September 2021</strong>.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 2: Forthcoming Consultations</strong></h3>



<p>None this time.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading"><strong>Section 3:</strong>&nbsp;<strong>Consultation Feedback</strong></h3>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-one">3.1: Mount Florida Community Council – Letherby Triangle planning decision</h4>



<p>This project was first in <a href="https://www.gobike.org/consultation-digest-issue-66-04-august-2020-an-abundance-of-new-consultations-some-very-topical-and-some-old-favourites-so-do-get-involved-in-improving-where-you-live-11804" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Digest 66, 1.3</a> when Mount Florida Community Council (MoFloCoCo) were consulting about it. It&#8217;s good to see it progressing towards being built. </p>



<p>The plan is to close the end of Carmunnock Road at Cathcart Rd to link a triangular traffic island to nearby shops. It will have a viewing platform added and be used for leisure and cultural events. There&#8217;s a handy <a href="https://www.reglasgow.com/mount-florida-civic-space-plan-gets-go-ahead/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">overview of the proposal on the ReGlasgow website</a>. </p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img data-recalc-dims="1" loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="525" height="403" src="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Letherby-Triangle.jpg?resize=525%2C403&#038;ssl=1" alt="" class="wp-image-11816" srcset="https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Letherby-Triangle.jpg?resize=600%2C460&amp;ssl=1 600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Letherby-Triangle.jpg?resize=300%2C230&amp;ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Letherby-Triangle.jpg?resize=1536%2C1177&amp;ssl=1 1536w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Letherby-Triangle.jpg?w=1600&amp;ssl=1 1600w, https://i0.wp.com/www.gobike.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Letherby-Triangle.jpg?w=1050&amp;ssl=1 1050w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 525px) 100vw, 525px" /><figcaption>Artist&#8217;s impression of how Letherby Triangle could look </figcaption></figure>



<p>It&#8217;s <a href="https://publicaccess.glasgow.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=documents&amp;keyVal=QK1LJ1EXJDM00" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">planning application 20/03067/FUL</a> if you want to look at it on GCC&#8217;s planning portal. Good luck to MoFloCoCo and their partners for the next stage. </p>



<h4 class="wp-block-heading" id="three-two">3.2: St. Paul&#8217;s Youth Forum –&nbsp;Flourishing Molendinar first consultation feedback</h4>



<p>In addition to the new plans in Item 1.2, above, Flourishing Molendinar published data from their earlier consultation (Jan–May 2021). There are plenty of interesting results on the website homepage and in their <a href="https://b6c3af05-b5ec-46fa-897c-166bcced266b.filesusr.com/ugd/428ac6_61e36f4281be4e75899a9a852cf8037e.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Summary Report (PDF)</a>. </p>



<p>In particular, the data shows <a href="https://www.flourishingmolendinar.com/?pgid=kpi7qu3r-a2668058-130b-498a-b41e-7bb616a8b9a6" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">strong support for keeping Spaces for People measures, as long as they can be adjusted/improved</a>. Overall, 89% wanted to keep the SfP measures in some form while only 11% wanted them removed (out of 152 responses). While FloMo is focussed on one local area, it&#8217;s hopefully a good sign for the results of Glasgow City Council&#8217;s wider SfP consultation (whenever those are published).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">14629</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
